Top Siding Repair Services in Durham

- Services described include windows, siding, roofing, doors, and Ezebreeze porch enclosures, with projects ranging from window replacements (several dozen total across jobs) to complete exterior upgrades.

- Customers consistently note a smooth process from first contact through quote and installation, with responsive communication in the sales phase and reasonable pricing. Some mention paying on inspection rather than upfront deposits.

- Installations are typically quick and efficient, often completed in 1–3 days (examples include 14 windows in under 2 days, 9 windows in 2 days, and 33 windows in about 2.5 days). Scheduling is reported as flexible to accommodate pets and home layout.

- Post-install follow-up generally includes a detailed check of each unit and care instructions; staff commonly praised for knowledge and helpfulness. Specific staff frequently cited positively include Ryan (sales/communication), Christy (post-install follow-up), Dallas Spruill (EZE Breeze guidance), and installers such as Charles Allen and Phillip Smith; foremen like Jarred are also noted.

- Product quality and outcomes highlighted include Okna windows, EZE Breeze porch systems, improved energy use and pollen protection, and overall favorable aesthetics and functionality. Customers also report benefits from gutter helmets and roof work in certain cases.

- Overall sentiment is highly positive with multiple 5-star reviews and long-time customers returning for additional improvements. People frequently recommend the company for reliability and value.

- There are a few negative notes: one customer reported poor service-after-sale follow-up on a door issue, and another explicitly stated extreme dissatisfaction, indicating isolated issues alongside widespread satisfaction.

Customer testimonials describe Ideal Siding as a professional, client-focused contractor led by Kevin Givens. Key practical themes include clear, ongoing communication; careful planning and attention to detail; and a emphasis on staying within schedule and budget. Many projects involved replacing older siding (and sometimes windows) on homes with prior Masonite/wood, using James Hardie fiber cement siding and following established install practices. Clients note design support through free consultations and mock-ups, help with color and style selection, and transparent, complete quotes with no hidden surprises. The process is described as organized and courteous, with onsite supervision, punctual crews, and thorough cleanup. Homeowners frequently report positive transformations to their homes, appreciation for proactive problem-solving on unique challenges, and willingness to recommend or reuse them for future projects.

Overall, customers report FYD Construction handles exterior renovations (siding replacement such as removing rotting Masonite and installing James Hardie siding or Hardie plank, roof replacement with architectural shingles, fascia and soffit work, and gutter installs) and select interior projects (painting, crown molding and built‑ins, custom trim). The experiences highlight clear, responsive communication from Pablo (estimator) and strong on‑site supervision by Francisco, including daily updates and project photos. Work is typically completed on the promised timeline, with crews described as punctual, respectful, tidy, and mindful of the property and household safety. Several clients note competitive pricing compared with other local companies, and many express high satisfaction with workmanship and the results, often stating they would hire FYD again or recommend them to others.

- Customers describe the staff as knowledgeable and communicative, with Tim providing product and warranty explanations and Brad offering quick, courteous service.
- The team is reported as responsive, returning calls and arranging on-site visits when needed, and providing clear, helpful estimates.
- Projects mentioned include roofing repairs and various deck-related work (rebuilds of elevated decks, handling old structures with large footers and steel supports, drilling holes for cable rail, and finishing with attention to detail).
- Work is described as starting quickly, progressing with no delays, and being completed with thorough cleanup and minimal damage to surrounding surfaces; inspections reportedly passed.
- Warranties and materials are highlighted, with emphasis on CHS and GAF products and “amazing” warranties.
- The company is noted for working within budget, finding workable, cost-effective solutions, and delivering high-quality results appreciated by customers.
- Overall sentiment is highly positive, with several customers expressing willingness to reuse the company and to recommend it to others.

- Overall impression: Strong positive experiences across multiple homeowners and an HOA, with emphasis on quality, reliability, and value. A follow-up phase was planned for 2024.

- Project management and communication: Manny, the project manager, is described as on-site daily, knowledgeable, responsive, and able to recommend practical solutions from start to finish. The crew is noted as honest, hardworking, and easy to work with. Excellent communication and willingness to stay late when needed were highlighted.

- Scope of work and workmanship: Work included replacing Masonite siding with James Hardie HardiePlank, addressing problem spots, exterior painting, and installing new shutters. Additional tasks cited include caulking around windows, priming, rebuilding a front porch column, painting trims, and other finish-work like soffits, fascia, and trim. Several reviews emphasize meticulous surface prep and attention to detail.

- Schedule and pricing: Projects were started and completed on schedule and within budget, with pricing described as fair and competitive. Some customers noted value-added touches, such as performing extra work (e.g., repainting at no extra cost) without increasing charges.

- Quality of outcome and likelihood of repeat business: Finished results are repeatedly described as outstanding or fantastic, with homeowners expressing willingness to hire J&D again for future projects and to recommend them to others.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: J&D Siding Construction appears capable of handling HOA-scale and residential exterior work, including siding replacement with HardiePlank, painting, trim and porch-related repairs, and detailed finish work. A dedicated project manager who maintains daily on-site presence and strong communication, along with a responsive crew, are frequently cited as key strengths.

- Overall, experiences with Recovery Roofing and Construction (RRR) are mixed: many customers praise quality workmanship and responsive service, while others report significant delays and communication issues.
- Responsiveness and communication are frequently cited as strong points on many projects (prompt replies to calls, emails, and texts; regular updates; thorough explanations with photos).
- Work quality and scope are commonly noted in positive reviews: roof replacements, gutter guards, skylights, leaks repairs, and coordination of multiple crews (roofers, painters, gutter specialists) often completed with neat clean-up; some projects were finished quickly (sometimes within a few days) and others took longer due to parts shortages.
- Specific staff mentioned positively include Reggie, Regi, Kelli (Kelly), and Josh, who are described as professional, helpful, and communicative.
- Insurance interactions are a recurring theme: several clients felt the company fought to get roof replacement approved; others experienced disputes, surprise charges, or delays related to insurance processes.
- Pricing is variable but often competitive; some quotes were substantially lower than competitors, with favorable perceived value. There are also complaints about extra charges or billing disputes and one note about not providing a quote for a commercial vent project.
- Timeliness and reliability are a mixed bag: a number of customers had quick on-site responses or same-day repairs, while others experienced multiple cancellations, missed appointments, or prolonged timelines (up to several months) with limited communication.
- Material handling and warranty concerns appear in some reviews, including reports of leftover materials being discarded or used in questionable ways, and one case of sagging plywood not being replaced post-inspection.
- Several reviews recommend RR for residential projects, while at least one or two customers advise caution or to consider alternative contractors due to perceived communication gaps or project delays.
- Practical takeaway for potential customers: confirm clear, written scope and timeline; request a detailed estimate with itemized costs; verify who will be the point of contact; ask about insurance coordination, cleanup expectations, and any material handling or warranty details; and consider checking references for both residential and commercial work if venting or large-scale repairs are involved.

Overall, the reviews depict Murcia’s Roofing as a family-owned company that frequently delivers high-quality workmanship on roofing and related home projects, with many customers expressing strong satisfaction. However, experiences vary, particularly around reliability and pricing.

Key observations by theme:
- Quality and scope of work
- Roof replacements, repairs, siding, gutters, skylights, and even interior/exterior damage repair have been completed to a high standard.
- Many jobs were finished quickly (often within a day) and left clean and tidy; several customers noted attention to detail and craftsmanship.
- A number of customers stated they would hire again for additional projects and praised the outcomes as “beautiful” or “excellent.”

- Pricing and quotes
- Several reviews report fair or competitive pricing and final costs aligning with initial quotes.
- There are reports of price increases during a project (e.g., one case with an added $900 drip edge and another of about $1,900 for plywood), leading to dissatisfaction.
- Some customers appreciated prompt, clear estimates, while others felt pricing lacked transparency or clarity about changes.

- Communication and reliability
- Positive experiences highlight responsive communication, especially with Marisela by text, thorough explanations, and helpful flexibility in options.
- Negative experiences include missed appointments, delays, and a lack of follow-up: at least one case involved multiple no-shows and extended time before rescheduling, creating a reported loss of four weeks.
- One reviewer reported a confrontational interaction after leaving a review, suggesting inconsistency in professionalism in some instances.

- Service consistency and outcomes
- Several customers described the team as courteous, professional, and respectful of pets and property, with repeat work and referrals following positive experiences.
- A few reviews emphasize exceptional reliability and going “above and beyond,” while others caution that reliability can be inconsistent.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect high-quality results on roofing and related exterior work, often with thorough cleanup and good workmanship.
- Get a written, itemized estimate and ask for a detailed scope of work, including materials and any potential contingencies.
- Be clear about scheduling and contingency plans; confirm appointment times and what happens if delays occur.
- Discuss potential price changes upfront and request a policy on change orders and how any additional costs will be communicated.
- Consider asking for recent references and a clear point of contact for ongoing communication during the project.

Overall, reviewers describe Accurate Renovation and Earl Amos as professional, punctual, and customer-focused, delivering roof replacements and related work (siding, window frames, foundation repairs) with thorough workmanship and clean sites. Practical details repeated across reviews include timely project completion, clear explanations of processes and options, assistance navigating insurance claims for storm damage, and a readiness to address issues such as leaks, vent repairs, and chimney work. Customers frequently cite fair or reasonable pricing, strong communication, and supervisors checking in during and after projects, as well as leaving the property in good condition. Several clients report positive referrals to neighbors. There is one notably negative post alleging fraud and unlicensed work, which is unverified here; potential customers should verify licensing and insurance, request written scopes and warranties, and review multiple references before proceeding.

Reviews for WJM Roofing depict a highly responsive, professional roofer with a focus on high-quality workmanship, timely scheduling, and thorough cleanup. Customers frequently note competitive pricing, clear communication, and crews that arrive on time and complete work efficiently (often in a single day). A few reviews report issues such as a leak developing after several years, and one mentions debris-related hazards (nails). Overall, feedback highlights honesty, reliability, and strong customer service.

Summary:
Customers report MoHandymen/Mohandyen as professional, communicative, and capable, delivering timely workmanship across a range of projects such as bathroom remodels, deck replacements and repairs, siding and trim work, and general repairs. They are described as reliable in design coordination, permits, material sourcing, disposal, and scheduling, with several clients noting on-time completion and no unexpected expenses. Work quality is frequently praised, and many customers value thorough post-job cleanup, paint matching, and responsiveness. There is a pattern of repeat business and trust from homeowners and property managers, including cases where clients relocated but would still hire them for future upgrades.

Practical details and considerations:
- Projects commonly handled: bathrooms (vanities, fixtures, showers, lighting), decks and pergolas, siding/trim repairs, cabinet fixes, leaks, vent resealing, painting/color matching, flooring, and stair renewal.
- Operational strengths: design coordination, permitting logistics, material procurement, disposal, frequent scheduling flexibility, and follow-up/additional work as needed.
- Service quality indicators: work described as high quality, on-time, and with clean final presentation; several reviews emphasize reasonable pricing and good value.
- Customer relationships: multiple repeat clients; trust noted for ongoing or future work, including landlords and property managers.
- Cautions: one significant negative experience where deck staining and screened porch work performed poorly due to subcontractor handling and lack of direct Mo oversight, leading to damage and a request for another contractor; some reports mention responsiveness concerns in that instance.
- Practical tips for prospective customers: clarify who will supervise on-site, confirm scope and timeline for larger projects (permits, materials, disposal), request paint-matching specifics if needed, and request post-project follow-up or rework assurances if any issues arise.

Customers describe Hatch Homes as reliable and professional in siding replacement work. The projects involved replacing cement fiberboard siding that had been improperly installed by a previous contractor, in a difficult location with HVAC venting constraints that limited contractor options. Hatch Homes matched the siding color exactly, repaired the damage, and provided warranty and guarantee paperwork. The planning and execution were described as smooth, with some jobs completed quickly. The team was praised for work on a large historical home and on James Hardie siding, with Bill and Matt noted for explaining the project from start to finish and for their knowledge. Overall, experiences were described as professional and enjoyable, with strong communication from the Charlotte office and a reputation that promises actions will be completed.

The reviews describe Mighty Dog Roofing as a company that handles roofing and related repairs, with several customers highlighting fast quotes, rapid inspections, and prompt completion (often within a day or two). Insurance navigation help and professional, courteous service are frequently praised, especially for staff like Pauleta. However, there are notable negative experiences citing sloppy workmanship, incomplete fixes, missed appointment windows, poor communication, and even a few added fees. Regarding siding, reviewers mention siding work and related repairs (including reuse of siding), but specific siding materials are not named. Overall, the service is viewed as generally positive with good value in many cases, tempered by concerns about quality control and follow-through on some projects.

- Overall impression: Across windows, doors, siding, and gutters, customers consistently report positive experiences with Kingsford Home Improvements, citing professionalism, quality workmanship, and good customer service.

- Installation and workmanship: Installers are described as skilled, thorough, and respectful of homes (e.g., using ladders carefully, removing shoes when outdoors, cleaning up after finishing). Projects are completed on time, with clear timelines and frequent updates. Work is associated with premium materials and attention to detail.

- Project scope and responsiveness: The company handles multiple projects for a single home (doors, windows, siding, gutters) and responds promptly to requests, including warranty-related repairs. Repairs are often completed quickly (e.g., next business day, within 24 hours) and under warranty when applicable.

- Communication and customer service: Staff are described as friendly, responsive, and customer-focused. Customers note good communication about process, timelines, and product/warranty information. The owner and sales staff are highlighted as helpful and trustworthy.

- Reliability and value: Several reviews reference long-term relationships (decades of service, neighbors with prior work) and a willingness to stand behind installations, contributing to a sense of reliability and value for money.

- Notable personnel: Perez and Eunoch (installers) receive frequent praise; Tripp (sales) noted for answering questions and explaining products and warranties; Kevin (owner) described as aiming to please and standing behind the work.

- Recommendation: Numerous customers state they would hire Kingsford again and would recommend them to others.

Summary of customer experiences

- Overall impression: Generally positive results on siding and related work, with several customers noting professional conduct and quality. A few reviews raise concerns about follow-up and post-installation issues.

- Services cited: siding replacement (including water-damaged wood), fascia, window trim, porch columns, house wrap, exterior painting; some projects also included porch rescreening and concrete work; a few mentions of correcting issues from previous contractors.

- Quality and craftsmanship: multiple accounts describe high-quality work and thorough repairs; some reviewers were satisfied with the final appearance and neighbors’ praise. A notable caveat is that a few customers reported items not painted after installation or issues emerging after work (e.g., leaks at a gutter seam) that required follow-up.

- Professionalism and communication: teams are described as polite and professional, with responsiveness during projects. One reviewer reported promising to seal a seam but did not receive a follow-up, raising questions about reliability for warranty-related work.

- Pricing and value: quotes are described as fair or competitive, often less expensive than other bidders who provided inflated estimates. Several customers felt they received good value for the quality of work.

- Follow-up and warranties: experiences vary; some customers appreciated follow-up and were willing to hire again, while others experienced difficulties obtaining promised post-project service.

- Repeat business and referrals: many reviewers indicated they would hire the company again for future work and would recommend them to others.

Practical considerations for potential customers:
- Confirm scope of work in writing, including whether painting is included and to what extent (e.g., fascia, trim, interior/exterior surfaces).
- Clarify post-installation follow-up, warranty terms, and response time for any leaks or unpainted items.
- Request a clear timeline and milestones, and verify who will be on site for the project.
- Consider requesting references or viewing completed siding projects (including any with water damage repairs) to assess long-term outcomes.

- Overall mix of experiences: Reviews for ARAC Roofing / Roof It Forward (and related teams) are varied, with many customers reporting positive, professional service and several negative experiences related to follow-up and warranties.

- Positive patterns observed:
- Punctuality, timely completion, and thorough workmanship without rushing.
- Strong project management, including coordinating with insurance adjusters and handling the claim process.
- Use of drone imaging to document damage and support claims.
- Cleanliness and careful workmanship during tear-off and installation (often with emphasis on good cleanup and protecting landscaping).
- High satisfaction with specific staff (e.g., Noman Iqbal, Chris, Jordan, Mark, Richard) and the overall quality of materials (e.g., Owens-Corning shingles) and workmanship.
- Some projects completed quickly (often in a single day) with ongoing on-site supervision.

- Notable concerns and negative experiences:
- Post-install issues such as chimney leaks reported by several customers.
- Warranty-related problems: claims of expired or voided warranties and limited or no follow-up support for leaks or repairs.
- Difficulties in obtaining service or communication after the sale (unreturned calls, being told they no longer work in the area).
- Disputes over repairs not covered by warranty, with some customers alleging they were not reimbursed for necessary fixes.
- Specific workmanship concerns noted by a few customers (e.g., pipe boots not properly sealed or secured).

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Clarify service area eligibility and the exact warranty terms, including what is covered after installation.
- Confirm post-install support and the process for addressing leaks or deficiencies.
- Request a written scope of work, a detailed warranty, and a documented punch list with final sign-off.
- Consider asking for drone imaging or other documentation of pre- and post-install conditions.
- Verify the specific products used (e.g., shingles type) and ensure alignment with your expectations.
- If pursuing repairs later, be aware some customers experienced communication gaps or challenges with warranty-based remedies.

Overall, the experiences with Feazel Roofing appear mixed but lean toward positive, with recurring themes of thorough explanations, professional staff, and fast, high-quality workmanship, alongside occasional scheduling and communication issues.

- Communication and transparency: multiple customers praised clear estimates, detailed explanations of options, and ongoing updates from site managers. Individuals such as Brandon, Colby, and Cruz were highlighted for responsiveness and clarity, including progress photos during installations.
- Quality of work and efficiency: many reviews noted professional, hard-working crews, careful protection of landscaping, and clean, organized work sites. Some jobs were completed very quickly (e.g., 12 hours for a roof replacement; three buildings renovated in three days), with customers explicitly appreciating high-quality materials and problem-solving when issues arose.
- Post-install service and warranties: several customers reported positive warranty experiences, including quick follow-up visits for leaks or issues found after installation, sometimes at no charge. A veteran-for-a-day program and ongoing maintenance visits were also mentioned positively.
- Financing and scheduling: Feazel was cited as assisting with financing in some cases and was generally proactive about rescheduling due to weather. Completion timelines were sometimes tightly managed, with updates throughout the process.
- Notable negatives or concerns: a minority reported negative experiences, including a no-show/no-call to reschedule, a vent-cap issue that created a code-related problem, and a single case of a longer period of unresponsiveness after causing damage (ceiling crack) or other communication gaps. Some reviews described the on-site experience as chaotic or less professional on a particular day.
- Large-scale projects and referrals: several condo complex projects were completed quickly and with positive feedback on cleanup and appearance, reinforcing Feazel’s capability for mult-unit/large-scale work and client referrals.

Potential customers may expect: clear communication and documentation, a focus on protecting property and tidy job sites, and responsive post-installation support, with variability depending on crew and project specifics.

Customers consistently describe American Craftsmen of NC as a responsive, professional, family-owned contractor for roofing, siding, gutters, and related exterior work. Key staff frequently mentioned include owner Barry (conducts on-site assessments, communicates clearly, and provides fair pricing) and Ron; John, a master carpenter, is praised for his high workmanship. The typical process involves an on-site evaluation of roof/chimney/siding, a clear explanation of needs, and a written estimate; most reviews note fair pricing even when projects prove more involved than expected. Work quality is praised across projects, with many repairs or replacements completed quickly and with thorough cleanup and respectful treatment of property. Several accounts highlight prompt emergency responses to leaks or storm damage, including pre-storm repairs and a well-received Thanksgiving repair. Many customers say they would use the company again or recommend them. A few isolated critiques mention a sales visit focused on shutters rather than windows and a follow-up on window quotes that did not occur. Overall, experiences emphasize reliability, clear communication, quality workmanship, and reasonable pricing for exterior repairs.

- Quick, efficient work with thorough cleanup, including gutter repair and gutter guard installation, and other related tasks such as downspout declogging and power washing.
- Responsive, professional communication from the company’s management and staff; prompt email replies and clear project status updates; some reviews noted next-day assessments and detailed contracts.
- Pricing described as affordable or fair, with high perceived value for the work performed.
- Services cited include gutter repair and installation, roof evaluations after storm damage, tarp placement, temporary fixes for missing shingles, and in one case a noted interest in bathroom remodeling.
- Positive experiences with specific team members noted (e.g., Bob Stallings, Juan, John) for timeliness, thoroughness, and helpfulness.
- Strong overall customer satisfaction and willingness to recommend the company (examples include 10/10 recommendations).
- A few customers reported receiving spam texts after inquiries.