Top Siding Repair Services in Richmond

Reviews portray Tredegar Construction as a contractor for siding, roofing, gutters, windows, and exterior improvements. The most cited siding material is Hardie Plank cement siding (fiber cement). Customers repeatedly highlight strong communication, organized crews, on-time or ahead-of-schedule project completion, and careful attention to detail, with several projects praised for clean sites and completed work. While overall positive, there are a few negative notes around a complex project (notably door installations) requiring multiple visits and some stress in pricing discussions. Pricing is described as fair or competitive by many, with financing options mentioned; a few reviews reference price increases due to material costs or price negotiation. Overall, customer service is highly rated despite occasional frustrations on specific projects.

Retex Roofing & Exterior handles siding and roofing projects with generally positive feedback on professionalism, responsiveness, and workmanship. Customers frequently note polite, knowledgeable crews, thorough project managers (e.g., Mark and Kaitlyn), and timely project completion with clear communication. Some reviews mention issues such as weather-related delays, miscommunication about materials, incorrect skylight sizes, and occasional property damage (nails, gutter downspout), but many of these are addressed through follow-up care. Pricing is typically described as competitive and fair, with quotes aligning to final costs. Warranties are mentioned but terms are not clearly defined in the reviews. Response times for inquiries are commonly same-day to within 24 hours.

Overall, the feedback portrays Julian as a reliable and trustworthy siding professional with a track record of client satisfaction. Customers describe him as responsive and timely, an active listener who helps ensure the siding options fit their needs, and a detail-oriented communicator who maintains clear, proactive communication. Reviews note his dedication, willingness to go above and beyond, and service-oriented approach, contributing to positive outcomes and high-quality workmanship. Several clients have established ongoing relationships and would hire him again, with strong recommendations. After launching Ideal Siding Richmond, reviewers suggest homeowners can expect the same level of dependable service and quality. Practical takeaways for potential customers: expect dependable scheduling and follow-through, thorough guidance on siding choices and installation, attention to detail, and responsive, courteous communication throughout the project.

Blue Ridge Exteriors specializes in siding replacement (primarily James Hardie Hardie siding, including HardiePlank) and related exterior work such as doors and trim. Customers consistently report professional crews, strong communication, on-schedule projects, and good value for the price. The company is described as responsive with owner involvement and thorough post-install follow-up. Most reviews are highly favorable with multiple projects completed across homes; few or no major complaints.

Overall, customers report a mix of positive experiences and notable concerns with T&G Enterprise LLC, particularly tied to exterior work such as roofs, gutters, windows, sliding doors, and siding.

Positive/consistent themes
- Professionalism, responsiveness, and customer-focused service are frequently cited. Several reviewers note clear explanations of problems and solutions, and flexible scheduling to accommodate busy lives.
- Competitive pricing and perceived good value. Several customers describe prices as reasonable or among the best they found.
- Quality workmanship on certain projects. Windows replacement (nine original house windows) described as professional and timely; roofing work praised for look and materials; gutter-related work and a new sliding glass door are cited as well-executed.
- Personal interaction and communication. Tom and staff are repeatedly mentioned as helpful, communicative, and available for questions; final walkthroughs are cited as part of a thorough process.
- Some projects are completed with little disruption and good cleanup, with references to respectful crews and clean results.

Significant concerns and negative experiences (notably siding)
- A siding installation project is described as a nightmare by one customer: siding began to fall off, and installation caused property damage (e.g., a broken cable box and exposed electrical) with alleged insufficient follow-through to rectify issues.
- Issues with discounts and payments: a veteran discount was not honored initially, with a later admission and partial compensation; concerns that discounts did not fully address damages or potential future problems.
- Communication and responsiveness problems: multiple references to delays, scheduling communication errors, and limited follow-up after issues arose; one customer felt the contractor did not respond promptly to post-install concerns.
- Cleanup and site cleanliness problems: reports of nails inside the house, leftover debris and scraps outside, and insufficient post-install cleanup (e.g., items removed during install not replaced afterward).
- A request for clearer expectations and processes: dissatisfaction centered on timeliness, the handling of delays or repairs, and the overall impact on family safety, given potential future damage.

Other notes
- Individual experiences vary by project type; roof, gutter, and door installations are described with generally favorable outcomes, while the siding experience contains the most critical feedback.
- Some reviews emphasize the importance of documented scope, warranties, and clear communication to avoid disputes or dissatisfaction.

Potential customers may want to verify the scope of work, warranty terms, written estimates, discount eligibility, and a detailed cleanup plan, and consider requesting a final walkthrough to ensure all issues are addressed before project completion.

Customer reviews consistently praise A Plus Roofing for roofing, gutter, fascia, and siding-related work, emphasizing professional and courteous crews, clear communication, timely completion, and fair pricing. Projects mentioned include replacing roofs on the main house and a garage, gutter guard installation, fascia repair prior to gutter work, and siding on a large home, separate garage, and guest house. The team is noted for handling insurance paperwork, providing helpful insights during consultations, and maintaining a proactive, no-pressure approach. Warranties are not specified in the reviews. Overall feedback is highly positive, highlighting trust, reliability, quality workmanship, and thorough cleanup.

Overall, customer experiences with Revival Restoration and Bill Menoutis are mixed, with several strong positives tied to insurance coordination, professional communication, and workmanship, but notable negatives related to communication, scheduling, and some project execution issues.

Key themes
- Insurance and claims handling
- Positive: multiple reviewers credit Bill with securing full replacement coverage through insurance and coordinating with third-party adjusters when needed.
- Negative: at least one reviewer felt the process required ongoing prodding and that final payment requests occurred before completion.

- Communication and updates
- Positive: some customers report proactive, weekly updates and timely responses from Bill.
- Negative: others report poor or infrequent updates, requiring customers to contact the company for status; one notes a lack of transparency after the sale.

- Scheduling and delays
- Positive: several reviews praise timely project progression and quality crews.
- Negative: other accounts describe long delays (e.g., November start with a April start), misalignment of expectations, and delays impacting mortgage/occupancy.

- Project execution and workmanship
- Positive: reports of high-quality roof and siding installation, careful cleanup, and attention to detail; some crews are highlighted for professionalism.
- Negative: issues cited include unloading materials on grass instead of a driveway, shutters not ordered or incorrectly sized, a non-working exterior light, and other missed items or incomplete work.

- Compliance and practices
- Positive: some customers note professional conduct and adherence to promises.
- Negative: at least one review claims the company does not follow local laws/ordinances; another mentions unwanted door-to-door soliciting behavior.

- Customer experience and trust
- Positive: several reviewers would recommend Revival Restoration to others; some customers report feeling supported and informed throughout the claims process.
- Negative: others express strong distrust or regret, citing aggressive sales tactics, ongoing communication gaps, and unfinished work.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- Clarify scope and materials upfront: ensure shutters, lighting, and all listed items are included and clearly defined in the contract.
- Verify scheduling and timelines: request a detailed start-to-complete schedule with milestones and regular progress updates.
- Establish a communications plan: agree on a preferred update frequency (e.g., weekly) and a single point of contact.
- Confirm insurance coordination: discuss whether a public adjuster is needed, expected timelines, and when final payments are due.
- Inspect site logistics: specify where materials will be staged, who is responsible for cleanup, and how any debris will be disposed of.
- Check compliance and solicitation practices: verify adherence to local laws and whether door-to-door outreach is standard for the company.
- Payment terms: avoid paying before substantial completion; require itemized invoices and proof of completed work.
- Post-completion follow-up: request a final walkthrough to confirm all items are completed and any warranty coverage is documented.

Overall, customers report positive experiences with Classic Construction across a range of projects, including decks, siding, windows, porches, gutters, and interior renovations. They frequently cite thorough initial consultations, detailed quotes, competitive pricing, and strong on-site teamwork as key strengths. The team is repeatedly described as professional, attentive, and communicative, with daily updates and clear expectations throughout the project.

Recurring project details and personnel mentioned:
- Notable team members: Juston Stiltoner (sales) and Brent Pittman (master carpenter), with Jordan (project coordinator) and other crew members referenced across projects.
- Materials and scope cited: TimberTech Advanced PVC decking (7.25"), TimberTech Impression Rail Express railing; Hardie siding; Wolf PVC decking; RDI Endurance railing; premium windows; gutters and related exterior work.
- Project management: projects are described as well managed, with regular communication, adherence to schedules, and careful site cleanup. Some customers note the ability to tailor crews or bring in specialists for specific tasks.

Timelines and outcomes:
- Some projects were completed within a month; others, such as a two-stage window replacement, spanned longer due to holidays or weather but were still viewed positively when completed.
- A few testimonials emphasize rapid responsiveness and stress-free coordination, with references to high-quality finishes and noticeable improvements in appearance, durability, and energy efficiency.

Notable caveats:
- While the vast majority are favorable, at least one review cites lack of communication and unprofessional behavior, illustrating that experiences can vary.

Overall, feedback portrays Classic Construction as a reliable option for decking, siding, and exterior renovations, with emphasis on customer service, workmanship, and value. Customers commonly express willingness to hire again and to refer the company to others.

Customers consistently report prompt, professional roofing and related work by JRL Construction & Roofing (notably Drew, Jose, and Leesa). Reviews cover roof repairs and replacements, gutter work, and deck projects, with crews arriving on time, completing jobs efficiently (often in a day), and leaving sites clean. The company frequently coordinates with insurers, communicates clearly, and provides courteous service. Pricing is described as reasonable or competitive with no high-pressure upsell. Overall, customer service is praised as honest and responsive, and while minor issues with shingles from suppliers occurred, they were quickly repaired. Warranties or guarantees are not discussed in the reviews.

Customers consistently described Bon Air Exteriors as professional, courteous, and responsive across a range of exterior projects, including decks, screened porches, siding, gutters and soffits, and exterior lighting. Crews were punctual, tidy, and diligent about cleanup; communication was clear and frequent, with Curtis handling design/estimates and Scott (and other project managers) overseeing scheduling and on-site work. Most projects were completed on the promised schedule; some were finished quickly (porch installations in one day; deck rebuilds within two weeks, including inspections), and crews often worked in challenging conditions while answering questions. The company was proactive in correcting issues (for example, re-mounting a downspout; addressing rot before re-wrapping siding) and conducted thorough post-work walkthroughs. Many customers noted high-quality finishes and good value for the price, with several expressing willingness to hire again and to recommend Bon Air Exteriors to others. Overall, feedback indicates strong customer service, reliability, and satisfaction with the outcomes.

Customer experiences with Window Depot regarding window replacements are consistently positive and describe a smooth end-to-end process from initial sales discussions to installation. Key practical takeaways include competitive pricing, clear communication, and flexibility to fit budgets (including splitting the job if needed). Installations are reported as professional and timely, often completed in about two days, with crew leaders such as Jarod, Mike, Jared, Logan, Manny, Johnny, and others coordinating and delivering quality work. Customers note on-time arrivals, attention to detail, thorough cleanup, and protective care for homes (yard left spotless, work around a baby and a dog when needed). The post-install results are praised as attractive and easy to operate, with installers described as courteous, respectful, and customer-oriented. Overall, many customers would highly recommend Window Depot and would hire them again for future projects.

- Most customers describe Absolute Roofing as professional, with a crew that produced high-quality roof and siding work and maintained good communication from start to finish.
- Multiple reviews highlight staff members such as Jesus, Clayton, Richard, Walker Briggs, Alex, Quincy Redmond, and Chris as knowledgeable, proactive, and helpful in guiding the project and addressing questions, including insurance-related guidance.
- Several customers report that work was completed within estimated costs and timeframes, with a strong emphasis on thorough cleanup and attention to detail.
- Reviewers note effective support with insurance claims and damage assessment, including scenarios involving hail damage and ensuring the proper scope of work.
- Color and siding selection assistance is valued by those who had trouble finding options, with staff helping to identify suitable colors and looks.
- One review mentions reimbursement for a tire incident during the process as an example of customer care.
- There are some negative experiences noted: one customer described an aggressive on-porch sales interaction and another advised not to use the company, indicating occasional dissatisfaction.

Jacob's Ladder appears to specialize in siding replacement and exterior painting, with frequent praise for on-time arrivals, efficient work, and strong project management. The reviews reference Hardy plank siding (fiber cement) and related painting and carpentry work, highlighting responsive communication, attention to detail, clean job sites, and high-quality finishes. Project managers such as Johnnie, Justin, and Seth are repeatedly mentioned for coordinating estimates, scheduling, and on-site oversight. Pricing is generally viewed as competitive, and warranties are not discussed in the reviews.

Mighty Dog Roofing (Richmond) is described by many customers as a dependable and professional contractor for roofing, siding, gutters, decks, and related exterior work. Reported strengths include strong leadership and communication from project leads (notably Coleson Pokorny), responsive scheduling and site presence (Kenny and Rafael mentioned), smooth coordination with insurance adjusters, helpful financing options, and high-quality results with attention to color matching and overall aesthetics. Several reviews highlight efficient execution, with some projects completed quickly (even in a single day), thorough cleanup, and proactive communication throughout the process. Customers also note cross-functional teamwork, including involvement of subcontractors, and a positive experience handling complex jobs (roof and gutter replacements, chimney work, interior repairs, and pest-related exterior issues).

Practical details cited by customers:
- Services cited include roofing replacement, gutter work, siding repairs, deck work, chimney repairs, and interior updates; some projects also involved enabling home sales.
- Insurance coordination is a common theme, with staff assisting in proposals and numbers for claims.
- Financing terms and warranty considerations are mentioned as favorable by some customers.
- Color selection examples are provided (e.g., Owens Corning Trudefinition Duration Estate Gray) and in some cases color matching and approvals were emphasized.
- On-site execution is praised for promptness, with notes of work completed efficiently and debris removal handled.

Negative or problematic experiences:
- One customer reported a pipe collar repair that leaked again within three months, with no follow-up response when asked to revisit the issue; another roofer allegedly found the repair was not fixed correctly and wood became rotten, describing the experience as a waste of money.
- A separate reviewer alleged a poor job, admitted as such, involving paint splatter on the house and yard, followed by threats of vandalism when requesting compensation.

Overall impression:
- The majority of feedback portrays Mighty Dog Roofing (Richmond) as reliable, knowledgeable, and customer-focused, with strong project management and communication. Potential customers may want to confirm warranty terms, scope of work, and post-service follow-up procedures, and may wish to check references for specific project types (roofing, siding, gutters) to ensure expectations are aligned.

Reviews of Exterior Home Solutions are largely positive and focus on high-quality exterior work and solid customer service, with several recurring practical details:

- Services commonly cited: vinyl siding, James Hardie/Hardie Board siding, roofing, gutters and gutter guards, fascia and trim, windows, doors, and even interior touches like sunrooms; some projects combined multiple components (e.g., siding, roofing, windows, and painting).
- Quality and results: finished work described as visually appealing and durable, with some homeowners noting curb appeal improvements and “brand-new” looks after completion.
- Pace and coordination: several projects completed quickly (e.g., roofing finished in a day; siding projects completed within about five days); crews described as professional, hardworking, and able to keep homeowners involved in decisions.
- Crew behavior and site care: frequent praise for punctuality, tidiness, and minimal disruption to daily life during installation.
- Pricing and value: multiple reviews mention fair or competitive pricing and good value for the work performed.
- Project management: positive mentions of responsive leadership and hands-on presence by managers (e.g., Ruben, Christian); strong customer care and willingness to address issues.
- Repeat business and referrals: many reviewers say they would hire again and would recommend to others.
- Cautions: a minority report negative experiences centered on a specific salesperson who pressured for appointments or estimates and poor follow-up; this suggests potential buyers should verify written estimates and timelines and ensure clear communication expectations.

Overall, potential customers can expect comprehensive exterior renovation capabilities, experienced crews, clear communication, and a focus on efficient, tidy project execution, with attention to quality materials and end results.

Overall, customer experiences with Elman’s Contractors Inc. were positive and focused on timely, professional service and high-quality results. Reports consistently note prompt quotes and completion, with projects often overseen by a project manager and updates provided throughout from deposit to cleanup. Work quality is described as high across a range of exterior tasks, including siding replacement and painting, roofing, gutters and leaf guards, soffit/fascia repair, shutters, windows, and attic additions. In one case rot in studs was discovered and repaired the same day, and weather-related challenges were managed to keep schedules. Pricing is frequently described as fair and transparent, with no hidden costs and several accounts of cost savings relative to other bids or contractors; some projects are cited with specific totals (for example under $22,000 for siding, gutters, and leaf guards on a 1700 sq ft two-story home). Cleanliness and professionalism of crews are consistently mentioned, with thorough daily cleanup and respectful, skilled workmanship. Many customers state they would hire the company again and would recommend them to others.

Overall, customers report fast, professional, courteous service with high-quality exterior work performed by Jay and his team. Practical strengths highlighted include:

- Wide scope of work: siding replacement (cedar and vinyl/Hardie plank), window and door installation, gutters and downspouts, trim and flashing, deck repairs, porch work, and even small jobs such as removing/installing a microwave.
- Strong communication and project management: proactive updates before, during, and after projects; thorough explanations of work scope; progress photos; clear expectations and on-time scheduling.
- Quality and reliability: skilled workmanship, attention to detail, and work completed on or ahead of schedule; accurate, comprehensive quotes that cover the full job rather than partial scopes.
- Problem-solving and trust: ability to diagnose and fix issues (e.g., leak origins, improper prior installations) and to complete complex tasks efficiently; consistent reliability and honesty noted by multiple clients.
- Customer experience: courteous, respectful crews; minimal disruption to daily routines (including working from home); willingness to handle smaller jobs and repeat engagements, with several customers becoming long-term or repeat clients.
- Value and recommendations: pricing described as fair for the quality; many customers expressed willingness to hire again and to refer others for future exterior projects.

In summary, prospective customers can expect a proactive, detail-oriented exterior contractor with a broad service offering, reliable communication, and a track record of quality workmanship across multiple properties.

I don’t have the customer reviews for this siding repair business. Please paste the reviews or share a link to the source, and I’ll produce a neutral, factual summary focusing on practical details such as timelines, communication, workmanship, pricing, warranties, and cleanup.

Overall, customers describe predominantly negative experiences with this siding repair business, citing aggressive sales tactics, questionable pricing, and uneven workmanship.

- Sales and pricing: multiple reports of high-pressure, door-to-door sales; inconsistent pricing and claims about all labor being in-house that were contradicted by later use of subcontractors; quotes that were far higher than alternatives; mention of financing with hidden fees and promised discounts that expired or were not honored.

- Communications and appointments: several instances of unresponsive or dismissive responses, difficulty canceling or rescheduling, and late or unclear on-site communication; some customers felt pressured to commit during or after sales pitches.

- On-site service and workmanship: complaints about unmarked crews, lack of introduction or communication from installers, and failure to repair the claimed damage; property damage such as broken paver stones and damage to garden beds; leftover material and trash left on the property; promises of compensation or checks not fulfilled.

- Labor and company representation: initial assurances that employees would perform all work were contradicted by appearances of subcontractors; mixed reports on the professionalism or attitude of individual sales staff, with some named as helpful or respectful and others described as pushy or dishonest.

- Customer experience and responsiveness: company responses to reviews criticized by some; a few positive interactions noted (e.g., certain representatives described as helpful or informative), but these were not representative of the overall tone.

- Location and branding: at least one reviewer singled out the Richmond office as particularly problematic.

Practical guidance for potential customers: obtain detailed written quotes, verify who will perform the work (employees vs. subcontractors), request a clear scope of work and timeline, document all damages and cleanup expectations, seek multiple estimates, and be cautious of high-pressure sales pitches and financing terms.