Top Siding Repair Services in Las Vegas

Reviews for this siding repair company are mixed. Positive notes include quick response and fixes, professional handling, and praise for specific staff (senior supervisor Mike and foreman Dusty), with a Nevada-based general contractor calling them amazing and fast to fix issues. One reviewer described the company as “fast in, fast out.” Negative feedback labels them as “ripoff artists” and “the worst people in the industry.” Some comments refer to roofing work rather than siding repairs, so potential customers should verify the exact scope of services, request written estimates, and consider checking references.

One customer review describes difficulty contacting Next Level Exteriors for a skylight quote. The caller encountered an unresponsive answering service, a transfer to a line that rang without voicemail, and unwanted promotional texts. The reviewer characterized the experience as suspicious of a scam. No details about siding materials, repair quality, pricing, warranties, or maintenance guidance are provided.

- Overall, reviews are largely positive for Window World’s window and door installations, with several customers noting improvements in comfort and appearance after installation. A number of reports cite energy benefits such as reduced heat in the home.

- Sales process and staffing: Multiple customers describe sales staff as honest, upfront, and responsive, with names like Kevin, Jeff, and Arthur appearing repeatedly as helpful and thorough. Quotes are often described as fair or competitive.

- Installation and workmanship: Install crews (examples include Scotty, Armando, Juan, Israel, Oscar, Dallas, Nalu, Hayze, Abraham, Blake, Joe) are frequently described as punctual, professional, courteous, and careful, with attention to detail and good cleanup. Several reviews mention installations going smoothly, on time, and some instances of crew going beyond the original scope to fix issues.

- Product options and outcomes: Customers report a range of products installed (windows, 60x80 patio doors, French doors with blinds between glass) and some customization (interior/exterior colors, frame modifications). Several reviews note high-quality aesthetics (e.g., “picture frame” look) and energy efficiency improvements.

- Pricing and guarantees: Many describe pricing as competitive or fair, with some noting strong value (including a lifetime warranty). A few reviews mention favorable refunds or partial compensation when adjustments or changes were needed.

- Negative/critical feedback: A minority express dissatisfaction with price or perceived quality of materials, and one review notes rude behavior from the owner. Another reviewer questioned the need for the quoted price for certain work.

- Notable logistics: In some cases, customers reference timely delivery of products and occasional issues (e.g., a damaged window arriving) that were addressed quickly with replacements. One review describes a larger project (25 windows and a sliding door) completed over a few weeks.

- Fortitude Roofing in Las Vegas, NV provides roof repair, replacement, and complex tasks such as solar panel removal and reinstallation (including torch-down roofs).
- Customers consistently mention prompt responses, clear estimates and timelines, transparent communication, and a helpful, professional staff (notably Misty, Chere, and Caesar).
- Work quality is repeatedly praised: thorough roof assessments, use of high-quality materials, careful handling of solar panels, precise repairs, and clean, well-organized job sites with panels reinstalled correctly.
- Pricing is described as competitive or best in some reviews, with several customers expressing strong satisfaction with value.
- Scheduling and reliability are generally positive, with on-time or early arrivals reported, but a few reviews note hiccups such as delays due to external factors (e.g., vehicle accident), driveway coordination issues, late start times, or slower post-project responses.
- Some customers encountered occasional communication gaps (especially around questions after project completion) and one instance of post-work discoloration of replaced parts after several months.
- Several reviews highlight a family-owned approach and active involvement by the owner, contributing to perceived reliability and accountability.
- Overall, the majority of feedback is highly positive, with multiple five-star ratings and strong recommendations for roofing and solar-related services.

Customer experiences portray Antonio Garcia of Building Plus LLC as consistently punctual, professional, and communicative. Reviews highlight fair and competitive pricing, clear upfront estimates, and reliable delivery—often with early arrivals, same-day or next-day follow-through, and thorough cleanup. Work quality is frequently described as excellent or flawless, with finishes that blend seamlessly into existing walls or ceilings and no visible signs of repair after completion.

Practical scope cited includes drywall and ceiling repairs (including post-water-damage work), drywall patching, stucco patching, painting, wood siding repair, fence repair, and a range of installations (ceiling fans, chandeliers, toilet, water filter). Many clients say they would hire him again and would recommend him; some note referrals or prior positive experiences with him in different locations. Overall, customers report reliable service, broad handyman capabilities, and good value for the price.

The feedback on DaBella’s window and roofing services is mixed. Many customers report high satisfaction with product quality (notably energy-efficient windows with features like a blue tint) and with sales staff who are described as professional, knowledgeable, and responsive. Installations are often described as efficient, with installers who are courteous and thorough, and some customers highlight positive, attentive post-install follow-up from reps.

However, there are significant negative experiences noted as well. A subset of customers encountered poor communication and delays after deposits, with little or no details about start dates or project status. There are also mentions of customers feeling rushed or pressured by certain representatives. A few reviews describe outright dissatisfaction or frustration with the company’s responsiveness after contract signing.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Product quality and energy-efficient options are frequently cited positively, with particular praise for windows and roofing systems.
- Positive experiences often center on specific, named reps (e.g., Brandan, LaDamien, Torrence, Koa, Isabella, Brian) who provided clear explanations and responsive service.
- Expect variability in communications: some customers received timely updates and follow-through, while others report being left without updates after deposits.
- Clarify project timelines, start dates, and post-sale communication in writing before committing; consider asking for a named point of contact for the project.
- If possible, review references for the specific team or salesman you’ll be working with to gauge consistency of service.

The experiences reported for H&M Construction/H&M Unlimited and associated crews are mixed, covering drywall, painting, insulation, flooring, and plumbing-related repairs, with several positive and negative themes.

Pros and positives
- Several customers praised clear communication, responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable staff (e.g., Bobby, Manny, Herbert, Carlos, Antonio, Andy).
- When projects went smoothly, work was described as high quality, finished promptly, and the sites were cleaned up well.
- Specific repairs (drywall/taping/painting, baseboards, flooring, and patching after water damage or repipes) were often completed to a high standard, with several customers noting that the repairs looked like there had never been damage.

Cons and concerns
- Communication and scheduling problems occurred in multiple cases, leading to chaotic or unclear timelines.
- Several issues involved the scope and thoroughness of work: insulation not replaced in the attic, unfinished or sloppy finish work (e.g., kitchen trim/baseboards), and overspray or mess left behind.
- Some customers experienced missing items (e.g., a light fixture component not replaced) and recommendations to purchase replacements elsewhere.
- Budget and bid practices were questioned by at least one customer, who felt the painting charge was not aligned with the actual wall area needing work.
- Coordination with other contractors (HVAC, plumbing, restoration) sometimes caused delays or miscommunication, and a few projects needed follow-up or rework.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- Request an itemized, detailed scope of work and a square-footage-based painting estimate to avoid overcharges.
- Confirm whether insulation will be replaced as part of drywall/repair work, and verify attic/hidden areas are addressed.
- Establish a clear punch list and final walkthrough to prevent missing components or unfinished finish work.
- Clarify who manages coordination with other trades (HVAC, plumbing) and set precise timelines and milestones.
- Ask about warranties or guarantees on workmanship and materials, and request progress updates or photos during the project.

- Positive experiences: Several customers report cordial reception and helpful staff, including a receptionist who assisted with the visit; multiple reviews praise Toni, the GM, and describe the company as professional with reliable service on commercial projects and standing-seam metal roofs. A number of clients expressed satisfaction with specific repairs and ongoing business relationships over many years.

- Negative experiences: A sizable portion of reviews describe significant delays and poor communication, including projects taking many months to finish, daily promises of “tomorrow,” canceled appointments, and failure to provide written estimates or timely responses. Some customers report rude or unprofessional behavior by employees and inadequate workmanship that led to ongoing leaks or the need for additional repairs.

- Notable concerns: One reviewer mentioned receiving a lien threat and collection letters related to Toll Brothers’ project, suggesting dispute over payments. Another reviewer recounted an on-site visit where staff did not bring a required ladder and failed to follow up, effectively wasting time.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Verify clear timelines, milestones, and project scope in writing before starting.
- Request written estimates and a defined schedule for follow-ups.
- Check references for projects similar to yours (residential vs. commercial) and ask about long-term outcomes and warranties.
- Be aware that experiences vary, with some customers reporting excellent service and others reporting delays and communication issues.

The reviews depict D&L Roofing as a tile/roofing specialist capable of full reroofs and tile repairs, often completing work quickly (even in one day) and following up with quality checks. Customers praise professional, courteous service, clear communication from staff (notably David Bunker and Herb), and work that matches or exceeds original materials. Typical jobs include repairing or replacing damaged roof tiles, sealing joints, and addressing leaks, with drone inspections used to assess damage. There are occasional notes of scheduling delays or communication lapses due to backlog or storms, but overall feedback emphasizes value, reliability, and good workmanship.

roofing_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

The reviews focus on roofing services from Tarnation Roofing rather than siding repairs. Customers consistently praise high-quality workmanship, professional and courteous service, clear communication, and quick appointment scheduling with pricing described as reasonable or great value. There is little to no discussion of siding materials, warranties, or long-term maintenance tips in these reviews; references to materials centers on asphalt shingles and related roof repairs (e.g., replacing missing shingles, fixing leaks).

The customer had Frank Hine provide a free siding estimate during an insurance-driven wind-damage claim and considered multiple bids to submit to the insurer. Frank stayed in contact and attempted to maximize the insurance payout to minimize out-of-pocket costs. After deciding not to hire him, the customer planned to send a small gift and asked for his address. Frank reportedly demanded payment for his time, stating it would be $500–$1,000, and pressed for an electronic wire transfer despite no commitment to work together. The customer felt pressured and perceived that an agreement was assumed at the initial meeting, concluding they would not recommend hiring Frank.

- The reviewer found the company timely, efficient, and punctual, with responsive communication.
- Staff were described as dedicated and humble.
- They addressed a roof issue that could have cost hundreds in HOA-related fees, completing work that another contractor did not finish.
- The crew conducted a thorough cleanup before and after work, ensuring no nails or sharp objects were left behind to protect pets.
- The finished roof repair was described as excellent.

Overall, reviews describe Power Home Remodeling experiences as largely positive in terms of professionalism, clear explanations, and high-quality installations, with some concerns about sales pressure and persistent follow-up.

- Contact and quotes: many customers report door-to-door marketing offering a free quote; one example quoted $60,000 to replace windows with financing offered at 18%, leading to declined interest for some; subsequent follow-up calls continued from different numbers.

- Sales process: several reviewers praise staff for thorough, easy-to-understand explanations (notably Jess, Alex, Noah, Dorian, Sam); some mention the sale process as smooth and informative, setting a professional tone.

- Installation experience: installation teams (e.g., Hector and crew, Ronnie) are described as punctual, professional, and capable; installs are often completed quickly (sometimes in one day) with attention to detail and a thorough cleanup.

- Quality and results: customers frequently note improved aesthetics and performance, such as windows looking great and temperature changes inside the home; some mention helpful features like easy-clean operation.

- Customer service and follow-up: multiple accounts of strong customer service, including thorough inspections and post-install follow-up (Anthony) and overall satisfaction; a few reviews highlight that the process exceeded expectations or led to future work.

- Maintenance guidance: customers report receiving practical guidance on window use and care (e.g., cleaning tips and cautions about using cleaners in direct sun).

- Cautions for potential customers: a recurring caution about aggressive follow-up after declining quotes and the possibility of high upfront pricing, which may lead to continued contact from multiple numbers. Some reviews also indicate the potential for expanding projects beyond windows (doors, solar) with ongoing engagement.

People say this painting company offers outstanding workmanship and stucco repair at reasonable prices. They also highlight the friendly and professional painters who do an amazing job, taking the time to remove items and cover surfaces to prevent damage.

Neutral summary of customer experiences with Terra Mia Construction (siding/renovation focus) based on the reviews provided:

- Project types and scope: bathroom remodels (including LED mirrors installation and wall/fixture work), kitchen remodels, siding replacement and repainting, fireplace removal, general home remodeling, and related improvements (lighting, textures, doors, landscaping).

- Common positives reported:
- Timeliness and reliability: crews often arrived on schedule and some projects were completed ahead of or on the planned timeline.
- Project management and communication: project managers like Roy, Lola, and Johnny were frequently cited for proactive communication, coordination, and on-site oversight.
- Quality of workmanship: multiple reviews praised the workmanship, attention to detail, and the finished look (e.g., house looks new, bathrooms and kitchens were completed to satisfaction).
- Cleanliness and professionalism: crews were described as clean, courteous, and professional; many reviews indicate a smooth, stress-free experience.
- Transparent or favorable pricing/quotes: several customers noted fair quotes with no hidden fees and good value for the work.

- Notable concerns and negative experiences:
- Plumbing-related issues: one review reports a shower renovation led to persistent hot water problems after using a sub-contractor (Preferred Plumbing) and a lack of responsiveness regarding grout concerns.
- Severe workmanship/safety complaints: one customer describes an “absolute worst” experience with multiple defects (shiplap doors, broken tiles, wiring short, a gas-leak fire pit) and long delays, resulting in construction defect concerns.
- Customer service issues: at least one review cites rude or unfair treatment and poor follow-up from the owner.
- Licensing and compliance questions: a reviewer raised concerns about licensing disclosures in advertising and a prior NV State Contractors Board citation related to license numbers and license limits; another reviewer notes investigations or sanctions associated with the owner’s licenses.
- Mixed recurrences: while many would hire again and recommend, the presence of critical, safety, and compliance concerns suggests variability in outcomes and contractor sub-subcontracting practices.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Clarify and document the scope, sequence, and responsibilities, including any third-party subcontractors (e.g., plumbing) and their warranties.
- Obtain written, detailed estimates with clear timelines and milestones; request progress updates and on-site supervision.
- Verify licenses and licensing status, confirm the contractor’s license number in advertising, and check for any past board actions or sanctions.
- Ask for references and follow up with past clients, especially on projects similar to yours and on any safety-critical aspects (electrical, plumbing, gas/ fireplaces).
- Be explicit about safety, permits, and post-completion warranty expectations; insist on prompt communication for any issues that arise during or after work.

Reviews for American Builders show a wide range of customer experiences, from highly positive to strongly negative. Key practical takeaways for potential customers:

- Scheduling and reliability
- Several callers reported timely estimates and on-time installations when crews showed up as scheduled.
- Multiple accounts described missed appointments, rescheduling difficulties, and in one case a no-show for an estimator, leading to frustration and work interruptions.
- Some communication gaps were noted, with customers having to call the office to confirm or reschedule.

- Customer service and professionalism
- Positive experiences highlighted polite, professional staff and good follow-through on fixes (e.g., returning to correct issues after initial installation).
- Negative experiences included rude interactions over the phone, unprofessional behavior during jobs, and claims of unresponsiveness or lack of accountability from office staff.

- Work quality and scope
- Gutters: Many reviews praised installation quality, appearance, and the installers’ competence; some noted minor issues (e.g., a misaligned downspout or a need to adjust to avoid hitting a security camera) that were subsequently addressed.
- Patio covers: Several customers were satisfied with the final result and the installers’ work, while others reported leaks after installation and attributed problems to workmanship or weather, with promises of follow-up maintenance.
- Other projects (carport, shade, etc.): Experiences varied, with some customers receiving helpful, stock-ready parts and timely service, and others reporting poor understanding of project scope or delays.

- Pricing, discounts, and guarantees
- Some customers cited discounts (e.g., military discounts) that were not honored, or discrepancies between advertised promises and actual practices.
- A few reviews referenced warranties (including a lifetime warranty on patio products) and the company’s willingness to perform repairs, though outcomes were mixed across experiences.

- Trust and reputational concerns
- At least one reviewer labeled the company a scam and claimed issues with payment methods and social media comments; other customers disputed or downplayed such concerns.
- Several mentions of aggressive scheduling software and communication tools that failed to deliver consistent results.

- Notable staff mentions
- Adam: referenced repeatedly as a point of contact for estimates and parts; experiences varied from highly helpful to problematic in some interactions.
- Jacqueline: described by some as unprofessional in scheduling communications.
- Installers such as Tony and Manuel were praised for professionalism in some projects, while other accounts described loud work environments or conflicts among crew members.

Overall, potential customers should expect a mix of experiences. If considering work with this company, it may be prudent to obtain written timelines and scope of work, request references, confirm scheduling expectations, verify warranty terms, and clarify discounts upfront.

Overall, customers describe Cooper Roofing Company as delivering high-quality workmanship with reliable scheduling and professional, courteous crews. Practical details repeatedly noted include on-time performance, thorough inspections, transparent communication with before/after photos, and tidy on-site cleanups. The company is cited as capable of handling roofing and solar-related work, including repairs, full roof replacements, and projects for new builds and remodels. Pricing is described as fair and competitive, with some reviews noting discounts for return customers. Customer service is highlighted for responsiveness (examples include Lori and Brittany), and crews such as Sal and Christian are frequently mentioned for efficiency and professionalism.

On the downside, at least one reviewer reported an incomplete electrical panel after a solar/roof project and indicated no return calls, highlighting a potential risk of communication gaps in some cases.

Customer feedback for this siding repair business is mixed. Positive reports describe high-quality siding work (including steel siding and aluminum/metal fascia), professional conduct, attention to detail, friendly and efficient service, and strong recommendations. Specific praise notes that projects in Las Vegas-area homes look great, with references to trustworthy staff (e.g., a contact named Keith) and satisfaction from homeowners.

Negative feedback highlights several issues: multiple attempts to contact the company (calls and website form) went unanswered; at least one reviewer observed that the company advertises service in Clark County but does not service Mount Charleston; a privacy concern was raised about information being shared with third-party companies without consent, leading to disappointment.

Practical takeaways for potential customers: verify the current service area (including whether Mount Charleston is covered); clarify expected communication timelines and methods; ask for the company’s privacy/data-sharing policy; inquire about material options (steel siding, aluminum/metal fascia) and viewable project examples; discuss timelines, warranties, and any follow-up/service guarantees.