Top Siding Repair Services in West Jordan

Across multiple West Jordan and surrounding-area projects, customers described Salt Lake City Advanced Roofing as professional, responsive, and thorough. Key practical details include assistance navigating insurance claims, obtaining approvals, and completing roof replacements promptly (with one project noting completion three days after permit). Jacob frequently served as the primary contact, providing regular updates and clear explanations, while Donovan and other team members were praised for quality workmanship and reliability.

Jobs were reported as well-managed and tidy, with emphasis on safety (e.g., preventing pets from ingesting nails) and a clean worksite at day’s end. A solar power system was often installed concurrently with roofing, with some customers noting a smooth integration and standout solar equipment. Assessments were sometimes conducted with a drone, and customers received detailed post-work reports with photographs.

Overall workmanship was described as high quality and thorough, including specific tasks such as replacing lead flashing around chimneys and uncovering rotten plywood underlying the underlayment. Pricing was viewed as fair in at least some cases, and several customers indicated they would recommend the company to friends, family, or neighbors. In addition to Jacob and Donovan, other staff such as Robin, Gracie, Jalin, Randall, Cody, Blake, and Greg were mentioned as professional and customer-focused in their respective roles.

The reviews present mixed experiences with R&JL Exteriors (R&JL / RJ&L), highlighting both strong workmanship and several reliability concerns.

- Estimating and pricing: Some customers reported late or missed estimates (one required reminders or a no-show) and wide variation in pricing, with one estimate of $3,400 deemed not competitive after receiving other bids in the $500–$800 range.

- Scheduling and communication: Accounts range from responsive, helpful communication to poor service, including missed appointments and lack of callback.

- On-site practices: Reports include mixed on-site handling, with some mentions of debris left behind or gutters placed in inconvenient locations, contrasted by other notes of courteous, efficient crews and thorough site cleanup.

- Quality of work and outcomes: Many reviews praise high-quality workmanship, craftsmanship, and results (e.g., siding and roof work, Hardie board projects, looks like new; attention to detail). Several customers also note staying within budget.

- Customer service and problem resolution: Several buyers highlight proactive, knowledgeable staff (e.g., Kyle, Matt, Jackson) and willingness to address issues, while others point to difficulties in resolving problems or communicating about changes.

- Overall takeaway for potential customers: Expect a range of experiences. To mitigate risk, verify estimator reliability, obtain detailed written quotes and scope, request references, and confirm cleanup and site-management practices before moving forward.

Customer experiences with New Look Siding are predominantly positive across siding, window, and related projects. Repeatedly, clients highlight Erik as a responsive and knowledgeable project manager who communicates throughout the process and helps with design choices, particularly for historic or older homes and the associated paperwork. Installations are described as thorough and timely, with crews described as hard-working, courteous, and respectful of properties, often going beyond the bid to address additional needs. Work includes a range of offerings—siding (including vinyl, board-and-batten, and stucco demolition), windows, doors, soffits/fascia/gutters, and even a PVC roof—and in several cases has involved multi-phase HOA projects (e.g., Willowbend West). Clients frequently note high-quality workmanship, clear explanations, and fair pricing with minimal surprise costs. Many would recommend New Look Siding and would hire them again for future projects. There is at least one report of a lack of response to outreach, indicating occasional responsiveness issues.

- Overall impression: mixed experiences; several customers praise professionalism and workmanship, while others report reliability and communication issues.
- Positive feedback highlights: Jason (the owner) is described as kind and easy to work with; the team is praised for responsiveness, clear communication, fair pricing, and high-quality workmanship on projects such as gutters, siding, fascia, and garage wraps; insurance bid assistance is noted as helpful; some customers felt the work was completed to a high standard and thoroughly explained.
- Notable positive specifics: timely responses and updates during projects; projects included replacing gutters, fascia, siding, and garage wrap; some customers appreciated going above and beyond to address problems found during work.
- Negative experiences and concerns: a few customers experienced long delays and needed to initiate communication; one case involved a canceled project with a dispute over a large deposit and an alleged debt situation, with claims of back taxes and withheld funds; another review reported a lack of follow-up on a chimney cap leak and repeated missed calls.
- Subcontractors and project management: some tasks were performed by subcontractors with mixed results; in one case, issues required customer involvement to ensure correct execution; a few projects were completed with minor issues not fully resolved or requiring further follow-up.
- Related company: EZ Shedz is mentioned as a sister company.
- Practical takeaways for potential customers: obtain a detailed written scope and timeline; clarify deposit terms and refund policies; request references and verify post-project warranty or maintenance commitments; ask how subcontractors are selected and supervised and confirm expectations for follow-up and issue resolution after project completion.

Customer reviews about Intermountain West Contractors (IWC) indicate they specialize in roof replacements and frequently complete projects in a single day, including tear-off, installation, and thorough cleanup. Clients consistently report excellent communication from staff, knowledgeable guidance on shingle selection, and dependable, tidy workmanship. Common materials referenced include asphalt shingles (often premium materials) and protective elements such as ice/water shields, with gutters added in some projects. Pricing is repeatedly described as affordable, fair, and competitive, with several customers noting they received the best price among multiple bids. Overall quality is praised, and warranties are mentioned as solid or outstanding; a few reviews note minor issues like supply glitches or occasional wait times, which were resolved to the customer’s satisfaction.

Two reviews describe positive experiences with exterior work performed by a siding/ exterior contractor. Projects included updating or repairing exterior components such as soffit, fascia, and gutters, with emphasis on professionalism, friendliness, efficiency, timely completion, and reasonable pricing. Both reviewers would recommend the company.

Customer feedback for Mountain States Windows & Siding is broadly positive, describing the firm as professional, trustworthy, and focused on high-quality workmanship for siding and window installations. Clients report quick responsiveness, clear bids, helpful design guidance, and crews that are clean, respectful, and dedicated, with Ian as a common point of contact and Don as a skilled installer. Projects have improved curb appeal and home energy performance, with many noting better insulation, reduced noise, and more comfortable interiors after new windows and siding. Practical strengths highlighted include thorough communication, timely responses, and willingness to offer cost-saving options and honest assessments; several customers would recommend the company and hire again. Some scheduling and lead-time delays were mentioned, attributed to supply chain constraints and limited crew capacity during peak times, resulting in projects taking longer or starting later than hoped. Common material and design options cited include insulated vertical siding, white vinyl siding, and color/trim choices such as black window trim, white board-and-batten, and white shake. Overall, customers report satisfaction with quality and outcomes and point to fair pricing and good value, while acknowledging occasional delays.

Customer feedback on Ideal Siding is overwhelmingly positive and focuses on practical, verifiable aspects for potential clients. Reviewers report honest pricing with no hidden costs and transparent bids, often presenting multiple options. Communication is described as proactive and consistent, with daily updates and responsiveness throughout the project. Timeliness is repeatedly cited; many projects are completed on schedule or ahead of schedule, with crews arriving on time. Workmanship is praised as high quality and detail-oriented, producing installations that noticeably improve curb appeal and feel durable. Several reviews note that the company is family-owned, professional, and customer-focused, with sales interactions that are informative rather than pushy. They highlight competent preparation work (e.g., plywood and barrier layers) to meet code and provide guidance on appropriate solutions without pressuring a full replacement. Overall, customers express high satisfaction and would recommend Ideal Siding.

- Pricing and value: Reviews describe pricing as competitive, with emphasis on a strong value, and a clear warranty (notably a 10-year warranty) discussed during initial meetings.

- Scheduling and project management: Projects often started earlier than anticipated and included on-site supervision, leading to quicker progress and timely issue resolution. A typical siding project referenced a completion timeframe of about one month.

- Work performed and outcomes: Siding replacement with moisture barrier, new siding, and trim; accompanying work such as gutters, heat tape, downspouts, door lights, and related enhancements were completed. Many customers note the appearance improvement and, in some cases, a look that resembles a brand-new home. Clean-up after work was frequently mentioned positively.

- workmanship and teams: Numerous installers and crew members were praised for professionalism, meticulous craftsmanship, and courteous interactions (examples include Craig, Victor, Alberto and team, Pedro and Juan Diego, Felix, Paul, Gabriel, Randy, Marty, Kelly, Josh, Cristo, Tate, and others). Several reviews highlight detailed workmanship and on-site attention to appearance.

- Customer service and communication: Front-office staff (Kayla, Maddie, Ellie) and field personnel (e.g., Kevin, Lenny, Jera) were generally praised for responsiveness and helpful follow-up. Several reviews report proactive communication and problem-solving. A notable exception cites unclear, inconsistent communication from a project manager (Quinton) and office staff, plus concerns about not receiving an itemized bill or full cost transparency.

- Aesthetic and maintenance notes: Some customers described the finished product as maintenance-free and looked “brand new,” particularly after siding and gutter work.

- Recommendations and repeat business: The majority of reviews express willingness to hire RGS Exteriors again and to recommend them to others, though a minority note communication and transparency issues that could affect future decisions.

Overall, customers report a consistently positive experience with Preferred Roofing & Exteriors, highlighting responsive communication, knowledgeable leadership (Nate, Ted, and Clay), and hardworking crews. Practical details include rapid project timelines (for example, a house and garage roof removal and reinstallation completed in one day; crews often finishing within two days with cleaning up afterward), effective coordination with homeowners' insurance, and successful repairs to soffits and siding, including emergency wind-damage repairs within an hour. The company is repeatedly praised for thorough cleanup, easy access to updates, and prompt responses to questions. Pricing is described as reasonable by several customers, and many say they would reuse or refer the company. However, there is at least one negative report of a missed appointment with no courtesy call, indicating scheduling reliability may vary. Overall, the feedback suggests a capable contractor for roofing, siding, gutters, and related exterior repairs with strong customer service and quality workmanship.

Summary of customer experiences:

- Overall sentiment is positive, with many noting quick, friendly, professional service and that the company kept promises and made it easy to do business.
- A frequent positive theme is strong communication and transparency, including a main point of contact (often Mario), upfront sharing of insurance and licensing, and clear explanations of options.
- Work quality and efficiency are commonly praised: experienced crews, fast progress (often completing roofing in a short time), effective leak repairs, and thorough cleanup that removes nails and debris.
- Several reviews highlight good coordination with insurance companies and prompt follow-up on questions.
- Additional service and reliability noted include samples of roofing materials, on-site preparation, and willingness to address issues or go the extra mile (e.g., chimney work, addressing minor problems without charge).
- Notable negative or mixed feedback includes occasional delays or lack of callbacks during bidding, a rocky end regarding pay details and a request for a detailed breakdown, and at least one buyer’s complaint that they felt scammed.
- Practical takeaways for potential customers: expect professional communication, clear estimates and documentation, rapid start-to-completion timing for roofing, thorough cleanup, and proactive insurance coordination; be prepared for potential scheduling or billing questions and verify all billing details before finalizing.

- Product quality and performance: Customers report triple-pane windows with UV-filtering options that significantly improve energy efficiency and reduce outdoor noise; several projects involved custom-sized windows (up to 10–16 units) and some installations replaced older single-pane or mixed configurations.

- Installation quality and process: Installations are described as professional, efficient, and meticulous. Crews are credited with thorough clean-up, careful trimming work around windows, and minimal disruption to daily life. Projects often completed quickly (sometimes within a day and a half or two days).

- Sales experience and support: The sales process is characterized as responsive, non-pushy, and informative. A/Benefits such as rebates from Rocky Mountain Power, Enbridge Gas, and federal tax credits are commonly highlighted, with staff providing clear guidance on how to obtain them.

- Value and pricing: Several customers note competitive pricing, with one or more quotes cited as best among several bids. While manufacturing lead times can extend project timelines, customers view the overall value as favorable.

- Aftercare and warranty/support: Long-term support is a frequent positive note, including assistance with warranty claims many years after installation (e.g., 12 years later) and ongoing responsiveness from staff.

- Additional observations: Some customers mention choosing window styles (e.g., avoiding double-slide designs due to closing/locking concerns) and occasional wait times for custom orders. Overall, feedback is consistently favorable with strong recommendations for Alpine Exteriors.

A homeowner with a house over 25 years old had the exterior stucco replaced by Ruben and his team, and the result makes the home look brand-new. They used quality materials and delivered workmanship with attention to detail. Communication was good, the crew was pleasant, and the project was completed in a timely manner. The property was left clean and tidy. The customer would highly recommend the company.

- Services: roof replacement; gutters and downspouts installation; flashing; color selection; occasional tree trimming or solar system retuning; in some cases gutters installed days after the roof.
- Speed and efficiency: many roofs completed in one day or within hours (some as fast as 6 hours); other components installed shortly after.
- Insurance claims: strong guidance through the homeowners insurance claim process; helped navigate claim details; regarded as a reliable point of contact with insurers.
- Communication: frequent updates and clear information throughout the process; described as transparent and honest.
- Quality and cleanup: high-quality workmanship with thorough cleanup; reports of no nails or trash left behind in at least one case.
- Value: several testimonials note good pricing.
- Reputation: consistently recommended; multiple claims of being the “best” or a top contractor; many five-star or near-perfect ratings.
- Notable contact: Michael/Mike frequently mentioned as the primary contact or lead.
- Location: testimonials reference service in Utah.

- Services provided: siding installation/repair, soffit, fascia, and gutters (including rain gutters) with some projects involving drip-edge corrections and paint matching.
- Overall sentiment: Generally positive about workmanship and value; multiple customers describe high-quality results and fair pricing.
- Quality and workmanship: Many reviews praise skilled, professional installers, attention to detail, timely completion, and clean work. Several note successful fixes of issues not initially visible (e.g., drip-edge leaks) and precise paint matching.
- Quotes and pricing: Several reviewers report honest, fair quotes and competitive pricing; a few compare favorably to other quotes.
- Communication and professionalism: A majority report good communication, courtesy, punctuality, and transparency throughout the project.
- Scheduling and timelines: Some projects completed quickly (often within a few days); gutters are frequently scheduled on Fridays, which can cause delays if the crew is backed up or weather intervenes. A number of reviews mention delays or being bumped by a week or longer.
- Follow-through and reliability concerns: A minority report poor follow-through, missed appointments, lack of callbacks, or unfulfilled repair promises (including one instance of waiting a year for follow-up).
- Emergency responsiveness: In at least one instance, the team responded quickly to an urgent gutter issue to prevent weather-related problems.
- Recommendations: Many customers say they would hire again or refer others; a smaller subset express caution due to reliability and follow-through issues.
- Practical tips for potential customers: obtain written quotes and a clearly scheduled timeline, ask about typical gutter booking days (Fridays) and potential delays, confirm follow-through policies for small repairs, and verify paint color matching capabilities before work begins.

Overall, the experiences depict V3 Roofing and Renovation as a professional, insurance‑oriented contractor with frequent praise for CJ, the primary point of contact. Customers cite clear explanations of options, assistance navigating insurance claims, daily on‑site check‑ins, and communication that keeps projects moving. Work commonly involves roof replacement and siding (often with upgrades such as James Hardie siding), with several mentions of completing projects on or near schedule and delivering a high‑quality exterior appearance. The crew is described as skilled, focused on thorough cleanup, and committed to customer service. A number of reviews also note value for money and the use of warranties (e.g., GAF) on the finished roofs.

Common positives:
- CJ acts as a proactive guide through insurance interactions, planning, and progress updates.
- Strong communication, transparency, and on‑site oversight during the project.
- Siding upgrades (James Hardie) and other exterior work in addition to roofing; many customers satisfied with final appearance.
- High workmanship quality, cleanups, and courteous, professional crews.
- Positive references to product quality, warranties, and overall value; referrals from neighbors.

Possible caveats or considerations:
- Large or stretched timelines: one notably large roof job (~9,500 sq ft) reportedly took longer than initial estimates, with some crew and schedule adjustments.
- Occasional现场 issues: at least one review described debris, safety concerns, and an exposed electrical component during cleanup.
- Insurance process hiccups: a few reviews mention needing additional coordination or finance steps to finalize claims.
- A minority of experiences reflect critiques of project management or timeliness, though these are not universal.

Overall takeaway for potential customers:
You can expect assistance with insurance coordination, a knowledgeable point person (CJ) who communicates clearly, and professional crews delivering high-quality roofing and siding work with thorough cleanup. If undertaking a large project, be prepared for possible longer timelines and confirm details on crew scheduling, debris control, and safety measures in advance.