Top Siding Repair Services in Louisville

- Customers consistently report prompt on-site assessments and quick responses from the company, with quotes and scheduling handled efficiently.
- The firm provides a broad range of exterior services beyond roofing, including siding replacement (notably Hardie Planks), gutters, soffits, fascia, chimney work, and interior ceiling/wall repairs.
- Several testimonials highlight very competitive pricing and the use of higher‑quality materials (e.g., better shingles, ridge vents) with additional protections in key areas.
- A common theme is strong assistance with insurance claims: they meet with adjusters, photograph the property, and advocate to maximize the insurer’s payout, often reducing out-of-pocket costs for homeowners.
- Projects are frequently completed quickly, with many customers noting one-day roof installations or rapid progression from approval to completion.
- Crews are described as professional, courteous, and thorough, with emphasis on cleaning up the site and leaving driveways or yards in good condition.
- Rep involvement is repeatedly highlighted (notably Colin/Collin Kelly), with customers citing clear communication, helpful guidance, and ongoing involvement throughout the process.
- Long-standing relationships are evident, including repeat work for churches and multiple properties, with customers often expressing high levels of satisfaction and willingness to refer others.

- Services offered: Roofing replacement/repair (including shingles, drip edges, skylights), gutters and gutter guards, window work, and hail-damage restorations; assistance with color selection and coordinating material delivery and insurance processes.

- Customer experience and communication: Generally positive; multiple employees are cited for helpful, polite communication (Alec, Trey, James, Dan, Brittany). People noted quick responses, thorough explanations, and organized office support.

- Scheduling and project management: Projects were reportedly managed start-to-finish with flexibility to accommodate schedules (e.g., vacations) and timely coordination with insurance; on-site teams were described as professional and efficient.

- Quality and outcomes: Reports describe exceptional craftsmanship, no leaks after installation, improved exterior appearance, and well-cleaned job sites; homeowners noted increased home value and aesthetically pleasing results (roof, skylights, gutters).

- Reliability and honesty: Long-term reliability implied; customers described the company as honest, fair, and easy to work with, with some instances of transparent options (including DIY alternatives) to avoid unnecessary costs.

- Potential drawbacks: At least one customer reported not receiving callbacks after leaving messages, indicating a communication gap in rare cases.

Overall, customers describe Able Siding Co. (Kevin Jones) as a professional, reasonably priced, and reliable siding repair business that handles both small and storm-damage jobs with a focus on customer safety and satisfaction. Key practical details from reviews include:

- Services provided: siding repairs (including storm damage), trim work, and minor miscellaneous tasks; some customers noted work extending to related repairs (e.g., replacing a panel or addressing lighting-related adjustments).

- Responsiveness and timeliness: several reviews praise prompt responses and timely, on-schedule work (e.g., showing up within an hour for urgent needs, calling ahead, arriving on time). There are also notes of flexibility with scheduling and rescheduling when unforeseen issues arise.

- Pricing and value: multiple reviews describe pricing as fair, competitive, and reasonable for the scope of work; several customers say they would hire again because of the value received.

- workmanship and professionalism: reviews consistently highlight professional conduct, attention to detail, and thorough workmanship; some describe Kevin as a perfectionist and highly respectful in how he works.

- safety and experience for vulnerable customers: at least one reviewer mentions feeling safe and well-treated as a single woman; another notes a long-standing, trusted relationship with a grandmother, underscoring trust and respectful service.

- repeat business and recommendations: many customers say they would use Able Siding Co. again and would recommend them to others; some references describe Kevin as a dependable, local small-business contractor.

- negative notes: at least one reviewer reported unresponsiveness after requesting photos and a follow-up; a separate account mentions difficulty with other contractors prior to finding Able Siding, highlighting variability in responsiveness across providers.

- warranty: one review mentions a free one-year warranty on the work.

Bone Dry Roofing is frequently praised for professional crews, frequent communication, and thorough updates (including real-time photos) during roofing, gutter, siding, and chimney work. Projects often span multiple tasks with coordinated scheduling and careful site protection, and customers cite competitive pricing and strong workmanship. However, some reviews mention communication gaps, scheduling delays, and occasional miscommunications about quotes or scope, which can affect the overall experience. Warranties or guarantees are not discussed in the reviews, while vinyl siding is specifically mentioned among materials used or referenced; overall sentiment leans toward high satisfaction when communication and timing align with expectations.

Overall, customer experiences with Skyguard/Home are predominantly positive, with several reviewers highlighting professional conduct, clear explanations of the roofing/siding process, and effective coordination with insurance claims. Reported strengths include responsive communication, detailed estimates, and guidance on preventative measures; workers are described as courteous, hardworking, and tidy. Multiple customers note rapid work completion, sometimes in a single day, and the use of higher-quality materials, including upgrades such as ice dam prevention, additional drip edge, and ridge vents. The team is frequently praised for thorough cleanup and for handling related projects (gutters) smoothly; many reviewers would recommend the company and would hire again.

There is at least one negative review describing poor communication with the insurer, unfulfilled promises, and no progress on repairs, leading the customer to switch to another contractor and not recommend the company.

Reviews for Cervices/Cervices show mixed experiences across roofing, siding, and gutter projects.

Positive themes
- Responsive and courteous staff in many cases (Mitchell, Laura); clear communication reported by several customers.
- Competitive pricing and straightforward quoting; several clients felt the process was smooth and affordable.
- Quality outcomes cited in multiple projects (new roofs, siding, gutters); some customers praised cleanup and finish appearance.
- Additional positives include drone inspections, help with financing, and recommendations from satisfied customers.

Negative themes and concerns
- Several accounts of poor communication, missed appointments, and failure to follow up after service.
- Reports of difficult or impossible access to owners/managers for issue resolution.
- Serious workmanship concerns: misinstallation, leaks within a short period (and sometimes years later), and at least one case where the root cause was not properly addressed.
- Property damage cited during installation (e.g., deck damage) and inadequate site protection.
- Some customers required multiple visits (one review mentions up to 15 corrective visits) to address problems; others ultimately hired different contractors.
- Instances where customers felt issues were not reliably resolved or the company did not stand behind their work.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- Request a written scope of work, timeline, and warranty/guarantee details; confirm who will supervise the project on site.
- Ask for transparent post-installation inspection procedures and cleanup protocols; request protection measures to avoid property damage.
- Check references and, if possible, verify the company’s responsiveness in aftercare before final payment.
- Consider obtaining multiple quotes and ask how issues will be handled if problems arise after installation.

- Urgent leaks were addressed promptly, with willingness to move up on scheduling; crews tarped roofs during storms and kept the customer informed at every step.
- The installation work was described as professional and thorough, with pride in completing the job correctly; multiple inspections during replacement helped ensure quality.
- When leaks persisted, the company investigated beyond the roof line, committed to keeping the home dry, and performed interior repairs (replacing wet drywall) as needed.
- Communication was highlighted as strong: detailed proposals, clear explanations, and prompt return calls; Eddie was frequently cited as knowledgeable, transparent, and reliable.
- They assisted with insurance claims and were perceived as offering competitive pricing/value; some customers reported favorable discounts or insurer interactions.
- The team was noted as friendly, respectful, punctual, and easy to work with; overall, customers felt satisfied with the service and would recommend Louisville Roofing.

- Services described: roof inspections and repairs, full roof replacements, gutter work, soffit repairs, and some exterior improvements; several customers noted help coordinating with their insurance carriers and understanding the claim process.

- Punctuality and professionalism: multiple reviewers cited on-time arrivals and courteous, thorough staff (notably Blaine, Preston, Edgar, Joseph, Desmond, Jaime); many described clear explanations with photos to show damage and explain repairs.

- Process and communication: widespread praise for transparent, low-pressure guidance, detailed planning, and ongoing communication from initial estimate through project completion; several customers appreciated photos and step-by-step updates.

- Site handling and care: reviewers highlighted careful preparation of homes and landscaping (e.g., protecting koi ponds, tarps to catch debris) and tidy, orderly crews with clean work sites.

- Insurance outcomes and pricing: several accounts mention effective handling of insurance claims, potential upgrades, and results that saved customers money; some called pricing competitive.

- Quality and outcomes: many reviews describe high-quality workmanship, installations that exceeded expectations, and long-term confidence in the finished work; some note of significant satisfaction with the final result.

- Mixed feedback and cautions: a minority of reviews raised concerns about post-project issues (e.g., soffit problems appearing after completion), longer-than-expected timelines, or questions about quality relative to cost; one review alleged attempts to influence feedback, and another suggested accountability is needed for delays.

- Overall impression: the majority of experiences described were positive, emphasizing professionalism, thorough inspections, organized processes, and strong customer service, with a few negative anecdotes suggesting potential quality or communication pitfalls to monitor.

Reviews overall show AIC Roofing and Construction in a favorable light, with many customers praising professional workmanship, thorough explanations, proactive communication, and punctual project completion. Projects cited include roof replacements, gutter work, and storm-related repairs, with strong on-site supervision and meticulous cleanup. A notable negative point in one edited review is a perceived lack of communication and a missing quote, along with a request for more transparency given a large project cost. Overall, customers emphasize high quality, responsiveness, and attention to property protection.

- The experiences described are largely positive, with emphasis on a thorough scope of work and clear pricing options.
- Inquiries and questions were reportedly answered promptly, contributing to a smooth start to projects.
- Crews are described as punctual, courteous, and diligent about site cleanup during and after work.
- Many customers report high-quality workmanship and attention to detail, with several saying the results were excellent or “top notch.”
- Multiple reviews highlight effective coordination with insurance companies and clear guidance through the claim process.
- Progress updates are commonly provided (including daily texts with photos), and management oversight is mentioned as a reassuring presence.
- Projects are noted for being completed efficiently, with some customers stating work was finished in one day and sites left clean with protective measures for landscaping and debris removal.
- Positive staff mentions include Brandon Reid, Adam E., Kevin, Jeff, and Gene, who are praised for communication and assistance.
- A number of reviews state strong overall recommendations and willingness to use the company again.
- Negative experiences are also present: at least one customer reported not meeting the adjuster as promised and stated they would not recommend the company, and another advised against trusting them for roof work due to similar issues.
- One reviewer notes that crews are employees rather than contractors, which was viewed positively by that customer.
- Overall, the majority of feedback supports reliable, professional roof (and related) services with good communication and cleanup, tempered by a few criticisms regarding scheduling and trust.

Customers describe A-1 Aluminum (Jeff Elder) as a professional siding, gutters, and screened-porch contractor with generally high-quality, well-fitting results. Practical details noted include custom-made porch screens and doors, gutter replacements for rear and front of homes, and occasional siding repairs; quotes are described as reasonable, and the team explains process options. Crews are described as punctual, polite, and knowledgeable, and site cleanup is noted as thorough. Turnaround times vary but are typically prompt—gutters can be installed in a day, and replacement siding pieces can arrive within a few days. Several customers are repeat clients and would recommend the company, with neighborhood compliments and satisfaction on the finished look being mentioned. There is one notable exception where an initial appointment was not fulfilled for about a year, though the owner later apologized and completed the repair.

- Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with repeated recommendations and mentions of high satisfaction for siding, roofing, and related repairs.
- Timeliness: several customers noted quick scheduling and fast work, sometimes completed in one day; one review cited a longer duration due to being short-handed.
- Quality of work: praise for craftsmanship, proper sealing, replacing rotted wood, and precise siding installation (e.g., Hardie board); sites were cleaned up after completion.
- Project management and communication: Joe Mueller and Victor/Viktor are highlighted for responsive, engaged, and professional coordination; customers appreciated clear guidance, options, transparency, and minimal pressure.
- Pricing and value: multiple reviews described fair or reasonable rates and good value for the work performed.
- Scope of services: work across roofing, siding, gutters, with coordination across properties; one review mentions electrical riser repair in addition to roof work.
- Trust and repeat business: several customers were repeat clients or would definitely use AHE again and would recommend to others.

Customer reviews for Louisville Roofing & Siding cover siding projects (including vinyl siding and Hardie Board), roof work, and related repairs. The majority praise workmanship, professionalism, transparency, and quick communication, with some noting the on-site results were excellent and the team went above and beyond. There are significant mentions of prompt on-site service and effective collaboration, though a few reviews criticize poor responsiveness, missed follow-ups on quotes, and scheduling issues. Pricing is generally described as affordable or competitive, with some customers appreciating help coordinating with insurers; warranties are not mentioned in the reviews.

Overall, customers report largely positive experiences with K&P Roofing for roof and gutter replacements prompted by storm damage. Key strengths repeatedly mentioned include knowledgeable, professional staff (notably Greg M., Brody Staples, Ben Heimach-Snipes, Aaron, MO, Stephen, Jesse Pryor), effective assistance with insurance claims, clear and timely communication, and thorough cleanups. Projects are described as well-coordinated, with some completed in a single day or within a short timeframe, and crews noted for professionalism and respect toward property and neighbors. Several reviews highlight successful installations of roofs and gutters, including Rain Drop gutter guards, with positive neighbor feedback.

Common practical details:
- Help navigating insurance claims and meetings with adjusters
- Prompt responses and ongoing updates throughout the process
- High-quality workmanship and site cleanup
- Some projects completed quickly (often in one day or day and a half)

Cautionary notes:
- At least one reviewer reported a negative experience with a sales/quote process, alleging pressure to sign a contract and a lack of an updated final quote, leading them to pursue a different contractor
- A separate review labeled some contractors as unethical, advising caution

Overall, potential customers can expect strong customer service, insurance support, and solid workmanship, with a recommendation to obtain a clear, finalized quote before committing and to verify any contract terms.

- Overall tone: The majority of reviews are positive, praising professionalism, punctuality, clear explanations, and thorough upkeep; a smaller number note administrative or communication hiccups.

- Positive, recurring themes:
- Timeliness and professionalism: Crews arrived on time, were courteous, and maintained a professional demeanor throughout the job.
- Clear communication and updates: Customers appreciated being kept in the loop about progress and next steps; several projects had a dedicated point person (e.g., Manny, Louie, Manuel) who provided ongoing updates.
- Quick damage inspections: Several reviewers were pleased with prompt hail/wind damage inspections and the assurance they received.
- Quality of work and finishing: The siding, fascia, gutters, and roof work were described as high quality, finished with care, and often completed efficiently by a large, coordinated crew.
- Cleanliness and finish: Post-job cleanup was frequently noted as thorough, leaving work areas spotless.
- Positive staff experiences: Specific staff members (Louie, Manny, Kat, Paul, Irving, etc.) were repeatedly credited for helpful, professional, and attentive service.

- Practical expectations for potential customers:
- You can expect on-site explanations of the process, timely inspections for storm-related damage, and regular updates as work progresses.
- Large crews can complete projects quickly (examples included two-day roof jobs and efficient gutter/siding work).
- Be prepared for a strong emphasis on cleanup and finish quality.

- Notable concerns / mixed feedback:
- Administrative follow-up issues: A few customers reported poor follow-up scheduling, lack of communication after initial contact, or delays that led them to seek alternatives.
- Scheduling interruptions: In at least one instance, a crew left due to light rain and there was limited proactive rescheduling communication.

- Bottom line: The company tends to deliver professional, timely field work with good communication and clean results, but potential customers might want to confirm scheduling and follow-up expectations to avoid administrative gaps.

- Services: Roofing, siding, and gutters; many reviews cite successful roof replacements and siding installations on single-story homes, with some projects including a detached garage.

- Communication and responsiveness: Repeated praise for clear, proactive communication from the estimator and crew; quick responses to questions and weather-related or scheduling changes; some reviews note daily site updates during installation.

- Timeliness and scheduling: Jobs completed in a short time frame (e.g., roof replacement in about 5 hours; another roof and installation completed in around 1 day; siding work described as about 1.5 days); occasional references to lead times before work could begin (deposit lead time around two weeks).

- Quality of workmanship and materials: Several reviewers report high-quality results, including well-matched shingles, sturdy installations, and durable siding; some mention addressing issues (e.g., plywood problems, leaks) promptly and effectively.

- Cleanup and site impact: Consistently described as thorough cleanup during and after work, with little remaining debris.

- Pricing and value: Multiple comments describe competitive pricing and fair or upfront estimates; many reviewers would choose Keller again for future projects.

- Overall sentiment: The majority of feedback is positive, with strong endorsements for reliability, professionalism, and customer service; one reviewer expressed dissatisfaction with a screening request for an estimate, though other accounts contradicted or downplayed this concern.

- Notable outcomes for potential customers: Positive experiences across both roofing and siding projects, demonstrated ability to handle changes during work, and a track record of timely completion and responsive communication.

- Overall sentiment: The majority of reviews are positive, with frequent praise for professionalism, clear communication, and effective handling of insurance claims. Several customers would use BHC again and would recommend them.

- What customers praised:
- Professionalism and thorough explanations throughout the process.
- Strong coordination with insurance companies and demonstrated knowledge of claims processes.
- Clear, respectful communication and regular updates from staff (notably Keith, Jared Mahorn, Tyler, Aaron).
- High-quality workmanship on roof replacements (house and garage) and siding work.
- Quick response times, on-site organization, and thorough cleanup.
- Some projects completed quickly, with mentions of single-day roof replacements; others were completed despite weather/backlog.

- Practical processes and outcomes:
- Initial inspections and documentation (photos) to assess damage.
- Assistance with starting and managing insurance claims; ongoing liaison with insurers.
- On-site work followed by post-project checks and sometimes additional fixes if issues appeared (e.g., caulking, securing upraised shingles, fixing leaks, interior repaint for water staining).
- Some customers received free roof inspections that identified no damage.
- Installations included both roofing and siding work, as well as gutters in some cases.

- Notable issues and how they were addressed:
- Occasional installation concerns (edge shingles curling, flashing caulking) were fixed after project manager and crew provided quick follow-up service.
- Weather and scheduling backlogs caused delays in some projects; customers generally reported understanding of delays and noted timely communication about status.
- A few customers experienced incidental property damage (plants, a brick, a damaged maple tree) and interior water staining; in each case, the company or crew returned to fix the issues and complete necessary repairs.

- Potential considerations for prospective customers:
- Expect detailed guidance through the insurance process and ongoing updates about claim status.
- Be prepared for potential scheduling delays due to weather or high demand, but anticipate responsive problem-solving and follow-up fixes if issues arise.
- Minor on-site issues may occur, but customers frequently report prompt corrective actions.

- Bottom line:
- BHC Roofing and Siding is generally viewed as professional and reliable, with strong emphasis on insurance coordination, transparent communication, and quality results. Most customers would consider them again or recommend them to others.

Overall, customer experiences with A&S Construction of Louisville appear mixed. Positive reviews describe professional conduct, good communication, clean job sites, and high-quality results on decks, home renovations (including attic work, wall removals, trim, and window repairs), and roofing. Clients frequently note attentive project managers and crews, timely scheduling (with some projects completed quickly), responsiveness, and the use of tools to update timelines and payments. Several reviewers express willingness to hire them again and recommend the company for future projects, highlighting design input, attention to detail, and reliability.

There is at least one notably negative experience involving a siding job: a large deposit was not refunded after materials could not be sourced, the job was not completed, and the firm reportedly refused to return the deposit, offering to apply it to another project at an inflated price, with little or no follow-up communication. This contrast highlights potential variability in outcomes and communication.

Summary of customer experiences with Christian Brothers Roofing (siding/roofing context)

- Overall sentiment: Mixed, with many positive experiences and some notable concerns. Several customers praised the company for strong project management, clear communication, and thorough cleanup, while a few reported serious issues related to workmanship and aftercare.

- Positive patterns and practical details:
- Project management and communication: Project managers such as Clay Baldwin, Austin Morris, and Skylar Sample were repeatedly highlighted for listening to questions, coordinating with insurance, keeping projects on schedule, and providing timely updates.
- Timeliness and efficiency: Crews often completed work quickly (examples include a roof replacement finished in about three days) and left the site clean with waste removed.
- Insurance coordination and assistance: Several customers appreciated help with insurance claims and seamless involvement of their insurer in the process.
- Quality and outcomes: Many customers were satisfied with the appearance and durability of their new roofs, color selections, and the overall workmanship. Positive notes also mention courteous, professional crews and good follow-up.

- Negative experiences and practical concerns:
- Weatherproofing and structural concerns: At least one review reported improper weatherproofing and rotten wood beneath a roof, raising questions about structural integrity.
- Punctuality and site impact: A reviewer described late arrivals, modifications to schedules, and damage to plants/debris left around the property.
- Gutters issue and accountability: One customer paid a substantial amount for gutters that allegedly caused water intrusion into the foundation, with complaints about lack of accountability, unanswered calls, and recommendations for an additional expensive roof to fix the problem.
- Mixed long-term reliability: Some reviews noted ongoing concerns or questions about long-term performance, despite initial positive impressions.

- Notable personnel and recurring themes:
- Specific team members repeatedly named positively for communication and service: Clay Baldwin, Austin Morris, Skylar Sample, Justin (insurance coordination), and Aaron (communications).
- Many reviewers would recommend the company, while a smaller subset urged caution and suggested verifying warranty coverage, cleanup practices, and potential risks with gutters or weatherproofing.

- Practical takeaway for potential customers:
- If considering Christian Brothers Roofing, expect strong project management, responsive communication, and efficient work with good cleanup, but also verify details on weatherproofing, material quality, and gutter-related improvements. Obtain clear written agreements on scope, warranties, and post-installation support, and consider asking for recent references regarding gutters and any past moisture-related concerns.

- Company background: Atlas Windows & Siding is described as a family-owned business with about 40 years in operation, offering windows, siding, doors, trim, and related services.

- Overall sentiment: Across multiple testimonials, experiences are predominantly positive, with strong praise for planning, installation, craftsmanship, and after-sales service. Several customers say they would highly recommend Atlas to others.

- Planning and communication: Customers highlight thorough planning and a smooth quoting process. Chuck and Jalen are frequently commended for project planning, and Chuck is noted as professional.

- Installation quality and workmanship: Tony and the installation team receive frequent acclaim for high-quality workmanship, precise trim work, and careful installations. Several reports mention flawless results and improvements to the home’s appearance.

- Cleanliness and professionalism on site: Several testimonials emphasize clean work sites, boot protectors inside, and workers who left the home in excellent condition.

- Scope of work and materials: Projects include multiple window installations (examples include 6 and up to 15 windows across projects), doors, siding, trim, and gutters. Some accounts mention triple-pane windows and other premium materials; one customer notes a successful update to window grid design and color.

- Pricing and value: Several customers describe pricing as great or within budget, with references to good value for the quality provided.

- After-sales service and warranties: Positive experiences with warranties and follow-up, including a case where windows with fading grid issues were replaced at no cost years after installation, and ongoing confidence in the company’s service. One testimonial notes the same crew returning for additional work with consistently flawless results.

- Scheduling and timelines: One account indicates a long scheduling lead time (8–12 weeks) for work, while others imply timely execution; another mentions currently waiting for work despite good service.

- Minor drawbacks or limitations: A note that a desired slider door handle could not be replaced because the specific brand was no longer carried, with the issue resolved elsewhere.

- Recommendation pattern: Given the frequency of strong endorsements, many customers would likely refer Atlas to friends or family seeking windows, doors, or siding work.