Top Siding Repair Services in York

- Overall impression: Experiences are mixed, with both positive notes on workmanship and friendliness and negative experiences centered on reliability and communication.

- Appointment reliability and scheduling: Numerous reports of no-shows or late arrivals for quotes and jobs; long or unclear waits for responses; some jobs postponed or partially completed over many weeks or months.

- Communication: Inconsistent communication across projects. Some customers received follow-ups and clear updates; others encountered delayed, incomplete, or unprofessional responses, including one notably rude message after a follow-up request.

- Work quality and issues: Positive references describe friendly crews, pride in work, and satisfactory results at a reasonable price. Negative references cite specific issues: aluminum wrapping not removed as contracted, improper installation with gaps and flashing problems, a half-inch gap bridged with caulk, and a window leak reoccurring after several months.

- Project scope and outcomes: Work cited includes windows, siding, and roofing. Some projects were completed quickly and cleaned up well; others involved partial completion or required additional contractors for remediation.

- Timelines: Some jobs were completed in a few days; others took six months or more to begin or finish, with delays recurring.

- Pricing and value: Several reviews characterize pricing as reasonable or good value; a few note favorable estimates or flexibility, while others emphasize reliability concerns over time.

- Staff and customer service: Positive mentions of Chad and the crew, including flexibility and willingness to fix issues. Negative mentions include unprofessional greetings, poor responsiveness, and negative interactions with staff in some cases.

- Practical considerations for potential customers: If reliability and timely communication are important, be prepared for potential scheduling delays and ensure detailed, written contracts specifying scope (including removal of existing wraps, flashing requirements), material selections (color of caulk, siding type), warranties, and a clear timeline with milestones and follow-ups. Consider requesting references and confirming who will handle follow-through on any issues.

- Overall, customers report high satisfaction with workmanship and professionalism across a range of home improvement projects, including siding repair, decking, doors, windows, and roofing tasks. Many say they would hire again and would recommend the company.

- Communication and responsiveness are repeatedly noted as strengths: Devan and his crew are described as easy to reach, provide timely updates, and respond quickly to calls, texts, and emails. Several projects featured ongoing project updates and transparent dialogue about options and costs.

- Quality and attention to detail are frequently highlighted: meticulous work, careful matching of materials (e.g., Trex for stairs), and improvements to railing and other finishes. Reviews credit the team with sticking to quotes and delivering results that exceed initial expectations.

- Timeliness and problem-solving are common positives: projects completed on schedule, assistance with design changes, and successful navigation of permit or site challenges (e.g., fitting a pergola to an uneven patio while avoiding underground utilities).

- Pricing and value are cited favorably: several reviews describe fair pricing, with some noting they stayed within the quoted amount or that pricing was reasonable for the quality provided.

- Notable exception: one review describes a missed appointment with no initial communication, but the contractor later called back to explain the situation, indicating accountability.

- Range of capabilities: the company handles exterior and interior work, including siding, deck/building a deck and pergola, stair replacement, window and door installs, spouting, and bathroom flooring, illustrating versatility for varied projects.

Customer feedback portrays Keystone Advanced Remodeling LLC as a professional exterior remodeling contractor with strong communication, transparency, and thorough workmanship across roofing, siding, gutters, fascia, soffit, and deck projects. Clients reported on-time or early completion, clean job sites, and minimal interior disruption. Projects included a roof replacement completed in a single day, gutters, fascia, and soffit replacement, and siding work that left homes looking like new. The team—often led by Mike with crew members such as Josh and Rafael—was described as courteous, knowledgeable, responsive, and easy to work with. Pricing was described as fair with straightforward explanations and no high-pressure upselling. The company aided with insurance claims and color/material selections, provided multiple options, and generally received strong recommendations for future work. Some initial skepticism was noted, but concerns were reportedly alleviated once work began. Overall, experiences highlight reliable scheduling, quality craftsmanship, and customer-focused service.

- Services noted: gutters and downspouts, gutter guards removal, siding repairs, and flashing leaks; some reviewers mention roofing/spouting work and general exterior repairs; several emphasize small-to-large exterior projects and problem-solving without unnecessary overhauls.
- Timeliness and scheduling: numerous accounts of prompt arrival and work started as promised; ability to accommodate customers’ schedules.
- Professionalism and communication: consistently described as courteous, pleasant, and professional; clear, continuous communication with updates and check-ins.
- Quality and workmanship: high praise for workmanship, attention to detail, and doing the job correctly; several reviews highlight fixing issues thoroughly the first time and practical maintenance advice.
- Pricing and value: described as fair or reasonable, with several customers feeling they saved money by avoiding unnecessary full replacements.
- Trust and reliability: multiple reviewers would hire again and would highly recommend; notes of honesty and straightforward assessments (no unnecessary upsell) and willingness to handle small jobs.
- Overall impression: strong positive sentiment toward Zack/Zach and the team, with emphasis on reliability, good communication, quality results, and fair pricing for exterior repair needs.

- Overall sentiment: Mixed reviews. Several customers report high satisfaction with workmanship and service, while others criticize communication and management.

- Positive experiences and practical details:
- Quick response and scheduling: roof assessments often occurred within days (e.g., look-at within four days; repairs scheduled within two weeks).
- Thorough work and documentation: crews explained planned work and provided before/after photos; work and cleanup were described as exceptional; final bills often matched initial estimates.
- Professional crew and site management: multiple accounts note professional, courteous teams; daily site cleanup; willingness to accommodate minor changes during the project.
- Scope of work: experiences include roof replacements/repairs, gutters, overhangs, siding, and related exterior work; some cases involved patching damage and coordinating with insurance.
- Positive outcomes: customers reported resolving water-damage issues, completing multi-day projects efficiently, and overall strong satisfaction, with several reiterating they would hire again or recommend the company.

- Negative experiences and concerns:
- Communication issues: at least one review cites poor communication between upper management; another notes that overall communication could be better despite a good performance.
- General sentiment: a strong negative comment characterizes the company as the worst the reviewer has used, indicating inconsistent experiences in some cases.

- Notable mentions:
- Some customers praised specific staff (e.g., Austin, Lauren, Denny, Mason, James Horn, David) for scheduling, guidance, and personable service.
- Instances of immediate assistance for neighbors or emergency-related fixes (e.g., tree damage patching) and subsequent full replacements.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Expect possible quick initial assessment and a clear path to repair, with documentation and an itemized final bill matching the estimate.
- Prepare to discuss project scope across roofing, gutters, siding, and related exterior work; confirm coordination with any insurance claims.
- Clarify communication expectations and contact points with management to avoid potential misunderstandings.

point_of_interest, establishment

- Overall experiences are mixed. Some customers report professional conduct, solid workmanship, and thorough cleanup on roofing work, with references to Lance and Jack as helpful and professional, and notes that the company aided with the insurance claim process.

- However, multiple reviews describe poor responsiveness and unreliable scheduling. Reports include quotes for siding or roofing not being provided even after weeks or months, multiple outreach attempts with no response, and at least one no-show after a stated appointment.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers: you may encounter delays or lack of communication when requesting quotes or scheduling; if the project involves roofing, some customers have had positive results and good cleanup, but consistency in responsiveness appears variable.

- Tim Seely and Seely Construction are consistently described as professional, honest, and skilled in roofing repair and related work, with a focus on clear communication and quality results.

- Estimates and assessments: Most customers received estimates within a couple of days and appreciated thorough, straightforward explanations of what was needed; several reviews note that Tim did not push unnecessary work and provided honest recommendations.

- Scheduling and reliability: Crews were generally on time and completed work as scheduled, with some customers reporting work completed earlier than expected; Tim or the team often coordinated around the homeowner’s schedule and provided advance notices about daily progress and plans for the next day.

- Work quality and scope: Repairs included leaks, chimney re-flashing, skylight replacement, gutter installation, roof replacements, barn roofs, and lean-to extensions. Reviews frequently praise the workmanship as high quality and durable, with examples like “tight as a drum” roofs and careful problem-solving on tricky issues.

- Property protection and cleanup: Customers report protection of surrounding areas during work and thorough cleanup at completion; neighbor and homeowner comments are often positive.

- Pricing and value: Pricing is described as fair and reasonable, with invoices typically matching initial estimates; several reviewers state they received good value for the quality provided.

- Customer service and follow-up: Several reviews highlight responsive and courteous service, with instances of follow-up support years after initial work; one review mentions slow initial contact, but most experiences are positive regarding communication.

- Overall sentiment: The majority of customers would recommend Seely Construction and indicate they would hire again for roofing or related projects.

point_of_interest, establishment

- Overall, customers report highly positive experiences with Abel & Son Roofing, emphasizing professionalism, courtesy, and a strong focus on customer needs.

- The sales process and communication: Sean is frequently highlighted as a clear, responsive point of contact who explains options in detail and guides customers through estimates and decisions; multiple mentions of easy, understandable processes and ongoing support throughout the project.

- Work quality and scope: reviews describe high-quality roof replacements (often with additional work such as plywood replacement, gutters, and sometimes window/door work) and note experienced crews (20+ years) delivering solid workmanship with attention to detail.

- Cleanliness and site management: customers consistently report thorough cleanup with little to no debris left behind and careful handling of nails and other waste.

- Timelines and scheduling: many projects are completed efficiently, sometimes in one day or within a few days; some jobs start earlier than planned; weather can affect duration, but crews strive to stay on schedule and protect the site during rain.

- Pricing and value: pricing is described as competitive and transparent, with some customers noting responsive handling of cost increases and that Abel & Son often provided the best price among estimates.

- Post-install support: customers report helpful follow-up, problem resolution (e.g., minor leaks, chimney issues), and even aftercare like sending photos to demonstrate work.

- Overall recommendations: multiple reviews state they would highly recommend Abel & Son Roofing and indicate positive appeals for future projects.

- Services cited: roof replacement, siding replacement, gutters (including gutter blockers), wrap, and related exterior work; window installation mentioned in some reviews.
- Quality and workmanship: consistently described as high quality with strong attention to detail; crews are skilled, work is thorough, and projects are completed to specification.
- Professionalism and integrity: Ray is frequently on-site or closely involved; honest assessments (e.g., diagnosing attic vs roof issues), clear communication, and a willingness to address adjustments without overselling.
- Site practices: projects are described as punctual with minimal debris left behind; crews are courteous, diligent, and maintain a clean work area; some reviews note long-tenured crew stability.
- Scheduling and reliability: customers report timely arrivals and reliable execution; some instances of proactive follow-up after storms to verify results.
- Pricing and value: multiple reviews mention competitive pricing and staying within budget; several say costs were below alternatives.
- Aftercare and warranty: willingness to inspect and address issues even after storms or when warranty coverage is unclear; in one case, a follow-up visit was offered to confirm roof performance after rain.
- Customer pattern: many repeat customers and referrals; positive notes on overall value and home improvements.
- Noted caveat: at least one reviewer experienced no response after attempting to contact via website form and voicemail.
- Overall impression: broadly positive, highlighting dependable workmanship, professional conduct, clear communication, and good value, with rare occasional communication gaps.

- Overall, experiences with Triple R Roofing & Siding are largely positive, with customers frequently describing the team as professional, courteous, and capable. They often note prompt scheduling, punctual crews, and careful site clean-up.

- Estimates and communication: Project managers (e.g., Tom, Travis, Andy) provided detailed guidance, multiple pricing scenarios, and kept clients informed before, during, and after projects. Some reviews highlight advanced measurement tools (LIDAR) used to generate timely, accurate roof estimates.

- Scope of work: Roofing projects (roof replacements, including standing seam options) are common, sometimes completed in a single day for certain jobs. They also handle gutters, skylights, and ridge vent issues, and have experience integrating roofs with solar installations.

- Materials and methods: Some clients chose RoofMaxx as a way to extend roof life, noting lower cost than full replacement. The team has coordinated with solar installers and promptly addressed any resulting issues or damages (e.g., repairing roof tiles after solar panel work).

- Quality and value: Several reviews emphasize high-quality workmanship and long-lasting results, with a willingness to pay for reliability, even if not the cheapest option.

- Timelines and issues: A few projects experienced delays due to material availability or scheduling, but customers report the team was receptive to feedback and corrective measures.

- Notable exception: One reviewer reported being ghosted after an estimate by the owner, Greg, and chose to take the business elsewhere.

- Recommendation: The majority of reviews express strong likelihood to recommend Triple R Roofing & Siding for future roofing needs.

Reviews describe positive experiences with Priddy Roofing and Exteriors (York, PA) for residential roof replacements in Central Pennsylvania. Practical details cited include competitive pricing, a well-organized planning and quotes process, and prompt execution (one project completed in two days). Mike Babski (Mike B) is consistently highlighted as knowledgeable, professional, and easy to understand, with strong communication that keeps customers updated from quoting through completion. Customers note that the company works within budget, provides honest input, and delivers high-quality workmanship with attention to detail; several testimonials state the final results exceeded expectations and that before/after photos don’t fully capture the quality. The feedback comes from homeowners and involves multiple projects, including a DaVinci slate roof for a company, with repeated recommendations and expressions of satisfaction.

Overview:
Most customers describe Shiloh Roofing as reliable and professional for both repairs and full roof replacements, with fair pricing and strong communication. Projects often begin with an on-site assessment, clear explanations of findings, and a plan to address underlying issues. Crews are reported as efficient, hardworking, and respectful of homes and landscaping, and cleanup is typically thorough with nails cleaned up using magnets. Several customers note prompt responses to inquiries and free, detailed estimates. A common theme is satisfaction with the final result and willingness to recommend the company.

Practical details:
- Services performed: full roof replacements and reshingle work; repairs for leaks; in one case replacing a skylight with a Velux Solar Tube; sometimes uncovering and fixing underlying issues during the process.
- Scheduling: many jobs completed quickly (often within a day or two); a few instances where projects extended (e.g., one roof replacement taking three days).
- Work quality: installations described as proper and visually appealing; proactive prep and cleanup; one testimonial notes a roof installed in 2003 still looking like new in 2019.
- Communication and customer care: detailed estimates and explanations, ongoing updates from staff or the owner, and responsiveness to short-notice requests.
- Cleanup and site handling: generally thorough cleanup and yard protection; some feedback about residual nails or debris in one case, later addressed by the owner.
- Pricing and value: free estimates; described as fair or competitive compared with other quotes; materials and options explained to the customer.
- Notable concerns: a solar-tube replacement issue where the wrong parts were used and questions about potential damage to underlayment; a single review noted less-than-ideal cleanup that was subsequently resolved.
- Customer sentiment: multiple reviewers expressed high satisfaction and would recommend Shiloh Roofing to others.

- Overall, customer experiences are mixed but include many positive reports of the staff and service, with several customers praising John (project manager) and Brendan (Director of Operations) for friendly, customer‑oriented service, thorough explanations, and strong communication from start to finish. Roofing work is described as high quality and completed efficiently, with good cleanup, on‑time performance, and a lifetime warranty noted by some reviewers.

- Positive aspects highlighted by multiple customers:
- Helpful, knowledgeable staff who respond to questions and provide advice.
- Professional conduct and clear communication during the project.
- Satisfactory workmanship and timely completion; neat cleanup.
- Perceived good customer service and willingness to answer questions throughout the process.

- Notable concerns raised by a detailed negative review:
- An initial quote of about $23,000 with a $5,000 down payment and financing for the remainder.
- Promise that a project manager would be on site the installation day and conduct a post‑install walkthrough, which did not occur; no communication about wood damage or upcharges during installation.
- Two weeks after installation, a claim that $10,000 of wood had been replaced, plus an additional $5,000 charge, presented without documentation or prior approval.
- Request for documentation proving damaged wood and materials; customer refused to sign a “Completion of Work” document due to unresolved charges.
- The customer filed a BBB complaint, alleging misleading, unethical, and unprofessional conduct, and reporting threats of legal action.

- Other notes:
- A complaint suggesting that a “No Soliciting” sign was ignored and that some reviews may be influenced by executives or employees sharing names with reviewers.
- A general caution to potential buyers to seek written scope of work, detailed documentation for any charges, and clear warranty terms before proceeding.

- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Get a written scope of work and a detailed, itemized quote before signing.
- Confirm who will supervise on installation day and ensure they will be on site as promised.
- Ask for written documentation of any additional work or charges (especially after installation) and request proof of any claimed damages or replacements.
- Clarify warranty terms in writing and understand what is covered and for how long.
- Be wary of post‑installation upcharges and maintain records; consider checking with the Better Business Bureau or other sources if unusual charges arise.

Customer feedback for Built 2 Last General Contracting is mixed. Positive reports highlight timely responses, clear communication, professionalism, on-time arrivals, thorough on-site cleanup, and high-quality results on roofing, decks, porches, windows, and doors, with some clients noting help with insurance claims, fair pricing, and concise project timelines (often around a few weeks from estimate to completion). Several customers praise the crew (including Rob/Robert and team) and would hire them again. Negative feedback cites unfinished work (e.g., painting railing not completed per contract), roof leaks due to sealing/installation issues, poorly closing shed doors, perceived poor craftsmanship, lack of communication, missed appointments for estimates, and an on-site incident of crew members drinking beer. One reviewer advised against using the contractor. Given the range of experiences, prospective customers should request a detailed written scope, confirm scheduling and milestones, and check multiple references before proceeding.

- Mixed reviews overall. Some customers report rude behavior and poor customer service etiquette, and say they would not return.
- Positive experiences noted include: fast, knowledgeable, reliable, and friendly service; helpful and knowledgeable sales reps; a newly renovated showroom; high-quality materials; and positive remarks about customer service across departments (customer service, sales, and management).
- Product and selection details: a large/extensive selection of building materials for roofing and siding; knowledgeable staff; and generally positive comments about material quality.
- Operational notes: one reviewer mentions that a name change (Yorktowne) has led to confusion and a messy experience for some customers.
- Logistics/access: the facility is described as not truck-friendly due to being on a residential street; some reviews indicate quick in-and-out service.

- Services provided: windows, siding, exterior doors, and bathroom remodels, with several customers noting successful multi-project updates (e.g., windows and doors, or windows with siding).

- Sales experience: consistently described as professional, knowledgeable, and not pushy; some customers highlighted specific representatives (e.g., Frank the sales associate) and in-home demonstrations.

- Installation quality and efficiency: installations described as on time, efficient, and well-executed; crews were careful, left interiors and exteriors clean, and protected furnishings; some projects completed in a single day for window replacements; same installation teams were often used.

- Workmanship and outcomes: high marks for product quality (e.g., energy-efficient triple-pane windows, appealing siding color match, well-installed doors and showers); customers noted improved comfort and noticeable savings on energy bills.

- Cleanup and site impact: repeated praise for thorough cleanup, trash removal, and minimal disruption to landscaping and gardens; gates and yards were left secure.

- Value and pricing: customers generally cited competitive pricing and favorable deals, including repeat-customer offers and promotions like a free window drawing.

- Financing: financing experiences were mixed; most customers seemed satisfied with the process, but one noted a negative experience with TGUC Financial and advised choosing financing carefully.

- Cautions and considerations: one comment suggested avoiding very cold installation days due to comfort during work; some delays or scheduling adjustments occurred to accommodate weather or customer timing.

- Overall sentiment: broadly positive across windows, siding, doors, and bathroom projects, with consistent emphasis on professionalism, quality results, and good customer service.