Top Siding Repair Services in Yakima

Available customer feedback consists of a single comment calling the siding repair work 'amazing.' No additional practical details (timing, cost, materials, warranty, or specific workmanship criteria) are provided.

Customer feedback for Complete Restoration and Construction, LLC (CRC) is generally positive and emphasizes professionalism, punctuality, and reliability. Clients report on-site work starting on schedule, quick responses to emergencies, and clear explanations of the proposed actions and reasons behind them. Work quality is repeatedly described as high, with strong attention to detail and effective problem-solving, particularly in addressing water damage, leaks, and related repairs, as well as assisting with insurance claims and coordinating with insurers. The team is praised for thorough communication, regular updates, organized workflows, and thorough post-job cleanup. Several testimonials note a stress-reducing, customer-focused approach, with staff going “above and beyond” to support homeowners through the repair process and insurance dealings. Many customers would hire CRC again and would recommend them, citing fair pricing and dependability. A minority note scheduling constraints due to being fully booked at times, though this did not detract from the overall satisfaction with the work.

- Services and outcomes: Gutters were installed and then completely replaced; a newly installed metal roof had unfinished details completed; one review also notes a gutter cleaning completed by the team.
- Customer impressions: The team was on time, professional, and left the property spotless; the crew is described as knowledgeable and kind; customers express trust and would hire the team again, with strong recommendations.

The reviews for State Wide Contracting LLC focus mainly on roofing and gutter work rather than siding repairs. Overall, customers comment on quick quotes, professional crews, and strong workmanship, with several noting timely scheduling and tidy results. A notable negative review highlights poor communication and long delays (a year-plus with lost orders and no contact). Positive feedback frequently mentions responsive staff (Oscar, Brian, Gino), competitive pricing, and projects completed efficiently, including multi-building jobs and rapid roof replacements.

The reviews pertain to a roofing contractor (Willy's Roofing) rather than a siding repair business. They largely describe professional conduct, thorough insurance coordination, timely completion, and work within budget, with several staff members praised. Notable negatives include poor customer service (damaged window with no replacement and lack of a detailed invoice) and at least one instance of a scheduling no-show. Overall sentiment is positive, with pricing viewed as good value and some assistance with insurance approvals mentioned. Warranties or maintenance tips are not addressed in the reviews.

- Overall, the experiences are mixed. Some customers report positive, straightforward service for small repairs, with the technician being professional and courteous.

- Positive feedback for Greystone Exteriors / Benjamin:
- Several reviews describe professional, courteous service, clear communication, fair pricing, and timely completion.
- Customers mention helpful guidance on roof/remodel options, on-time arrivals, quality materials, and clean job sites.
- Multiple accounts say work was completed ahead of schedule and would recommend the company to others.

- Negative experiences and warnings:
- A substantial set of reviews allege severe issues with a contractor identified as Ben / Greystone Exteriors LLC, including multiple delays (months) on roofing projects, missed appointments, poor or no contact, and failure to provide receipts or refunds.
- Some reviewers claim they were pressured to leave five-star reviews, report they were ghosted after contract cancellation, and accuse the contractor of fraud. There are mentions of ongoing complaints with agencies such as the attorney general, L&I, and BBB, and changes to the company’s BBB address.

- Practical considerations for potential customers:
- Verify the current status and legitimacy of the contractor, and check for recent reviews and local complaints.
- Insist on written quotes, a clear scope of work, and documented receipts or invoices, especially for large payments.
- Clarify payment schedules, cancellation terms, warranties, and a plan for communication and updates.
- Consider checking with consumer protection resources (BBB, state agencies) and requesting multiple references before signing.

Customers consistently report high satisfaction with Nano Construction’s siding repair and related work (windows, painting, ceilings, walls, bathrooms, and a washroom/floor area). Most projects are completed within about two weeks. The team, led by Nano and often with his son Miguel, is described as courteous, professional, and easy to work with, with quick responses to emergencies and clear, proactive communication (including initial quotes and on-site visits). Work quality is repeatedly praised as excellent, with good value for the price and a perception of long-term durability. Several customers note they would hire them again, recommend them to others, or consider them a contractor for life, including cases where they completed jobs after another contractor did not finish. Some clients mention feeling treated like family and appreciated the responsiveness and reliability.

- Responsiveness and communication: Clients report quick replies and prompt dispatching of technicians (e.g., Brandon responding to inquiries; Jeremy on-site promptly) and thorough, patient explanations of options and questions answered.
- Pricing and value: Several reviews describe competitive pricing and value, with one noting substantial savings by identifying what could be salvaged versus what needed replacement.
- Services performed and outcomes: Projects include re-roofs on residential homes, replacement of cedar roofs with 50-year laminated shingles, living roof replacement with a TPO roof, leak patching, and even interior work (epoxy countertops and sinks). Work is described as high quality and completed on time, with at least one customer reporting a leak-free result for over a year.
- Integrity and customer welfare: Clients emphasize integrity and a focus on the customer’s best interests, including guidance that prevented unnecessary full roof replacements and practical tips during rainy periods.
- Reliability and future work: Reviewers state they would hire again and plan to pursue additional projects, indicating satisfaction and trust in the company.
- Key personnel: Brandon and Jeremy are frequently mentioned as primary contacts/crews, with Justin also highlighted for customer service and pricing discussions.

DaBella’s customer experiences are mixed but often positive about staff knowledge and product quality, with notable variation in sales approach, pricing, and post-install follow-up.

Key practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Services and visits: The company appears to offer windows, siding, and roofing work with on-site inspections, including free 30-minute inspections. Some representatives provide thorough, technical explanations of what’s needed and how systems work; others focus more on sales pitches.
- Scheduling and responsiveness: Many customers report friendly, professional visits and good communication from certain staff, but there are also reports of poor local service and difficulty returning calls.
- Pricing and quotes: Several reviews note aggressive sales tactics and quotes that can be three to five times higher than estimates from big-box retailers like Home Depot. Some customers report help navigating financing or budgets, while others feel the pricing is not competitive.
- Products and quality: Customers mention high-quality, exclusive roofing systems and efficient windows, with some noting products are Made in the USA. A few customers report post-install issues such as siding coming apart within months.
- Notable staff mentions: Positive remarks about Sean Hein, Shawn Flanagan, Linda Sanchez, Abbey Roberts, Mason, Jesus, Cameron McKinney, Brandon Mora, and Devyn, often describing them as knowledgeable, professional, and helpful. There are also mentions of aggressive sales tactics and pushy behavior in some cases.
- Language and accessibility: Several Spanish-language mentions indicate some staff can communicate in Spanish and explain options clearly in multiple languages.

Overall, DaBella can offer knowledgeable staff and quality products, but potential customers should be prepared for variable sales approaches, compare quotes carefully with other providers, and assess post-install service history and warranty expectations.

Please provide the customer reviews or experiences you’d like summarized (paste the text or share a link). I’ll produce a neutral, factual summary highlighting practical details such as project duration, pricing ranges, scheduling, communication, workmanship quality, materials used, warranties, follow-up/callbacks, and overall satisfaction.

- The feedback portrays LF Construction as a family‑owned, bilingual contractor (English/Spanish) delivering high‑quality workmanship with professional communication.
- They have completed a range of projects, including building the shell of a house, foundation, framing, siding, and roofing, as well as a 12x24 shed, often delivering on or ahead of schedule (one project cited a 6‑week timeline for a 1000 sq ft home with attached garage).
- Clients note quick or efficient permitting and strong project management, with the supervisor (Alex) praised for delegation and keeping customers informed; attention to detail and seamless execution are frequently highlighted.
- Work is consistently described as on budget and fairly priced, with several reviews emphasizing good value and honesty.
- Site work is described as clean and code‑compliant, with mentions of respectful, professional conduct.
- Customers report positive personal experiences, including compassion for financial circumstances, involvement in decision‑making, and clear, proactive communication; many would hire again or readily recommend LF Construction.

- The customer contacted the company in November for a leaking roof and hood vent installation; a quote was provided but the project began only weeks later.
- Equipment and materials (ladders, generators, propane tanks, extra roofing materials) were stored around the property for an extended period, even after they were no longer needed.
- The crew size declined from a small team to a single worker, attributed to rising labor costs.
- By December, multiple new leaks appeared; the company initially responded quickly to mitigate damage but soon stopped appearing to be a priority.
- An emergency visit around 11 pm involved a worker delivering a pump to address water intrusion; this was the only consistently positive interaction mentioned.
- The project featured long gaps with days of work followed by weeks with no progress; the customer attributed slow progress to weather but noted ongoing delays despite patience.
- In mid-January, there were multiple clogged roof drains; the company claimed they were waiting on flashing parts and had scheduled a roto-rooter visit, which never occurred.
- The site left significant messes: muddy drips on windows and siding, nails and scrap metal in the yard/driveway, and portions of new roof material hanging below flashing.
- By March, equipment had disappeared again; a walkthrough was promised to update the contract and address cleanup, but the visiting worker appeared confused and no lasting follow-up occurred.
- The customer found over 50 nails, scrap metal, and piles of rock around the home, with new debris appearing daily.
- The company stated it could not unclog drains but would assist for an additional fee; drains were covered without prior consultation, and a vent for the bathroom was not completed despite prior discussion.
- The city notified the customer that the roofing permit had not been closed out nor was a final inspection scheduled; the company stopped answering calls and emails, hindering the insurance claim process.
- The repairs appeared rushed yet stretched over four months, raising concerns about whether the project would pass inspection.
- Safety and professionalism concerns were raised: the company parked in a throughway without marker lights, cones, or four-way signals; one employee waved at the customer while they were impeded, indicating a perceived rushed and reckless approach.
- A separate, brief positive note described another customer who received a consult from the owner and considers the company a go-to for roof advice, highlighting mixed experiences.

Overall, the experiences depict significant delays, communication breakdowns, safety and cleanup concerns, incomplete work, and permitting/inspection issues, with only a few positive interactions noted. Potential customers may want to verify scheduling, cleanup expectations, permit closure, and references before proceeding.