Top Siding Repair Services in Peoria

- Several reviews cite competitive pricing and good value from a small business.

- The company handles roofing and siding projects, including hail-damage repairs and new construction (e.g., a brand-new garage).

- Customers report clear, upfront explanations and transparent communication.

- Work is described as quick to complete with high quality and attention to detail; projects look good.

- Site cleanup is consistently noted as thorough after completion.

- The team is described as responsive and helpful, with quick site visits and fair pricing; workers are characterized as kind and considerate.

- Overall, customers express strong willingness to reuse the service and to recommend the company.

- Overall sentiment is mixed: many customers praise the staff, professionalism, and installation, while a few express concerns about durability and warranty terms.

- Staff and sales experience:
- Positive interactions cited with specific team members (examples include Jeff Vogel, Javier Ocon, Stephen Hawkins, Sheldon, Blake Nibble, Cesar Gomez).
- Descriptions include knowledgeable, helpful, patient, and thorough explanations; some quotes mention receiving bios or photos of who would visit, and a “no-pressure” sales approach.
- Several customers noted clear communication about pricing, process, and next steps; deposits were mentioned in the sales process.

- Installation and product quality:
- Windows were described as custom-made after measurements, with installations deemed smooth, professional, and clean; some customers were impressed by the final appearance and quality.
- Positive remarks about timely service and on-site professionalism; some installers were noted for going the extra mile to improve presentation.

- Pricing and value:
- One customer cited a $15,000 price for windows, with frustration expressed about cost and a negative overall impression.
- Other comments mention discussions about getting the best price and overall value, with several customers expressing willingness to proceed with future projects based on current experiences.

- Service responsiveness and warranty:
- Positive reports of rapid service, including next-day visits for repairs and quick issue resolution.
- Warranty terms referenced include installation coverage for one year; at least one customer reported that certain frame issues emerged after about 18 months and were not covered under the warranty period, leading to dissatisfaction.

- Durability and issues:
- A negative experience noted: several windows had bottom-frame gaps or separation within the first 18 months, raising concerns about long-term durability and warranty coverage.

- Loyalty and referrals:
- Several customers indicated they would refer others or use the company again based on their positive service experiences, despite occasional durability/warranty concerns.

The reviews center on SNS Roofing’s roofing replacement and repair services, highlighting fast and professional work completed efficiently (often in one day), strong communication, honesty, and good customer service. Customers frequently mention prompt responsiveness (including after-hours calls), thorough inspections, assistance with insurance coordination, and tidy job sites. There are few if any complaints, and pricing is described as good value. No explicit siding materials or warranties are discussed in the reviews.

Customer experiences with River City Roofing are generally positive and focus on clear communication, professional staff, and timely execution. Reported interactions with Justin Wilson and other team members emphasize responsiveness, transparent explanations of options, and reliability in following through. Crews are typically described as arriving on time, working efficiently, and leaving sites clean, with many projects completed within one to two weeks and some smaller jobs (e.g., mobile homes) completed in about a week. Several reviewers note under-budget results and helpful guidance on insurance-related steps.

Practical details highlighted by customers include free inspections or quotes in some cases, prompt responses after storms, and assistance coordinating with insurers. Some projects included gutters or piping, and a few customers reported rapid, same-day or next-day assessments. There are a couple of negative anecdotes: one reviewer recounted a prior poor experience with a different staff member regarding an insurance estimate, and another described ownership as overcharging or constraining warranty despite praise for specific team members. Overall, potential customers can expect professional communication, structured project management, and solid workmanship, with a note to review invoices carefully given the minority negative experiences.

Prairie State Siding & Windows is a siding, roofing, gutter, fascia, soffit, and window contractor. Reviews consistently describe high-quality workmanship, professional crews, and strong communication, with Josh frequently cited as the main contact. Quotes are provided quickly (often within a day), and projects are completed on a relatively tight timeline (typically 1–2 weeks, sometimes as fast as a few days). Work highlighted includes aluminum siding replacement, fascia, soffits, gutters, and occasional window work. Color options mentioned include Carbon Gray for siding, Heather Blend for shingles, and Royal Brown for gutters/fascia/soffits. Pricing is described as competitive, with financing options mentioned. Overall, customers express high satisfaction and would recommend the company.

The customer reported an initial State Farm denial for hail-damage claims. Storm Recovery Team, including Alex and Davey, helped overturn the denial to secure a full roof replacement. Gutters were covered, and the customer paid only the deductible for all work, resulting in substantial savings. The customer praised Storm Recovery Team for the outcome.

- Overall sentiment: Experiences are largely positive regarding installation quality, efficiency, and customer service, with a few significant exceptions related to delays, fit issues, and communication gaps.
- Positive outcomes noted:
- High-quality, energy-efficient windows with noticeable temperature improvements shortly after installation.
- Professional, courteous crews who kept jobsites tidy, handled non-square openings, and completed installations efficiently and on schedule.
- Strong customer service reputation, with mentions of friendly staff (e.g., Anna), fair pricing, and even charitable donations (Habitat for Humanity).
- Customers planning future purchases and recommending the company based on overall workmanship and service.
- Notable negatives and risk factors:
- Long lead times and installation delays (examples include estimates of 8–12 weeks but actual timelines extending to 23 weeks).
- Fit and manufacturing issues (screens not fitting, large picture window not manufactured correctly, frames breaking or needing replacement).
- Post-install issues and communication gaps (damaged work, multiple measurement attempts, and lack of follow-up or status updates for extended periods).
- At least one customer expressed strong dissatisfaction and would not recommend the company due to ongoing problems and unresolved issues.
- A comment about online shopping processes suggests a preference for in-person/structured information collection.
- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect potential delays; confirm explicit lead times and a written schedule, and request updates on progress.
- Verify measurements and window size compatibility; ask about potential reworks or replacement parts if sizing issues arise.
- Inquire about warranties, post-install service, and a clear point of contact for follow-up or problems.
- Inspect components (windows and screens) at delivery/installation and document any damage or misfits immediately.
- Consider asking about the company’s process for handling errors or damages to avoid extended communication gaps.

- Overall pattern: Mixed experiences. Many customers report high-quality workmanship and fair pricing, while others encounter poor follow-up and communication.

- Services mentioned: gutter installation and re-pitching; window replacement; siding replacement; door installation; deck construction; flashing around doors; general remodeling.

- Positive experiences highlighted:
- Scott Doerr (sales) described as prompt and not pushy; explained the process well.
- Jim (installer) praised for quality work, even on hot days; professional and courteous.
- Several customers note excellent finish, clean sites, and value for money (e.g., windows, siding, and flashing work).
- Sam (office) praised for prompt, organized, and friendly communication.
- Steve Doerr cited for honest and fair estimates; “stands behind the work.”
- Will (flashing) and other crew members praised for skill and attentiveness.
- Multiple reports of long-term customer relationships and willingness to go beyond expectations.

-Negative experiences and concerns:
- One customer reported gutters not draining properly and being ghosted after promises to re-pitch before freezing temps; no call or show after multiple follow-ups.
- Some references to rude staff or being hung up on; inconsistent phone/communication experiences.
- Quotes and insurance-related requests: multiple follow-ups without itemized quotes; delays or lack of response to insurance inquiries.
- A consult was canceled by the owner with poor or no subsequent follow-up.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- If you value workmanship and price, Doerr has several positive references for gutters, windows, siding, and decks.
- Clarify communication expectations up front: follow-up timelines, quotes, and itemized pricing, especially for insurance claims.
- Verify scope and guarantees: confirm post-install support and whether issues will be remediated promptly.
- Consider requesting references from both sales and installation staff to assess consistency.

Customer reviews cover Messing Roofing (primarily roof replacements) and related services; reports consistently praise workmanship, efficiency, on-site foremen, and thorough cleanup, with several customers noting strong communication from staff like Jeff Sacco. However, there are notable complaints about response time and follow-up, including delays or missed callbacks and a dispute over add-on work and estimates. No siding materials, warranties, or explicit siding repair details are mentioned in the reviews.

The company handles roofing, gutters, and siding repairs/remodels, with frequent emphasis on coordinating with insurance providers. Reviews describe prompt, professional crews, thorough cleanups, and quick project completion (often within a day). Customers cite friendly, responsive service from Amanda and Jose, and highlight assistance with insurance claims and ensuring proper siding matches when materials are hard to source. Pricing is generally noted as competitive or good value. Warranties or guarantees are not specified in the reviews.

- Scope and expertise: Practical experience with roofing and related work, including old or complex projects (e.g., 106-year-old slate roofs, dormers, skylights) and siding; capable of repairs, full replacements, and insurance claim support.

- Scheduling and timelines: Quick scheduling for roof replacements; projects completed efficiently and, in many cases, faster than expected.

- Work quality: Consistently described as high quality and craftsmanship; teams are professional, thorough, and capable of solving unique roofing problems; work is described as reliable and done right.

- Cleanliness and site care: Regular, thorough cleanup with daily debris removal; crews often perform additional checks to ensure the yard is clear after work.

- Communication: Responsive and easy to communicate with; updates provided (including photos for remote clients) to ease concerns during the project.

- Insurance claims: Assistance with navigating and securing insurance claims when damage is involved.

- Pricing and value: Described as fair or great value, with emphasis on quality relative to price.

- Client experience and trust: Family-owned, long-standing business with repeat clients and strong recommendations; staff described as friendly, respectful, and appreciative of clients.

- Project scope and outcomes: Reviews reference siding replacement for residential and commercial properties, with additional work including 34 windows repaired and a deck/fence/retaining wall project. Three commercial buildings were resided, and several homes received window and related upgrades.

- Timeliness and scheduling: Experiences varied widely. Some projects started slowly and several reviews note delays beyond initial estimates (for example, a contract promising 4–6 weeks finished after about 13 weeks). Pandemic-related material delays were mentioned in at least one case. In other instances, work proceeded efficiently.

- Quality and workmanship: Many customers praised the craftsmanship, particularly Ryan, noting high-quality work and professionalism. Windows and deck work were described as resulting in excellent or greatly improved appearances. A patio door installation issue was encountered in one project but ultimately repaired successfully.

- Staffing and conduct: Reports range from highly positive to negative. Positive notes highlight courteous, professional, and accommodating crews and a project manager who explained processes. Negative notes describe inconsistent attendance, a crew member engaging in inappropriate behavior on site, and a sales experience perceived as pushy.

- Customer service and warranty: Several reviews commend responsive customer service and a willingness to stand behind warranties, including honoring fixes for windows when the original manufacturer went out of business due to Covid. Some feedback criticized front-desk support and complaint handling.

- Overall sentiment and practical considerations: The experiences indicate potential for high-quality results and strong customer service, especially when Ryan or similar professionals are involved, but also highlight risks related to scheduling reliability, crew consistency, and on-site conduct. Potential customers should expect variable timelines, verify warranty coverage specifics, and confirm communication expectations upfront.

Customer reviews portray KNZ Construction as a responsive, professional roofing and siding contractor notable for quick turnaround (often 1–2 days), thorough cleanup, and clear communication. Work mentioned includes roof replacements, gutter work, and storm-related siding repairs. Reviewers frequently cite competitive pricing, value for money, and dependable service, with many noting the team’s politeness and tidiness. A workmanship guarantee is referenced, and response times are typically within a day of contact. Maintenance-related guidance is occasionally provided, particularly regarding gutter drainage considerations.

- Positive experiences frequently cited: quick completion of roof and siding projects; clear, responsive communication; thorough answers to questions; clean job sites after work; and ease coordinating with an insurance company. Several customers noted good or fair pricing and were happy with the appearance of siding and roofing, including color selections. One customer mentioned a deck rebuild as part of the exterior work.
- Additional positives: one reviewer reported the company completed work in no time and that the colors chosen looked great.
- Negative experience: one reviewer stated the owner was extremely rude and that they would not do business with the company.

- Overall, customer experiences are mixed. Many reviews cite high-quality workmanship, professionalism, timely completion, thorough clean-up, and good results on windows, siding, roofs, and even a 3-season room addition. The owner, Tom Magnusson, and his crew are frequently praised for their effort, reliability, and neatness, with several customers noting they would hire again and that pricing was fair.

- Positive specifics include: matching existing siding well, completing multiple windows in a short time, strong roofing work, excellent final appearance, and good coordination with insurance companies.

- Notable concerns include: long periods with no communication or updates (noted in September and again in spring), difficulties with contract clarity for remaining windows, and a report of rude handling when discussing a contract.

- Warranty and installation issues appear in a few reviews: a glass replacement that leaked and was blamed on others, and a roof job installed in temperatures below manufacturer guidelines, with claims of compromised quality and warranty implications; another note mentions a third-party product (Gutter Helmut) affecting warranties.

- Practical considerations for potential customers: verify the exact scope of work and contract terms in writing, establish a clear communication plan and project timeline, confirm adherence to manufacturer installation guidelines (especially regarding temperature and materials), and review warranty coverage and any third-party product implications before starting work.

- Overall impression: broadly positive, with many customers highly recommending Blue Line Roofing & Exteriors and noting they would use them again for future projects.

- Pricing and estimates: customers describe estimates as fair and competitive, with several highlighting straightforward, easy-to-understand quotes and good value for quality materials.

- Scheduling and speed: frequent mentions of quick response times, same-day or next-day scheduling, and efficient project turnaround (including one-day roof or exterior projects in some cases).

- Service quality and workmanship: reports of high-quality workmanship, attractive finished results (roofs, decks, fences, gutters, fascia, etc.), and attention to detail.

- On-site conduct and professionalism: crews described as friendly, respectful, punctual, and careful not to damage surrounding areas; strong emphasis on thorough cleanup and leaving sites tidy.

- Communication and coordination: consistent, clear communication from initial contact through completion; updates on arrival times and progress; easy scheduling and responsive staff.

- Scope of work and materials: experience across a range of exterior projects including roofing, gutters, fascia, soffit, leaks, deck builds, and fencing; ability to source materials and offer color/style options.

- Problem-solving and reliability: quick identification and remediation of issues (e.g., leak-related concerns, unexpected damage); reliable follow-through and customer-focused service.

- Customer experience notes: several reviews describe the process as stress-free or painless, with customers feeling well-informed and supported throughout.

Overall, customer experiences with Roof Tiger show a generally positive pattern for roofing, siding, and gutter work, with a few exceptions. Common themes include clear communication from sales and office staff (notably Mike and Nick), involvement from the owner on estimates, and reassurance through the insurance process. Many jobs are completed quickly—roof replacements are frequently described as finished in a single day—and installers are characterized as professional, careful around landscaping, and thorough in cleanup (tarps used, magnets to capture nails). Several reviewers mention reasonable pricing and peace of mind from hiring a trusted local company.

Some customers highlight the breadth of services, including complete home replacements of roofs, gutters, downspouts, gutter guards, fascia, and siding, and the ability to coordinate with insurance and scheduling. Positive outcomes include leak fixes, strong, aesthetically pleasing results, and minimal debris left behind. A minority report negative experiences, such as a long delay in follow-up after an estimate, and concerns about tidiness or nails left on the property; in one case, the founder personally apologized and offered a gesture of goodwill. Overall, most reviewers would recommend Roof Tiger for roofing and related work.

Customer feedback for Peoria Siding & Window is largely positive but mixed in parts. Many customers praise the sales team, especially Craig Beaty, for responsiveness, product knowledge, clear communication, and on-site quotes or fast estimates; they appreciate seeing prior project photos and having options discussed, including DIY choices. Projects mentioned include siding replacement (notably vinyl with woodpecker finish), window replacements, a front door with sidelights, decks, screened-in porches, a front porch, pergola, and even roof work, with several noting professional crews, on-time performance, and quality workmanship. Benefits highlighted include energy savings from added insulation and the ability to obtain rebates, along with additional perks like gutter cleaning during roof work. Positive reviews frequently cite specific staff (Dan, Clint, Angie, Jason, Joe Smith) and report smooth coordination and helpful project guidance.

However, there are notable drawbacks in the record. At least one customer reported poor follow-up and unresolved installer issues two months after installation, with front-desk staff described as rude. Other feedback mentions difficulties getting return calls, delays in scheduling, and frustration when deposits or payments did not yield timely service. Overall, the business appears capable of delivering installations and guidance with skilled crews and strong sales support, but potential customers should verify follow-up reliability and scheduling commitments after deposits or installations.

- Work scope and outcomes: The firm handles roofing, siding, fascia, gutters, doors, patios, and interior work (e.g., plaster repair, bathroom remodeling, garage improvements). Several customers report durable, high-quality results and noticeable improvements to their homes (e.g., added attic space, neater garages, new roof and siding).

- Craftsmanship and crews: Multiple customers credit specific team members for good workmanship and professionalism (e.g., Todd and Tony; Richard Crowe; Travis Sutton; Moe and Isaac; Steve; Kyle F; Dan; Austin; Fred Blanchard; Jammie). Cleanliness and careful attention to property during work are frequently noted, along with courteous interactions.

- Communication and project management: A common positive theme is timely updates and responsiveness in many projects. However, there are repeated irritants about communication gaps, unreturned calls, and delays in scheduling or completing work. In one case, a customer waited about 15 months for roof/finish work and felt bids were unresponsive or misaligned with expectations.

- Pricing and bids: Some experiences describe fair pricing with no surprises, while others report overpriced estimates or bids that did not reflect discussed scope, leading to frustration or distrust.

- Overall sentiment: Experiences are mixed but lean toward favorable outcomes when crews perform well and communication is strong. Dissatisfaction tends to center on delays, inconsistent communication, and concerns about bid/value in certain instances. Many customers would consider using the company again or recommend specific crews, depending on the project and team involved.

- Services cited: roof replacement after storm damage; gutters and gutter guards; siding; in some cases interior work and decking/doors were included.

- Insurance support: repeatedly described as handling or navigating insurance processes, addressing denials, and coordinating with insurers to secure coverage; several reviews note relief from dealing with the insurer and ensuring the work was approved.

- Response and communication: multiple customers praised prompt response (including rapid on-site assessment for leaks) and consistent, clear communication throughout the project.

- Quality and professionalism: high marks for workmanship, attention to detail, and professionalism; yards cleaned up after work; projects described as durable and well executed.

- Timelines and process length: experiences vary—some projects moved quickly (estimate to installation in about two weeks), while others extended over many months due to insurance approvals or disputes, with a notably long example of about a year in one case.

- Staff references: frequent mentions of Miguel, Rafael, and Allie as helpful, knowledgeable, and responsive.

- Pricing and value: generally described as reasonable; some customers attributed successful outcomes to good value and thorough work.

- Potential concerns: at least one customer reported a no-show for an inspection and advised others to verify scheduling; overall sentiment is positive but a negative experience was noted.