Top Siding Repair Services in Scranton

Two reviews about Stott Roofing report storm-related damage to roof, gutters, and siding, and describe quick, fair service. The first review highlights a fair and honest price and prompt repair by Bob Stott with a strong recommendation. The second review mentions fair, professional, and timely roof installation (and fireplace work) by Stott Roofing, reinforcing a positive assessment of their service.

The feedback on BF Construction is largely positive, with multiple homeowners citing fast turnaround, professional conduct, and reasonable pricing for roofing and siding projects. Customers frequently note clear communication, thorough estimates, and workmanship that meets or exceeds expectations, often completed in a single day.

Key practical details mentioned:
- Turnaround and scope: many jobs finished in one day, including removal of one or two layers of shingles and installation of new roofs; some projects include additional work such as new plywood or vent work.
- Scheduling and estimates: quick response to inquiries, prompt quotes, and rapid progression from estimate to completion, with some customers reporting same-day or next-day service.
- Quality and efficiency: skilled, courteous crews delivering high-quality results and often completing work ahead of schedule.
- Cleanup and site respect: tidy work sites, proper dumpster use, and thorough post-job cleanup.
- Communication and trust: consistent updates, clear explanations, and honest assessments; customers report feeling informed and confident in the process.
- Pricing: generally described as fair and reasonable, with no pressure to oversell.
- Real-world scenarios: storm-related repairs and siding repairs after high winds are cited, along with standard roof replacements and garage roofing projects.
- Overall sentiment: customers frequently express willingness to recommend BF Construction and to hire the company again, citing reliability and trust.

- Service and staff: Reviews consistently describe friendly, helpful, and polite staff; ordering is often noted as smooth, knowledgeable, and easy. Mike is specifically praised in one review.

- Pricing: Several customers report great or good prices, though at least one says the deals aren’t the best; pricing appears variable.

- Delivery and availability: Materials are reported to be delivered in a timely manner, with some noting that obtaining building supplies can be difficult and expensive in the current market.

- Operational concerns: A notable negative point is that computer and system updates are infrequent, leading to some dissatisfaction with administrative processes.

- Practical takeaway for buyers: This business can be a reliable option for fast access to siding/building supplies with strong customer service; potential customers should verify current pricing and stock, and be aware of potential IT/administrative delays.

Overall, the feedback is mixed. Negative reviews describe cheap materials and workmanship leading to leaks, including a report of ongoing leaks after a roofing job. A positive review commends excellent service and workmanship.

- Services and outcomes: NEPA Builders has completed a range of exterior and interior projects including roof tear-offs and replacements, siding removal and installation, gutters, trim, deck work (replacement and repairs), windows, doors, and even bathroom and kitchen remodels. Several homeowners reported a noticeably improved exterior appearance and, in some cases, better interior ventilation and comfort.

- Project management and communication: The firm’s project managers, notably Matt, and a consultant named Sean, are frequently cited for professionalism, accessibility, and clear communication. Projects were described as completed on schedule and, in many cases, within estimated budgets. They were also noted for assisting with insurance coordination and handling unexpected challenges with problem-solving and practical, cost-conscious approaches. Several reviews highlighted proactive communication before and during work.

- Pricing, quotes, and value: Reviews show a range of pricing experiences. Some customers reported fair or cost-effective solutions and successful project management. Others described high minimum quotes (e.g., 25k–30k for a deck) or quotes over 10k for certain projects, and one reviewer felt the initial interaction implied limited affordability, with no follow-up after an in-person visit. A few customers eventually obtained quotes from other contractors after initial discussions.

- Positive testimonials: Many customers expressed strong satisfaction, recommending NEPA Builders and praising specific teams for quality work, honesty, professionalism, and responsiveness. Notable projects consistently cited include roof replacements, deck work, window and door replacements, and bathroom/kitchen improvements. Some customers appreciated being referred to other qualified contractors when NEPA could not take on a project.

- Cautions and mixed feedback: While several reviews are highly positive, at least one customer stated they would not recommend the company, and another noted a lack of follow-up after an initial quote. Another review described a negative interaction regarding a deck pricing policy and customer treatment on the phone.

- Notable strengths highlighted: thorough project management, ability to handle complex or aging homes (e.g., 85-year-old homes with challenges), responsive customer service, and a track record of transforming homes’ exterior and interior spaces. The company also provided before-and-after photos to document changes.

The collection of reviews presents a predominantly negative view of the siding repair company, with a few isolated positive notes about individual workers. Reported experiences center on quality, reliability, and conduct, and potential customers should consider these themes when evaluating the firm.

Quality and completion
- Many reviewers describe sloppy workmanship, incomplete or poorly executed work, and materials that do not meet expectations (e.g., siding issues, peeling or damaged surfaces, misaligned components). Some projects are described as unfinished or only partially completed, with parts installed inconsistently or left in poor condition.
- Several accounts mention damage to existing features or interiors (cracked drywall, floors that squeak, a damaged deck) and in one case a walk-in tub and ramp that did not meet needs.
- A number of customers report projects taking far longer than promised, with one notably long timeline and others noting repeated delays or partial completion.

Site condition and safety
- Multiple reviewers report debris and nails left around the property after work, including nails around the perimeter and general trash or disorder on site.
- Some accounts describe abrupt departures from jobs or returning to a site that had not been properly protected or cleaned up.

Professionalism, communication, and conduct
- There are frequent claims of unprofessional behavior, including threats, harassment, and confrontations with homeowners, and unannounced visits.
- Several reviewers allege poor communication, broken promises, and a lack of responsiveness. In some cases, customers say contracts or project details were not provided in writing or were altered without consent.
- A number of posts describe disputes over payments, with accusations of exaggerated charges or attempts to pressure for additional money.

Contractual and financial aspects
- Reviewers report perception of overcharging, misleading statements, and tactics described as extortion or coercive, including withholding services or components until new payments were made.
- Some comments reference involvement with “homeowner funding” processes and misrepresentations or mismanagement related to funding or grants.

Subcontractors and scope
- Several accounts mention subcontractors (e.g., window installers, other referenced crews) bringing additional coordination challenges, delays, or inconsistent quality.
- In a few instances, reviewers point to specific individuals positively (e.g., some workers who installed windows or handled particular tasks well), but these are isolated and not representative of the overall trend in the reviews.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- Verify licensing, obtain a detailed written scope and contract, and request copies of all agreements.
- Insist on a clear, written timeline, milestones, and a cleanup plan, and confirm who is responsible for debris removal and site safety.
- Check references and inspect past work if possible; ask about subcontractors and project management processes.
- Be cautious of high-pressure tactics or funding/sales offers that require immediate decisions; ensure all promises are documented in writing.
- Plan for contingencies around delays, potential scope changes, and the possibility of disputes requiring formal resolution.

Overall, the reviews urge careful due diligence and suggest there is a substantial risk of poor workmanship, disrupted schedules, and challenging interactions with the company.

Current customer feedback is positive, noting excellent workmanship ("Excelente trabajo"). No further practical details—such as pricing, project duration, materials used, warranty, or communication quality—are available in the provided data.

general_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

A client reported that the company finished their basement, did a great job, and offered reasonable pricing. The reviewer highlighted excellent communication and consistent on-site work, noting they were typically present most days and knew when to expect them. The client indicated they would hire the company again for future work.

Customer feedback for this siding repair business is uniformly positive. Reported strengths include high-quality workmanship, friendly and professional staff, and owner-operated management. Reviewers describe the company as honest and reliable and say they would highly recommend it to others.

- The customer noted prompt, courteous service.
- The company responded quickly to a siding repair after a wind storm in Mt. Top.
- The repair was completed quickly.
- The customer highly recommends the company.

- Product range and availability: Wide selection of materials for remodeling or new construction, including windows, siding, and doors; suitable as a complete supply source for construction projects.

- Customer experience and service: Generally positive and welcoming, with an emphasis on learning about products. Staff praised for knowledge and service (notably Jerry P); one comment noted occasional roughness and communication gaps.

- Delivery and logistics: Positive delivery experiences reported; drivers appreciated easy processes, coffee offered on delivery, and safe parking with space available on the side of the road out front; site described as quiet; drivers would return (10/10).

- Timeliness and efficiency: several customers reported on-time arrival and rapid work, with some jobs completed in one day; a few notes mentioned longer durations and logistical issues such as driveway blocking for two days.

- Professionalism and communication: many praise the crews as professional, courteous, and good at explaining progress; sales representatives and project managers were highlighted positively by some. A minority described unprofessional behavior (e.g., crews without company logos) or gaps in communication.

- Work quality and scope: most customers are satisfied with roof replacements and overall workmanship; some appreciate good results and sturdy installations. A few customers raised concerns about scope accuracy (e.g., claims about replacing all sheathing versus only some) and a mold issue in the attic not being addressed as expected.

- Cleanup and site safety: cleanup is frequently described as thorough, with tarps and quick debris removal; at least one report noted finding a nail on the sidewalk afterward.

- Logistics, pricing, and paperwork: several accounts mention smooth paperwork, payment processes, and discounts, with some customers comparing quotes and choosing the perceived best value.

- Customer sentiment and referrals: the majority express willingness to hire again or strongly recommend the company, though a minority recount negative experiences or concerns that impacted their satisfaction.

The experiences are mixed. Several customers praise high-quality workmanship, meticulous attention to detail, and strong results, with notes that the team is friendly and the owner, Nicole, is skilled, responsive, and knowledgeable in roofing, repairs, and maintenance. Some clients refer friends and feel they received good value and timely service.

However, other reviews describe reliability and communication issues: unresponsive to texts or calls, failure to provide written estimates or quotes after multiple inquiries, and delays of weeks. A few accounts mention unprofessional conduct or dishonesty, and at least one reviewer described an unprepared estimator and a poor initial interaction. Some customers advise staying away or choosing a more reliable company. Potential customers should verify responsiveness, request written estimates, and confirm scheduling expectations in advance.

Reviews for the siding repair service show generally positive experiences with prompt response times, on-time arrivals, and professional workmanship. Several customers mention fair pricing and good value, with tasks ranging from siding repairs to other handyman services. The strongest negative note is a report of rude communication when scheduling. Overall, customers appear satisfied with quality and service, though occasional customer-service issues are noted.

The reviews present a mixed picture of this siding/insulation contractor. Many customers describe professional, courteous service from both the sales/estimate staff and the installation crew, on-time arrivals, thorough explanations, careful site protection, and clean, efficient work. Several buyers report noticeable improvements in home comfort and energy performance after installation, with positive notes about the efficiency and thoroughness of the crew, and some instances of post‑work follow‑up or credit for unused work.

However, there are notable negative experiences as well. A few customers report significant dissatisfaction with pricing and scope issues, including quotes that appeared to include work not performed and disputes over refunds; one reviewer alleged fraudulent pricing, though the owner later addressed concerns. Another customer claimed the winter performance was worse after installation, calling it not a good investment. Overall, most positive comments emphasize professionalism and cleanup, while negative feedback centers on price/scope transparency and, in at least one case, post-install performance.

- Company and scope: Green Rhino Builders, offering roofing, siding, gutters, soffit, fascia, and related exterior work; some testimonies also reference deck projects.

- Overall impressions: broad consensus of high professionalism, responsive communication, and strong workmanship. Multiple customers note that crews were on time, finished on schedule, and maintained tidy job sites with thorough cleanup.

- Pricing and quotes: several clients report receiving very competitive pricing, with quotes that beat other companies; one reviewer appreciated an itemized materials list and transparency about costs.

- Project management and communication: customers frequently highlight clear, transparent communication from start to finish; owners and crews checked in to ensure satisfaction; detailed explanations of options and processes were common.

- Quality and outcomes: many testimonials describe dramatic, positive results (e.g., house siding transformation, high-quality roofing finishes, excellent color selection, and overall durable installations). Warranties cited include strong terms (e.g., 50-year material, 25-year labor) and Gold Pledge options on certain roofing systems.

- Cleanliness and protection: repeated notes about protecting the home with tarps, safeguarding landscaping, and leaving the work area spotless with no scrap left behind.

- Customer advocacy: several reviews express strong endorsements, with some reviewers stating they would hire Green Rhino again without hesitation and recommend them to others.

- Notable caution: at least one reviewer reported issues with a back deck (splinters after using pressure-treated wood), suggesting potential material-specific concerns for deck work.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: you can expect competitive pricing with itemized quotes, thorough upfront education on options, professional and communicative teams, on-time project starts/ends, strong warranties, and careful site protection and cleanup. If you’re planning deck work, consider discussing material choices to avoid wood-related splinter issues.

Quality Roofing Express (Osman and Yuvannia) is a family-owned contractor that primarily handles roofing, with services including gutters and siding. Customer experiences are mixed but tend to cluster around roofing work rather than siding repairs.

Positive patterns
- Several customers describe highly professional service, attentive on-site management, and use of high-quality materials.
- Work is often completed promptly, with crews reporting good workmanship and thorough cleanup.
- The company is repeatedly praised for responsiveness, including rapid response to weather-related emergencies, and for fair pricing.
- Many reviews express strong overall satisfaction and willingness to hire again or recommend the company for roofing projects.

Negative or cautionary patterns
- At least one customer reported siding issues (siding rippling) after installation; the company allegedly blamed the manufacturer, and the customer ultimately fixed the problem with the manufacturer’s documentation indicating improper installation.
- A separate review described poor scheduling and communication, with a missed or delayed appointment and no follow-up.
- A customer noted nails and debris left in gutters after roofing work, which caused drainage/sewer cleaning costs.
- In another case, there was discomfort or disagreement about tarp placement on slate shingles, reflecting broader concerns about communication and scope.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- If seeking siding-related work, request references specifically for siding installations and verify any installation warranties.
- Confirm who will manage the project and how communication will be handled, especially for non-roofing components (siding, gutters).
- After completion, inspect gutters for nails/debris to avoid drainage or sewer issues.
- Clarify tarp policies and procedures for slate or other delicate roofing materials.
- Clearly define scope and potential responsibilities for installation-related issues, including who covers defects and what constitutes a defect versus installation error.

Summary of customer experiences with the USA roofing/siding contractor:

- Overall tone: Predominantly positive, with several strong endorsements for professionalism, speed, and workmanship; a minority report negative experiences related to installation problems and follow-up.

- Positive patterns and practical details:
- Measured quotes and upfront discussions: customers report thorough consultations covering colors, warranty, financing options, and questions answered in detail.
- No-pressure sales approach: several mentions of not being pressured to proceed immediately.
- Fast, efficient installations: many projects completed in one day; crews described as professional and careful with surroundings; strong emphasis on thorough clean-up.
- Financing and payment options: multiple references to financing availability and, in at least one case, zero-down payment.
- Clear communication and follow-up: multiple testimonials note good communication, with follow-up within 24 hours after completion.
- Insurance/urgent deadlines: at least one customer indicated the company met an insurance-required deadline and provided reputable service under time pressure.
- Siding/roofing outcomes: customers frequently express satisfaction with the look and longevity of metal roofs and siding, noting visible improvements to home exteriors.

- Notable concerns and negative experiences:
- Installation issues and leaks: a couple of customers reported improper installation leading to leaks, damage, and subsequent calls for repairs; some did not feel the follow-up remedied the problems.
- Pricing and value: a few accounts describe high prices compared to other quotes.
- Weather-related delays or complications: winter installations involved extra challenges (e.g., snow removal).

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect detailed initial consultations with information on colors, warranties, and financing.
- Projects are often completed quickly (frequently in one day) with emphasis on cleanup.
- Ask about warranty coverage, potential need for follow-up work, and post-installation service if issues arise.
- Compare quotes on pricing and verify the contractor’s availability to meet deadlines, especially for urgent or insurance-driven timelines.
- Inquire about down payment requirements and financing options.

Overall, customers describe prompt initial contact and a collaborative planning process led by Aldo Strack, with pricing that frequently undercuts competitors and covers a broad scope. Work often begins when weather cooperates and includes exterior tasks such as power washing, painting, and trim, as well as interior painting of entire spaces (first and second floors) and, in some cases, cabinet painting. Reviewers frequently note hardworking, detail‑oriented crews and respectful scheduling, with some projects completed quickly (examples include a four‑day cabinet‑painting window) and many customers reporting high‑quality, transformative results. A number of clients say they would highly recommend the company, and several describe the finished work as outstanding or showpiece level.

However, there are notable downsides raised by some customers. Several reviews indicate that cabinetry work was subcontracted to painters with limited cabinet experience, resulting in issues such as doors not closing, mismarking, inadequate prep (no sanding or cleaning), bubbling, and peeling. Warranty handling is disputed in at least one case, with a claim that a 3‑year warranty was not honored and communications about service or warranty claims were slow or unresponsive. A few reviewers also mention inconsistent responsiveness or delays in returning calls. Potential customers should verify who will perform specialized tasks (especially cabinetry), confirm warranty terms in writing, and set expectations for post‑project follow‑up and communication.