Top Siding Repair Services in North Las Vegas

- The customer requested a skylight quote from Next Level Exteriors (a siding repair business).
- The call was handled by an answering service that did not answer; the operator confirmed the number was correct.
- The operator collected the customer’s name, address, phone number, and email before transferring the call.
- The call was transferred to a line that simply rang with no option to leave a voicemail.
- The customer then began receiving promotional text messages with no opt-out option.
- The customer described the experience as potentially scam-like.

roofing_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

Desert Valley Roofing is consistently described as punctual, professional, and responsive, with strong emphasis on clear communication and honesty throughout the process.

- Scheduling and responsiveness: multiple reviewers note on-time arrivals, quick responses to calls or emails, and willingness to adjust scheduling to accelerate service.
- Communication and transparency: customers appreciate thorough explanations, progress updates, and the use of photos to show problem areas and completed work; some quotes include ranges to help budgeting.
- Estimation and pricing: reviewers often compare multiple bids and report that Desert Valley Roofing offered fair pricing, sometimes the best quote; several note that the company provides transparent options (e.g., whether wood replacement is needed) and avoids surprises.
- Work quality and efficiency: crews are described as fast, careful, and tidy, with examples of work completed in a couple of hours or finished promptly; tile-roof projects covering underlayment, flashing, edging, and valleys are specifically mentioned.
- Coordination and aftercare: several reviews highlight coordination with other trades (AC disconnects, solar re-installations) and quick resolution of issues found after installation; the company is praised for disposing of unused materials and minimizing disruption to daily life.
- Trust and professionalism: reviewers repeatedly call out honesty and reliability, including instances where they were advised against unnecessary repairs or informed of more cost-effective options; there are strong endorsements and recommendations to friends and clients.
- Value and outcomes: while not always the cheapest option, many customers feel they received good value and high-quality results, with durable roofs that meet or exceed expectations.
- Notable strengths highlighted: consistent contact persons (notably Ashley and Ari), prompt estimate delivery, photo documentation, thorough explanation of processes, and post-project follow-up.

Overall, potential customers are likely to encounter a responsive, transparent roofing contractor with a focus on quality workmanship, careful project management, and supportive customer service.

- Overall impression: Highly positive; customers describe Preferred Roofing as efficient, understanding, and punctual.

- Responsiveness and communication: Quick responses and timely communication.

- Service details: Addressed a roof issue that could have incurred HOA fees; completed work that another company claimed to have started but did not finish.

- Worksite practices: Noted for thorough cleanup before starting; ensured the area was clear of nails and sharp objects; took care to protect pets (dogs) at home.

- Quality of work: Final result described as amazing; workmanship met or exceeded expectations.

- Staff demeanor: Described as dedicated and humble.

Overall, customers report consistent reliability and quality from Antonio Garcia (Building Plus LLC). Common themes include punctuality for both estimates and work, clear communication, and fair or competitive pricing. He is described as capable across a broad range of tasks—drywall repair and ceiling work, painting, siding and fence repairs, and various installations such as chandeliers, toilets, ceiling fans, water filters, and other home systems. Job sites are consistently noted as clean, with finishes that blend well with existing surfaces. Several reviews mention returning after initial visits, working around scheduling needs, and providing explanations and reasonable quotes. Many customers say they would hire him again and would recommend his services to others.

These reviews discuss Window World’s window replacement and door services rather than siding repairs. They show generally positive experiences with sales staff, installers, and setup, highlighting timely communication, professional installation, and energy-efficient results. A few reviews mention higher perceived prices or rude behavior from some staff, and one notes overpricing relative to quality. Warranties commonly cited include a lifetime warranty and industry-leading guarantees backed by national and local franchises.

- Overall, reviews are mixed. Several customers praised quick response and efficient service, describing the company as professional and capable in roofing-related work.
- Positive notes highlight rapid issue resolution, good communication, and thorough handling of roof needs; specific staff members named as helpful include senior supervisor Mike and foreman Dusty.
- Location mentioned in at least one review is Nevada, with a commenter noting experience as a general contractor there.
- A few reviewers described the company as fast, “in, out” quickly, and efficient in completing tasks.
- On the negative side, one customer labeled them “ripoff artists” and “the worst people in the industry.”
- The feedback largely references roofing work rather than siding repair, so potential customers seeking siding services should verify the scope of work and warranties before hiring.

The reviews about Cooper Roofing Company (and Cooper Roofing and Solar) describe mostly positive experiences focused on roofing and related services. Customers highlight reliable, on-time service and completion of work, accurate quotes, and thorough inspections. The crews are frequently praised for professionalism, efficiency, tidiness, and careful clean-up, with properties often left spotless. Communication is a common strength, including prompt scheduling and responsive office staff (notably Lori and Brittany) and crews (e.g., Sal, Christian), with the use of before-and-after photos cited in some cases. The company is viewed as trustworthy, offering fair or competitive pricing and, in some instances, discounts for return customers. Work examples include leak repairs and roof replacements, as well as projects for new builds and remodels, with many customers expressing high satisfaction and willingness to recommend the business. A minority note a negative experience where an electrical panel work was left incomplete and callbacks were not received.

Reviews focus mainly on windows and roofing projects rather than siding repairs. Customers frequently praise sales representatives and installers, report efficient installations, and describe product quality as high. There are some negative notes about poor communication and follow-through from at least one contractor. Pricing is mentioned as affordable in some cases, but there is no discussion of siding materials or warranties. No maintenance tips are provided in the reviews.

A collection of reviews for Tarnation Roofing focusing on roofing installation and repair. Customers generally report high-quality workmanship, professional and courteous service, and reasonably priced work. Appointments are described as scheduled quickly with clear, prompt communication, and several reviews highlight effective leak repair and weatherproofing. No warranties are mentioned in the reviews, and there are no notable complaints; maintenance tips are not provided. Note: the reviews pertain to roofing, not siding repairs.

The customer sought a free siding estimate after wind damage and submitted multiple bids to their insurer. Frank Hine provided the estimate and reportedly stayed in touch, trying to maximize the insurance payout to reduce out-of-pocket costs. After deciding not to hire him, the customer told Frank they appreciated his efforts and would send a gift; Frank asked for his address and claimed he wanted $500–$1,000 for his time. The customer says Frank then demanded $500 for his time via electronic wire, implying consequences if not paid. The customer felt pressured and not committed, and they do not recommend hiring Frank Hine.

Reviews describe D&L Roofing as a professional, courteous, and capable roofing contractor known for thorough repairs, quick turnaround on some jobs, and good value. Several customers highlight rapid service (including roofing reroof in one day) and material matching to original shingles. Positive mentions focus on clear communication from project leads, efficient teams, and staying on budget. A few notes point to occasional communication delays and scheduling backlogs during high-demand periods or after severe storms.

- Overall, reviews are mixed. Some customers praise courteous reception, helpful staff, and long-standing professionalism in commercial projects; others report delays, miscommunication, and quality concerns.

- Scheduling and communication:
- Repeated delays and promises of “tomorrow” without resolution.
- Canceled appointments or no-shows (e.g., one case where an inspection was attempted but no estimate followed).
- Inconsistent information about estimates (reports that estimates are only written on certain days and that follow-up was not conducted).

- Work quality and results:
- Several accounts of ongoing leaks or recurring issues after repairs, with multiple repair attempts.
- Some positive notes on completed work (e.g., standing seam roof projects) but others indicate that fixes were temporary or ineffective.

- Professionalism and interaction:
- Positive mentions of Toni (GM) and cordial reception in certain instances.
- Other accounts describe rude staff or unprofessional behavior.
- One controversial note alleging aggressive collection practices (lien threat) after work was performed.

- Practical considerations for potential customers:
- Be aware of potential delays in completing projects and in obtaining written estimates.
- Expect possible communication gaps and follow-ups to confirm schedules and pricing.
- Consider seeking multiple quotes or referencing recent project timelines and guarantees, given reports of recurring issues after repairs in some cases.

- Overall: Customer experiences are mixed. Several customers praised politeness, professionalism, timely installations, and strong follow-up, while others reported scheduling failures, communication problems, and quality or reliability concerns.

- Positive experiences highlighted:
- Polite, professional initial calls and estimates; good listening to customer needs.
- Seamless or efficient installations for rain gutters and patio covers; on-time crews.
- Installers who communicated well and were described as courteous and skilled.
- Willingness to address post-install issues (e.g., relocating a downspout, adding an elbow) and commitments to follow through when problems were raised.
- Some projects (e.g., tearing down old structures and installing new patio covers) described as adding value and resulting in ongoing customer referrals.

- Notable concerns and negative experiences:
- Rude or unhelpful interactions during phone conversations; some claims of being hung up or dismissed.
- Missed appointments or failure to show up for scheduled estimator/site visits; several mentions of poor scheduling and lack of communication.
- Reports of leaks or improper installation on patio covers, with customers citing inconsistent explanations (e.g., weather-related excuses) and unfinished fixes.
- Complaints about inconsistent or unprofessional job-site conduct (loud music, disputes between installers, hostile language).
- At least one strong accusation of scam behavior from a reviewer, plus claims that comments or complaints were deleted.
- A note that a military discount advertised on the website was not offered in one case.
- Some reviewers questioned reliability for larger or ongoing projects, citing communication gaps and scheduling unreliability.

- Practical details for potential customers:
- Services offered include rain gutters, patio covers, carports, and related shade structures, with some projects requiring coordination between gutter work and patio installation.
- Warranty and post-install service are mentioned in some reviews (e.g., lifetime warranty on a patio cover) but not consistently confirmed across all projects.
- Verify who will be on-site, confirm start/end times, and request a single point of contact to avoid scheduling confusion.
- After installation, inspect for alignment, leaks, downspout placement, and any adjustments; request prompt follow-up if issues are observed.
- Be aware of potential scheduling or communication gaps; consider confirming appointments in writing and documenting agreed timelines and price quotes.

- Overall, customer feedback is predominantly positive, with many 5-star experiences praising professionalism, communication, and workmanship.
- Common strengths cited: prompt responses and clear estimates, detailed explanations and timelines, on-time or punctual crews, careful handling of complex tasks (including removal and reinstallation of solar panels), thorough site cleanup, and transparent progress updates (often with photos).
- Work performed typically included roof repairs and replacements, fixing leaks and worn areas, and, in several cases, torch-down roofing; projects often involved removing solar panels, protecting them during work, and reinstalling them afterward.
- Quality outcomes are repeatedly described as high: repairs are described as flawless, roofs look good, and solar panels remain fully functional after reinstallation.
- Customer service notes highlight friendly and knowledgeable staff, with Misty and Chere singled out for communication, and various crew members (e.g., Caesar, Joseph) delivering solid work.
- Pricing is generally perceived as competitive or fair, with at least one reviewer calling it the best price they received.
- The company is described as family-owned, with owner involvement and willingness to coordinate with homeowners’ warranties; management and office staff are noted for keeping customers informed.
- Notable drawbacks include occasional scheduling or communication hiccups (e.g., delays or miscommunication about arrival times and driveway requirements) and at least one report of a mess left in the yard and a later concern about parts’ appearance after several months.
- Overall recommendations are strong, with many customers expressing willingness to reuse Fortitude Roofing and to refer others for roof repair or replacement work, including complex tasks involving solar panels.

- The company (often referred to as H&M/H&M Unlimited) provides drywall and finish work, insulation replacement, painting, and related repairs, frequently tied to water damage, plumbing reroutes/replacements, and occasional flooring or door/window work. Reports cover a range of projects, including full room remodels, ceiling repairs, baseboards, and closet/pantry repairs, sometimes in conjunction with other contractors.

- Overall sentiment is mixed. Some customers praised the team for thorough, high-quality drywall finishing, clean job sites, on-time arrivals, good communication, and responsive staff. Several reviews specifically highlighted individual team members (e.g., Bobby, Manny, Herbert, Carlos, Antonio, Andy, Umberto) for professionalism and customer care, with several customers expressing willingness to hire again.

- On the negative side, several reviews described inconsistent communication and scheduling, chaotic workflows, and incomplete or poorly coordinated work. Specific issues included missing internal components (e.g., a ceiling light fixture), overspray and mess left on walls/floors, and instances where insulation or finishing work appeared not to have been completed or properly documented. One review cited a bid practice that charged a larger painting area than was actually damaged, indicating concerns about pricing methods. Another case involved insulation not being replaced, contributing to future cooling concerns.

- Some jobs were completed quickly and to the customer’s satisfaction, while others extended over a long period or required follow-up by additional contractors to finish the work. In several instances, customers noted that subsequent inspections by other trades found gaps or issues not initially addressed by the team.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Obtain a detailed, written scope of work with itemized pricing and ensure all tasks (e.g., insulation replacement, fixture replacements) are clearly included.
- Expect and request clear communication protocols and a single point of contact to manage updates and scheduling.
- Verify that all components and finishes are completed and cleaned up, and confirm post-work touch-ups or corrections are included.
- Check references for projects similar in scope (e.g., drywall and insulation repair after water damage) to gauge consistency across jobs.

- Terra Mia Construction offers a range of residential remodeling and exterior services, including bathroom and kitchen remodels, siding replacement and painting, fireplace removal, landscaping, and LED mirror installations. Several reviews note experience with HOA emergencies and multi-trade coordination.

- Positive experiences frequently highlight strong project management and communication (notably project managers Roy and Lola) and on-site supervision, with teams arriving on time, keeping work areas clean, and completing work ahead of or on schedule. Customers often praise clear, inclusive quotes and a seamless, stress-free process, with notes of courteous staff and high-quality workmanship.

- Specific projects mentioned positively include complete bathroom remodels, kitchen remodels, siding and paint refresh for older homes, fireplace removal, and LED mirror installations. Several reviewers say they would hire Terra Mia again or recommend them to others.

- Several reviews mention practical outcomes such as timely updates, transparent scheduling, and proactive problem-solving, with examples like quick responses to emergencies and regular on-site checks.

- Some negative experiences and concerns are also present:
- One customer reported a plumbing issue (hot water) after a renovation and criticized the use of a third-party plumber (Preferred Plumbing), along with a lack of response regarding grout concerns, and indicated filing complaints with the BBB and NV Contractors Board.
- Another extensive, highly negative review described a wide range of issues (shoddy workmanship, safety hazards, delayed completion, and several specific defects) and alleged dishonesty, advising others to avoid hiring them.
- A reviewer raised concerns about licensing and advertising practices, noting a missing contractor license number in print ads and citing sanctions related to the owner’s other license; some reviewers recommend verifying licenses with the Nevada State Contractors Board.
- A few reviews mention rude treatment or uneven customer service.

- Practical tips for potential customers: verify Terra Mia’s current contractor license status with the Nevada State Contractors Board, confirm who will perform plumbing work and ensure proper licensing of any subcontractors, request a detailed written scope and timeline, and review multiple references across different project types to gauge consistency.

- Overall, reviews are mixed but skew positive for project management, reliability, and workmanship, with notable warnings about licensing transparency and potential issues when third-party subcontractors are involved.

Overall, customer experiences with Discount Roofing are largely positive, with recurring praise for pricing, responsiveness, workmanship, and ease of doing business. Highlights and practical details for potential customers include:

- Pricing: described as very affordable and fair; several customers noted prices were lower than competing bids or other quotes. A few mentions of extra costs for work not initially quoted.
- Responsiveness and communication: across reviews, customers commend quick responses, helpful guidance, and proactive coordination (including remote assistance and HOA approvals).
- Scheduling and turnaround: experiences vary; some jobs were completed quickly (even in one day or within two weeks), while others reported longer wait times (up to around six weeks). Some projects were done on time and efficiently; a few notes about scheduling gaps or early start times.
- Work quality and reliability: repeatedly described as high quality with skilled workmanship; many customers say the team stands behind their work, delivers craftsmanship, and leaves the property clean with no nails left behind.
- Service scope and capabilities: users report reroofing, shingle repairs, and tile roof repairs; some installations involved architectural shingles and color selection; several references to assisting with HOA approvals and remote coordination.
- Customer experience: reviewers frequently highlight friendly, courteous staff and easy collaboration; several mention notable relationships with Christa and other company leadership.
- Payment and terms: one recurring caveat is a 4% credit card processing fee or the need to mail a check; ACH payments are not available per some reviews.
- Potential drawbacks: occasional negative notes include an early start time for crews and a perception that a portion of the rear roof was not quoted upfront, leading to additional costs.

In summary, customers generally view Discount Roofing as affordable, responsive, and skilled, with strong emphasis on communication, project coordination, and clean, well-executed results, while advising diligence around scope and payment terms.

Overall, customer experiences are mixed. Some clients report excellent workmanship and professionalism, with testimonials noting a high-quality finish, attention to detail, friendly service, and satisfaction with siding and fascia projects (including aluminum/metal fascia and steel siding). Positive remarks frequently mention trust in the team (including a reference to Keith), and willingness to recommend the company.

However, several concerns recur. A number of potential customers have experienced difficulty contacting the company (multiple unanswered calls and website inquiries). Some reviews indicate the service area listed (Clark County) does not align with where work was performed (e.g., Mount Charleston). There are privacy concerns about the company sharing or selling contact information without consent. One comment describes a negative interaction, and another states a negative sentiment about treating the relationship as a business rather than a personal service.

Practical takeaways for potential customers: verify current service areas and availability, clarify expected response times, inquire about data/privacy practices, and review portfolios or references for siding and fascia options (including aluminum/metal fascia and steel siding) before proceeding.