Top Siding Repair Services in Pueblo

Summary of customer experiences for E. Esquivel Roofing (Roofing Esquivel):

- Overall sentiment is mixed. Many customers praise professionalism, efficiency, and high-quality workmanship, with strong attention to detail and thorough site cleanliness.
- Practical strengths highlighted:
- Effective communication and coordination, including constant updates from estimators and on-site supervision by the owner or supervisors.
- Prompt scheduling and quick project completion (examples include jobs started within a week and finished in a couple of days; some projects involved multiple structures such as houses, garages, shops, and barns).
- Experience handling insurance processes, including meetings with adjusters, arranging needed repairs, and tarping to protect roofs during material delays.
- Ability to work with both shingles and metal roofing, as well as gutters; several reviews mention multi-building jobs and comprehensive roofing services.
- Positive remarks on pricing and perceived value from several customers.
- Notable emphasis on thorough cleanup and safety, with comments about leaving the site free of nails or debris.
- Negative experiences and concerns:
- At least one reviewer reported a leak within nine months of a roof replacement and claimed the warranty was not honored.
- A few customers alleged serious misconduct, including material theft and accusations of fraud, and warned others to avoid the company.
- A reviewer described a poor warranty/inspection experience, advising against using the company.
- Considerations for potential customers:
- If considering this contractor, verify warranty terms in writing and request detailed project timelines and scope.
- Seek references and confirm the level of involvement from the owner or supervisors on site.
- Obtain a clear plan for insurance coordination and post-install cleanup expectations.
- Be aware that experiences cited by customers vary, ranging from highly positive to severe allegations.

- Overall impression: PC Roofing is described as professional, reliable, and customer-focused, with strong emphasis on communication and follow-through.
- Services cited: roof replacement and repair, leak repairs, gutters, and projects on both single-family homes and a shed; some reviews mention working with budget and providing value.
- Communication and reliability: customers report being kept informed throughout projects and that issues were addressed promptly; several reviews note guarantees or commitments were honored.
- Timeliness and workmanship: multiple accounts of timely work, including jobs completed in a single day or by lunch; crews described as efficient and skilled.
- Cleanup and site condition: frequent notes of thorough cleanup, daily nail pickup, and sites left in better condition than before.
- Pricing and value: several reviews describe pricing as reasonable or budget-friendly and that the service provided good value for the quality.
- Crew behavior: reviewers highlight courteous, respectful, and professional crews; references to Sam and Annica as approachable points of contact.
- Service area: experiences reference work in Colorado communities such as Pueblo, Florence area, and Cuchara, indicating a regional focus in southern Colorado.

- Scope of work across testimonials includes roof replacements, gutters, skylights, and related exterior work; one note mentions a metal roof with a 20-year warranty.
- Overall experiences are positive, described as professional, with high-quality workmanship and attention to detail.
- Communication and responsiveness are emphasized: quick replies, straightforward processes, and staff (notably Josh Martin) who answer questions and provide updates.
- Workmanship and cleanup are repeatedly praised: crews are hardworking, meticulous in cleaning up (including nails and debris), and respectful of the property, pets, and yard art.
- Insurance coordination is a common benefit: staff assist with filing and submitting claims and liaising with insurers.
- Timelines are highlighted as favorable: work completed quickly and on or before requested deadlines; some customers could accommodate tight schedules.
- Customization and options are mentioned: color choices (including black gutters) and skylight considerations, with proactive communication about changes or additional costs if needed.
- Customer service and referrals: several customers express willingness to recommend Valley Exteriors and say they would hire them again.
- Notable staff references: Josh Martin (and sometimes Nate) are repeatedly cited for professionalism, helpfulness, and reliability.

Customer expresses very high satisfaction with the quality of the siding repair work and with the customer service. They note the job was completed while meeting every specific request and indicate they would hire the company again.

Reviews consistently describe a roofing contractor delivering high-quality workmanship with skilled, courteous crews and professional service. Customers report prompt and efficient service, attention to detail, clear communication, and projects completed on schedule. One review notes competitive pricing. There are no mentions of specific siding materials, warranties, or maintenance tips; overall sentiment is very positive and suggests Excellent quality and customer service.

Overall, customers describe Quality Stucco as delivering skilled workmanship at a fair price, with quick turnaround in some cases (notably a two-day job). The company handles diverse projects, including applying a new coat of stucco on a house with contours and even a straw-bale structure, with results described as making the home look brand new. Minor stucco repairs are noted as easy to coordinate, with Chris described as courteous, knowledgeable, and willing to go above and beyond to ensure quality. Clients mention good communication, thorough follow-through, and clean-up after projects, as well as respectful behavior around homes with families. Specifics cited include a garage-hole repair that is not visible after completion and the use of color 121 Sandalwood by El Rey on an older home with DIY modifications. A testimonial from a relative highlights Chris’s character and conduct as foundational to the business’s success.

Customer feedback notes positive experiences with roofing and gutter services. In one project on a personal residence, the owner’s son Luis served as the roofing crew lead, with work including installing new vents, replacing underlayment, adding metal edging, replacing a furnace cap, and installing premium shingles. The customer was satisfied and plans to budget for additional gutters. In another report, J&O completed gutter work described as fast, convenient, and reasonably priced, with the customer indicating they would recommend the services.

J Turner Roofing (Luke, Luke Jr.) is described as a versatile contractor handling roofing, gutters, windows, trim, and related remodels. Reviews frequently praise responsiveness, professionalism, and value, with many noting on-time completion and good interaction with insurance companies. A few customers report communication gaps, missed appointments, delays, or unresolved issues (such as a leaking roof) despite overall positive experiences. Pricing is generally described as reasonable or affordable, contributing to an overall impression of good value. No specific siding materials are mentioned in the reviews.

Customers report fast, high-quality work at fair prices across different projects. One reviewer highlighted staff member Luke for his expertise and a realistic, competitive price, noting he wouldn’t recommend anyone else. Another reviewer described a partially remodeled bathroom as professional, knowledgeable, and affordable, with subsequent painting by the customer contributing to a good result. A separate project by Exodus Restoration involved landscaping and interior work: crews were punctual and energetic, completed within budget, with bids lower than competitors, and the finished work was described as looking great.

roofing_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

Summary of experiences with the siding/roof and gutter contractor:

- Overall sentiment is mixed; several customers report negative experiences with scheduling reliability, communication, and follow-through, while a smaller number describe positive outcomes and strong service.
- Scheduling and communication: multiple accounts of promises not kept, missed visits, and difficulty reaching the company by phone or in person. Some waited months without resolution after initial contact or payment.
- Work quality and completeness: several reviews note incomplete or incorrect installations (e.g., missing sections of gutters, improper routing, water pooling on a roof edge). In some cases repairs were promised but not completed; in others, work was said to be well done and appreciated.
- Responsiveness and warranty: mixed experiences on post-install support. Some customers report timely response and warranty-related repairs (including free repair for downspouts or addressing warranty coverage), while others cannot get a return visit to fix issues.
- Pricing and value: a few reviews describe competitive pricing and good value, with some calling the company the best option in the area; conversely, others feel they overpaid or that the company did not deliver as promised.
- Positive outcomes: several customers praise professional conduct, efficient installation (e.g., gutters installed quickly), good cleanup, and strong results after work was completed. Some cite help with insurance claims and long-term satisfaction with the performance of new gutters and drainage.
- Practical takeaways for potential customers: verify scheduling commitments in writing, confirm what is included in the scope of work (and any gaps), discuss how issues will be addressed if something is incomplete or faulty, ask about warranties and service after installation, and clarify expectations for post-installation communication and follow-up.

Potential customers should weigh both the reported reliability concerns and the instances of high-quality work and responsive service when considering this contractor.

Overall, the experiences shown are mixed. Positive reviews describe courteous, helpful staff, reliable and timely service, good communication, and affordable pricing in Pueblo and Southern Colorado, with customers feeling safer and satisfied with the workmanship. Some accounts tout strong customer service, responsiveness, and long-term relationships. However, several reviews allege incomplete work, unreturned calls, and poor follow-through; issues cited include expired permits discovered after the fact, accusations of misleading practices, and perceptions of being rushed or overcharged. There are conflicting claims about warranties (some mention lifetime workmanship warranties, others question their existence) and about the alignment of work with real estate transactions. Several comments focus on roofing rather than siding repair, underscoring the need to confirm service scope. Potential customers should verify scope of work (siding repair vs roofing), permit handling, warranty details, and written estimates, and seek local references before proceeding.

Customer experiences with Hornet Roofing and Exteriors are mixed. Many reviewers describe punctual, professional service, clear communication, thorough daily cleanup, and high-quality workmanship across roofing, gutters, and leaf guards, with additional praise for assisting with insurance issues and for staff who explain things in plain terms.

Strengths noted by customers:
- On-time arrivals, professionalism from start to finish, and efficient work
- High-quality workmanship with noticeable improvements to appearance and curb appeal
- Cleanliness and site restoration after each visit
- Helpful guidance on insurance claims and project management
- Positive interactions with staff, sometimes named individuals (e.g., Jonathan/Johnny)
- Quick installation timelines (often completed in a couple of days)
- Reliable gutter repairs and leaf guard additions, with mentions of good value

Negative experiences and caveats:
- Some customers did not receive estimates or had difficulty obtaining written quotes
- Occasional unresponsiveness to calls, messages, or emails, sometimes for weeks
- Instances of unfinished or incompletely fixed issues after payment (e.g., leaks or damaged decking not fully addressed)
- A few reports of repairs not aligning with or addressing the root cause of a problem
- One review describes regret due to unresolved items and prepayment issues

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- If you value prompt scheduling, professional conduct, and clear project management, Hornet Roofing and Exteriors has many favorable reviews
- Before committing, obtain a written estimate and scope of work; confirm how follow-up issues will be handled and documented
- Ensure there is a clear plan for post-installation support, especially for leaks or related repairs
- Consider asking for a single point of contact and request evidence of workmanship and warranty details
- Be aware that experiences can vary, and some customers have faced slower communication or incomplete repairs

Overall, the company is frequently praised for quality work and professionalism, with notable exceptions related to communication and follow-through on repairs.

Customer feedback describes the contractor as professional, honest, and reliable, with many noting friendly, proactive communication. They have experience with both large and small projects, including multi-unit condo work, commercial and residential roofing, repairs, and full replacements, and are capable of handling diverse tasks such as skylight repairs without full roof replacement. Respond times are typically quick, with same-day or next-day assessments and bids, and crews often mobilizing within days to complete work. Several customers mention coordination with insurance adjusters and being present when adjusters arrive to ensure the repairs align with coverage. Pricing is repeatedly described as fair or affordable, offering solid value for the quality of work. Work quality is frequently praised, including thorough cleanup, durable results, and sometimes notable fixes that prevent leaks. Follow-up is common, with staff checking in after completion. Overall, repeated positive experiences across multiple engagements suggest consistency and reliability for both repairs and new installations on residential and commercial projects.

Customer experiences with Almighty Exteriors are mixed. Some reviews describe delays and poor communication, including four months before a team was sent after payment, a siding piece falling off after a few weeks, and repeatedly unanswered calls. Other customers report very positive experiences, praising Josiah and Maria for honesty, reliability, fair pricing, and strong workmanship; crews that complete work on schedule, with thorough cleanup and no hidden costs; and prompt estimates. The company is described as capable of siding repair, roof work, leaks, and even full roof replacements for both residential and commercial projects, with local ownership and community involvement highlighted as benefits. Potential customers may encounter variability in responsiveness and scheduling, but multiple references indicate high-quality work, transparent pricing, and good value.

The reviews show a wide range of experiences with Laser Remodel & Construction (notably Vince Medina) across bathroom remodels, kitchen projects, expansions, and other renovations. Some customers praised responsive communication, detailed quotes, professional conduct, and high-quality results, while others criticized delays, missed quotes, inconsistent project management, and disputes over pricing and payments. Practical patterns include:

- Quotes and pricing: A few clients received detailed, timely quotes and described pricing as competitive or reasonable. Others reported delays or non-delivery of quotes after weeks, and several accounts mention substantial changes to estimates during the project or disagreements over what was charged.

- Communication and project management: Positive experiences cite daily contact, proactive scheduling, and attentive collaboration with a single point of contact. Negative experiences describe missed callbacks, frequent turnover among staff, lack of in-home oversight, and inconsistent communication, sometimes requiring the homeowner to coordinate subs.

- Timelines and inspections: Some projects progressed steadily and finished with satisfactory results. Others faced extended timelines, inspector-related delays, and work needing to be redone to meet code or plans.

- Quality and outcomes: Many projects (bathrooms, kitchens, floors) resulted in high-quality finishes and customer satisfaction. However, there are strong negative accounts alleging poor workmanship, non-completion, or work that required removal or rework due to code or structural issues.

- Payments and refunds: Several reviews note deposits (e.g., 50% down) and substantial sums for materials, with at least one case reporting unspent funds and difficulties obtaining refunds, including legal disputes.

- Overall impression: The sentiment is mixed. Some customers would highly recommend the team for quality work and professionalism; others caution potential customers about communication gaps, billing disputes, and the risk of delays or unrefunded funds. Potential customers should verify written quotes, establish clear points of contact, confirm permit and inspection responsibilities, and understand payment and refund terms before proceeding.

- Overall sentiment: Mostly positive testimonials with high satisfaction for stucco repair, color/texture matching, and professional service; several customers would hire again.

- Responsiveness and communication: Several reviewers noted prompt contact and good communication. One account described a negative experience with the owner cursing during a request for an estimate, indicating potential variability in interactions.

- Quality and workmanship: Consistently praised for meticulous repairs, seamless texture and color matching on aged stucco, and noticeable improvement after fixes. Multiple reviews mention near-invisible repairs and attention to detail.

- Scope of work and capabilities: Jobs cited include large patch repairs, repairs around the entire house, color matching and texture matching, stucco repairs around cracks and columns, and re-stuccoing a large home. Examples also include installing a large dog door through stucco without exterior damage, and a Kiva fireplace remodel with tile removal and texture changes; some reviewers noted additional exterior work like stone updates.

- Process and finish: Reports of thorough pre-work color selection, floor protection during projects, good site cleanup, and keeping promises (e.g., returning to address small fixes). Scheduling and timely completion were mentioned as positives in several reviews.

- Pricing: Several reviewers described the pricing as fair or reasonable.

- Recommendations and repeat business: Many customers explicitly recommend the company and indicate they would use the service again.

- Overall impression: The experiences with Colorado Roof Builders and Tom Campbell are overwhelmingly positive, with multiple customers praising responsiveness, professionalism, and thorough workmanship.

- Services described: Roof replacements after hail damage, siding work, skylights, gutters, and related repairs. They also handle standing seam metal roofs, tarp vulnerable roofs to prevent further damage, and address issues on older homes or hard-to-reach properties. A few customers noted involvement with windows, stucco, and fences as part of damage claims.

- Insurance and claims: A common strength is helping clients navigate and maximize insurance claims. Customers report upfront planning, clear explanations of coverage, and effective negotiations with insurers; Tom is described as knowledgeable about claim processes and shingles selection.

- Project management and communication: Customers appreciate proactive communication, clear explanations of the process, and timely updates (including daily progress photos). They highlight prompt responses, reliability, and keeping projects on track from start to finish.

- Quality and workmanship: Numerous reviews note high-quality materials and workmanship, attention to detail, and problem-solving beyond the initial scope (e.g., fixing issues left by previous builders). Work is described as completed efficiently, often with a focus on ensuring thorough completion.

- Timeliness and logistics: Crews are described as hard-working, able to work in challenging conditions (heat, remote locations), and capable of completing work quickly (some projects finished in a single day).

- Customer experience and loyalty: Many customers express strong trust in Tom, with statements about returning for future needs and recommending the company to others. Repeated use by homeowners after multiple hail events is noted.

- Representative examples: Several testimonials mention specific positives, such as proactive guidance through claims, detailed explanations, on-site updates, swift responses to emergencies (e.g., leaks), and after-service diligence (addressing issues found during work).

Reviews of Drury Brothers Roofing Company show a mix of highly positive and highly negative experiences. Positive feedback highlights responsive estimators, helpful office staff, on-time installers who completed work as scheduled, good cleanup, professionalism, and strong recommendations. Specific staff frequently praised include Ike Drury, Dawn Daurio, Samantha Costanzo, Kris, Monte, and Dylan, with comments about quick responses and clear estimates.

Negative experiences are also common and include long scheduling delays (up to several months for initial installation), messy job sites with debris and nails, inadequate protection of property, leaks or venting issues, and installations that were later rejected or required rework by inspectors. Several reviewers cite failures to follow instructions or scope, rude or dismissive staff, communication breakdowns, and the need to hire other contractors to fix problems. Some customers reported not receiving promised repairs or timely follow-up, and there are accusations of not being responsive after negative reviews. There is at least one update noting a resolution reached with Dawn on 5/16/25.

A few customers who initially posted negative experiences later updated to positive after perceived improvements in communication, while others felt the company did not maintain consistent service after reviewing changes. Practical considerations for potential customers include confirming the full scope in writing, clarifying timelines and cleanup plans, verifying venting and skylight work, checking underlayment and material specifications, understanding who will perform the work (whether subs are used), and establishing a clear point of contact for post-installation issues and warranty questions.

Customer experiences with Adame Roofing are largely positive and emphasize practical, service-oriented outcomes. Highlights include:

- Responsiveness and value: quick responses to inquiries, fair or reasonable estimates, and generally competitive pricing with some testimonials noting substantial savings versus other bidders.
- Timeliness and workmanship: work completed on time with no surprises in several cases; crews described as efficient, skilled, and able to handle adjustments as needed. Cleanliness and site tidiness were repeatedly noted.
- Communication and transparency: professional explanations of inspections and work, honest assessments, and clear communication throughout the process; some instances of guidance with insurance coordination.
- Range of services: roof inspections, roof repairs, roof replacements, and gutter installations; some projects involved coordination with insurance claims and weekend scheduling.
- Customer service and reliability: customer-facing representatives (e.g., Francisco, Serena, Javier) described as friendly and helpful; long-term relationships cited, including eight years of roofing service for some customers.
- Positive outcomes: reports of high-quality results, enhanced curb appeal, and confidence in the workmanship.
- Caveat: one testimonial described unprofessional behavior and a lack of responsiveness, indicating that experiences can vary.

Overall, potential customers can expect responsive communication, fair pricing, professional crews, careful cleanup, and thorough explanations, with occasional variability in reliability.