Top Siding Repair Services in Augusta

Summary of customer experiences with C & P Siding (roof repair, replacement, and siding):

- Services offered: roof repair, roof replacement, and siding work are provided.

- Timeliness and reliability: Jobs were completed within the stated timeframe; crew arrived as scheduled; installation was focused on finishing on time; work conducted in a timely and professional manner.

- Estimates and pricing: Estimates were provided quickly (even after storm activity); at least one reviewer noted a great price for a new roof.

- Pre-installation coordination: In one case, the team made several trips to the property before installation to confirm preferences, even though the property was far away.

- Cleanup and follow-up: The installation was followed by thorough cleanup; post-install follow-up addressed a vent that was blown off in a heavy storm.

- Overall sentiment: Reviewers express high satisfaction and would highly recommend the company for results, value, and service.

Customer experiences with Truth Roofing were markedly mixed, with several accounts highlighting speed and responsiveness and others noting significant follow-up and service issues.

Key practical details:
- Initial response and scheduling: Multiple customers reported prompt inspections and an eagerness to start work; in one case a color match from a different manufacturer was obtained and a replacement scheduled quickly. However, at least one review described a no-show for a free estimate and poor follow-up.
- Work quality and outcomes: Some reroofs were completed to the customer’s satisfaction, with notes of good weather resistance (e.g., after a hurricane) and clean debris removal. Other reviews described subpar workmanship, such as loose shingles on a dormer, and some customers experienced ongoing issues after completion.
- Warranty and service after sale: A 1-year craftsmanship warranty was cited by at least one client but reportedly not honored in their experience. Other reviews referenced a separate 10-year workmanship warranty via a partner, with inconsistent follow-through on warranty claims.
- Communication and follow-through: Early interactions were praised for responsiveness (noting specific staff members). In several cases, communication deteriorated after signing, with multiple unanswered calls or inconsistent information from different staff, leading to unresolved issues for extended periods (one account spanning 11 months).
- Pricing and insurance: Several customers found pricing to be fair or comparable to other quotes, and Truth Roofing assisted with inspections and insurance discussions. Some clients faced insurance-related cost gaps (e.g., depreciation or Actual Cash Value issues) that required out-of-pocket payments.
- Personnel and partners mentioned: Ed Williams and Terry Kondzich were cited for good responsiveness in some reviews, while Chris (owner) was praised for eagerness to start but criticized by others for poor follow-through. Other mentions included Maggie, Ben Harris, and Mission Catastrophe Resource in supporting a customer with insurance.

Overall, feedback indicates a spectrum from positive experiences centered on quick response, clear communication at the outset, and solid results, to negative experiences characterized by post-project communication failures, warranty concerns, and unresolved issues. Potential customers should verify warranty details, clarify post-completion service expectations, and confirm scheduling and communication norms before proceeding.

- Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with multiple customers praising professional service, clear explanations, and satisfying results on projects including windows, doors, and a shower.

- Staff and interactions highlighted:
- Trevor: professional, explains details; share excitement about the final look.
- Steve Hefner: excellent sales representative, helped explain the walk-in shower.
- Devin Morris: long-time salesperson (15+ years) described as outstanding.
- Carlos: professional approach as a salesman, well received.
- Megan White: praised as an effective head of canvassing.
- David Hunter: thorough, fair, honest, and enthusiastic; provided compelling plans for windows; easy to work with.
- Eli: straightforward and easy to work with.

- Pricing and value: Several comments note reasonable pricing and good value for the quality delivered.

- Scheduling and workmanship: Installations described as quick and on time; some testimonials mention “spectacular” or “beautiful” results.

- Customer loyalty and trust: At least one customer notes over 15 years of ongoing relationship with the company.

- Product scope mentioned: Projects encompassed windows, front doors, and walk-in showers; some references to broader home-improvement services and pre-quote experiences (trade show presence to home visit).

- Practical takeaway for potential customers: Expect thorough product explanations, honest and enthusiastic sales interactions, timely service, and results described as high quality.

Overall, reviews describe Jones Roofing, Windows and Siding as capable of handling roofing, siding, windows, and exterior repairs, with many customers praising prompt responsiveness, professionalism, and fair pricing. The company often takes a holistic approach to exterior projects, addressing issues beyond the roof itself (e.g., fascia, chimney, siding on multiple surfaces, and window/door replacement). Jobs are frequently completed quickly, with examples of one-day roof work and timely follow-ups to ensure satisfaction. The owner, Billy Jones, is repeatedly described as friendly, professional, timely, and fair, and long-time employee Donald is noted for punctual, precise work on siding, windows, and doors. Several customers report high-quality results and strong recommendations, including improvements in energy efficiency with Low-E windows.

Notable positives
- Rapid response to leaks and prompt follow-up checks to ensure repairs are solid.
- Comprehensive exterior work including fascia, siding (vinyl), chimney, back wall, carport, and windows/doors.
- Competitive pricing and no-pressure estimates; positive experiences with the estimate-to-install process.
- Efficient project completion (often within a day or a few weeks, depending on scope) and thorough cleanup.
- Positive interpersonal experiences with the owner and long-tenured crew member.

Notable concerns
- At least one customer could not obtain a service call for a repair months after a prior job, indicating inconsistent follow-up service.
- Reports of nails left on the ground after roof work.
- Some customers experienced delays or unfulfilled promises to send someone to repair siding after initial work.
- A few comments emphasize caution in dealing with the company to avoid missed follow-ups.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- If hiring for roofing and siding, confirm the full scope of work (roof, fascia, gutters, siding, windows/doors) and whether fascia-related repairs are included.
- Request a written plan for any needed follow-up repairs and a clear timeline.
- Ask about post-project cleanup expectations and guarantees or warranties on repairs.
- Consider the value of the owner’s involvement and the experience of long-time crew members when evaluating bids.
- For energy improvements, inquire about Low-E windows and the overall impact on comfort and energy bills.

All South Roofing (and related siding/window services) presents as a capable contractor for roofing, siding, window replacement, and additions like screened porches, with a strong focus on storm-related work and insurance coordination. Reviews depict a range of experiences, but several recurring themes emerge.

Positive experiences
- Professionalism, knowledge, and clear communication: several customers highlighted staff (e.g., Anthony, Collin, Daniel, Kevin) as courteous, informative, and non-pushy, able to explain product options, lifespans, and pricing.
- Quick, efficient service and timely scheduling: many projects were completed promptly, with some windows installed in a single day and crews starting soon after approval or favorable weather.
- Quality workmanship and thorough cleanup: multiple testimonials praised solid craftsmanship, careful installation (including siding, roofing, and window work), and meticulous site cleanup.
- Good customer service and responsiveness: staff typically responded quickly to questions, coordinated with homeowners, and followed through on color choices, installations, and scheduling.
- Insurance coordination and value: several customers noted helpful interactions with the company and agents during the claims process, with fair pricing and clear estimates. Some projects included post-storm repairs and replacements (roofing, soffit/fascia, gutters) with positive results.
- Notable positive cases: praise for specific individuals who went above and beyond (e.g., Kevin Tierney for timely, detailed work and customer care; Collin for on-site estimates and warranty considerations; Daniel for project management and follow-through).

Negative experiences and concerns
- Communication and access issues: at least one customer reported never meeting the person in charge and felt the process lacked transparency, including unannounced visits.
- Difficult interactions with ownership: a report described the owner as rude, with a request to leave the property; concerns about management style affecting the experience.
- Scheduling reliability problems: one testimonial described four repairs attempted with four no-shows, indicating inconsistent on-site follow-through in that case.
- Post-storm service gaps: some customers noted difficulties in securing timely assessments or repairs after hurricanes, and a few concerns about pricing and expectations when insurance coverage was partial or delayed.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- The company appears capable across roofing, siding, windows, and additions, with many customers noting timely installation, quality work, and helpful insurance coordination.
- Expect clear explanations of options, price transparency, and, in many cases, proactive communication throughout the project.
- Be prepared to confirm the point of contact and project leadership, and to document schedules and timelines in writing given occasional reports of communication gaps or scheduling inconsistencies.
- If timing or a strict schedule is critical (e.g., post-storm repairs), verify availability and the project lead prior to committing, and clarify cleanup, debris removal, and warranty coverage.

Customer feedback for Crosby Roofing and Gutters covers roofing, gutters, siding, and related work, with generally positive reports on workmanship and professionalism. Commonly described processes include an inspection scheduled the day after contact, a detailed quote provided the same day, and work scheduled promptly after approval. Projects often involved a crew of 6–8 and could be completed in one day for roofing; materials and a dumpster were coordinated by the project manager, and clean‑up was praised. Some customers noted proactive problem‑solving, such as design solutions for gutter changes and timely resolution of issues like a skylight size mismatch, which was rectified with new skylights installed within a few days.

Several staff members are repeatedly mentioned positively, including Tom Wilmot, Elijah, Kevin, and Christian, with Tommy noted for providing schematics and communication. Financing options and free estimates were commonly cited as helpful, and many reviews reported satisfaction with the final results (new roofs, fascia work, gutter upgrades, and siding/paint). However, there are mixed experiences regarding communication and project management. One customer criticized the owner’s accessibility and the office manager’s handling of scheduling and payments, describing a three‑month delay before gutters were scheduled, a cash deposit of about $6,000 with no invoice, and a hold on completion until the balance was paid. Overall, most customers report reliable service and quality work, with a few concerns about administrative and communication practices.

- Services performed: window, front door, storm door, and gutter guard installations; roof and siding replacement; screened porch/screen room additions or renovations; porch railing, beam repair, column installation, trim replacement, and gutter work with leaf guards.

- Overall impression: consistently positive and professional experiences, with customers noting friendly, knowledgeable staff and clear, helpful guidance on design decisions.

- Experience and service quality: reports of reliable, punctual teams delivering high-quality workmanship; careful project management and thorough cleanups; staff described as honest, responsive, and easy to work with.

- Pricing and estimates: multiple customers mention fair or reasonable pricing and detailed estimates; some note beating competitor quotes on certain projects.

- Timeliness and responsiveness: rapid scheduling and execution, including after-storm work (examples include initiating work within a few days after Hurricane Helene) and completing projects efficiently.

- Specific outcomes: improvements to home aesthetics and function (e.g., homes looking better after window/door work; high-quality screened porches; secure repairs to beams and columns; effective gutter systems).

- Value and reliability: many customers refer to CSRA Exteriors as a “go-to” or “trustworthy” provider for future exterior projects; households report long-term satisfaction and willingness to reuse the company.

Overall, reviews for Armour/Armor Roofing are mixed. Many customers report prompt responses, professional conduct, thorough inspections, and helpful guidance, especially during insurance claims, tarping, and repairs after storms. Several specific positives stand out:
- Named staff frequently praised for professionalism and clear communication: Blaze Burgess, Mark Deraney, Jeremy, Weston, and Drayton.
- Services cited include accurate inspections with detailed reports and photos, timely tarping and repairs after damage, and assistance with insurance paperwork.
- Some customers note good initial interactions, honest assessments, and reasonable timelines for projects or estimates.

However, there is a notable negative experience:
- One customer reported a roof replacement 8 months earlier followed by multiple issues, including a crew spraying Clorox/bleach onto siding that damaged the finish. The company allegedly refused to fix the damage and became unresponsive to calls and texts, serving as a cautionary example for potential clients.

Practical considerations for potential customers:
- The company is frequently cited for prompt storm-related work (tarping and rapid repairs) and for providing detailed inspections and insurance documentation.
- Several reviews suggest shopping around for pricing, as some estimates may be higher than insurance quotes.
- Be sure to confirm post-service support, warranties, and point-of-contact for follow-up issues, given the mixed experiences with responsiveness.

Customers describe the company as mission-driven, likening its leadership style to a ministry and noting it is unique among local roofing/siding providers in the CSRA. Reported experiences include great service, fast job completion, and thorough cleanup after work.

The reviews for this roofing/siding contractor are mixed. Several customers praise meticulous workmanship, early arrivals, safety-conscious crews, and responsive communication, while others report scheduling mishaps, unresponsiveness, and unprofessional behavior. Most feedback centers on roofing work rather than siding materials, with one mention of wood sheathing. Pricing is described as fair to slightly higher than competitors, often deemed worth the cost. A warranty is referenced by at least one reviewer, though terms are not detailed.

Summary of customer experiences with EZ Roofing (E-Z Roofing):

- Responsiveness and scheduling: numerous reviews highlight rapid responses after storms or damage, quick inspections, and prompt scheduling of repairs. Customers often note being kept informed of timelines and having quick, flexible scheduling even during busy periods.

- Work scope and quality: projects covered include roof repairs, complete roof replacements, fascia replacement, gutter work, skylights, and chimney-related improvements. Reported outcomes include durable results, seamless integration with existing roofing, and noticeable improvements in appearance. Several reviews mention work completed in a single day during storms and high effort to address urgent needs.

- Professionalism and communication: customers consistently describe office staff and technicians as courteous, professional, and communicative. Clients note clear updates, attentive service, and responsiveness to questions or concerns, including post-work follow-ups.

- Honesty, value, and pricing: several reviews emphasize transparent quotes, reasonable or competitive pricing, and avoiding unnecessary work (e.g., opting to replace vent pipe boots rather than pursuing a full roof replacement). One review cites substantial savings by correcting specific deficiencies instead of a full roof replacement.

- Cleanup and site conduct: multiple accounts mention thorough cleanup, absence of nails or debris after completion, and careful handling of surrounding areas.

- Warranties and assurances: at least one review notes a 10-year guarantee on the new roof, contributing to perceived long-term value and confidence.

- Emergency and storm response: several customers describe effective, proactive actions during severe weather, including securing damaged structures to prevent further problems and rapid mobilization for inspections and repairs.

- Local presence and community: reviews reference work in the Georgia area (e.g., Augusta) and some mentions of charitable or community involvement by the company.

Overall takeaway for potential customers:
EZ Roofing appears to deliver prompt, professional roofing-related services with clear communication, thorough workmanship, and reliable cleanup. They are frequently chosen for storm-related damage, offer transparent pricing with examples of cost savings, and provide assurances such as warranties. Potential customers can expect responsive service, detailed project handling from inspection to completion, and attention to scope accuracy to avoid unnecessary work.

Neutral overview of the siding and exterior repairs company based on customer reviews. The bulk of feedback is positive regarding high-quality work, professionalism, thorough prep (washing, sanding, replacing rotten wood), and strong communications, with many praising warranties (notably a lifetime warranty on non-moving features) and responsive crews. Some reviews mention downsides including unresponsiveness to follow-up requests, fluctuating or perceived overpriced quotes, and cleanup or painting-related mishaps. Overall sentiment leans favorable for quality and service, but potential customers should be aware of pricing variability and the importance of clear communication on scope and follow-through.

- Overall, experiences are mixed. Some customers praise quick responsiveness, professional crews, and solid workmanship; many others report serious issues.

- Negative and practical issues reported
- Scheduling and quotes: appointments frequently missed or delayed; difficulty obtaining ETA or a quote after a window was arranged.
- Communication: repeated failed attempts to reach staff; some accounts mention a change in ownership and unclear points of contact.
- workmanship and results: leaks after roofing work (including skylights/dormers); improper flashing and caulking; siding damage around dormers; color mismatches on shingles; messy or incomplete cleanup with nails/materials left behind.
- timeline and reliability: projects stretched over weeks or months; some crews worked late or left without completing tasks; multiple reports of unfinished work.
- cost and contracts: deposits paid with dissatisfaction or disputes over what was included; warnings from customers to avoid paying upfront; some customers felt the price was not justified by results.
- outcomes: several cases where leaks persisted or recurred, forcing customers to seek repairs from other providers; some customers reported having to rework or redo portions of the job.

- Positive experiences and notes
- A subset of customers report prompt responses, fast completion (sometimes within a day or two), professional communication, and satisfactory results.
- A few reviewers specifically commend certain staff (e.g., sales/contact people) and describe the work as high quality or well-priced compared to others.

- Notable considerations for potential customers
- Verify current ownership status and obtain clear, written scope, materials, and warranty details.
- Insist on a firm schedule with named point of contact and documented follow-up commitments.
- Require a detailed cleanup plan and a clause addressing post-work leaks or deficiencies.
- Be cautious about upfront payments; ensure milestones are tied to progress and approvals.
- Check multiple references and assess whether the company’s strengths (speed, communication, value) align with your project needs and risk tolerance.

- Overall, customer experiences with Posey Home Improvements for siding and window projects tend to be positive, with many customers praising professionalism, on-time crews, thorough cleanups, and good value for money.

- Projects commonly involve window replacement (ranging from a few to 30+ windows), siding installation, and occasional gutter work; several reviews note noticeable energy efficiency improvements and aesthetic enhancements (color matches, looks of the home).

- Key strengths cited:
- Experienced, efficient crews led by Allen Williams on window projects.
- Prompt communication from managers and crew; thorough explanations and ability to answer questions.
- On-time arrivals, minimized disruption, and strong cleanup at the end of the job.
- Perceived value: many customers felt they received good quality product for a fair installation cost.

- Notable individuals repeatedly mentioned: Allen Williams (installation lead/crew), Phillip (initial measurements/quote), Brandy (office contact), and Geri (office visits).

- Positive outcomes highlighted:
- “Pleased” or “highly recommend” Posey in multiple reviews.
- Substantial improvements in appearance and energy performance.
- Large projects completed efficiently, sometimes finishing ahead of schedule.

- Reported issues and areas for improvement:
- Communication and scheduling inconsistencies: a few reviews noted slow or missing responses to quotes or inquiries, and some inaccuracy in scheduling.
- One review indicated a gutter issue on the first installation attempt and cited timing/communication gaps elsewhere.
- A concern about potential code-related tempering requirements not being clearly communicated in a bid.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Posey appears capable of handling large-scale window replacements and siding projects with attention to detail and cleanups.
- Expect professional, approachable crews with strong on-site coordination; use Allen Williams as a point of contact on window installations.
- Be prepared to confirm scope, pricing, and any code-related requirements in writing, and to verify scheduling details up front to avoid delays.
- If gutters are included, verify color match and confirm any follow-up work if issues arise.

Customer testimonials for Southpaw Roofing describe largely positive experiences with roofing projects, highlighting reliable communication, on-time appointments, and thorough project management. Key staff cited include Kip Custer (roofing representative) and Josh Noyce (project manager), both noted for listening to concerns, providing clear guidance on shingle selections and color options, and responding promptly to questions and texts. Pre-install and on-site practices frequently mentioned include attic inspections for potential electrical, wiring, or HVAC issues, and additional checks during the job to mitigate problems.

The workmanship is portrayed as careful and diligent rather than rushed, with emphasis on quality installation and thorough cleanup, including removal of a full dumpster and minimal furniture or property damage concerns such as nails. Several reviews reference quick turnaround times, often completing work within a day, and competitive pricing supported by written estimates with comparisons to other local quotes. Communication is described as ongoing, often via text updates, and several customers report feeling reassured by the team’s transparency and willingness to explain each step of the process.

Many customers express high satisfaction and a willingness to recommend Southpaw Roofing and to reuse them for future projects, with some using them across multiple properties. A few comments mention a language barrier with some crew members but note that it did not impede understanding or overall performance. One review also references a different company name (Southpoint Roofing) for a water-leak repair, suggesting potential branding overlap in the region. Overall, the experiences depict a professional, responsive, and dependable roofing contractor with a focus on customer guidance, inspection, and quality results.

Customers reported quick response and scheduling, on-time arrivals, and prompt completion (often within one day) for large siding repairs, including full side of a house and portions of the back. They described fair to excellent value, with estimates that matched final costs. Work included hurricane-related siding damage and fiber cement siding replacement, plus repairing sections damaged by lawn equipment. The crews were described as knowledgeable and reliable, with staff such as Nick, Mick, Lee, Rose, Trey, Rod, Christina, and Kristin noted for helpful communication and coordination. In one instance a minor installation mistake occurred but was corrected the next day at no extra charge. Overall, customers expressed high satisfaction and would highly recommend Complete Residential.

Garden City Roofing, led by Luke Detchemendy, has multiple customer notes noting positive outcomes from siding and roofing work, including a siding replacement and a roof replacement for a church facility. Practical details mentioned by customers include:

- Services performed: siding replacement; roof repairs; gutter guard installation; adjustments to gutter downspouts; and roof replacement for a church sanctuary and fellowship hall.
- Quality and appearance: clients report attractive results; one comment notes the roof “looks great” and another mentions compliments on the house after siding replacement.
- Property protection and cleanup: crews are described as conscientious with minimal damage to property or shrubbery and thorough post-job cleanup.
- Communication and reliability: some initial communication mishaps are mentioned, but Luke is said to have followed up and is often contacted first for future work.
- Scheduling: customers prefer to work with Luke, but time-sensitive projects led some to hire others due to scheduling constraints.
- Insurance coordination: Luke is described as able to work with insurance adjusters to help save money for clients.
- Overall sentiment: multiple reviewers express high satisfaction, with one explicitly rating services highly.

Potential customers can expect experienced roofing and siding work, careful site cleanup, and the option to coordinate with insurance, but may encounter initial communication hiccups and scheduling considerations for time-sensitive projects.

- Services and outcomes: Customers report Impact Roofing & Construction handling roofing repairs/replacements, siding repairs, and remodeling projects (including kitchen and bathroom work) as well as deck replacement (including screened porch) and full rebuilds after Hurricane Helene. Projects referenced locations in Augusta area (including Martinez and Brynwood) and a Trinity Baptist Ministries roof. Several jobs were completed with high-quality results and thorough cleanup.

- Timelines and coordination: Roof replacements were often completed quickly, with some cited as finishing in about two days. Some projects were delayed or extended due to the effects of Hurricane Helene and the need to coordinate with insurance, including obtaining multiple estimates.

- Communication and staff: Clients frequently mention clear explanations of the process, regular updates, and the provision of photos. Staff named in multiple reviews include Taylor O’Neal, Stateon, Will, Derrick, Mike, and others, described as professional and responsive.

- Insurance and estimates: Several reviews note interaction with insurance processes (e.g., USAA guidelines) and the requirement for insurance estimates, with occasional delays in receiving those estimates.

- Practical cautions for potential customers: A few reviews highlight the importance of timely and accurate material orders, avoiding tarp-related water issues, and protecting gutters from ladder damage. There are mentions of ensuring crews communicate about any structural concerns (e.g., unintended openings or ceiling issues) during tear-downs.

- Overall sentiment and recommendations: The prevailing tone is positive, with many customers expressing satisfaction with workmanship, responsiveness, and fairness of pricing, and most indicating they would recommend Impact Roofing & Construction.

Overall, customer experiences with Augusta Roofing and Siding are mixed, with both favorable and unfavorable outcomes reported. Positive accounts mention prompt estimates or rapid service, courteous interactions from some staff, and final work described as thorough or visually satisfactory. Negative accounts describe unprofessional or rude phone conversations, appointments not kept or rescheduled, pressure to proceed with work, and aggressive or unclear payment practices. Several reviewers report leaks arising after roof replacements and question warranty coverage, including claims of short warranty periods and disputed fixes. Some customers praise specific workers or the owner in certain contexts, while others accuse the company of blame-shifting, miscommunication, unnecessary charges, or attempts to collect payment before work was properly authorized. The services cited include roofing and siding work, storm-damage assessments, and insurance-related work, with outcomes varying by project and interaction.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Insist on a written scope of work, costs, and warranty terms before any work begins; confirm who is authorized to approve and schedule.
- Clarify appointment expectations, travel distance, and who will perform the work; confirm arrival windows to avoid no-shows.
- Align on payment methods and timing; request a detailed invoice and avoid paying until the work scope is agreed and completed.
- Inquire about warranty coverage, what is included, and the procedure for follow-up repairs if leaks occur.
- Establish a clear point of contact for progress updates and issues to avoid miscommunication or escalation.

Overview:
- Customer experiences with RCS Roofing and Scott Gunter are mixed but often positive. Many customers praise professionalism, clear communication, affordability, and the ability to complete roofing work quickly, frequently in one day, with thorough cleanup and strong final results.

Positive patterns:
- Quick scheduling of estimates and thorough explanations of options.
- Honest, non-pushy approach to pricing and insurance discussions; many describe pricing as affordable or reasonable.
- Professional, courteous interactions; good real-time updates and transparency throughout the process.
- High-quality results and clean finishes; effective guidance through insurance processes; strong follow-through for some clients (especially real estate professionals).

Common concerns:
- Post-project issues with gutters damaged during roofing work and leaks that were not repaired in a timely manner, with multiple promises to fix but limited follow-through.
- Reports of scheduling missteps or delays, and some instances of reduced responsiveness after payment or after the project was completed.
- Perceived lack of follow-up or accountability in resolving gutter/leak problems, including long waits (months) for repairs in some cases.
- Some reviews mention miscommunication or unfulfilled promises, especially after storms increased demand.

Scope and clientele:
- Projects cited include roof replacement (often after storms), window/shutter considerations, gutters, gutter guards, and related repairs.
- Positive notes from homeowners and real estate agents emphasize reliability and straightforward communication; negative notes focus on post-work service and warranty-type concerns.

Overall takeaway for potential customers:
- RCS Roofing is frequently praised for upfront communication, clear explanations, competitive pricing, and efficient, high-quality roof work. However, several reviews raise concerns about post-work service, particularly gutter damage and repair follow-through, suggesting potential risk of delayed or incomplete post-project support.