Top Siding Repair Services in Champaign

- Overall, customers describe Freeman Exteriors as knowledgeable, friendly, and hard-working, with a strong emphasis on integrity and honesty.
- The company handles a range of exterior projects, including roofing, siding, windows, fascia repairs, gutters, decks, and porches.
- Several projects were completed quickly: roofs in as little as one day; siding for a house in around three days; gutters installed the next day after roofing.
- Cleanup and site neatness are frequently praised; crews are described as professional and courteous.
- Communication is a notable strength: fast appointment setup, clear updates, and responsiveness; in one case, photos were used to show issues.
- Specific staff members are mentioned positively (e.g., Chance, Hayden, Dave) for helpful, communicative, and easy-to-work-with conduct.
- Value and quality are highlighted together, with customers noting competitive pricing alongside high-quality workmanship.
- Customers express willingness to hire Freeman Exteriors again and to recommend them for future exterior projects.

general_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

- Services and scope: residential roof replacements (including stone-coated metal), gutters, skylights, and storm-related repairs; includes large commercial projects (e.g., ~190,000 sq ft).

- Responsiveness and issue handling: frequent notes of prompt responses to leaks, tarp-ups, and weather-related problems; many issues addressed the same day; rapid on-site action for repairs.

- Insurance coordination and costs: several customers reported help with filing and negotiating insurance claims to cover full replacements, often resulting in little to no out-of-pocket expense.

- Quality and outcomes: multiple testimonials praising high-quality workmanship and aesthetically pleasing results; some projects completed quickly and with strong final results.

- Staff and experience: repeatedly favorable mentions of specific team members (e.g., Jeremy, Josh, Kyle, Travis, Eduardo, Joe) for professionalism, honesty, and clear communication.

- Customer experience variability: a few negative notes, including an eight-month gap with no follow-up on a skylight replacement and isolated delays in measurement activities, with limited potential solutions afterwards.

- Overall impression: the majority of customers would likely recommend Copper Creek for roofing and storm-related repairs, citing reliability, professionalism, and constructive collaboration with insurers as key strengths.

point_of_interest, establishment

- The experiences with this company are mixed. Many customers report high-quality workmanship on projects such as window and door replacements, roofing, siding, vent replacement, and additions (pergola, awning), with knowledgeable staff, timely service, and thorough project management. Several long-time customers express satisfaction and view the company as a reliable go-to for repairs and renovations, noting improvements in comfort (e.g., basement stays dry) and overall home makeovers.

- There are notable negative experiences as well. Warranty disputes arise with the windows, including claims that the lifetime warranty is not honored because the installer is out of business, and conflicting explanations about installation issues or door components. Some customers felt they were misinformed about the causes of problems (e.g., siding or door sill issues).

- Communication and responsiveness are inconsistent. Some customers praise prompt communication and responsiveness; others complain about poor internal and external communication, delays in siding work, and not receiving bids or callbacks after inquiries.

- Pricing concerns are mentioned by multiple customers. Some describe the work as very expensive and express frustration about not knowing starting prices before an estimate.

- Safety and conduct concerns are reported. There are accounts of an after-hours service visit with inappropriate personal questions targeting a customer, and a separate report of a door-to-door salesperson attempting to enter a home during a hailstorm, with one reviewer rating the company very poorly (0/5).

- Overall, sentiment is polarized: several customers have had positive experiences with quality workmanship and helpful staff, while others have serious concerns about warranties, communication, pricing, and safety practices. Potential customers should seek written warranty terms, obtain detailed and timely estimates, and verify staff conduct and safety policies before committing.

Overall, customers describe DECA Improvements as a contractor capable of rapid quotes, quick project starts, and solid workmanship across roofing and renovation projects. Many reviews note professional, courteous crews, careful work around landscaping, and thorough site cleanup, with products backed by written warranties in at least some cases. Pricing is generally described as fair, with some projects noted as less expensive than competing bids.

Practical strengths highlighted:
- Responsiveness and quick quotes; several projects began promptly and progressed steadily.
- High-quality workmanship on roofing (including one-day replacements and precise installations) and on remodels (e.g., kitchen backsplash, full renovations).
- Professional conduct, careful handling of property, and clean post-job sites.
- Ability to handle multiple project types (roofing, renovations, market-readiness work) and to deliver completed work within tight timelines (one testimonial cites about 4 weeks for a full renovation).

Common cautions:
- A subset of experiences reports scheduling and communication issues, including missed or late initial quotes, delays in providing next steps, and inconsistent follow-up. Some customers felt the company was very busy and could be slow to respond on new projects.

Overall customer sentiment:
- Many customers recommend DECA Improvements and return for additional work, citing fast quotes, good value, reliable workmanship, and positive results on multiple home projects. A minority raise concerns about communication and scheduling consistency.

Customer experiences with Unity Construction in Saint Joe cover a range of services, including roof work, a two-room leak patch, fence installation, garage ceiling repair and painting, water-damaged ceiling repair, and painting/caulking/patching. Across these notes, customers report a professional, friendly, and knowledgeable team. Common practical details include a clear proposal with options, explanations before work, ongoing updates during the project, a post-job walk-through explaining what was done, timely or early arrivals, daily cleanup, and responsive communication. Reported results describe high-quality workmanship that refreshed interiors and exteriors, with some clients noting their home looks brand new. Several customers indicate they would hire Unity Construction again and would recommend them to others.

Customer experiences with NRC Roofing and Restoration are mixed.

- Service scope and sales practices: Some customers reported a roof replacement was discussed, a walk-through conducted, and a contract signed on the same day, with a stated 4-6 week start. In at least one case, the company later indicated it does not service townhomes or duplexes, leading to unresolved work and questions about refunds.

- Positive experiences: Several customers praised specific staff for professionalism, knowledge, and communication (examples include Jorge Luis Flores, Angela Peña, Jay, Niko, Angela, Luca, Gwen, Wes, and Jerry). They described clear explanations of the process, responsive and ongoing communication, assistance with insurance coordination, and reliable follow-through. Some crews reportedly completed work on the promised schedule and left the property cleaned, with follow-up to ensure satisfaction.

- Insurance and process support: Multiple reviews highlighted help with insurance benefits, advocacy with insurers, and transparent explanations of options and costs.

- Overall impression: There is a range of experiences from highly positive—centered on communication, reliability, and workmanship—to problematic, particularly regarding service area limitations and refund issues after a prior agreement and walk-through. Potential customers should verify service scope (townhomes/duplexes) in writing and confirm timelines and refund expectations before proceeding.

Neutral summary of customer experiences for 4th Stud Construction LLC (Amin and team):

- Overall sentiment: Predominantly positive experiences with professional workmanship, good communication, and reliable performance; a few negative incidents noted.

- Services and scope: Projects cited include deck removal and rebuild, trim and brick painting, baseboard installation estimates, bathroom remodels (shower, vanity), foundation-related repairs, shed construction, and general home improvements. Works often performed in occupied spaces and under challenging conditions (storms, freezing temperatures).

- Quality and professionalism: Many customers describe high-quality results, attention to detail, and thoughtful, professional conduct. Cleanliness after daily work and ability to provide expert guidance during projects are frequently mentioned.

- Communication and reliability: Several reviews note prompt questions handling, regular updates, and responsiveness. Some praise punctual arrival and scheduling efficiency; a minority report scheduling gaps or delays in callbacks.

- Value and bidding: Bids are described as informative and reasonably aligned with expectations; in one case a bid helped a customer determine an offer price on a property.

- Notable positive outcomes: Clients report “dream” renovations, transformative bathroom/showers, and substantial problem-solving for structural or space issues; several reviews express willingness to hire again.

- Notable negative experiences: One reviewer reported a missed appointment and poor follow-up; another described deceit, overcharging, and unprofessional behavior, including personal accusations which starkly contrast with other feedback.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: Expect clear explanations of options and progress updates; confirm scheduling expectations in advance; obtain and compare bids; be aware of the possibility of both highly satisfactory experiences and isolated negative interactions.

Reviews for Legend Exteriors and Construction are predominantly positive, praising professional, attentive service and high-quality work on siding, roofing, and gutters, with strong assistance navigating insurance claims. Jim Hobson and other team members are frequently highlighted for responsiveness and thorough communication. A minority of reviews describe negative experiences involving sales pressure, scheduling delays, miscommunications, and workmanship issues during subcontracted work. Overall, the business is depicted as capable and customer-focused, with healthy emphasis on insurance coordination and customer care, alongside some caveats related to execution and communication in a few cases.

Summary of customer experiences with Crown Exteriors and Construction:

- Overall pattern: Reviews show a mix of highly positive experiences and several serious complaints. Projects cited include siding, roofing, gutters, windows, doors, skylights, porches, decks, and basement repairs.

- Positive experiences and strengths reported:
- Several customers praise professionalism, knowledge, and clear communication from team members (notably Colton, Dillon Shupe, Jake, Dakota, Joe, Paul).
- Projects are described as high quality with good workmanship, thorough clean-up, and minimal disruption.
- Clients cite reliable scheduling, responsive follow-up, and strong customer care during complex projects (e.g., roof, gutters, skylights, and window installations).
- Local, long-term relationships and repeat business are mentioned by some customers.

- Reported issues and concerns:
- Multiple accounts of projects not completed after payments, with some contractors allegedly disappearing or not showing up for scheduled work or court dates.
- Communication gaps and delays are common in some experiences, especially around window and door installations.
- Specific problems cited in installations include doors installed on the wrong side, water intrusion at the bottom of sliding doors, and some windows not opening.
- Financial disputes and liens are mentioned by several reviewers, with some reports of unpaid suppliers and legal action or threatened liens.

- Project scope, timing, and costs:
- Projects range from a few thousand dollars to around $20,000–$24,000 for windows, roofing, siding, and related work.
- Timelines vary widely: some jobs are completed within days, while others experience months-long delays before installation or follow-up; in some cases, updated timelines were not communicated proactively.

- Representative and staff notes:
- Colton is frequently mentioned as a positive point of contact for estimates and coordination, though some reviewers report losing direct contact after staff changes.
- Other team members (Dillon Shupe, Jake, Dakota, Joe, Paul) receive praise for project management, workmanship, and communication in various positive reviews.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect a wide variance in experiences; verify references and obtain written contracts with scope, materials, timelines, and payment milestones.
- Request explicit timelines for each phase (measurement, order, installation) and designate a current point of contact.
- Confirm warranty coverage and require lien waivers or clear satisfaction milestones to limit financial disputes.
- Check for consistent on-site supervision and follow-up, and ask for examples or photos of similar completed projects.
- When planning window/door work, clarify installation details and potential issues (e.g., door orientation, weatherproofing) before work begins.

Customer reviews center on Central Roofing, with multiple project managers referenced (e.g., Derrick Roy, Justin Colclasure, Zack, Corey). Reported timelines show rapid work, often finishing in 1 day or 1.5 days, and inspectors providing photos and assistance with insurance claims. Reviewers generally praise responsiveness, clear communication, workmanship, and fair pricing, and several note the company’s helpful coordination with insurance. A minority note poor cleanup or property damage in a separate incident. No specific siding materials or warranties are mentioned in the reviews provided.

Customer reviews primarily describe fencing and exterior work by SK Exteriors (S&K Exteriors), with aluminum fencing explicitly named as the material. Highlights include timely scheduling and communication, professional installation, and fast completion (often within a day), as well as competitive pricing and price-matching. Customers praise knowledgeable staff and high-quality results. A single review notes a lack of follow-up on an estimate. No warranties or guarantees are mentioned in the reviews.

- Rapid responses and quotes: several reviews note quotes within hours of contact and assessments completed quickly; some jobs finished the same day or within one day.
- Pricing and quotes: most mention reasonable pricing, with some quotes including tax; a few customers reported the work was cheaper than expected or better value than alternatives.
- Service scope: performed siding repair/replacement (often with insulation), flashing, roofing, gutters, fence construction/repair, deck work, and even addressing chimney or structural issues; multiple jobs were completed in a single visit, and some reviewers found additional problems and had them fixed at no extra cost.
- Quality and professionalism: customers frequently describe high-quality workmanship, fast turnaround, thorough cleanup, and good communication; several noted professionalism and courteous crew behavior, with some help maintaining good relations with neighbors.
- Payment flexibility: at least one reviewer noted paying timing was flexible (final payment delayed until after payday).
- Mixed experiences: while most feedback is very positive, at least one review describes a poor outcome and says the company was not willing to fix it; another indicates lack of follow-up after pricing, with unanswered calls/texts.

Customer experiences with Dillman Brothers are mixed, with some projects described as high quality and well-executed, and other experiences highlighting significant issues with follow-through and communication.

Common themes:
- Work quality and projects: Several customers praised the craftsmanship on items such as siding, gutters, fascia, and screened porches, noting clean work sites and professional crews. Positive mentions include improved aesthetics and solid structural work (e.g., repaired fascia/soffits and built porch features). However, at least one customer reported an installation flaw (a bathroom-vent connection left with a kink and inadequate insulation) that raised concerns about whether the job was completed as agreed and whether it could cause attic moisture problems.
- Reliability and responsiveness: A recurring concern is poor communication and unresponsiveness. Multiple reviews describe long delays obtaining bids or estimates, failed callbacks, and difficulty getting refunds or follow-up after issues were raised.
- Problem resolution: Some customers reported that problems were not promptly or satisfactorily resolved, with promises to address issues not fulfilled and extended timeframes (months to years) without resolution.
- Overall sentiment: While a few reviews reflect positive experiences and willingness to work with Dillman Brothers again, many accounts warn prospective customers about inconsistent service, poor customer service, and unreliability.

Potential customers may want to verify project scope in writing, request concrete timelines and written guarantees, and seek references to confirm reliability and follow-through before starting a project.

- Overall impression: Generally positive experiences with responsiveness, clear communication, and solid workmanship; a few mentions of scheduling efficiency and value; one note of difficulty reaching a specific contact.
- Responsiveness and scheduling: Many customers report same-day or very quick responses, rapid inspections, and roof replacements often completed within about two weeks; gutters installed a few weeks after roofing; some emergencies were addressed within hours.
- Services provided: Roofing repairs and replacements, gutter installation, fascia/soffit repair, vent installation, and related inspections; some customers received help with insurance claims and warranty processes (including GAF Golden Pledge).
- Communication: Frequent praise for proactive, informative communication and updates throughout the process; staff cited repeatedly as professional and easy to work with (owners and team members such as Kurt, Nick, Adam, Bradley, and Jose).
- workmanship and outcomes: Reports of thorough inspections, quality workmanship, proper cleanup, and positive final results; some customers noted added value (e.g., discounts on sheathing when needed, vent installation).
- Pricing and value: Several comments describe pricing as reasonable or great, with quotes and updates provided as projects progressed.
- Reliability and trust: Repeated client trust built over multiple projects (six roofs mentioned by one customer) and willingness to use Freedom Roofing again; one customer highlighted strong reliability for urgent leaks.
- Minor issues: Occasional scheduling delays due to weather and one instance where a customer could not reach a specific contact for follow-up.
- Recommendation: Broad sentiment of satisfaction and willingness to hire again or recommend for roofing-related needs.

- Overall, customers report positive experiences with White Roofing Service, citing professionalism, good communication, and solid workmanship.
- Services described include roof replacement, gutter projects, siding work, chimney cap and flashing repairs, vent and skylight work, and occasional plywood replacement.
- The process often begins with a detailed, timely estimate and a clear quote; staff assist with material choices and project planning.
- Scheduling and pace are frequently praised: crews arrive as planned, work efficiently, and complete projects in a短 period (often within 1–2 days); in some cases, projects or cancellations were offered to move dates earlier.
- Communication is highlighted as a strength, with responsive office staff and regular updates, including weather-related pauses.
- Worksites are noted as neat and careful, with thorough cleanup and protection of landscaping.
- Outcomes are consistently described as high quality and durable, with some reports of improved home performance (e.g., reduced water intrusion) and satisfaction with the final appearance.
- Pricing is described as fair or reasonable, with several customers noting competitive rates.
- A number of reviewers would highly recommend White Roofing Service and indicate they would use the company again for future projects.

Customer feedback for ATS Custom Construction/Fencing is consistently positive across a range of exterior projects (fencing, porches/breezeways, and hail-damaged roof replacements). Reviewers repeatedly cite clear, proactive communication, professional and courteous crews (often naming Miguel C., Sergio A., Narciso D., Luis S., Jose D., Avery M., and others), and workmanship that meets or exceeds expectations. Projects are described as efficient, frequently completed in one to two days, with careful attention to detail and neighbors’ comfort, and with sites left clean and orderly. Customers note maintenance-free or well-constructed fences (vinyl, cedar, or chain-link replacements), thoughtful problem-solving, and responsiveness to questions or concerns, including handling weather-related issues or initial estimate hiccups. Overall, the experiences emphasize reliable service, quality results, and willingness to go above and beyond, leading to strong recommendations for ATS among potential customers.

Bash Pepper Roofing (Cord Shroeder) in Champaign generally receives positive feedback for prompt responsiveness, thorough on-site evaluations, and solid workmanship across roofing, siding, gutters, and related work. The firm is praised for handling a range of services, including slate roofing, historically maintained gutters, patching and replacing flat roof areas, and integrating a new garage roof with an existing structure. Customers frequently note quick scheduling, courteous and professional crews, honest assessments, and fair pricing. Several reviewers report fixing leaks or minor issues on the spot, providing supplies at no charge, and repeat engagements for both roof and siding projects. The company is described as knowledgeable, reliable, and capable of complex projects, including work on historic homes and multi-family settings.

Notable positive specifics include: rapid response to urgent issues, comprehensive services (roofing, siding, gutters, soffit, skylights), and strong workmanship with good outcomes. Some customers highlight free or reduced-rate repairs after installation when problems arose, and clear, uncomplicated communications in many interactions.

However, there are two notable drawbacks mentioned by a few customers. One reviewer experienced terrible communication and failure to provide a quote after a three-week period, ultimately choosing another company. Another set of reviews mentions debris left from a roof replacement and ongoing difficulties obtaining receipts or timely responses to inquiries, with some reports that the main office or scheduling was less responsive than field staff.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect prompt on-site evaluation, quick scheduling, and a broad service scope (roofing, siding, gutters, soffit, skylights), including work on historic homes.
- Cord and his crews are often praised for thorough, honest assessments and reasonable pricing; some repairs or supplies may be provided at no charge.
- Confirm written estimates and timelines upfront, and clarify cleanup expectations and receipt/warranty documentation to avoid the communication issues noted in a minority of reviews.
- Consider requesting a single point of contact to minimize potential gaps between field teams and office follow-up.

Please provide the customer reviews or excerpts you’d like summarized (or a link to them). How many reviews should be included, and are there specific aspects you want emphasized (timeliness, workmanship, communication, pricing, warranty, cleanup, etc.)? Once you share the material, I’ll produce a neutral, factual summary focused on practical details for potential customers.