Top Siding Repair Services in Tampa

Customer reviews describe Gladiator Exteriors’ gutter, soffit, and fascia work as highly professional and thorough. They consistently arrived on time, explained the process, and delivered high-quality results that improve drainage and protect the home during heavy rains. Reviews repeatedly recommend the company and highlight strong communication, clean job sites, and competitive pricing for premium work. No specific siding materials are named beyond gutters and related exterior components; the emphasis is on exterior repair/installation work and customer service.

Overall, customers report highly positive experiences with this company for roofing-related repairs. Key practical takeaways include: high-quality workmanship and on-time completion, clear and proactive communication throughout the project, and a strong emphasis on thorough cleanup after work. The staff—both office and field crews—are described as courteous, helpful, and trustworthy, with some customers noting a feel of “family-like” service and ease in dealing with insurance matters. Multiple reviews mention responsiveness to questions and a smooth process from initial estimate to final cleanup. Many customers express willingness to reuse the company for future projects and to recommend it to others.

Overall, customers describe Mighty Dog Roofing as professional, communicative, and reliable, with strong satisfaction across residential and condo-association projects.

Key practical details:
- Service scope often involves roof replacement, sometimes with gutter installation; also noted are leak repairs and checks for additional issues (e.g., rotten fascia boards discovered during work).
- Projects are described as on-time, thorough, and completed with attention to cleanliness (no debris left behind) and high-quality workmanship.
- Customer experience emphasizes clear communication, timely updates, and involvement from project managers or key staff (examples of staff frequently mentioned include Tara, Dylan, Manoj, Johnathon, Jordan, and others).
- Some reviews highlight quick response times, detailed assessments (including video or walkthroughs), and transparent processes; clients report favorable impressions of pricing and perceived value.
- Positive experiences extend to large-scale tasks and small jobs, with praise for handling budgets, scheduling, and follow-through, including support during challenging situations (e.g., litigation-related needs).
- A minority perspective notes a potential policy concern: one reviewer claimed the company would not provide repair estimates and would only take clients for full replacements, describing this as false advertising; this contrasts with several reviews that mention repair capabilities.
- Additional notes: work for a condo association was described as quick and professional; some customers singled out specific individuals for exceptional service and for maintaining communication throughout the project.

A mixed set of reviews for Morgan Exteriors (siding/ exterior work and windows) shows generally positive feedback on professional staff, thorough explanations, and prompt scheduling/installation, with several comments praising installers by name (e.g., Taner, Ed Stansberry, Greg and Gavin) and on-site cleanliness. Positive notes emphasize water-tight exterior trim work and careful workmanship. However, there are notable negatives: a customer reported ongoing communication failures after submitting issue details, and another described a horrible job with high costs and a refusal to stand behind the work. Overall sentiment suggests solid workmanship and responsiveness in many cases, but concerns exist around communication, warranty guarantees, and pricing.

- Services provided: siding installation, impact window installation, and related work (including window framing) for residential homes.

- Reliability and professionalism: customers describe the team as punctual, professional, dependable, and clear communicators who explained the process step by step.

- workmanship and attention to detail: multiple reviews note meticulous, high-quality craftsmanship; projects were completed to specification with careful attention to every detail.

- timelines and budgeting: several testimonials state work was completed on time and within budget, with some noting honest pricing.

- outcomes: customers report a refreshed home exterior from new siding and noticeable improvements in interior quietness and security due to the impact windows.

- overall sentiment and referrals: reviewers express high satisfaction and indicate they would recommend Alejandro Melo Contractor to others.

Overall, reviews describe the contractor as delivering high-quality exterior work (roof, siding, gutters) with professional crews, timely completion, and thorough cleanup, and many customers would recommend them. However, several reviews raise concerns about communication, responsiveness to warranty issues, scheduling, and financing promises, resulting in mixed experiences.

Reviews for Westfall Roofing (the referenced siding/roofing contractor) consistently highlight exceptional customer service, clear communication, and high-quality workmanship. Clients report on-time arrival, thorough cleanup, and professionalism from sales through installation. The company handles various roof-related projects (shingles, tiles, metal roofs) and gutter work, with examples of rapid response to emergencies (e.g., tarping after a lightning strike) and accurate invoicing adjustments when needed. Pricing is described as transparent with detailed quotes, and several reviews note strong support for insurance-related processes. Warranties are not mentioned in the reviews.

Universal Roofing and Contracting is a roofing-focused contractor offering services including roof replacement, gutters, and skylights. Reviews consistently note thorough, technology-assisted estimates (involving in-person roof checks or drones), proactive project management, clear communication, and thorough cleanup. Most experiences are positive, citing professional crews and prompt responses, though at least one case mentions follow-up and warranty communication gaps. Overall, customers highlight professionalism, timeliness, and cooperation with insurance or HOA processes.

Overall, reviews portray SCM Roofing as a professional and responsive roofing contractor with a focus on quality workmanship and clear communication. Common positives include prompt quotes, help with permits, provision of insurance and license documentation, competitive pricing, and reliable project management. Customers frequently note on-time arrival, thorough site protection and cleanup, respectful treatment of the property, and efficient completion of roof replacements or repairs, sometimes within a single day. The team is described as courteous, knowledgeable, and easy to work with, and many reviewers say they would recommend SCM Roofing to others. A few reviews raise caution about warranty coverage and follow-up, particularly regarding fascia damage and leak-related issues, indicating potential risk in those areas. Overall sentiment is favorable with a minority of concerns about warranty handling.

- Services and outcomes: Reviews cover roof repairs and replacements, including tile-to-Decra metal conversions, leak repairs, and code upgrades. Work is described as high quality with attention to detail; several customers note improvements to roof life and appearance.

- Communication and project management: Many customers praise timely, courteous communication from points of contact (e.g., Stone, Shan, Alex Sajonz, Adam Polins, Andrew B.), with updates at each project stage and proactive problem-solving.

- Quality and materials: Customers report use of quality materials and thorough workmanship; some reviews mention identifying and addressing issues (e.g., structural concerns) that others missed.

- Speed and scheduling: Positive notes include quick estimates, fast or same-day execution in some cases, and projects completed on or ahead of schedule; responsiveness throughout the process is frequently highlighted.

- Cleanup and workmanship follow-through: Several reviews emphasize thorough cleanup with no leftover mess, and prompt handling of minor follow-up needs or small issues.

- Insurance and pricing: Several customers appreciate assistance with insurance processes, and many describe pricing as competitive or reasonable; some references to payment scheduling and coordination.

- Notable negative experience: A minority review describes significant issues including delays, broken materials, lack of communication, language barriers on-site, and a disputed contract, ending in legal action; this appears to be an outlier relative to the majority.

- Overall impression: The majority of reviews recommend Roof It Forward/ARAC, citing professionalism, reliability, and satisfactory results, with practical details useful to prospective customers such as communication practices, cleanup, and insurance support.

Reviews describe generally positive experiences with Mr Handyman for a range of home repairs (including wood repairs, drywall, windowsills, and related exterior/interior work). Customers frequently note high-quality workmanship, professionalism, and timely, courteous service from several technicians. There are some negative notes about pricing disputes, bid delays (one instance of about a month to receive a bid), and a few rude interactions from staff or management. Pricing is described as mid-range to competitive, with several comments praising value for money. No warranties are mentioned in the reviews, and maintenance tips are not provided.

Customer reviews show a mix of positive experiences and notable issues. Many clients praised professional crews, quick estimates, attentive service, and high-quality results on gutters, fascia, and soffit, noting neat installations and durability. However, several reviewers reported difficulty contacting the company, delays in replies or scheduling, and concerns about warranty handling, with at least one case of gutter failure after installation. Pricing is described as competitive and transparent by some, with mentions of discounts. Potential customers should verify warranty terms and ensure responsive communication before proceeding.

Ridgeline Construction Roofing & Exteriors in Tampa specializes in roofing repairs and replacements. Customer feedback is largely positive, highlighting clear communication, professional and thorough workmanship, reliable scheduling, and on-site project management. Materials cited include asphalt shingles (notably GAF Timberline UHDZ) with a stated 25-year workmanship warranty. Reviewers commend clean work sites and strong customer service, though some note higher-than-average quotes, occasional workmanship issues requiring follow-up visits, and concerns about ethics related to a former field representative. Overall, customers view the company as trustworthy, capable, and worth the price for quality work.

- Customers consistently report very positive experiences with Feliciano Construction across services including roofing, Hardie board siding, gutters, skylights, and indoor/outdoor repairs, often after storm or water-damage events.
- Core strengths cited: high-quality workmanship, thorough and meticulous finish, and effective post-project cleanup.
- Project leadership and communication: multiple testimonials highlight strong, proactive communication from a dedicated team (owner Miguel, Project Manager Carlos, and Office Manager Jennie), with clear estimates, schedules, and ongoing updates; projects are described as well coordinated and responsive to questions and concerns.
- Scheduling and flexibility: teams are praised for accommodating client schedules, including arrangements to minimize disruption (e.g., allowing time for pets away from work areas) and for coordinating with other contractors or floor/install professionals.
- Problem solving and reliability: crews are described as detail-oriented and solution-focused, able to handle issues (design changes, cabinet order delays, and weather-related delays) and to keep projects moving; some projects required longer timelines (e.g., custom skylights taking about 6 weeks, large remodels extending due to finish and cabinet issues), but communication remained steady.
- Trust and referrals: many customers report they would, and have, referred others; clients frequently express willingness to hire Feliciano again for future needs and describe the company as honest, reliable, and fair.
- Value: several testimonials note competitive or best-value pricing, with emphasis on receiving good service and quality outcomes for the price.
- Notable outcomes: several praises about specific results (e.g., redesigned kitchens, bathrooms, laundry rooms; successful roof, gutter, and skylight replacements; effective storm-damage repairs) and instances where project managers or crews went above and beyond, such as fixing minor issues or smoothing the process during stressful repairs.

Overall, customer experiences with Mighty Dog Roofing of West Tampa are mixed but largely positive when projects proceed smoothly. Key strengths noted in multiple reviews include professional and responsive communication (notably from Nick and Jillian), prompt scheduling for inspections and work, and competitive pricing. Customers frequently appreciated on-site involvement during installations, help with color selection, thorough cleanup, and, in several cases, quick completion of roofing and gutter work. Some reviews also highlighted practical benefits such as the inclusion of wind mitigation reports and insurance savings, as well as courteous office staff (e.g., Tara and Dawn).

Positive outcomes frequently cited:
- Prompt inspection scheduling and reasonable estimates
- Flexible scheduling and hands-on project management
- Clear communication and accessibility from the team
- Competent roofing and gutter work with good results
- Assistance with color choices and overall satisfaction with the finished product
- Insurance-related savings after wind mitigation reporting

Reported concerns and potential risks:
- Occasional incomplete siding/trim work, missing flashing, exposed house wrap, and gaps in caulking
- A few instances of delayed follow-up or difficulty obtaining inspections/ callbacks
- One notably prolonged attempt to obtain a leak inspection after installation (months)
- Some reviewers noted the company is a newer franchise and not BBB-rated at the time, which affected initial trust for some potential customers

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect strong communication and coordination during roofing jobs, with hands-on involvement from the project lead and team
- Verify scope and follow up on any siding/trim components separately to ensure completeness
- Ask about the availability of wind mitigation reports and potential insurance savings
- Clarify timelines and post-installation follow-up for any repairs or inspections, and confirm responsiveness expectations with the office
- Consider current BBB status if this is a deciding factor for you, especially for newer franchises

Summary: Morgan Exteriors has produced mixed experiences across different projects (windows, siding, soffit/fascia, and gutters). Positive reports praise several staff members for professionalism, helpful product knowledge, punctuality, and quality workmanship, with several customers noting no-pressure sales and thorough explanations (examples include Steve, Taner, Bobby, Elder, Jeff Laws, Heather Velazquez, Kevin, and Danielle). However, a substantial number of reviews describe significant problems: projects left incomplete for months after payment, windows installed without screens, extensive delays and multiple no-shows or miscommunications, crews arriving with incorrect products or measurements, and customers doing much of the legwork for permits. Several accounts cite poor communication from offices, difficulty obtaining timely updates, and perceived lack of accountability, including instances where the owner did not intervene. Some customers felt the company acted as a middleman coordinating various subcontractors rather than delivering a single, accountable project, and there are criticisms of coordination with third-party painters and inconsistencies in service after initial sales. One lengthy review details a door installation with multiple visits, improper hardware, incorrect painting, and a lengthy unresolved end state, along with warranty disputes and dissatisfaction with front-office communications. Conversely, other customers report long-standing satisfaction after corrections or successful multi-project commitments (e.g., replacing multiple windows with overall positive outcomes).

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect variability in project timelines and potential delays; confirm a detailed schedule and milestones before work begins.
- Clarify who is the primary project manager, how communications will be handled, and how changes or issues will be tracked and resolved.
- Verify scope, product specifications, and measurements up front; confirm who provides and manages permits and inspections.
- Discuss warranty terms, post-install service, and how issues will be addressed if problems arise after completion.
- Consider requesting references and checking BBB reviews; ask for a detailed written plan and a single point of contact to reduce coordination friction.
- Be prepared for coordination with third-party contractors (e.g., painters) and confirm responsibilities and timelines for those teams.

- Overall impression: Reviews are mixed. Many customers report positive experiences with communication, scheduling, and workmanship, while at least one detailed account raises serious concerns about installation quality and follow‑through.

- Positive patterns
- Responsive project managers and good communication. Examples include David (project manager) and Jason Worley (sales representative) who provided timely updates, options, and follow‑through.
- Prompt scheduling and on‑site performance. Crews often arrived on time, completed work efficiently (sometimes in a day and a half for a roof), and then conducted thorough cleanup (magnet/nail cleanup, yard safety for pets).
- Transparent, reasonable pricing relative to other quotes. Several reviewers noted competitive pricing and even quotes lower than expected after comparing with other firms.
- Quality of work on some projects. Reports include solid gutter installs, well‑executed roof replacements, and siding/paint results that look like a brand‑new exterior.
- Positive experiences specifically cited for gutters, siding, and storm-related repairs, with praise for the team’s professionalism and care for the property.

- Notable negative experiences
- A former employee described a roofing project with serious alleged missteps (improper flashing, insufficient overhang, reused/failed flashing, decking replacement not matching counts, and unauthorized siding changes) and claimed the company did not resolve the issues, including a contentious interaction around change orders and accountability. The reviewer also claims internal escalation and a dispute over a Master Elite certification. An update in the review asserts further disputes about the company’s response.
- At least one reviewer labeled the experience as the worst, indicating strong dissatisfaction with service or outcomes.

- Practical considerations for potential customers
- Request a detailed, written change order process and full photo documentation for any scope changes.
- Verify decking replacement counts and confirm flashing specifications align with building codes and manufacturer recommendations.
- Confirm scope before work begins (especially if siding, gutters, or wind‑mitigation work are involved) and obtain written approvals for any changes.
- Ask for a dedicated project manager contact, proposed timeline, and a clear schedule, including permit or inspection steps if applicable.
- Seek references from customers with similar project scopes (roofing, gutters, siding) and consider checking on warranty terms and post‑installation support.
- Clarify cleanup expectations and yard protection, particularly for pet owners or landscaped areas.

Service Pro Roofing
- A customer (T. Lee) states Tim with Service Pro Roofing replaced their roof after Hurricanes Milton and Helen, with workers described as very professional and the job completed in one day. The county inspection reportedly praised the company, and the reviewer recommended contacting Tim for an honest, fair price.

Southern Pro Roofing
- Multiple customers report high satisfaction with Southern Pro Roofing, highlighting responsiveness, punctuality, clear explanations, honesty, and not pressuring unnecessary services.
- The company is described as capable of handling insurance coordination, HOA approvals, and even attorney involvement when needed; staff such as Kaitlyn (Katelyn) and David B. are repeatedly noted for guiding clients through the process and securing favorable pricing.
- Work examples include a large, steep roof installed about five years ago and, after hurricanes, a confirmation that it remained in good condition against high winds; another report notes a tile roof installation in 2019 with positive long-term results.
- Projects are described as completed quickly and thoroughly, sometimes ahead of schedule, with strong workmanship and minimal mess. Specific crew members mentioned include Aaron and the team, with appreciation for their responsiveness and quality.
- A customer described a tile roof installation that used distinctive materials (e.g., Barcelona 900 Burnt Chestnut concrete tiles) and resulted in notable curb appeal; another project involved coordinating with an HOA and ensuring a clean jobsite over a 12-day period.
- Overall, customers repeatedly describe Southern Pro Roofing as reliable, customer-focused, and worth recommending for roofing work, including storm damage repairs and insurance-related projects.

Feedback on Ridge Top Exteriors is mixed. Several customers report high-quality workmanship and professional crews: Jason Lee (foreman) with Joshua and Chris on vinyl siding replacement; Luke and his crew on roof installation; Nelson described as attentive with good communication; Marco (project manager) keeping clients informed; Josh the salesperson noted for knowledge. Some reviews describe the work as fast, detailed, and reasonably priced, with positive remarks about communication during planning and completion, and strong recommendations for the company.

Other customers report serious issues: one notes being overcharged for gutters and another cites a quote that was significantly higher than competing estimates, followed by a later reduction which raised suspicions. Additional recurring problems include: poor communication after signing a contract and delays tied to sales staff (e.g., Matt); delivering the wrong materials on install day and a lack of accountability; confusing or slow billing, with long delays in invoices and payment difficulties; unaddressed cleanup after work, lack of project updates, and even reports of not receiving photos of finished work. Some reviewers advise caution in certain areas (e.g., Pinellas County) and recommend obtaining multiple quotes, reading all contract fine print, and requesting detailed progress updates and post-project documentation. Overall, potential customers should seek clear, written quotes, defined timelines, material specifics, and verifiable references before proceeding.