Top Siding Repair Services in Springfield

Based on the provided reviews, the company primarily handles roofing, gutters, and related repairs. Customers generally report high-quality workmanship, professional and responsive service, and trustworthy staff. A notably negative review describes a roof job with leaks, ripple shingles, and damage to landscaping, along with a lengthy timeline and lack of on-site supervision. Several reviewers mention optional upgrades like ice barriers and note satisfaction with value and speed of service. Mentions of siding are rare except for one comment about some siding with loose pieces being addressed. Specific siding materials are not described in the reviews.

- Overall sentiment across reviews is predominantly positive, with strong praise for appearance, workmanship, and professionalism. A few comments mention pricing concerns and variable communication.

- Timeliness and scheduling: installations are described as quick (often about 2 days) and crews work daily regardless of weather; crews are noted to have arrived on schedule and completed work as promised.

- Project management and communication: project managers (notably Eric and John) are frequently highlighted for keeping updates, addressing questions promptly, and coordinating tasks; one reviewer appreciated help with rebate paperwork.

- Installation quality and finishes: installers are repeatedly described as skilled, courteous, and meticulous; comments highlight excellent window installations, spot-on siding installs, and impressive finishes such as refreshed window sills and polished stone work; some reviewers mention the final product as “beautiful” or “fantastic.”

- Customer service and staff: multiple references to friendly, honest, and helpful staff; Chad R. is praised for product presentation and integrity; other team members (Taylor, Alex) are cited for their contributions and accessibility.

- Cleanup and follow-up: most reviews note good cleanup and haul-off of old materials; one comment notes cleanup was slower than desired; several reviewers say concerns were fixed promptly after installation.

- Value and outcomes: reviewers mention energy efficiency benefits and seeing utility savings as a future expectation; one review notes the warranty positively; a price concern is acknowledged in at least one experience.

- Neighborhood impact and referrals: neighbors and local community members have expressed approval, contributing to overall positive perception and willingness to recommend.

Across the reviews, Chino and the AECO team are described as reliable, professional, and easy to communicate with. Customers report prompt estimates (including same-day quotes) and completion within or shortly after the promised timeline, often starting work within the same week and finishing within days to a week. Pricing is consistently labeled as reasonable, with several notes of lower costs than competing estimates or adding only minor, inexpensive add-ons.

Services mentioned include gutter installation and cleaning, vinyl siding, and siding repairs, with some projects involving weather-related or accidental damage. Customers highlight punctual arrivals, thorough cleanup, and a post-job walk-through to verify satisfaction. The overall sentiment is positive, with praise for responsiveness, quality of work, and the ability to accommodate short-notice requests; multiple reviews indicate willingness to reuse the company and to refer others.

- Customers report the company arrived on time, explained options clearly, and had an efficient crew that kept the yard clean.
- The new siding is described as looking fantastic, durable, and improving curb appeal.
- Pricing is noted as transparent and fair with no surprises.
- Several customers would hire the company again for future exterior work.
- Jamie, the installer, is highlighted across multiple projects for siding, aluminum-wrapped trim, window replacement, and fixing leaks/insulation; described as professional, quick, and thorough.
- One customer’s inspection uncovered an under-house issue, which was addressed; Jamie is recommended for any project and both residential and commercial work.
- Overall, customers characterize Jamie as honest with good craftsmanship and competitive pricing.

Customer experiences with Superior Exteriors show a pattern of high-quality workmanship across a range of projects (bathrooms, kitchens, windows, siding, decks, porches, gutters, soffit/fascia, etc.) and generally professional, friendly staff. Many projects were completed on schedule or with clear timelines provided upfront, and customers praised leadership figures such as Rick, Joe, Nathan, and Jeff for responsiveness, attention to detail, and clean, respectful work sites. Several reviews cite fair pricing and a transparent bidding/estimation process, with value perceived as worth any wait caused by a backlog. A common theme is a substantial backlog that can lead to longer lead times, with some noting a wait of a couple of months, while others report timely completion once started. Repeated engagements indicate satisfaction across multiple projects and willingness to hire again. A minority reported poor communication and lack of follow-through, particularly regarding proposals or long delays before a decision was made. Overall, customers who used them again generally would recommend the company for exterior remodeling and related work, valuing professional service and quality results.

Customer reviews for Autumn Exteriors cover siding and window projects with a mix of positive and negative experiences. Some clients praised the appearance and insulation of installed vinyl siding and noted professional, efficient installation. Others reported significant issues, including wrong materials, incomplete workmanship, siding pulling away, paint peeling, and problems with communication and follow-up. Pricing is described as both favorable and pricey depending on the reviewer, with several citing high pressure sales or delays. A window-related lifetime warranty is mentioned by at least one review, but no clear siding warranty is consistently documented. Overall, the feedback is mixed; potential customers should verify materials, workmanship, post-installation support, and warranties before proceeding.

- The contractor appears to be a long-standing roofing and siding provider with many positive experiences centered on high-quality workmanship, thorough repairs, and attentive project coordination.
- Common strengths cited: good coordination and communication throughout the process, efficient scheduling (including large jobs completed in a day) and prompt follow-up on issues, and effective problem-solving (e.g., locating leaks others missed, quickly fixing problems under warranty).
- Warranty and post-service support are frequently highlighted as strong points, with several customers noting that issues were honored and resolved even years after installation.
- Pricing and value are generally described as fair or reasonable, with several mentions of competitive pricing and clear communication about costs.
- Specific services mentioned include roof replacement and repairs, gutter installation/repairs, attic fan installation, flashing inspections, and some mention of siding work.
- Positive experiences often emphasize that staff treated customers respectfully, were patient with non-native English speakers, and provided detailed explanations and photos during the repair process.
- Notable but minority concerns include:
- A few customers experienced delays or lack of timely follow-up on quotes and scheduling.
- One customer reported a confrontational in-person visit that criticized other workers and urged removal of a Google post.
- A couple of customers described inconsistent experiences with communication or service initiation.
- Several customers advised seeking referrals from neighbors or friends before choosing, indicating variability in experiences but strong overall satisfaction when references are favorable.
- Overall, most customers would consider rehiring or recommending JR Roofing & Siding, particularly for leak repair, comprehensive roof work, and warranty-backed service; a small portion suggested caution or additional verification before engaging.

Summary of customer experiences with Modern Exteriors of Springfield

- Projects and outcomes: Customers report a range of exterior repairs and remodels, including converting a screened porch to a sunroom (with the space described as usable year-round), replacing four sliding glass doors, deck work (repair or new deck), and installing new windows. Several projects are described as completed per contract and in a timely manner, with lasting satisfaction from the results.

- Quality and workmanship: Many reviews praise the workmanship and specific installers (e.g., Danny Whittemore, Randy, James, John Cook) for professionalism, careful installation, and attention to detail such as dust control and interior trim work. Windows and doors are generally viewed as quality products, and several customers express strong satisfaction with the final results, including aesthetically pleasing outcomes.

- Staff and customer service: Positive notes highlight helpful and friendly staff, particularly John Cook, Danny, Randy, Meg/Megan, Steve, and James. Some customers report exceptionally positive experiences and highly recommend the company, while others mention that individual interactions were more dependent on the staff member.

- Communication: While several reviews mention good communication and responsive updates, others note room for improvement, describing glitches, missing or incorrect information, or less efficient updates during the process.

- Vehicle safety and conduct concerns: A subset of reviews raise concerns about company vehicle behavior, including speeding, unsafe driving in school zones, and other risky driving practices. There are also broader concerns about how company vehicles are used and the behavior of some employees in public settings.

- Other notes: One reviewer described the company’s cold-calling approach as intrusive and felt they were caught off guard, while others view cold-calling negatively. A few reviews emphasize solid value, competitive pricing for quality work, and the overall care shown to customers.

Overall, potential customers can expect generally positive feedback on workmanship and project outcomes, especially when staff members cited in reviews are involved. However, there are mixed experiences regarding communication, and safety/conduct concerns about company vehicle use have been raised by several customers.

Customer reviews for Rozell (primarily mentioning windows, roofing, and related services) are mixed. Many clients praise workmanship, professionalism, timely project completion, and good value, with multiple recommendations. However, several reviews report poor warranty handling, problematic customer service, misquoted or disputed pricing, and inconsistent communication. While there are strong positive accounts, negative experiences around warranties and service issues are notable. The reviews do not specify siding materials by name; most discussion centers on windows, roofs, gutters, and related installations.

- Overall, experiences with Sutton’s Siding & Remodeling are mixed: several customers praise professionalism, insurance coordination, and quality workmanship, while others report scheduling, communication, and installation challenges.

- Positive aspects frequently noted:
- Helpful sales staff and project coordination (e.g., Mike McCormick; attention from sales to status updates).
- Courteous, professional crews and attention to detail.
- Quality outcomes on gutters, windows, doors, roofing, and various remodels (bathroom, kitchen), with some projects completed on or ahead of schedule.
- Willingness to work with customers to ensure satisfaction and to resolve issues.
- Some customers appreciated the “family-like” organization and timely quotes.

- Common concerns and negative experiences:
- Scheduling and communication problems: delayed starts, lack of calls, installers arriving unannounced, and inconsistent updates.
- Extended project timelines, with some jobs taking weeks or months longer than expected; limited installer hours cited in at least one case.
- Reports of unprofessional behavior from certain staff, and some dissatisfaction with specific sales or office interactions.
- Issues with estimates and pricing clarity (awnings estimates not provided as expected; some confusion over costs and scope; some inquiries about “cheapest estimate” were declined).
- Post-installation follow-up problems: delays in addressing fixes or adjustments, and in a few cases, unfinished or problematic installations (e.g., window wells, seals, hinges) that required subsequent work.
- In some reviews, customers stated they would not use or recommend the company due to the service problems, while others would definitely reuse and recommend for the services received.

- Range of services observed in reviews:
- Roofing, siding, gutters, windows, doors, deck work, and porch/railings.
- Add-on remodeling projects (bathroom, kitchen).
- Some references to coordinating with partnering specialists for certain installations (e.g., garage doors).

- Overall sentiment toward recommending Sutton’s varies: many customers would recommend or reuse for satisfied work, while others caution that scheduling, communication, and installation processes can be problematic.

Overall, customer experiences are mixed, with strong praise for workmanship and some project-management touches, but recurring concerns about scheduling, communication, and post-installation issues.

Positive experiences and practical details:
- Several customers report on-time crews, professional installation, tidy work sites, and high-quality results on roofs, siding, and windows.
- Staff such as Gwen (contact) and Dennis are frequently highlighted for responsiveness, guidance, and willingness to customize projects (e.g., converting a 3-season room to an all-season room, mid-project scope changes, additional doors, color selection).
- Projects are described as well-managed: transparent pricing, clear expectations, and occasional assistance with insurance claims.
- Some customers note subcontracting for roofing, but still frame the overall process as positive when communication and coordination were strong.
- Flexibility to adjust plans and ongoing communication during the project are cited as strengths by certain clients.

Significant concerns and practical details for potential customers:
- Scheduling can be unreliable, with multiple reports of last-minute cancellations requiring time off work and scheduling errors on quotes.
- Some customers experienced difficulty obtaining straightforward information about availability, and a few felt they were ghosted after requesting quotes.
- At least one case involved persistent roof leaks after multiple repair attempts, leading to hiring another contractor; another report described slow response to concerns.
- Several reviews mention rude interactions or inconsistent communication, including a terse “sorry for the inconvenience” response to a service issue.
- One review advised against solar panel installations because they could void the roof warranty, indicating potential warranty considerations for future upgrades.
- While some customers are very satisfied, others emphasize the importance of verifying scope, timeline, warranties, and who performs roofing work (subcontractor vs. in-house).

Notable staff mentions:
- Gwen and Dennis are repeatedly praised for helpful, attentive service and direct contact.
- Brian is recognized as conscientious for window work.

Recommendation for potential customers:
- Seek a clear, written schedule and scope of work; confirm whether roofing is subcontracted and who will be your point of contact.
- Clarify warranty coverage, post-installation support, and responsiveness expectations.
- Request references and a detailed timeline, including any potential contingencies for weather or changes in project scope.
- Be prepared for possible scheduling variability and communication gaps, and plan accordingly.

Feedback on SmithCo Exteriors is mixed. Many customers report high-quality workmanship and positive outcomes across a range of projects (siding, windows, decks, pergolas, awnings, gutters, stone work), professional staff, timely completion, thorough cleanups, and color matching. Several also note competitive pricing and a family-owned, customer-focused impression, with multiple repeat customers and endorsements from neighbors.

However, several practical concerns appear as well. One customer received an email cancellation of the siding project without explanation, forcing them to find another contractor. A separate experience included an instance of unprofessional, confrontational communication from the owner when a window issue was discussed. Some projects involved subcontractor crews with inconsistent results and finish quality. Pricing experiences vary: a few customers felt pricing was competitive or the best among quotes, while others found costs Piedra beyond their budget. Material and scope clarity sometimes required additional attention, and there were references to not receiving an itemized statement or mixed follow-up on warranty work. In one case, customers reported payment and warranty disputes, though resolution attempts were mentioned.

Overall, SmithCo Exteriors is viewed by many as capable and reliable for exterior work, but potential customers should seek clear, written scope and pricing, confirm who will perform the work, discuss warranties and post-completion follow-up, and set expectations for communication and scheduling.