Top Siding Repair Services in St. Petersburg

Overall, customer experiences with Paradise Exteriors are largely positive, with many customers praising installation quality, product strength, and clear communication, while a few note scheduling or coordination issues that were resolved.

Key details for potential customers:
- Products and services: customers reported replacing or upgrading windows, front doors, garage doors, sliding doors, and trim. Strong emphasis on the strength and integrity of the products, and several accounts of successful warranty explanations and coverage.
- Installation experiences: installations were described as fast, smooth, and professional in many cases, with examples such as completing multiple new items in a few hours and installers arriving on time. Drew is specifically highlighted for punctuality, professionalism, and quality work in several reviews. Occasional reports mention early issues during installation that were later corrected.
- Communication and process: many reviews say communication was good throughout the project, from sales to completion and warranty follow-up. Some accounts note periods of strong communication, while a minority report inconsistent or problematic communication that was later addressed.
- After-sales and warranties: brand ambassadors and warranty staff were involved in explaining warranties, and warranty-related service was provided when concerns arose (e.g., screens, repairs). Customers have reported willingness to rely on warranty support if needed.
- Scheduling and logistics: most customers describe scheduling as seamless or manageable, but a notable minority recount scheduling delays or poor initial coordination (e.g., a missed in-home appointment and slow follow-up), which were eventually resolved.
- Permits and cleanup: several accounts mention permit processes and that crews left after cleanup, indicating attention to site maintenance during and after installation.
- Satisfaction and referrals: a strong theme of willingness to refer Paradise Exteriors to others, with many customers expressing high overall satisfaction and appreciation for the work and staff.
- Performance expectations: a couple of comments note that hurricane strength has not yet been tested, so reliance on reported strength and future performance remains based on the stated product claims rather than firsthand testing.

Summary of customer experiences with Ridge Top Exteriors (siding repair)

Overall pattern:
- Experiences are mixed. Some customers report high-quality workmanship, attentive project management, and strong communication, while others describe pricing concerns, poor post-contract communication, and significant coordination and billing problems.

Positive experiences and practical details:
- Vinyl siding replacement completed in about 2.5 days; foreman Jason Lee with crew members Joshua and Chris; described as fast, thorough, and with good workmanship; pricing noted as favorable.
- Siding work including soffit repair praised for high standards and attention to detail; projects managed from planning through completion with clear communication in some cases.
- Several customers cited strong communication and knowledgeable staff (e.g., Josh the salesman; Marco the project manager) and overall satisfaction with the process from planning to completion.
- Nelson (siding specialist) repeatedly highlighted for attentiveness, frequent updates, and reliable workmanship.

Negative experiences and practical concerns:
- Instances of markedly high or questionable quoting (e.g., gutter charges; one quote reported at about $24,000 when others were around $14,000), prompting caution about price comparisons and fine print.
- Post-contract issues: delays attributed to sales staff (e.g., Matt), difficulty obtaining samples, and occasions of wrong materials delivered with limited accountability.
- Billing and payment problems: months-long delays in invoicing, unclear or difficult payment processes, and reports of rude or unhelpful accounts handling.
- Significant communication gaps and coordination problems: no updates for extended periods (e.g., ~12 weeks), unannounced crew arrivals, messy job sites, tenants having to manage cleanup, and lack of post-project photos or confirmation of completion.
- Mixed regional feedback: some reviewers discourage doing business in certain areas (e.g., Pinellas County) due to communication and process issues.

Notable personnel mentioned:
- Jason Lee (foreman) praised for efficiency and quality on siding work.
- Nelson (siding specialist) described as attentive and reliable.
- Josh (sales) and Marco (project manager) cited for good communication and project oversight.
- Matt (salesperson) associated with delays or communication problems.
- Brian (manager) described as offering reassurance but not resolving issues in some cases.

Practical guidance for potential customers:
- Obtain multiple quotes and compare not just price but scope, materials, and delivery timelines; read the fine print on estimates.
- Check independent reviews (Yelp, Better Business Bureau, Google) and state records for complaints or lawsuits.
- Request written project milestones, material order timelines, and photos from key milestones (start, mid-point, completion).
- Clarify who will be the primary contact (salesperson, project manager) and how communications will be handled after signing.
- Confirm cleanup expectations, subcontractor conduct, and the process for addressing any incorrect materials or work quality issues.
- Ensure a clear invoicing process with a working payment link and timely follow-up on balances due.

Baldwin Roofing is generally described by customers as a knowledgeable, professional contractor with strong responsiveness and clear communication. Reviewers repeatedly note thorough assessments (including attic inspections and drone footage), detailed and honest estimates, and proactive project updates, often coordinated with insurance claims. Projects are described as efficiently staffed and finished with good cleanup, sometimes within a few days, and customers frequently praise the quality of results (e.g., GAF roofs and well-matching gutters) and the use of photos and videos to illustrate work.

Practical details and patterns:
- Services include roof replacement, gutter installation, attic inspections, and in some cases solar installations; several reviews mention drone photos and water testing as part of the process.
- Estimating and cost clarity are highlighted as positive; some customers report accepting a premium option (GAF roof) as an investment for longer-term durability.
- Timelines and logistics: quick scheduling, with examples of multi-part jobs completed efficiently; gutter work can occur soon after roofing, sometimes within a few hours.
- Communication: many customers say Baldwin’s team explains what needs to be done, what it will cost, and what to expect throughout the process; some reviewers receive ongoing updates and photos during work.
- Quality signals: reviewers frequently commend the final appearance and describe the crews as detail-oriented and professional; some note good compliance with warranties and follow-up.
- Personnel: several names recur (e.g., Mitch, Adam, Joseph Aldaco, Chris King) as representatives praised for thoroughness and professionalism.

Caveats noted by a subset of customers:
- Marketing practices: at least one reviewer reports unsolicited mailers with photos implying a roof replacement is needed.
- Warranty and post-install issues: a few reviews raise concerns about warranty handling or disputes (including a later update describing a leak and a claim that the warranty was not honored), though these are isolated within the overall feedback.

Overall, customers who hire Baldwin Roofing tend to report positive experiences with knowledgeable staff, transparent communication, efficient execution, and high-quality results, while noting a couple of concerns related to marketing tactics and warranty disputes in isolated cases.

Customer experiences with Mighty Dog Roofing are generally positive and highlight reliability, timeliness, and quality. Reported details include on-time start and rapid completion (e.g., a full roof replacement finished in two days), thorough prep and cleanup that left yards and neighboring properties in the same condition, and installations or repairs that cured leaks. Customers value honest, proactive communication, including one instance where the owner corrected an overcharge and issued a refund. Reviews note responsiveness, professionalism, and fair pricing that matched quotes, with several references to affordable or competitive pricing. The team is described as capable of handling both large jobs (whole roof replacement) and small jobs (flat roof repairs), with some projects requiring permits or facing bureaucratic delays. Overall, customers express high satisfaction and would recommend the company.

Quality Home Renovation (QHR) is described by customers as professional, reliable, and skilled at handling a range of home restoration and renovation projects, with a strong emphasis on old homes and attention to detail.

- Project scope and outcomes: Projects include complete restoration of a 1935 house, turning an attached garage into a gym/media room with the garage lifted 2 feet, new foundation, and added windows; major additions; window replacements; bathroom remodels; and various repairs (doors, stucco, siding). In several cases finishes were matched to the original home, and spaces were improved with higher ceilings or more functional layouts.

- Professionalism and communication: Grady and Diane are frequently described as honest, upfront about needed work and costs, and easy to communicate with. Diane is noted for coordinating schedules and explaining financials clearly. The team is praised for good collaboration with subcontractors and responsive problem-solving.

- Scheduling, budgeting, and reliability: Many projects are cited as completed in a timely manner and within expected budgets; customers report that promised outcomes were delivered. When issues arose (as with any renovation), Grady and Diane reportedly solved them and kept projects moving forward. One customer specifically mentions help with insurance claims.

- Expertise with older homes and code/compliance: Several testimonials highlight QHR’s knowledge of 100-year-old construction methods and their ability to achieve historically appropriate finishes. They are described as able to handle concrete, electrical, carpentry, siding, and other trades, with inspections passed consistently.

- Risk and trust: One customer notes replacing a failed kitchen renovation from another contractor, with QHR turning a stressful situation around, including assistance with finishing touches and making the project look beautiful.

- Overall sentiment: The experiences are largely positive, with strong recommendations and expressions of willingness to hire again for future projects.

Neutral overview of customer feedback: Reviews indicate a siding materials supplier/installer with generally competitive pricing and availability of vinyl siding, soffit, nails, and channel materials. Several customers praise helpful staff, fast service, and willingness to work with the public. However, there are notable negative experiences focusing on poor communication, delayed follow-up, and at least one instance of subpar installation safety concerns. Overall, experiences are mixed with emphasis on price and service consistency affecting satisfaction.

The reviews primarily praise punctual, professional installation with high-quality results and neat workmanship. Positive notes often highlight on-time arrival and staff courtesy. Pricing feedback is mixed but favorable when budgets are accommodated or promotions are offered. A notable minority describe a problematic consultation process with lack of upfront pricing and aggressive sales tactics. Overall sentiment is positive with some concerns about pricing transparency and the consultation experience.

Customer feedback portrays ASC Aluminum Specialty Contractors, Inc. as a professional, customer-focused provider for a range of aluminum projects, including porches, awnings, carports, shutters, screen porches, and skirting. Reported strengths include professional workmanship, courteous and personable staff, clear explanations of work, and efficient crews, with several jobs completed quickly (often within two days) and many customers describing the process as easy and affordable. In multiple instances, customers praised the appearance and quality of work and noted they would recommend ASC or consider them a go-to provider for aluminum work.

A recurring theme is strong responsiveness to issues after installation: a hurricane-related porch awning replacement was completed with positive neighborhood feedback, and when leaks arose, ASC dispatched an installer to seal and address the problem, demonstrating commitment to making things right. In one case, a customer experienced a considerable scheduling wait but still felt the final result was worth it and suggested improved scheduling updates. Other instances describe prompt corrections (e.g., trim adjustments made after a photo was sent) and adding an extra piece at the customer’s request.

Overall, the experiences emphasize professional execution, good communication, timely completion, and a willingness to rectify issues to the customer’s satisfaction.

Reviews show mixed experiences for siding-related work, with several mentions of aluminum and vinyl as the primary materials and some positive notes about quality and professionalism on specific projects (e.g., extensions, carport, screen room). However, there are frequent concerns about responsiveness and follow-through: multiple customers report unreturned calls, voicemail-only contact, and delayed or incomplete repairs, including a lanai project with leaks several months after installation. Pricing is described variably, with some references to competitive pricing and others to high costs or questions about value. At least one review raises concerns about advertising practices (BBB logo usage). Overall, potential customers should expect a mix of solid workmanship in some cases and significant post-installation or communication issues in others.

- Overall impression: Broadly positive experiences; many customers would hire Mitchell and Sons Roofing again and would recommend them to others; several customers were repeat clients or referred by friends.

- Responsiveness and communication: Customers praised prompt responses, clear and ongoing communication, and providing professional updates and reports (including a clean, photo-backed report for insurance when needed).

- Work quality and outcomes: Reported high-quality workmanship on roof replacements, shingles repair, and gutter installations; projects completed efficiently (often in a couple of days) with attention to detail.

- Site practices and disruption: Teams protected customer property (staying off designated yard areas, using tarps, and ensuring no nails were left behind); sites were described as clean with minimal disruption.

- Customer service and reliability: Positive notes on knowledge of the team, professionalism, and willingness to address questions; several accounts mention stress relief and perceived care during the process.

- Scheduling and delays: Generally smooth, though one project experienced a minor delay due to the company’s busy schedule; occasional brief delays noted but without major impact.

- Pricing and value: Several mentions of competitive quotes and value; one instance noted a discount to offset plant damage caused during work.

- Additional services and capabilities: Also performed gutter installation and assisted with pre-closing roof needs for home buyers; could coordinate payment at closing through title in some cases.

- Insurance and documentation: Provided documentation needed for insurance claims; in at least one case, helped deliver a thorough report with photos for insurer.

Drew Roofing is repeatedly described as professional, responsive, and fairly priced, with a strong track record of both repairs and full roof replacements. Customers note on-time arrivals, prompt responses, clear explanations, and thorough cleanup. They highlight honest assessments—such as repairing when possible after storms rather than recommending a full replacement—and a willingness to stand by their work, with some fixes provided at no charge or within budget. The company is trusted by homeowners and HOA communities, with multiple repeat customers and referrals. Specific practical points include quick response to leaks (no charge for fixes), replacement projects completed efficiently (often in under two days), proactive problem-solving (e.g., identifying a missing tile), and durable results in Florida weather. Office staff (notably Stacey) is cited for responsiveness, and the crew for quality workmanship and courtesy. Overall, customers report reliable service for both small repairs and larger projects, with good value and clean work sites.

Customer feedback on Mitchell Roofing is mixed but often positive. Many clients describe professional, responsive service with competitive pricing (in several cases the lowest quote among seven) and high-quality workmanship. Projects are commonly completed quickly—some roofs in a single day or within 1–2 days—with crews noted as skilled, courteous, and thorough in cleanup. Clients frequently cite proactive communication, including regular updates, before/during/after photos, and quick scheduling; some reports highlight strong follow‑up service to fix issues after installation. Key staff frequently mentioned in positive reviews include Scott MacDonald, Josh, Jay, Buddy, and Armando. Several customers would highly recommend Mitchell Roofing, especially for price-quality value and reliable service.

However, there are negative reports as well. One customer described a very sloppy job with significant debris (nails, screws, and other roofing material left on site), poor communication, and damage to property. Another review noted a surprise additional invoice after payment, and there were mentions of inconsistent communication or slower progress in a rental project. Overall, most customers would recommend Mitchell Roofing, but a minority warn about cleanup safety concerns and billing communications.

- Customers consistently describe Massey Roofing (led by Jon Lusby) as prompt and highly responsive, often inspecting damage the same day and providing clear, upfront guidance and estimates.

- The team is characterized as professional, trustworthy, punctual, respectful, and hardworking, with multiple accounts of staying late, arriving early, and completing work efficiently.

- Roofing work is frequently completed quickly (examples include a full roof replacement in 1–2 days) and with attention to cleanup, including protecting plants and leaving sites tidy.

- Insurance coordination is a notable benefit, with customers praising assistance in navigating claims, obtaining approvals, and securing favorable outcomes or timing.

- Several customers emphasize fair or below-expected pricing, and one account highlights paying less than neighbors for similar work.

- The company is willing to address non-roof issues and even return for minor repairs, demonstrating willingness to follow up beyond the primary project.

- Communication throughout the process is repeatedly cited as a strength, including clear explanations, timely responses to questions, and ongoing updates during construction.

- Positive long-term endorsements and referrals from customers, with some noting peace of mind and confidence in the work after completion.

- Customers recount favorable experiences with Jon Lusby specifically, including prior work at a different company and continued recommendations after partnering with Massey Roofing.

- Storm-related projects (e.g., after Hurricane Milton) are described as well-handled, with rapid assessments and efficient repairs in the face of widespread damage.

- Several testimonials mention that competitors were slower or less responsive, highlighting Massey’s quicker scheduling and execution.

- Overall sentiment is highly favorable, focusing on quality workmanship, reliable service, and strong customer support throughout the project lifecycle.

- Coastal Palms Contracting is consistently described as professional, competent, and honest, delivering a stress-free experience for clients.

- Projects are reported as finishing on time and within budget, with some noting faster-than-expected completion and competitive estimates; minimal or no extra charges for minor fixes.

- Keith is frequently highlighted as the primary, dependable contact—responsive, reachable, knowledgeable, and good at clear, ongoing communication.

- The company handles a range of work (storm-related repairs, demolition, drywall, texture matching, bathroom remodels) with high-quality workmanship; clients note attention to detail and clean, respectful, well-managed job sites.

- The overall customer experience is described as easy, trustworthy, and friendly, with several clients recommending Coastal Palms and expressing willingness to hire again.