Top Siding Repair Services in Indianapolis

Cochran Exteriors offers exterior remodeling services, including siding, roofing, windows, and soffit work. The most commonly cited siding material is James Hardie fiber cement. Reviewers note thorough on-site evaluations and detailed quotes from consultants, with several positive remarks about workmanship and final results. However, experiences vary widely on customer service and responsiveness: some customers praise staff and prompt communication, while others report difficulty reaching the company, missed callbacks, and long delays after estimates or installations. There are also some reports of post-installation issues (such as roof-related problems and improper installations) and mixed opinions on value for money. Overall, the company appears capable in workmanship but inconsistent in service and communication.

Customers reported positive experiences with Hoosier Windows and Siding, noting knowledgeable sales staff and a smooth process from quote to installation. In several encounters, managers met at a home show; questions were answered and options discussed, including a quote for house wrap even when the house lacked it. Projects included replacing 12 to 18 windows and applying vinyl siding to both a house and a detached garage, with installations described as quick (windows often completed in one day) and crews as friendly, polite, and respectful. Minor issues were addressed quickly without dispute. Customers cited competitive pricing and considered Hoosier the best value among multiple bids. A siding replacement was praised for color and product quality; a sliding door quote and installation process was described as smooth. Overall, customers would recommend the company to friends and family and felt guided throughout the process.

- Overview: Across multiple projects, customers report positive experiences with Beeson Construction, highlighting professionalism, clear communication, and thorough workmanship on roofing, siding, gutters, windows/doors, and related exterior repairs.

- Services and scope: Roofing (new roofs for homes and detached garage, hail damage repair), siding replacement (including matching siding and a stucco-to-siding conversion), gutters and downspouts, skylights (including drywall work around skylights), soffit/ventilation, window and door installations, and interior painting.

- Responsiveness and scheduling: Quick response after initial contact; many projects completed within days to a couple of weeks. Some jobs finished in one day (e.g., window/door install, certain roof or siding tasks), while others progressed with steady coordination. Weather considerations were noted for siding work (temperature requirements).

- Process and communication: Frequent, proactive communication with updates and explanations. Coordination with insurance providers was mentioned positively. On-site supervision and owner involvement (e.g., Phil Beeson visiting to ensure satisfaction) were noted.

- Quality and value: Work described as high quality with attention to detail (e.g., matching siding, thorough cleanup, aesthetically pleasing results). Materials cited include superior shingles; several customers cited fair pricing and good value for the workmanship.

- Customer sentiment: Consistently favorable, with several customers recommending Beeson Construction and indicating they would use the company again for future projects.

Indy Rooftops is a roofing contractor primarily serving Indianapolis, with multiple reviews highlighting fast estimates, clear explanations, and competent handling of roof repairs, fascia, soffit, and gutters. Customers frequently note responsive communication, professional staff (e.g., Lexi, Carl, Dan, Kyle, Zack), timely completion, and fair pricing. Several reviews mention insurance coordination and overall satisfaction, though some indicate the work may be subcontracted. No warranties are discussed in the reviews, and explicit siding materials are not specified.

- Overall impression: Customer experiences are mixed. Many reviewers praise the company for quality work, strong communication, and responsiveness, while a subset report frustrating interactions with insurance processes, scheduling, or sales tactics.

- What customers commonly praised:
- Punctual arrivals and attentive listening to project goals (roofing, porches, gutters).
- Detailed, transparent estimates and thorough reports (aids decision-making).
- Professionalism and workmanship; teams described as friendly and skilled.
- Clear, ongoing communication throughout projects, often with photos or drone footage of work.
- Helpful coordination with homeowners’ insurance, with examples of advocates guiding claims and ensuring coverage.
- Quick fixes and after-project follow-up (e.g., adjustments to downspouts, additional repairs).
- Positive experiences across multiple exterior projects (roof replacements, repairs, gutters) and consistent performance across years.

- Common concerns or criticisms:
- Some customers felt certain sales or claim-handling practices were aggressive or inefficient (e.g., pressure to submit deductible supplements, pushy pricing conversations).
- A few reviews report wasted time, incomplete or delayed quotes, or being ignored after initial consultations.
- Not all experiences with insurance claims were smooth; some customers felt ignored or given poor treatment.
- A couple of one-star comments warn against dealing with the company due to perceived practices.

- Notable staff or points frequently mentioned:
- Positive references to Gary, Biz, Kevin S., Mike Higbee, and other team members for guidance, responsiveness, and knowledge.
- Emphasis on having a reliable single point of contact and ongoing follow-up after work completion.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect detailed, itemized estimates and documentation to help understand what will be repaired.
- Be prepared for active involvement with your insurer and clarify how supplements or deductibles are handled.
- Confirm a clear point of contact for questions and schedule updates, and inquire about after-service support for any adjustments.
- If time and communication are priorities, ask for current timelines and a dedicated project manager to minimize delays.

Summary of customer experiences:

Most customers report Watertight Roofing/WaterTight Roofing as responsive and communicative, with scheduling that often accommodated urgent repairs (sometimes the day after contact) and clear, transparent pricing. Several reviewers highlighted quick, practical fixes for leaks and roofing issues, including same-day or next-day service, and some received follow-up or no-cost inspections related to storm damage. Many reviews emphasize honesty and practicality in assessments—owners and crews often avoiding unnecessary replacements and prioritizing sound, affordable solutions. The owner, often identified as Richard, is frequently noted for hands-on involvement, thorough explanations, and straightforward workmanship; several customers mention feeling they received a fair deal and trustworthy service. Long-term relationships are mentioned, including past work (e.g., a roof replacement) followed by later repairs; a few reviewers note warranty-related assurances or favorable pricing.

However, experiences are not uniformly positive. A reviewer described poor communication and felt the business functioned as a one-person operation, raising concerns about consistency. There are also accounts of scheduling inconsistencies or delays (e.g., changing appointment times or delayed arrivals) and difficulties in getting a timely follow-up with the owner in at least one instance. A minority of reviews emphasize that the experience did not meet expectations, though most still express willingness to recommend the company for roofing and related services.

Key practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Scheduling and responsiveness: generally prompt for urgent repairs; occasional delays or changes in appointment times can occur.
- Communication: typically transparent and informative, with progress updates during projects.
- Pricing and value: reported as fair or transparent; some praise best-value quotes and a mentioned lifetime warranty on work in at least one review.
- Service approach: emphasis on honest assessments, practical fixes over full replacements, and clear explanations of options.
- Work quality: positive notes on thorough inspections, effective repairs, and references to professional craftsmanship; gutters, drip edge, and ridge-related work are among cited services.
- Ownership/contacts: frequent mention of Richard as the primary contact; some reviews describe a one-person operation, which can affect consistency and scheduling.
- Overall: generally recommended by reviewers for roofing and related repairs, with emphasis on reliability, fair pricing, and practical problem-solving, while recognizing occasional scheduling or communication hiccups.

The reviews show mixed experiences with Jaybird Roofing and Restoration (also referred to as Jaybird Roofing), including both highly positive reports of workmanship and responsiveness and a notable negative incident of incomplete work and poor communication.

Positive experiences and patterns
- Prompt responses, quick quotes, and timely scheduling are commonly noted.
- Several customers report high-quality roof replacements, effective installation, and thorough cleanup.
- Warranties and paperwork (including insurance-related documents) are frequently provided, and some customers cite help with insurance claims.
- Many accounts describe professional, friendly, and trustworthy service, with staff described as knowledgeable and customer-focused.
- Multiple reviews commend pricing as competitive and value-oriented, including small-business/family-owned advantages.
- Several clients mention favorable outcomes in challenging situations (e.g., aiding real estate deals, holiday or urgent repairs, and personalized, hands-on service).

Negative experiences and concerns
- At least one detailed complaint describes unfinished work, nails left in the yard, gutters misinstalled or left on the lawn, and a crooked roofline, with charges for services not performed.
- This case alleges long delays (over a year) and lack of follow-up after an initial visit months earlier.
- Some reviewers report difficulty obtaining additional quotes, slow or unresponsive communication, and post-review billing pressure.
- There are mentions of discrepancies or confusion between different company names (Jaybird Roofing vs. Jaybird Roofing and Restoration), which could affect references or accountability.

Insurance and financing notes
- Some clients report positive experiences coordinating with insurance and receiving a binder/warranty.
- Others recall initial guidance toward financing before involving the insurer, followed by insurer approval, suggesting inconsistent messaging around financing and insurance steps.

Practical takeaways for potential customers
- Ask for a detailed written scope, timeline, and itemized warranty, including what is and isn’t included (e.g., gutters, yard cleanup, siding).
- Request references and direct contact information for prior projects, and verify the current company name and contact points to avoid confusion.
- Confirm how insurance claims will be handled and what documentation you will receive.
- Document all communications and inspect the site during and after work to ensure cleanup and finish quality match the agreed scope.
- Be explicit about payment milestones and avoid payment requests before work is completed to your satisfaction.

- Consistently on time and punctual for appointments, with teams described as professional and courteous.
- Services performed include siding replacement (notably Hardie board and board-and-batten), gutters, attic fan installation, window replacement (including Anderson windows in one project), chimney board replacement, and roof repairs/removal; some projects combined multiple tasks.
- Quotes and cost process were thorough and transparent, with detailed breakdowns of estimates; in several cases UHQ was among the best-priced options and also offered the strongest reviews and value.
- Project approach emphasized clear communication from start to finish, with site assessments that included photos, careful explanations of work, and responsiveness to questions; a project manager named Darcy (and other team members like Cory and Matt) were frequently cited for guidance and accessibility.
- Work quality and outcomes were repeatedly praised as high-quality and thorough, with claims of no shortcuts and results that looked like a substantial improvement or a “new house” appearance; attention to proper execution and cleanup was noted.
- Some customers highlighted proactive steps such as temporary roof fixes to prevent leaks and coordination with insurance, improving the overall service experience.
- Overall sentiment across reviews indicates customers would hire again and would recommend UHQ to others, citing reliability, honesty, and solid workmanship.

Customer reviews describe TAG Exteriors (Jason and team) as a responsive, professional contractor focused on siding and roofing repairs. They are praised for thorough problem diagnosis (e.g., identifying insulation and structural issues), honest assessments, clear communication, and fair pricing. Response times are often described as next-day or prompt, with work covering siding repairs, roof fixes, gutters, doors, and even coordination with a structural engineer when needed. While most feedback is positive, there are occasional notes of past siding issues and roofing installation concerns that were addressed. No explicit warranties are mentioned in the reviews. Overall, customers report high satisfaction with quality and customer service and would hire again.

- Project scope: Siding/residing a barn using Hardie Board; initial assessment and recommended plan provided by Chris; customer expressed willingness to proceed and recommended Amos Exteriors and Chris.

- Timeline and outcome: The crew completed the siding work in about 3 days; the finished appearance was described as great; final inspection was reported as great; the customer plans to have the barn painted next.

- Contacts and communication: Chris Rossetti was a consistent point of contact across projects; customers praised his thorough explanations and pleasant demeanor; another staff member, Zachary Laffin, handled a service call addressing gutter issues and identified a 2022 roof not up to code.

- Quality and service: Multiple reviews note high satisfaction with workmanship and service; one reviewer mentioned a past positive gutter project and overall pleased with continued service; several testimonials indicated they would highly recommend Amos Exteriors and Chris.

- Issues and considerations: A note about gutters looking uneven or sticking up in places; some customers could not access ladders to verify details; one mention of a potential code issue identified by staff.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: Availability of Hardie Board siding; organized, knowledgeable consultation; consistent single point of contact; ability to assist with insurance claims and inspections; quick project turnaround (about 3 days) with positive final inspections; be aware of potential gutter alignment concerns and verify roof codes where relevant.

Customer reviews for North American Contractors indicate a focus on roofing, siding, gutters, and related exterior work. Clients report fast response times, thorough estimates/quotes (often next-day), effective coordination among multiple crews, and strong communication with project managers and insurance. The work is described as high quality, completed efficiently, and with attention to safety and process. A few complaints include a report of being overcharged for tree removal and at least one note about drywall work not meeting standards on a related project. Overall sentiment is highly positive, with several references to excellent service and 5-star satisfaction. The company is described as family-owned and capable of handling insurance coordination. Warranties are not mentioned in reviews.

Reviews describe Richmond Exteriors handling siding and other exterior projects (e.g., gutter repairs, fences, privacy screens). Customers report generally prompt scheduling, on-time crews, courteous and professional service, and high workmanship quality. A few notes mention a failure to replace flashing per agreement and communication challenges due to language barriers, but overall feedback emphasizes good value and reliable service for exterior repairs.

The reviews portray Bone Dry Roofing as a professional company handling roofing and siding-related repairs with high-quality workmanship, strong attention to detail, and thorough post-job cleanup. Customers praise responsive communication, clear explanations, and the ability to coordinate with insurance and color selections. While some appointments were rescheduled and a few customers noted the price could be higher than competitors, many felt the value matched the quality. Warranties are not mentioned in the reviews. A practical maintenance note mentioned is to have crews clean up nails and debris after work, and to monitor the repaired areas for ongoing sealing and durability.

Overall, experiences with Indy Roof Company/Indy Roof & Restoration are mixed but show several consistent strengths along with some notable service gaps.

- Inspection and assessment: Multiple reviews describe thorough, detailed inspections and honest, clear assessments; several customers were told no work was needed, while others received actionable estimates or guidance on timing for future projects.

- Scheduling, workmanship, and site condition: Crews are frequently described as punctual, efficient, and careful, with sites left clean after work. Some comments mention working under challenging conditions (e.g., hot weather) and addressing specific issues like missing shingles.

- Communication and customer service: Many customers praise straightforward, informative communication and ongoing updates during the process. However, there are reports of delayed or missed callbacks, unresolved balance questions, and billing/financing communication problems.

- Insurance and financing: Several reviewers highlight successful assistance with insurance claims and, in some cases, obtaining full payment from insurers. Financing options are mentioned as part of the process.

- Billing and payment issues: At least one review describes ongoing billing disputes, miscommunication about balances, and delayed responses that led to frustration and a negative overall impression.

- Community involvement: Some customers note the company’s community outreach and charitable activities as a positive aspect.

- Overall recommendations: A number of customers would use the company again or strongly recommend it for roofing needs, while a smaller portion express dissatisfaction related to follow-up, billing, or communication gaps.

Neutral summary: The reviews depict a siding/exterior repair contractor handling work such as window and door installations, soffit/fascia updates, and exterior vinyl wrapping. Customers report on-time arrivals, professional and courteous crews, and thorough cleanup. The process is described as smooth, with clear explanations and good communication. Several customers note fair pricing and willingness to accommodate urgent or emergent projects, and many say they would hire or recommend the company again. Warranties or guarantees are not mentioned in the reviews, and there are no significant negative complaints highlighted.

- MK Property Solutions is a local contractor offering a broad range of services, including roof repairs, siding, gutters, skylights, painting, drywall and ceiling texture, flooring (carpet with padding), and related exterior/interior improvements. They also perform brick maintenance, patio work, fences, privacy panels, barns, and window work.

- Customer sentiment is generally positive, with many noting professional conduct, prompt communication, reliability, and quality workmanship.

- Common positives: on-site supervision by company staff (often the owners), courteous and professional crews, thorough attention to detail, and work that residents felt improved the appearance and functionality of their homes.

- Reported outcomes include well-executed roof, siding, and gutter projects; color matching for shingles; patching and sealing issues; and appliance-free, tidy job sites.

- A frequent theme is strong communication and a smooth, stress-free experience, with several customers expressing high satisfaction and willingness to refer others or hire again.

- Notable strengths highlighted: responsiveness to inquiries, clear estimates, and flexibility in addressing customer needs during projects (e.g., color matching, adjusting scope).

- Reported concerns: one customer described additional charges not listed in the contract and unprofessional handling of questions about those charges, leading to not using the service again; this indicates potential pricing disputes or communication issues in certain cases.

- Practical tips for potential customers: obtain a detailed written scope of work and pricing before starting; request a clear process for change orders; confirm who will manage daily on-site activities; discuss expectations for color matching and material choices upfront.

Synthesis of customer reviews for VIP Home Solutions indicates a contractor that provides roofing, siding, gutters, windows, and various home remodeling services. Experiences are largely positive regarding workmanship, communication, and project management, with many customers praising timely completion, thorough cleanup, and clear updates throughout the process. Several reviewers noted successful coordination with insurance companies, assistance navigating claims, and attention to detail on complex tasks (e.g., chimney wraps, leak repairs).

Common strengths cited:
- Regular, proactive communication and responsive project management (notably by Raine, Walter, Ed, and others)
- High-quality workmanship and attention to detail
- Efficient, tidy job sites and strong cleanup
- Ability to handle insurance claims and facilitate a smooth process
- Willingness to take on large or multi-room projects and to adapt to unforeseen issues
- Long-standing relationships with the company (comments from customers who have used them multiple times over many years)

Noted concerns and risks:
- A reviewer raised licensing and permitting concerns in Indiana, alleging a roof replacement was performed without a permit and did not meet code; they claimed the contractor was not licensed for state work.
- A separate negative experience described dissatisfaction with a fence repair and window installation, though subsequent follow-up from the owner led to resolution and a revised view in a later update.
- Another review described a mismatch between quoted work and the actual repair outcome on a faucet/tile project, with an eventual discussion about remediation and owner involvement improving the situation.

Overall takeaway for potential customers:
- Many customers report reliable, high-quality work and strong communication, with repeated use and referrals noted.
- There is a potential risk to verify licensing, permits, and exact scope of work before starting, and to document everything in writing.
- If issues arise, direct engagement with the company’s owner or project managers appears possible and has led to resolutions in several cases.

- Scope of work: Roofing replacement/repair with insurance claim support; some projects included TPO roofing, custom sheet metal wall caps, and scuppers.

- Insurance process support: Rene and the GRC team guided clients through claims, helped maximize payouts, explained estimate details before work, and followed up after storms to ensure issues were addressed.

- Timeliness and workmanship: Replacements were completed quickly (one-day roof removal and replacement cited); crews described as professional, thorough, and skilled; work cited as high quality with careful attention to detail and good cleanup.

- Pricing and quotes: Initial quotes were honored even when unexpected challenges arose; many describe pricing as affordable and offering good value.

- Reliability and trust: Consistently portrayed as honest, reliable, and customer-focused; strong emphasis on small-business integrity and caring for clients.

- Customer experience: Repeated notes of easy collaboration, responsive communication, and favorable overall impressions; many customers express high recommendations and willingness to reuse the company.

- Overall sentiment: Experiences are largely positive, with many customers highlighting professionalism, thorough workmanship, and responsive service; there are also notes of pricing disputes from a minority of customers.

- Services and scope: Projects include roof repairs, chimney work (tuck pointing, lining interior), vent installs, gutters, siding, attic work, and related exterior improvements. Several jobs involved multiple crews handling different phases of work.

- Process and communication: Customers frequently cite on-time arrivals, respectful treatment of property, thorough explanations, and use of photos or videos for estimates and verification. Cleanups after work are commonly noted as thorough, and supervisors or crew leads often checked in after completion.

- Staffing and reliability: Multiple crews for multi-phase projects were described as professional and communicative; overall experiences with sales teams and field crews are praised, with several customers willing to hire again.

- Pricing and billing: Mixed experiences. Some customers praise value and fair pricing; others report feeling the charges were excessive for short, low-material tasks, with some saying they were dismissed when concerns were raised. A few reviews mention partial repairs or charges tied to contract terms.

- Insurance and claims: A few customers credit Bone Dry with going above and beyond to assist with insurance claim processes.

- Outcomes and warranty: Roofs and other repairs are described as looking or functioning well, with some noting a warranty that stands up under scrutiny. In some cases, customers felt pricing or billing practices affected overall satisfaction despite good workmanship.

- Recommendation and repeat business: Many reviewers express a willingness to hire again and to recommend Bone Dry, though a subset indicate they would consider other options in the future due to pricing concerns.

Overall, customer feedback for UHQ is positive, with recurring notes of punctuality, professionalism, clear communication, and high-quality workmanship. Crews are described as respectful, attentive to detail, and diligent about cleanup, often finishing on schedule and within the agreed scope. Projects cited include siding replacement with James Hardie siding, soffit replacement, attic fan installation, and window replacement with refreshed exterior trim; repairs such as flashing work and other roof-related tasks are also mentioned. Reviews commonly state that the process is well-managed from start to finish, with walkthroughs and good responsiveness, and some note no hidden fees. Many customers report improved curb appeal and high satisfaction with the outcomes. Team members frequently mentioned are Darcy, along with Garrett and Cory, who are described as professional and capable. Potential customers can expect a professional exterior remodeling experience, thorough workmanship, and reliable project execution.