Top Siding Repair Services in Rancho Cucamonga

Two customers report positive experiences with Tony, owner of Perry Roofing. One hired him to reroof a previous home and later called him back for an inspection and sealing; the customer describes the work as excellent and attributes integrity and honesty to Tony. The other recommends Tony, noting he charged $600 to repair several broken tiles and clear the gutter, contrasting it with an earlier estimate that was triple the amount; this customer calls him professional, kind, and honest. Overall, the feedback emphasizes quality workmanship, reliability, honesty, and favorable pricing relative to prior estimates.

- Overall impression: The majority of customers report VG Tech as responsive, professional, and reliable for gate-related repairs and installations; one reviewer cites unethical pricing.

- Responsiveness and scheduling: Many note quick responses (Maya often coordinating), easy scheduling, and prompt follow-up; post-install issues are often resolved quickly (within 24 hours) and on-site visits can be timely (e.g., 1.5 hours).

- Personnel and communication: Maya (office manager) is repeatedly praised for communication and scheduling; technicians mentioned include Dmitri/Dima/Dimka and Ivan, who are described as knowledgeable, punctual, neat, and communicative, with installations and repairs well explained to customers.

- Services provided: Gate and keypad troubleshooting, motor replacements, welding, and general gate hardware repairs; replacements of older systems with newer ones; some work cited in conjunction with locksmith tasks (e.g., Yale lock) and door hardware.

- Pricing: Several customers say pricing is fair or competitive; a minority report high charges or questionable pricing (e.g., a $1,000 service charge and $125 keypad), recommending getting quotes and weighing options.

- Follow-up and guarantees: Multiple reviews mention follow-up after service to confirm satisfaction and address any lingering issues; some issues are resolved at no additional charge.

- Notable outcomes: Multiple customers express strong satisfaction and willingness to refer others; some individuals report lifetime preference for VG Tech based on experience.

- Inquiries and lead handling: A customer asked about drywall and was given a link for contractors; they contacted one contractor. The customer stated that the company shared their phone number with all contractors in California, resulting in about 5–10 calls per hour seeking drywall services.

- Work quality and outcomes: One contractor, Rancho Cucamonga Drywall and Plaster, was described as having fixed the walls seamlessly and received a high recommendation.

- Turnaround and finish: Another project involved installing new drywall for a remodel; the work was completed within a few days with a smooth, attractive finish described as beautiful.

Reviews depict Best Roofing Company (Fontana) as a highly rated roofing contractor specializing in roof repair and replacement (including shingles and textured metal options) with strong emphasis on communication, on-time performance, thorough cleanup, and coordination with insurance. Customers frequently note friendly, professional staff (Cameron, Malachi), quick estimates, transparent pricing, and a credible warranty program (notably a 100-year guarantee on metal roofs). The team is praised for diagnosing and fixing leaks, addressing vent/soffit issues, and maintaining accessibility for questions. Occasional concerns mention third-party lead services and minor cleanup remnants (e.g., nails left in yard). Overall, experiences point to reliable service, good value, and solid customer care.

Reviews describe T&G Roofing and Solar as a contractor focused on roof replacements, repairs, and solar work. Customers frequently report professional, timely service, high workmanship quality, and clear communication, with some specific staff praised by name. A roof warranty is mentioned in at least one review, and several customers note assistance with insurance to achieve fair pricing. A minority of reviews express dissatisfaction with customer service or perceived lack of follow-through. Overall, the sentiment is largely positive with emphasis on responsiveness and quality, though a few negative experiences are noted.

roofing_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

general_contractor, roofing_contractor, electrician, plumber, home_goods_store, point_of_interest, store, establishment

CB Bright Construction (Carlos and team) is described as a versatile remodeling contractor handling bathrooms, kitchens, exteriors, and related projects, including siding installation. Reviews portray them as meticulous, honest, and highly responsive, with strong attention to detail, clear communication, and pride in their work. Clients report on-time performance, thorough site cleanup, and creative problem solving, with projects ranging from small repairs to large renovations. Pricing is described as good value, and overall sentiment is highly positive; no warranties are mentioned in the reviews.

- Overall, reviews are mixed. Several customers report very negative experiences, while one subcontractor of ALT reports a positive relationship.

- Negative experiences (reported details):
- Descriptions of rude and expensive behavior tied to a person named Diego; perceived unprofessionalism from staff.
- Claims that workers did not provide basic courtesy or supplies (e.g., water) and that the supervisor was very demanding and time-specific in an inappropriate manner.
- A 5-week delay to obtain a budget/quote, followed by two no-shows for scheduled appointments, with no calls or notifications to cancel.
- General concerns about professionalism, reliability, and communication.

- Positive experience (reported):
- A subcontractor working with ALT states five years of positive collaboration, noting a strong crew, Diego’s solid trade knowledge, and Amy’s excellent administrative support.

- Practical considerations for potential customers:
- Be prepared for possible delays in quotes and potential appointment no-shows; confirm scheduling and pricing expectations in writing.
- Verify professionalism and communication expectations before committing.
- If engaging via ALT or its subcontractors, consider checking references and specifically inquire about lead times, pricing clarity, and customer communication.

Overall, customers describe West Meridian Roofing (also operating as Oshcon) as a family‑owned, professional contractor delivering roofing and siding work with a consistent emphasis on upfront communication, transparency, and quality workmanship. Practical details cited by customers include:

- Estimates and pricing: multiple quotes exist; several customers note they selected West Meridian for competitive pricing without sacrificing quality; quotes are described as upfront with no hidden costs.
- Permits and inspections: the company commonly handles city permits and scheduling inspections.
- Project scope and visuals: customers appreciate video footage showing roof condition and the need for repair or replacement; occasional mentions of additional work beyond roofing (e.g., siding and a deck/porch project).
- Scheduling and completion: many projects are completed within a short window (examples include 4–5 days for roof replacement); work starts promptly and progresses in a timely manner.
- Communication: customers report regular updates on arrival times, progress, and any questions answered by the office or leadership (e.g., Jeremiah, Chase, Eli; Paul in customer care).
- Cleanup and site management: daily cleanup of debris and nails; careful, respectful handling of the home environment.
- workmanship and materials: evidence of attention to detail, quality installation (e.g., proper ventilation considerations), and use of quality materials; work is described as precise and thorough.
- professionalism and trust: crews are described as hard‑working, punctual, polite, and respectful to family members; several customers note a high level of trust and transparency, including handling of insurance delays and changes.
- customer experience and referrals: many customers explicitly recommend the company and say they would hire again or refer others; some praise their responsiveness and lack of high‑pressure sales.
- versatility and consistency: beyond roofing, the company has experience with related exterior work (e.g., siding, porches, decks) and handles custom or additional projects from foundation to finish when requested.

- Overall, experiences with Home Masters Contractor/Home Masters International range from highly positive to very negative, with a mix of praise for workmanship and serious concerns about project management and safety.
- Positive themes: strong craftsmanship on kitchen and full-home remodeling, attention to detail, professional on-site work, and staff who were responsive to feedback (notably project managers Moe and Amier/Nader, as well as Mamoon and Will in design roles). Several customers reported projects finished to their satisfaction and occasional warranty service (e.g., replacing a shower head, a window under warranty).
- Notable strengths cited by many: clear design involvement, helpful showroom staff, keeping to timelines and budgets on some projects, and willingness to address issues raised during the process.
- Recurrent concerns and negative experiences:
- Cabinet design vs. delivered reality: several reviews say cabinets/doors did not match the approved design or 3D elevations, with sizes incorrect or not symmetric; mentions of pressure to accept non-matching cabinetry or to pay for custom solutions not originally disclosed.
- Scheduling and costs: backorders on cabinet components and other materials, last-minute changes, and accusations of unanticipated price increases or restocking/fee charges; some reports of cash payments and subsequent liens from subcontractors due to nonpayment.
- Communication and professionalism: multiple accounts of inconsistent or dismissive communication, some claims of being treated poorly or differently (including reports of disrespect toward women) and of meetings being declined.
- Safety and compliance concerns: a gas leak discovered in a range installation, with allegations of improper gas-line work; claims of ongoing plumbing/sink issues and other safety-related problems; several customers reportedly pursuing licensing boards or consumer protection actions.
- Post-project issues and warranty: unresolved items like ceiling cracks, ongoing repairs, and delays in scheduling follow-up work; mixed experiences on whether warranty work was honored or completed satisfactorily.
- Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Request a detailed, written scope with measurements that align to the final 3D elevations, and confirm cabinet sizes and symmetry before installation.
- Clarify backorder timelines, price protections, and a formal change-order process to avoid unexpected costs.
- Verify licensing, insurance, and the payment practices of any subcontractors to prevent liens on your property.
- Insist on clear, written communication and regular progress updates; confirm who will be your point of contact throughout the project.
- Require a safety review for any gas or plumbing work and confirm warranties on all components and labor, with specific timelines for post-completion service.
- Check references and recent project outcomes similar to yours to gauge consistency across projects.

- Pricing and quotes vary: at least one reviewer called the bid one of the pricier options but noted friendly, quick responses; another described pricing as decently priced; another labeled the work expensive and criticized finishing.

- Responsiveness and communication: several reviews praised prompt responses, helpfulness, and regular updates; a couple of reports mention delays in returning calls or responses, and one notes that by the time they answered, the roof had already been replaced.

- Timeliness and on-site performance: teams are described as arriving on time and working efficiently; some jobs included prompt shingle replacement after wind damage; one reviewer highlighted that the tear-off crew proceeded with the job and aimed to minimize disruption.

- Quality of work and materials: multiple reviews praise professional service, expert craftsmanship, and high-quality materials; some reviews emphasize thorough workmanship and clean site completion; one review mentions excellent teamwork with solar installation and knowledgeable electricians.

- Project scope and specifics: projects include roof replacement/tear-off, shingle replacement after wind events, and solar installation with electrical work; some reviewers note special considerations like preserving a koi pond and waterfall during work.

- Trust and customer experience: several reviewers describe the company as trustworthy and top-notch, with high overall satisfaction and willingness to recommend.

- Notable negative signals: at least one review reports expensive finishing with poor results; another notes lack of response to messages; a few reviewers’ experiences contrast with the consistently positive accounts.

Ontario Roofing:
- Generally positive reviews: repairs were fast and professional (often same day), with problems identified and fixed quickly.
- Notable workmanship: leadwork around the chimney restored to prevent leaks; flat roof repairs eliminated water pooling; exterior painting enhanced appearance and protection.
- Customer experience: transparent costs and timelines; strong communication; workmanship described as top-notch; several customers would highly recommend.
- Cautions: a few miscellaneous comments about a call-routing issue to another company and a reported minimum job quote; one review suggested skepticism about overall five-star ratings; another note claimed the company had closed.

ReHome Solutions (spanning multiple home-improvement services):
- Consistent positives: staff described as hard-working, punctual, professional, and courteous; high-quality craftsmanship with two-way, ongoing communication.
- Project scope and performance: handled varied work (garage doors, patio deck, French doors, attic insulation) efficiently; estimates fair; work started on time, finished quickly; cleanup often noted as thorough or better than original condition.
- Customer experience: praised for accuracy of matching finishes (e.g., doors to wood floors), reliable follow-up, and willingness to resolve issues promptly (e.g., a missed deck section fixed quickly); financing accommodations mentioned in at least one case.
- Overall sentiment: customers frequently stated they would use ReHome Solutions again and would recommend them; several testimonials emphasized exceptional customer service and satisfaction with the results.

The reviews for Certapro Painters (Rancho Cucamonga) are mixed but overall skew positive. Positive experiences highlight professionalism, punctuality, courtesy, and thorough communication. Customers report crews arriving on time, working efficiently, completing interior and exterior painting to a high standard (including walls, ceilings, cabinets, and eaves), and leaving sites clean. Several accounts note fair pricing, clear quotes, and no hidden costs, with homeowners able to schedule work to fit tight timelines and, in some cases, to rehire for additional projects. Many would hire them again and recommend the company.

Negative experiences mention hidden or unexpected charges in quotes and perceived overcharging. Some customers report incomplete work (a room not finished) or inadequate cleanup (paint on new tile), and at least one review states edges were sloppy or uneven. A reviewer also claimed calls and texts were ignored and raised concerns about subcontracting affecting quality. One commenter explicitly did not recommend them due to subcontracting.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Obtain a detailed written, itemized quote and confirm exactly what is included (scope of work, finishes, cleanup).
- Clarify whether subcontractors will be used and who will supervise the work.
- Set and agree to a clear start/completion schedule and communication plan.
- Confirm cleanup expectations and post-job touch-ups or warranty processes.
- Consider checking references and recent projects to verify consistency in quality.