Top Siding Repair Services in Lorain

Reviews portray VanDyke Construction as professional and reliable remodelers who deliver high-quality workmanship across kitchens, bathrooms, basements, and exterior projects. Customers note on-time completion, attention to detail, and good customer service, with comments about fair pricing. No specific siding materials, warranties, or maintenance tips are mentioned in the feedback; the comments focus on general craftsmanship and trustworthiness.

Customer reviews largely describe positive experiences with in-store assistance, staff friendliness, and efficient service related to exterior home projects (siding, roofing materials, and replacement windows). Specific mentions include choosing siding, a good price on replacement windows (argon-filled), and quick in-and-out service at a supply location. A notable drawback is a complaint about delivery timing and poor communication regarding delivery estimates, with one customer indicating they would not spend there again due to delivery issues. Warranties for repairs are not mentioned, and there are no explicit maintenance tips provided.

Customers report that Ohio Roofing Siding Slate handles roofing, siding, gutters, skylights, and related repairs with generally high satisfaction. They frequently note quality workmanship, clean job sites, and aesthetically pleasing results; crews often completed work efficiently (including several one-day installs) and were respectful of neighbors’ property. Scheduling is described as flexible, with some customers delaying start dates to align with available funds. Communication is highlighted as a key strength, with prompt responses from office staff Dawn and Sarah and ongoing updates from Mike, Dave, and John. Pricing is described as fair and transparent, with clear explanations of changes and financing options discussed upfront. When issues arose, the company addressed them promptly (for example, fascia repairs and arranging interior skylight finish through a subcontractor found by Dave). Several customers reported repeat business or strong recommendations, and trust in Dave, Michael, and the team; there is at least one note about not receiving a receipt in a single instance. Overall, experiences are described as positive and the company is frequently recommended.

- Overall, reviews show a mix of positive and negative experiences. Many customers praise the company for fast response, helpful insurance guidance, and professional communication throughout the roof or siding project.

- Positive patterns frequently noted: quick scheduling of estimates after storm damage; assistance with insurance claims and paperwork; one-day roof replacement with removal, installation, and thorough cleanup; ability to select or confirm colors with staff; use of a web portal for paperwork; professional, knowledgeable staff (e.g., Chad, Rob B., Jeff, Chris, Ryan, Sean) who help coordinate with insurers and keep customers informed; and plans to hire for siding work.

- Specific strengths highlighted: efficient project execution (often completed in one day), clear and proactive communication, good customer service, and cleanup professionalism. Several customers would highly recommend the company and have referred friends and family.

- Common concerns and negative experiences: prolonged delays and lack of timely progress or communication in some cases (e.g., money held for months without starting; projects extending for over a year with little or no follow-up); reported damage to landscaping or property with insufficient follow-through to remedy; instances of unresponsiveness, missed calls, or inadequate workmanship; some claims of incomplete work or leaving loose nails/shingles after visits; one review noted a denial of an insurance claim by the insurer with little ongoing follow-up from the company.

- A few customers explicitly stated dissatisfaction or advised caution, noting unprofessional behavior or poor outcomes, while others emphasized that the company delivered on promises or improved their homes significantly.

- In summary, potential customers can expect generally strong customer service, insurance coordination, and efficient outcomes (often a one-day installation) from Journey Home Restoration, but should be aware of potential variability in responsiveness and project follow-through, and verify post-installation commitments especially regarding insurance claims, repairs, and any siding work planned.

Overall, the experiences described are mixed. Some customers praise New Level for quick response, reliable problem-solving, and quality work, particularly in safety-focused projects, such as installing a gate and rails for an elderly family member, with attention to detail and custom craftsmanship. Other comments highlight reasonable pricing, pleasant neighbors, and positive interactions with the company.

On the negative side, one tenant recounts severe maintenance failures, including sewer backups and mold, unsafe conditions, and rude, unresponsive landlord behavior, resulting in dislocation and disputes over charges. A few reviews also contain brief negative notes, such as “they don’t want to fix anything” or “they are ok,” indicating inconsistency in experiences.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- If you need installations or upgrades (e.g., gates/rails), the team has documented capabilities and has produced favorable, detail-oriented results.
- For rental experiences, assess management responsiveness and maintenance history through references, as reports vary from highly responsive and attentive to problematic and unaddressed issues.
- Compare pricing and confirm scope of work and maintenance expectations upfront, as experiences range from reasonable pricing to claims of poor upkeep.

Two reviews describe a positive siding repair experience with prompt service. Reviewers mention quick arrival and same-day completion, no mess left behind, and good workmanship; one notes that the technician (Cody) is reliable and would be recommended.

Overall, customer experiences are mixed, with some praising professionalism, timeliness, and fair pricing, and others reporting delays, permitting issues, cleanliness problems, and higher costs. Key observations:

- Timeliness and availability: Some customers reported on-time arrivals, weekend availability, and rapid completion (e.g., a sliding door installation finished in 5–6 hours with quick cleanup). Others experienced lateness and missed appearances.

- Permits and regulatory issues: One reviewer stated no permits were obtained, leading to inspector involvement and roughly $80,000 in costs for the client.

- Pricing: Several reviews describe fair or reasonable pricing, while others note paying more than original estimates or Premium pricing for certain work.

- Quality of work and outcomes: Positive experiences cited quality work, good results on projects like fences and door openings, and trustworthy crews. Negative experiences cited damage or mess from painting (e.g., paint on a brand-new floor, lack of drop cloths) and additional steps needed to fix issues (resealing floors).

- Cleanliness and site protection: Mixed—one report praised cleanup, another described poor protection leading to floor damage and extra cleanup.

- Professionalism and trust: Experiences vary from highly positive (owner and workers described as wonderful; highly recommended) to strongly negative (claims of a horrible person and company; not recommended).

- Services and scope: Reports cover siding repair, fencing, sliding patio doors, creating wall openings, texture and paint work, and related carpentry. Not all reviews exclusively address siding repair, but reflect broader contractor services.

- Recommendations: Some reviewers would use or recommend the company for future projects; others warn potential customers to look elsewhere, especially given the risk of permit issues and cost overruns.

Overall, the reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with customers praising professional and efficient crews, high-quality workmanship, and thorough cleanup. Several notes consistently highlight the company’s handling of insurance claims, detailed estimates with 3D previews, and responsive communication from project managers and crew members. A number of customers report rapid or single-day roofing work, neat site maintenance, and the ability to secure favorable insurance outcomes.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Estimation process: detailed estimates provided, often with 3D photos of post-project results; estimates described as non-pushy and informative.
- Insurance assistance: staff coordinate with insurers and help maximize coverage; several reviews indicate significant cost savings and a hands-off experience for the homeowner.
- Communication: project managers (notably Nick) and team members (Gabriel, Mickey Williams, Paul, Austin) are described as responsive, communicative, and proactive, including updates via text.
- Work scope and quality: capabilities across roofing, siding, and gutters; examples include vinyl siding repairs and complete roof replacements, with emphasis on craftsmanship and minimal disruption.
- Speed and cleanup: projects frequently completed quickly (some in one day) with careful site cleanup, leaving properties looking orderly or “spotless.”
- Reliability and trust: reviewers describe the team as honest, straightforward, and easy to work with, with multiple recommendations for future projects.

Reviewer notes that the company has completed several roofing projects for them and they greatly appreciate the work. An individual named Nate is described as highly recommended. The reviewer also claims the company is the best in Ohio.

Emergency Task Force Restoration (ETFR) receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across a range of restoration jobs, with notes of quick response, clear communication, professional handling, and high-quality results. Reviews describe rapid responsiveness to incidents (water leaks, floods, fires, mold remediation), thorough explanations of processes, and courteous, reliable service. No specific siding materials or siding repairs are mentioned in the reviews; the examples cite roofing, flooring, basement work, porch repairs, and general renovations. There is little to no discussion of warranties or pricing details in the reviews. This information can help potential customers gauge service quality and reliability, though it may not reflect siding-specific offerings.

Across multiple customer comments, A. Kelch Construction is described as professional and communicative, with timely updates and fair pricing. Clients report high-quality siding repair and replacement, thorough yard cleanup, and careful, detail-oriented exterior work (including roofs and fences). Several reviews highlight responsiveness and flexibility, such as fitting projects into tight schedules, completing work ahead of deadlines, and coordinating with insurance companies to minimize client involvement. Some customers note reference points like Tony and the team, with praise for handling storm, wind, or tornado damage and resolving prior contractor issues or warranty matters. Overall, customers consistently recommend Kelch Construction, describing their work as reliable, easy to work with, and well executed.

Reviews describe Custom Gutter and Exteriors as a provider of siding repair and exterior work, including garage wrap, fascia, window trim, gutters, soffits, and leaf guards. Many customers report positive experiences with prompt quotes, on-time crews, thorough workmanship, and clean job sites, as well as reasonable pricing and good office communication; several would hire them again and would recommend them. Some customers, however, report negative experiences such as missed appointments or delayed estimates, difficulty with warranty repairs or defective products, and a subcontractor-related complaint about inferior trim material and insufficient replacement of gaps. Overall, potential customers can expect generally solid exterior repair and installation services with strong professionalism and value, but may want to verify product warranties, material quality, and scheduling reliability ahead of time.

Overall, experiences with the siding repair work appear mixed but often positive. Customers report that Fraley Fox reached out to address the siding issue, dispatched a crew that worked daily, and completed the repair with the crew generally described as polite. In at least one instance, the same crew additionally hung shutters purchased by the customer after finishing the siding work. Some customers also note prompt communication and timely visits on related exterior tasks, such as a soffit replacement, which a reviewer described as efficient and performed by knowledgeable installers.

There are notable negative reports as well. One customer stated that the top row of siding began to detach again after the repair, and felt the fix was not properly completed; they criticized the proposed solution of driving nails through the subsurface via the weep holes, suggesting it could cause moisture issues. This ongoing problem led to multiple follow-ups. Other accounts mention scheduling and communication friction in some interactions, and there are mentions of unprofessional behavior by staff in unrelated projects.

- John Fair: recommended by friends; punctual and starts work promptly; repairs reportedly completed quickly and correctly; overall strong satisfaction.

- Claude C. Coller: concrete repair near the front steps of a mother-in-law’s home and trimming bushes around the perimeter; both tasks completed to satisfaction and in a timely manner; described as a very good worker and highly recommended.

- Just Call John: described as an excellent handyman service; lead contractor John is knowledgeable; both planned and emergency jobs handled with care; experience mentioned with an older home (built in 1902); credited with renewing the family home.

- Negative experience: not a good experience; poor workmanship and long duration to partial completion; scheduling to return finished by text cancellation; eventual return described as a debacle; cost about $170; had to hire someone else to redo the work; advised to think twice and consider value for money.

- Practical takeaway: mixed reviews overall; services cited include concrete repair and landscaping; experience with older homes noted; potential customers should verify scope, timelines, and costs in advance and consider requesting referrals or a written plan.

- Overall, customer feedback for Bill Jackson Roofing is consistently positive, with emphasis on professional, knowledgeable installers delivering quality workmanship and thorough yard cleanup.

- Customers report strong communication and responsiveness, including timely updates and keeping projects on schedule.

- A recurring theme is assistance with insurance claims: guiding customers through the process, helping claims get accepted, and securing payouts quickly; several reviewers specifically credited Brenden or Matt for this support.

- Pricing is described as transparent and fair, with mentions of no hidden costs and upfront estimates.

- The work cited centers on roofing projects (including storm-damage roof replacements) with positive outcomes and reliable completion.

- Several reviewers note punctuality and reliability, stating crews arrived as scheduled and completed work as promised, with good post-job cleanup.

- Some comments highlight staff members (e.g., Jennifer, James Rivera) as standout, and a few reviewers mention metal roofing as an offered service in-house.

Overall, the experiences reported are mixed. Several customers praise Midwest Siding for quality workmanship, professionalism, friendly service, and good value across multiple projects, while others critique installation quality and poor communication. Key points:

Positive experiences
- Multiple customers report high-quality workmanship and professional service, with installations completed to a high standard and sites cleaned up afterward.
- Customers note reasonable or competitive pricing.
- The owner is described as friendly and personable, contributing to positive interactions.
- Siding and related work on various parts of homes (front siding, shake siding, gutters and downspouts, windows and doors) are cited as satisfying, with some buyers indicating long-lasting results (e.g., original siding persisting well for decades).
- Some reviews highlight strong customer care and positive overall experiences.

Negative experiences
- One installation is alleged to have been performed without proper training, resulting in warped siding that expands and contracts with sun exposure; claims of improper nailing (face nailing vs. utility channel) and a lack of timely resolution for more than four months, with the customer expressing frustration and considering other options. Resolution occurred only after attorney involvement.
- Several customers report poor or unresponsive customer service, including missed callbacks, not answering phones, and delayed or no follow-up after requesting estimates.
- An overall sentiment in some reviews is critical, with advice to consider alternatives due to inconsistent experiences.

Resolution notes
- In at least one case where issues were raised, the company corrected the problem after escalation.

- Overall: The reviews are mixed. Some customers report very positive experiences, while others cite unprofessionalism and poor communication.
- Positive experiences noted: quick initial assessment (e.g., for a leak); crews described as friendly, hardworking, and knowledgeable; on-time appearances and thorough cleanup; high-quality work on roof and chimney; pricing described as reasonable.
- Negative experiences noted: lack of professionalism; having to call repeatedly to locate workers or to get updates; some instances of not returning calls or not showing up on time; strong warnings to avoid the company.
- Work scope referenced: roof replacement, roof and chimney work; one mention of siding (context suggests siding repair may be part of their offerings); some reviews emphasize the final appearance and workmanship.
- Practical guidance for potential customers: verify the exact scope of work (roof, chimney, siding) and timelines; ask for written estimates and a clear schedule; confirm communication expectations and point of contact; request references and a warranty or guarantee details; prepare for potential follow-up if scheduling or responsiveness is a concern.