Top Siding Repair Services in Tempe

- Rapid response to wind damage and quick initiation of repairs.
- Short project timelines, with many jobs completed in one day or within 48 hours.
- High-quality workmanship resulting in a roof/siding look that owners describe as “brand new” and built to last.
- Professional, respectful crews who communicated steps clearly and kept homeowners informed; generally no pushiness.
- Thorough site cleanup with no nails or debris left behind; property left in good condition.
- Positive customer experience and strong satisfaction, with several reviews stating they would recommend the company.
- Neighbors or bystanders noting favorable appearances after work.
- Perceived value, with comments about quality materials and competitive pricing in some cases.

Reviews consistently describe Healthy Structures Roofing (and siding) as professional, honest, and highly capable across a range of roofing-related projects. Customers cite Josh Hipps and Bill Hipps by name for clear communication, responsive service, and diligent project management. Work cited includes roof replacements and repairs, re-roofs for patios, skylight replacements, vent and HVAC framing work, and patching/repair of trim, underlayment, fascia, and decking. The company also handles related exterior projects such as porch builds, concrete slabs, and gutter work, and has serviced both single-family homes and rental properties.

Common process and delivery details include prompt scheduling, early arrivals, long work days to complete projects, thorough cleanup, and documentation of work with photos sent to the customer. Several reviewers note flexibility in pricing (for example, adjusting quotes when not all materials are needed) and the ability to coordinate subcontractors to keep projects on track. Customers frequently report minimal disruption to their schedules and responsive problem-solving when unforeseen issues arise, with some describing the experience as trustworthy and supportive.

Outcomes highlighted in the feedback include high-quality workmanship, durability (many projects described as lasting well and meeting or exceeding expectations), and the use of warranties (including a 10-year transferable warranty). Multiple customers mention they would recommend Healthy Structures to friends and family and return for future roofing or exterior needs, including repairs after severe weather and for multiple rental properties. Overall, the experiences emphasize reliability, strong communication, fair pricing, and solid craftsmanship.

- Overall impression: The reviews are largely positive, with frequent praise for professionalism, responsiveness, and value. A few reports mention unresolved issues or service-area limitations.

- Strengths noted: courteous, professional crews; thorough initial inspections and explanations; timely scheduling and completion; meticulous site cleanup (including removing nails); good communication throughout the process; strong documentation for insurance claims (photos/videos); reliable follow-up and support for future projects; competitive pricing with several reviewers saying they beat competitors or offered value for money.

- Services highlighted: roof replacement (including tile and shingle), underlayment work (including double underlayment), installation of flashing and vents, painting of risers/vents, fascia work, leak investigations and warranty-related visits; some projects involved multiple visits and coordination with insurers.

- Customer experience details: many reviewers, including realtors and property managers, report repeat business and referrals; estimators (notably Victor and James) described as thorough, honest, and knowledgeable; quotes often provided with free estimates and rapid timing; some projects started early or finished within tight windows.

- Pricing and quotes: multiple references to reasonable or competitive pricing; instances of quotes being significantly lower than others; several customers were impressed by the value relative to the price.

- caveats and considerations: at least one case of ongoing leaks after a supposed repair; one note that Sunnyslope is not serviced; a warranty call regarding a debris cleanup awning reportedly did not receive a timely follow-up.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: obtain a clear written scope and timeline; request documentation (photos/videos) of inspections and work; confirm service area coverage; discuss warranty terms and guarantees for repairs; anticipate some variability in outcomes with leaks and coordinate follow-up if issues arise.

Summary: Reviews for Love Our Roof / LoveMyRoof are largely positive, focusing on professional service, responsiveness, and quality workmanship for roof replacements and hail-damage repairs. Key points include:

- Professionalism and responsiveness: Jeff Lakomy and Kody Landals are frequently described as knowledgeable, dependable, and quick to answer questions; homeowners feel supported through the process and often coordinate with real estate teams.
- Quality of work and speed: Work is described as thorough and well-executed, with several jobs completed in one day; customers note good material knowledge and careful installation.
- Safety and customer experience: Crews reportedly wore masks around occupants, contributing to a comfortable experience during the project.
- Insurance claims and coordination: Many customers cite help identifying hail damage, guiding insurance claims, and following through to completion, reducing the homeowners’ burden.
- Communication and transparency: Ongoing updates and easy access to project supervisors (notably Kody) are highlighted as strengths.
- Real estate endorsements: Local real estate teams frequently recommend the company for reliability and on-time performance.
- Noted concerns: A small number of negative anecdotes exist, including a report of reckless driving by a vehicle associated with the company and an unrelated claim that the business “went out of business.” These are isolated and not representative of the majority of experiences.

Tacheny Exteriors handles exterior home projects including siding (notably James Hardie fiber cement), roofing, gutters, and doors. Reviews consistently describe professional, courteous crews, thorough communication, on-schedule work, and clean, neat results. Pricing is noted as reasonable, with positive interactions coordinating with insurers; warranties or ongoing roof inspections are mentioned in at least one review, indicating some coverage beyond the immediate project.

Customer reviews for Power Home Remodeling focus on window and door installations (plus some roof and solar work). Reviewers consistently describe the team as professional, efficient, communicative, and thorough in cleanup, with high overall satisfaction and willingness to recommend. There is no explicit discussion of siding repair materials or siding-specific outcomes in these reviews, so practical details for siding are not directly addressed beyond general remodeling service quality.

Customer feedback about Vinyl Guys centers on positive window replacement experiences. Key points include a low-pressure, informative sales approach from Russ; quotes that are quick and not time-consuming to obtain; lead times around six weeks for window delivery; full-house installations typically completed in one day; crews described as extremely professional and courteous. Pricing is noted as lower than some competitors while product quality is perceived as equal or better. Overall satisfaction is high, with recommendations to others.

- Overall impression: The reviews are largely positive, with frequent praise for communication, professionalism, and value. Several customers specifically name Kevin (foreman) and Larry (sales/coordination) for their responsiveness and clear explanations.

- Communication and updates: Customers appreciated prompt responses, regular updates (texts and photos during progress), and being able to reach the team easily. Several reviews mention thorough explanations of the work and steps involved.

- Scheduling and efficiency: Most projects started on schedule and were completed efficiently, sometimes requiring early starts due to heat, but finishing earlier than expected. Crews were noted to be organized and were able to complete work within the planned window.

- Work quality and scope: Services included roof removal/repair/replacement, installation of vents, skylights, gutters, and coatings. Work was described as high quality, precise, and thorough, with minor repairs sometimes performed without extra charges. Several reviews highlight the crews’ attention to detail and problem-solving abilities.

- Cleanliness and site handling: Many customers commented on good cleanup after shifts and careful work around homes and pets; some even noted positive, considerate interactions with their animals.

- Pricing and transparency: Pricing was frequently described as competitive or below other estimates, with invoices described as detailed and clear.

- follow-through and issue resolution: Issues or questions were typically addressed promptly, with many customers expressing strong satisfaction and willingness to recommend the company.

- Notable negative feedback: One review stated the company ignores “No Soliciting” signs and harasses people, indicating a possible approach concern. A few others cited past hesitations with other contractors before turning to Mighty Dog.

- Notable staff mentions: In addition to Kevin and Larry, customers referenced other team members such as John, David, Carlos, Adolfo, Allen, and the install crew, often praising their professionalism and communication.

roofing_contractor, general_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

Reviews focus on window replacements offered by Lifetime Windows/Lifetime Home Remodeling, with many customers praising professional installation teams and the overall quality of Marvin Infinity windows and arcadia doors. Several posts highlight lifetime warranties and rebates (e.g., Costco). However, there are notable criticisms about unfinished or incorrectly sized work, poor communication, and debris left on the property, and at least one review describes unethical practices. Pricing is sometimes seen as high, though rebates and warranties are cited as value. Overall experiences range from very positive to mixed.

Customers describe a friendly, professional roofing team that communicates clearly and offers upfront, fair pricing. Projects are often completed quickly—some in a single day—with careful site protection and thorough cleanup (tarps, moving items, leaving the property tidy). Services include reroofing with tiles, replacing around tiles, and fixing ridges with color-matched shingles, as well as prompt repairs for storm damage and follow-up checks after solar panel work.

The company assists with color selection and works with insurance estimates, paying attention to details such as vent pipe alignment and overall aesthetics. Numerous customers praise craftsmanship, reliability, integrity, and responsiveness, and many say they would highly recommend the team to others.

Overall, customer feedback for Roman Roofing (including Roman Roofing Solutions) is largely positive. Many clients describe the company as responsive, reliable, and professional, with crews that completed repairs or replacements efficiently and with minimal disruption. Strengths repeatedly noted include clear communication, thorough explanations of the process, on-time performance, clean job sites, and fair or competitive pricing. Several customers, including real estate professionals, report repeat use and referrals, and some cite helpful support during insurance claims, such as quick estimates, detailed paperwork, and site photos. A minority of reviews express serious concerns, including alleged leaks, vent closure, perceived subpar workmanship, and a recommendation to consider alternatives. Overall, the experiences suggest a credible option for roof work, with one negative case highlighted.

- Overall impression: The majority of experiences described are positive, focusing on knowledgeable staff, thorough installations, and noticeable value. A single negative incident was reported.

- Product and services highlighted: GlassWing exclusive window with claimed energy efficiency benefits; noise reduction from new windows; safety features in a walk-in shower; roofing tiles in at least one project; generally presented as high-quality, durable options.

- Staff and interactions: Repeated praise for several team members (e.g., Harley, Marchae, Riley, Brian Wills, Jaden, Raymond, Anthony, Rebecca, Isaia, Alan, Andrew, Tylor, Allan, Kobe, Zach, Derek, Davis). Customers describe staff as courteous, professional, knowledgeable, patient, and willing to accommodate special needs or scheduling.

- Installation and process details: Installations described as on-time or completed within a day; crews noted for being clean, organized, and thorough; installers often assisted with moving furniture and recalibrating blinds; office leadership (e.g., the GM) sometimes involved to ensure satisfaction; responsive communication during the process.

- Customer service and values: Many customers mention the company being family-owned, easy to work with, and focused on customer comfort and satisfaction; emphasis on educating customers about investments and potential savings.

- Notable concerns: One customer reported a negative interaction where a technician yelled at a disabled veteran and stated they would report the incident to the BBB; this stands in contrast to the generally positive feedback elsewhere.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: Expect thorough product explanations and demonstrations (especially of GlassWing), clear installation timelines, attentive aftercare and cleanup, and readiness to accommodate scheduling and space considerations in the home. There is a strong emphasis on the potential long-term comfort and energy savings from upgraded windows and related home improvements.

Reviews are mixed. Some customers report serious workmanship problems and poor communication, while others report positive experiences with reliability and responsiveness.

Negative experiences (reported issues)
- Work not completed and calls not returned for extended periods (over two months in one case).
- Structural/workmanship damage: destroyed roof, drip siding with large gaps, nails driven through the facade and into an open finished ceiling; significant nail holes (reported as over 120) in living and kitchen areas and an open beam ceiling.
- Open ceiling and skylight concerns: issues occurred despite prior warnings about an open ceiling and potential skylight problems; skylight opening did not align properly.
- Improper installations and modifications: outside patio attached to the roof (a flat roof) and heated, requiring removal; claims that some tasks were not completed.
- Project management shortfalls: alleged lack of clear direction to workers; misalignment of skylight opening; claims of unaddressed issues and incomplete work.
- Unresponsiveness and possible payment disputes: some reviewers said the company would not return calls and that payments from another party may have influenced work.

Positive experiences (reported positives)
- Several customers praised communication, reliability, and being kept informed throughout the process.
- Individual project managers and staff were highlighted positively (e.g., Rick as project manager; Alex for coordination and remote supervision; John Morris and crew).
- Overall satisfaction with the finished roof in some cases; perceived dependability and helpfulness of staff.

Practical considerations for potential customers
- Verify scope and timeline in writing; confirm completion expectations, especially if any structure is open or if skylights are involved.
- Clarify whether any exterior work (e.g., attaching a patio to a roof) is planned and ensure it is completed or properly resolved.
- Request detailed, written notes on the condition of the roof/ceiling before work begins; require documentation of any holes, gaps, or skylight alignments.
- Discuss protections for interior finishes (ceilings, beams) and plan for cleanup; insist on checking for nail holes or damage after work.
- Obtain multiple references, confirm communication protocols, and establish a clear point of contact; ask for status updates and expected call-back times.
- Consider requesting a warranty and a final walkthrough to verify all items are completed to satisfaction.

Overall, feedback is strongly positive. Practical takeaways for potential customers include punctuality (on-time service), professional and courteous staff, excellent customer service, and a seamless, stress-free process. Several reviews describe the company as great or amazing and highly recommend it, with one comment calling it the best metal roofing company.

- Overall, experiences with Weather Tight Exteriors/Weather-Tite Roofing & Construction and Brock Thomas are consistently positive, emphasizing honesty, reliability, and professionalism.
- Inspections are described as thorough and detailed, often including photos and a clear roofing report that explains current condition, remaining life, and future expectations.
- Communications are highlighted as clear and understandable, with step-by-step explanations and transparent recommendations about what is needed versus not needed.
- Customers note informally competitive pricing and the use of higher-quality products, with examples of being offered better underlayment at the same price as inferior options and receiving robust warranties.
- Service delivery is praised for being timely, with updates provided throughout projects, and for keeping the worksite clean with good cleanup after completion.
- Repeated referrals and repeat business are common, and several reviews mention trust, dependability, and honesty as reasons to work with them again.
- Typical service areas referenced include the East Valley and Gilbert, indicating regional familiarity and prompt availability in the Phoenix metro area.
- No notable negative experiences are described; the feedback centers on satisfaction with results, peace of mind, and confidence in decisions related to roofing and exterior work.

Gryphon Roofing is generally portrayed as professional, responsive, and capable of delivering complete roof replacements in a relatively short time, with clear communication and thorough inspections. Many customers report on-time arrivals, efficient crews, detailed explanations, and clean post-project cleanup. Several testimonials highlight competitive pricing, strong craftsmanship, and the owner and staff (notably Russ and Brooks) as communicative and trustworthy. Real estate professionals frequently recommend them, and several clients note prompt handling of leaks or issues that arose during or after installation. A number of projects are described as completed within about three to five days, with materials delivered promptly and work scheduled quickly after approval.

However, there are notable negative experiences noted in other reviews. Critics describe nails, debris, and other remnants left around the property for extended periods, misaligned or faulty tiles and skylights, and in some cases damage or workmanship concerns. Some customers report language barriers or crews with limited training, one-sided contract terms or pre-lien practices, and dissatisfaction with certain finish details. A few reviewers question the quality of the final appearance compared with neighboring homes or express skepticism about the consistency of online reviews. There are also accounts of post-install issues requiring follow-up fixes, though some of these were resolved by the company.

Practical takeaways for potential customers: request recent, local references and view actual completed jobs; obtain a detailed written scope and inclusions/exclusions; clarify cleanup responsibilities and warranty terms; verify crew language and training expectations; and plan for a multi-day installation window with potential follow-up visits if issues arise. Overall, Gryphon Roofing receives strong endorsements from many clients and realtors, but prospective customers should perform due diligence and verify specifics before proceeding.