Top Siding Repair Services in Cedar Rapids

Customer experiences with AW Home Improvement span very positive to critical, with many reviewers praising responsiveness, professionalism, and solid workmanship, and a minority reporting significant issues.

Key strengths noted by customers:
- Quick responses and good communication; organized teams and prompt on-site presence.
- High-quality results on roofs, siding, gutters, soffits, and related upgrades; color matching and clean, thorough site cleanup.
- Fair or competitive pricing; ability to handle both small rental-property jobs and larger remodels; efficient project completion when materials were readily available.
- Positive examples include matching siding to existing house, repairing derecho-related damage, and completing multi-part projects (garage siding/roof, house siding) to customers’ satisfaction.

Noted concerns and mixed experiences:
- Some reports of miscommunication, delays, or slower start times due to material ordering.
- A few workmanship-related issues on certain projects, including doors not sealing properly by subcontractors, cracked drywall around a header, warped rail, and a patio door set out of square.
- One reviewed case involves a long-after-the-fact dispute: delays in rectifying work, a concern over structural and finish problems, and a small-claims court outcome with allegations that AW closed the account to avoid payment—claims that are presented by the reviewer and not independently verified in this summary.
- A separate comment mentions feeling quickly dismissed or hung up on, indicating consistency in customer service experiences can vary.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Clearly document the project scope, timelines, and material specifications in writing; confirm lead times and ordering processes.
- Request references and a detailed warranty or post-project follow-up plan; verify who is responsible for subcontractor work (e.g., door sealing).
- Expect some variability in response times and potential scheduling delays due to materials, but weigh this against overall project quality and cleanup.
- Seek a formal dispute-resolution path or written assurances if issues arise, and obtain a clear understanding of payment terms and remedies.

- Timeliness and availability: Customers typically received estimates promptly and projects began within a few weeks; some work (e.g., siding) was completed in one day, and scheduling could be adjusted based on weather.
- Quality and workmanship: Repeated praise for high-quality finishes, thorough and detail-oriented work, and professionalism. Color matching on siding and seamless repairs were highlighted; several projects finished with cleanups and minimal disruption.
- Scope of work performed: Projects included siding replacement, deck replacement, gutters and roof work, doors and walls in garages, window removal, and masonry repairs; some reviews also mention replacing rusted wrought-iron columns with aluminum.
- Value and pricing: Multiple reviewers described pricing as affordable or competitive, with some noting especially good value or the best pricing compared to others.
- Team and process: Work often performed by multiple crew members; teams were described as efficient, respectful, and capable, with some reviewers noting early arrivals and finishing before dark.
- Communication and reliability: Most experiences cited prompt responses and clear communication; however, at least one customer reported that a quote never arrived after multiple follow-ups, leading to no business.
- Minor criticisms: A review indicated masonry joints needed more attention; another noted the lack of a follow-up quote.
- Overall sentiment: The majority of reviews express satisfaction and would recommend Pro Exterior for siding and related work, citing quality, efficiency, and value; a few caveats exist regarding communication gaps or minor workmanship issues.

Summary: Customers describe Feldco’s window/door sales and service as friendly and professional, with staff such as Matt and Cody receiving frequent praise for knowledge, responsiveness, and a no-pressure approach. The sales process is noted as informative, including product demonstrations and clear explanations of installation steps and processes, with binder materials that aided decision-making. Pricing discussions often involved adjustments or financing to fit budgets, with multiple reports of obtaining satisfactory or reasonable pricing and manager involvement to adjust estimates. Service outcomes include timely responses to issues (e.g., replacing leaking French doors) and generally high-quality products, especially windows. Overall, experiences emphasize helpful staff, clear product information, and an effort to work within customers’ budgets, though one customer claimed pricing was excessive.

Customer experiences with Affordable Pro Exteriors are mixed but often positive. Pros frequently cited include punctual crews, clear communication, thorough site cleanup, precise measurements, and high-quality results on siding, roofing, gutters, and awnings. Several reviews note timely or even single-day completion and good collaboration with insurance appraisals, with staff members such as Dave, Tina, and Megan specifically mentioned for responsiveness and professionalism.

On pricing, some customers report good value and satisfaction with the final work, while others allege overcharging or unexpected attached costs. There are a few negative remarks about the job experience, including claims of nails found in the yard after work, concerns about crew conduct, and accusations that some reviews are influenced by payment for positive feedback. Potential customers should verify quotes, thoroughly inspect completed work, and clarify any charges upfront. Overall, many customers express trust in the workmanship and finish, along with appreciation for communication and cleanup, though a subset report pricing or conduct concerns.

- Overall, customer feedback for Options Exteriors and its representatives is consistently positive, highlighting strong communication, prompt responses, and smooth coordination with insurance companies during roofing and siding projects.
- Speed and scheduling: quotes are described as prompt, with crews often arriving quickly and completing work efficiently; several projects were finished in a single day, with careful on-site management from start to finish.
- Communication and project management: customers note thorough updates, explanations of processes, and reps who stay on top of insurance adjusters and questions throughout the job.
- Insurance handling: multiple reviewers credit specific staff (e.g., Dylan Clark, Mike Patestas, Logan Peterson, Ryan Navara) with navigating claims, obtaining approvals, and securing favorable outcomes, sometimes ensuring compensation for hail/wind damage.
- Work quality and site care: feedback frequently mentions professional crews, careful cleanup, protection of landscaping, and attention to details such as skylights and gutters; final results are described as beautiful and well-installed.
- Scope and applicability: testimonials cover roofing, siding repairs, and related elements (gutters, soffits, skylights) across various projects and storms.
- Notable personnel: Landon Diehl, Austin Hotchkiss, Dylan Clark, Mike Patestas, Logan Peterson, and Ryan Navara are repeatedly highlighted for their roles and responsiveness.
- Caution: at least one reviewer notes a post-install issue (roof leaking two water marks after a year), indicating potential variability in long-term outcomes.

- Company and scope: Tri County Enterprises (d.b.a. Tri-County Enterprises), based in Iowa, offers exterior remodeling including roofing, siding, porches, decks, and related options (e.g., Celebright lighting, Comfort Zone under-deck ceiling, windows). The firm is also referenced as having previously operated as DeNeve Construction.

- Positive experiences and practical details:
- Estimating and planning: clients note thorough initial consultations with estimator Tom, who listened to sketches and provided guidance on feasible options (e.g., replacing front siding when necessary due to material availability).
- Scheduling and execution: projects typically progressed from estimate to on-site work with clear timelines; front porch framing and concrete work were completed promptly (Ken, the concrete crew chief, finished in one day).
- Team reliability and process: multiple references credit on-site teams (framing, roofing, siding) for professionalism, coordination, and attention to detail; on-site supervision and regular walkthroughs by project staff (e.g., Bill Renner, Tom Klostermann, Damon) helped ensure alignment with expectations; crews were praised for cleanliness and respect for property, with neighbors commenting on workmanship.
- Specific projects praised: porch and porch conversion, deck and railing installations, siding replacements (including a two-story house completed in two days), and window installations (11 windows completed in two days). Customers also highlighted the quality of lighting systems (Celebright) and related services.
- Customer service and transparency: several reviews emphasize responsive communication, clear pricing, and the willingness of staff to address concerns and make adjustments to meet client expectations (notably Tom, Kevin, Mitch, and Bill Renner).

- Notable negative experience and limitations:
- A prior roofing project performed by DeNeve Construction (now operating as Tri-County) in fall 2020 allegedly caused water intrusion and related damage; in June 2025 the company was contacted about reimbursing repair costs, but responses were delayed and, as of late July 2025, no reimbursement had occurred. A BBB complaint was filed but closed due to scope; the extenuating repairs by a roofer are described in detail, highlighting ongoing accountability and reimbursement concerns.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect a formal estimator visit and a documented plan with options and pricing; project timelines can involve scheduling and weather-related delays but on-site supervision is common.
- Confirm representative availability for questions and site visits during construction; ask for a named contact for frequent updates (e.g., Tom, Bill Renner, Damon).
- Check references for specific project types (porches, siding, decks, windows) and inquire about warranties, post-project support, and past accountability history (especially related to prior DeNeve work).
- If applicable, verify insurance coverage and permit requirements in your area.

- Services provided: roofing, siding, windows and doors installation, and soffit/fascia work; some projects included coordination with insurance claims.
- Customer interaction: described as professional, easy to work with, and patient with homeowners’ parents or elderly family members.
- Outcomes: high-quality workmanship on soffit and fascia; praised as 5-star service; positive appreciation and readiness to engage for future projects (including a potential new roof).
- Process and accessibility: website reported as easy to use, aiding the initiation of roof projects; noted effectiveness in working with insurance companies.

Customer reviews depict Four Star Roofing & Siding as a long-standing contractor for roofing and siding, including siding repair and aluminum trim work. They are described as prompt, professional, and reasonably priced, with warranties on workmanship and shingles and a reputation for good communication and cleanup. The company appears to handle short-notice requests, works with insurance adjusters, and provides reliable service across multiple projects for both residential and commercial properties. Overall, feedback emphasizes high quality, strong customer service, and fair pricing.

Customer feedback for Cedar Rapids Construction & Remodeling (CRC&R) is overwhelmingly positive and emphasizes reliability, professionalism, and good value. Reviewers report that estimates are fair and that the crews arrived on time, worked diligently, finished within or ahead of schedule, and left sites clean. Workers are described as friendly, courteous, respectful, and easy to communicate with, and projects are noted for high quality workmanship and attention to detail. Several customers appreciated proactive, thorough communication from quote to completion and the company's willingness to coordinate with electricians, plumbers, painters, and insurers when needed. The firm handles a wide range of projects, including siding and mobile-home work, decks and porches, doors, attic improvements, and garage renovations, and many clients note the team's flexibility and problem-solving, including making design suggestions and working around backordered materials. Repeat business and strong recommendations are common, with multiple customers stating they would hire CRC&R again or refer others.

Overall, customer feedback for Robison Construction reflects prompt responsiveness, clear communication, and professional, skilled crews across roofing, siding, and related repairs. Clients report thorough initial consultations, detailed estimates, and the ability to adjust scope as needed, with on-site updates throughout the project. Many jobs are completed efficiently—some even in a single day when feasible—while maintaining careful cleanup and attention to quality. Several reviews note assistance with insurance claims and guidance through the process. Pricing is described as fair, with customers appreciative of options presented and the value provided. Repeated comments highlight reliability, trustworthiness, and a high likelihood of re-hiring or recommending Robison to others for roofing, siding, and associated work.

Customer experiences with Window Depot are predominantly positive and focus on practical outcomes for potential customers. Work includes window replacements (including insulated options), siding, gutters and fascia, doors, vinyl decking, and metal railing, with several customers reporting they also purchased windows or related products for DIY projects. The crews are described as on time, efficient, professional, friendly, and thorough in cleanup, leaving minimally disruptive work sites and clean surroundings. The installation process is generally characterized as smooth and well‑communicated, though one project noted a longer-than-expected timeline and less frequent updates. A number of customers highlighted high-quality workmanship, aesthetically pleasing results, and functional benefits such as improved energy efficiency and easy-to-clean panes. Many testimonials mention attentive sales staff and crew members by name and indicate willingness to hire Window Depot again and to recommend the company to others. Pricing is described by some customers as fair or reasonable, with several noting they would reuse the company for future home projects.

- Response and estimates: Customers consistently report rapid responses, on-site estimates, and scheduling within days. The owner, David Garcia, is described as hands-on and prompt in communication; several reviews note timely returns calls and on-time arrivals.

- Work performed: Common projects include roof repairs for storm-related damage and flashing (chimney and window flashing), with occasional siding work required after uncovering issues. Some jobs expand to full roof and/or siding replacements. In at least one instance, a late-service repair required the crew to stay late to complete the siding work.

- Materials and durability: Malarkey Legacy shingles are used in some projects and described as durable. In one case, additional window-flashing repairs were performed without damaging the siding.

- Cleanup and workmanship: Crews are noted for thorough cleanup and careful handling of siding; work is described as high quality and organized.

- Transparency and communication: Reviewers appreciate receiving photos of damage and repairs, and the ability to see exactly what was found and fixed.

- Timing and duration: Many repairs are completed quickly, sometimes in one day, with some projects (like full roof replacements) planned a couple of weeks out and completed in a short timeframe.

- Cost and value: Quotes are described as reasonable or low, with extra repair costs (e.g., about $300 for additional siding work) disclosed upfront or during the project; final pricing often aligns with initial estimates.

- Insurance assistance: At least one reviewer notes help with insurance-related processes and even a reduction in premium after information was provided.

- Overall impression: Multiple customers express high satisfaction and would recommend Garcia Roofing and Exteriors for roofing and siding work.

Overall, the reviews present Serenity Windows and Siding as a largely positive option for siding, windows, and related remodeling, with frequent praise for professionalism, communication, timely completion, and value. Several customers note thorough assessments that uncovered underlying issues, clear explanations of options, and strong final results.

Key practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Timeliness and responsiveness: many projects are scheduled quickly after initial contact, estimates are provided promptly, and some jobs are completed within days to a couple of weeks. Emergency window leaks were addressed within about two days.
- Communication and service: frequent updates, clear explanations of products and options, and staff (notably Jayden) described as patient and knowledgeable. Positive impressions from interactions at home shows and in-person visits, with a documented emphasis on customer care (e.g., handwritten thank-you notes).
- Work quality and outcomes: multiple reports of solid workmanship, clean job sites, and finishes that look like new; projects include siding, windows, soffit, and door transformations. Several reviews mention the ability to tailor color/style to home, improving curb appeal.
- Value and reliability: several customers indicate competitive pricing and value that exceeded expectations, sometimes beating competitors even after uncovering additional issues.
- Community and ongoing relationships: ongoing use for additional projects and recommendations to others; examples include nonprofit work and nonprofit partnerships.

Noted concerns:
- One negative deck project: delays (no-shows for several days), insufficient progress, and final results not meeting expectations; issues with punch-list items, with report of spray-foam filling causing water intrusion, and a stated intention to pursue legal action.
- Another negative experience: employees described as rude by residents; a safety complaint where a cord caused a back injury; expressed intent not to return.

Bottom line for potential customers:
- Serenity appears capable of delivering timely, well-communicated siding and window work with strong value and quality, and positive experiences are common across residential projects and emergencies. However, there are isolated reports of project delays, quality concerns on a deck job, and interpersonal issues, so potential customers may want to verify timelines, scope, and communication expectations in writing and seek references for the specific project type.

Customer feedback on this siding repair business is mixed, with both strong positives and notable criticisms. Key practical takeaways for potential customers include:

- Insurance coordination and cost outcomes: Several customers credit the company with helping navigate insurance claims and saving money on deductibles; one testimonial notes a deal with the insurer after deductible considerations. Projects mentioned include roofing and siding replacements, as well as window, gutter, and door/frame work.

- Project scope and timelines: Work cited ranges from siding-only projects to multi-element renovations (roof, siding, windows, gutters). Timelines vary widely: some crews completed work in a few weeks, while others reported multi-month timelines and delays, particularly after severe weather events.

- Quality of workmanship and finish: Positive notes highlight thorough, high-quality workmanship and good finish results in some cases. Negative reports describe issues such as nails left on site, a rushed roof job, and certain components (e.g., doorbells or wiring) not being completed or properly addressed.

- Communication: Communication experiences are inconsistent. Some customers praised proactive project managers and responsive owner engagement, while others experienced variable or improved communication only later in the process.

- Subcontractor payments and business practices: There are multiple serious allegations regarding nonpayment of subcontractors and ethical concerns about the owner. Some reviewers describe the company as not paying subs and label the owner as unethical or dishonest; others do not mention these issues. Potential customers should verify subcontractor payment practices and request verifications or references.

- Safety and conduct observations: At least one testimonial reports a driver using a cell phone and swerving in traffic, raising safety concerns about company conduct and culture.

- Staffing and project management changes: In weather-related work, initial staff or teams were replaced or let go partway through a project, with some workers staying on to finish the job. This suggests potential volatility in teams assigned to projects.

- Brand and identity notes: Some comments reference Division 7 and BRG (Building Resource Group), implying possible brand changes or related entities. Confirm the exact company name and scope of work when contacting them.

- Overall stance: The collection includes highly positive endorsements for insurance support, project management, and finished work, alongside strong warnings about financial practices and some workmanship/communication shortcomings. Prospective customers should conduct due diligence, request recent references, clarify payment terms with subs, and obtain a detailed written contract and timeline.

Summary of customer experiences with Perfect Pitch Roofing:

- Overall sentiment: Experiences are mixed. Some customers report high satisfaction with workmanship and professionalism, while others describe delays, unfulfilled warranty promises, and poor follow-up.

- Quality of work and scope: Several reviews praise roof repairs, replacements, and related work on gutters, fascia, soffit, and siding as high quality, with attention to detail and effective cleanup. Projects are noted to have been completed promptly in some cases (including same-day or one-day installations) and to have involved coordination with insurance adjusters. A few customers note ongoing concerns (e.g., soft spots or leaks) after installation or partial work that remained unresolved.

- Timeliness and reliability: Positive accounts highlight on-time arrivals and timely completion. Negative accounts cite missed inspections, unreturned calls, and delays, with some customers waiting months or longer for warranty inspections or repairs.

- Communication and customer service: Several customers commend specific staff (e.g., Sherry, Brian, Mitch, Kody, Joe) for good communication, responsiveness, and willingness to explain insurance processes. Others report poor follow-through, rude or condescending interactions with a project manager, and insufficient updates or documentation (e.g., letters to insurers not delivered, unclear pricing).

- Warranty and post-install issues: There are reports of leaks developing under warranty, and some clients claimed that warranty-related inspections or repairs were not completed as promised. A few reviews mention damage (e.g., to gutters) or questions about whether issues were resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

- Insurance and pricing: Several reviews note effective collaboration with insurance claims and transparent discussions about material choices (e.g., storm shingles) and potential impact on claims. Some customers report difficulties with pricing, changes to estimates, or disputes over leftover materials.

- Practical considerations for potential customers:
- Get a clear, written scope of work and warranty terms before starting.
- Request a single point of contact and a written timeline; confirm who will manage claims and communications.
- Verify inclusion of all requested work (roofing, gutters, fascia, soffit, siding, attic ventilation) in the contract.
- Document and track follow-up commitments for inspections, repairs, or warranty work.
- Check references for projects similar to yours and ask how post-install issues were handled.

In short, Perfect Pitch Roofing appears capable of delivering solid roof-related work and helpful guidance on insurance claims, but experiences with follow-up, warranty service, and project management are inconsistent.

Customer experiences with RM Construction Services are consistently positive, focusing on responsiveness, professionalism, and solid workmanship across siding, roofing, and related projects.

- Responsiveness and estimates: many customers report rapid initial contact, same-day or within-hours visits for estimates, and quick follow-up from the owner, Ryan.
- Scheduling and timeliness: projects are described as timely, with crews arriving on schedule and completing work efficiently.
- Work quality and scope: experiences cover roofing replacements, siding installations, gutter work, soffit/fascia, and even concrete or deck projects. Work is described as high-quality, neat, and resulting in aesthetically pleasing results.
- Cleanup and site care: several reviews note thorough cleanup after work and minimal disruption.
- Crew and supervision: Ivan, a crew supervisor, is frequently highlighted for professionalism, patience, clear communication, and ensuring smooth project execution; the overall crew is described as hardworking, friendly, and organized.
- Communication and pricing: customers praise transparent, ongoing communication and fair pricing, with some noting RM’s rates are more reasonable than larger competitors.
- Overall satisfaction: multiple reviewers characterize their experience as excellent (some using 10/10 or five-star language) and express willingness to hire again or recommend RM Construction.
- Local, small-business perception: several reviews emphasize the owner-operator dynamic and personal attention to projects.
- Minor note: one reviewer mentioned not having photos of the completed gutter work, indicating a small gap in documentation for that project.

In summary, potential customers can expect prompt responsiveness, professional crews, clear communication, fair pricing, and dependable workmanship on siding and roofing projects.

The customer reviews for this siding repair business are mixed. Several customers report fast, neat, and high‑quality siding and roof work with good communication from specific staff, while others describe delays, poor updates, and concerns about safety and conduct.

Positive experiences and practical details:
- Siding and related work described as top quality, with thorough cleanup (no nails left, pristine result) and quick service.
- Staff such as Michael V., Dan, Mike, and Matt are repeatedly praised for professionalism, responsiveness, and helpful planning of projects (including prep work for older homes) and follow‑ups to ensure satisfaction.
- Multiple reviews highlight competitive pricing and good value; some projects (including roofing) were completed in a short time frame or even in one day.
- A few customers note smooth processes from initial contact to project completion, including clear scheduling and quick quotes; some mention successful multi‑part work (siding, gutters, doors) with good outcomes.

Negative experiences and practical details:
- A few reviews describe poor communication and scheduling issues, with promises to fix problems not kept (e.g., leaking roof cases where crews did not follow through or provide updates).
- One explicit safety concern: an employee appeared to fall from a ladder and was reportedly intoxicated, described as a negative and unprofessional incident.
- Reports of unprofessional behavior include an unsolicited solicitation from a staffer in a company sweatshirt at a public place.
- One customer felt the company prioritized other jobs over a time‑sensitive leak and did not keep them updated.

Overall impression:
- The company can deliver fast, tidy siding and related work with strong customer service from certain team members, but experiences vary due to communication gaps, scheduling delays, and at least one notable safety/conduct concern. Prospective customers may want to confirm clear timelines, designate a point of contact, and request regular progress updates.

Summary of customer experiences:

- Performance and speed: Several customers praised how quickly work was completed and how cleanly it was finished. One note highlighted completion of house and shed stripping and reshingling in under five hours with all cleanup done.

- Quality and workmanship: Multiple reviews credited good siding work and a high-quality result, with praise for the product and for staff who could offer budget-friendly options and explanations.

- Communication and service: Several customers commended Mitch and, in particular, Ryan Nolen/Nolan for professional, helpful, and ongoing communication and for going above and beyond.

- Overall sentiment: The majority of reviews were highly positive, with statements like “A+,” “5 stars,” and strong recommendations.

- Issues and follow-up: A minority reported problems:
- soffit work caused gaps; an attempt to remold the soffit did not fully repair damage and subsequent repair was required the next day
- residual damage remained visible
- oil from a compressor was left on the driveway, and tar smears appeared on siding and the sidewalk

- Takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect fast project turnaround and thorough site cleanup from several teams.
- You may receive strong product guidance and budget-conscious options, with direct contact and responsive communication from named staff.
- Be aware of potential issues with soffit handling and surface staining/mess; confirm cleanup and any follow-up repair policies before work begins.

- Services performed include window installation, door repairs/customizations (including for mobile homes), siding repair/installation, roof and gutter work, and deck construction; one job involved garage door wrapping.
- Project sizes ranged from single-window or door fixes to full-home roof/gutter projects and storm-damage siding repairs.
- Estimates and pricing: online estimates were provided; on-site quotes were offered; customers described pricing as fair.
- Timeliness and reliability: crews were reported to be on time and to complete work promptly; some jobs were completed in one day.
- Work quality and finish: workmanship described as high quality; patches and repairs were often seamless; doors fit tightly; decking and siding looked good; cleanup was thorough.
- On-site assessment and problem-solving: technicians performed in-person inspections (including on the roof rather than relying on remote data); they resolved issues from prior installations and, when needed, researched compatible materials for nonstandard sizes.
- Communication and customer service: staff, including Devin in several reports, were described as prompt, courteous, and able to explain issues clearly.
- Overall sentiment: many customers would highly recommend the company and indicate they would hire them again.

- Services provided: windows, doors, and siding installations and repairs; several projects involved Pella products; some mentions of energy-efficiency improvements and handling oversized or older home details.

- Overall experience: consistently professional, courteous, and responsive; no-pressure consultations with option-based guidance; pricing described as fair, with at least one testimonial noting a price below other bids.

- Installation quality: high craftsmanship and attention to detail; precise fits with good-looking results; thorough cleanup; crews addressed adjustments promptly (e.g., screen tweaks, casing replacements, weatherproofing, extra insulation).

- Crew and communication: multiple references to specific crews (e.g., Chase, Alex, Charles, Adrian); 3-person teams noted; crews were knowledgeable, polite, and easy to communicate with; willingness to return for future work or follow-up tasks (e.g., re-installing casing with a new order).

- Project logistics: installations completed efficiently and/or quickly, even under challenging conditions (extreme heat, rain); some projects managed tight timelines and included assistance such as moving furniture; in at least one case, crew stayed late to ensure completion.

- Aftercare and reliability: strong emphasis on cleanup and finishing touches; several testimonials highlight dependable, thorough service and a willingness to go above and beyond; customers express willingness to reuse the company for future needs.