Top Siding Repair Services in Pittsburgh

Customer experiences with Cousins/CNS Cousins Construction are broadly positive across siding, decking, roofing, and related repairs. Practical, recurring details include: punctual arrivals and easy-to-schedule appointments; clear, responsive communication from sales representatives and project teams; high-quality workmanship with some projects completed in one to two days and others in two stages with different crews; ability to adapt to unexpected issues during the job without delaying progress; thorough cleanup and consideration for surrounding property; and follow-up after completion. Customers report durable, aesthetically improved results and added home value, with several noting the siding’s longevity relative to typical vinyl. Pricing is described as fair, with at least one customer noting available financing that facilitated the project. Many customers state they would hire them again or recommend the company. A noted limitation is that they do not work on clay tile roofs. Overall, the experience is described as professional, courteous, and customer-focused.

Customers consistently describe Alan Construction LLC as professional, reliable, and easy to work with. Practical details frequently mentioned include receiving an in-person estimate (not a drive-by) with clear explanations of the work and approach, and projects that are completed promptly, with several noting work finished in one day. Crews are described as courteous, respectful of property and neighbors, and thorough in cleanup, while communication is highlighted as strong and ongoing throughout the process. Pricing is generally viewed as fair or reasonable for the quality provided, with several testimonials noting good value and honest dealings. Outcomes cited include successful roofing, siding, and gutter work, color-matched shingles, resolved gutter leaks and flashing, and effective repairs or replacements of fascia and other components. Customers also report fast responses to storm damage and appreciation for no-pressure guidance, with multiple references to Alan Construction as a preferred vendor and strong recommendations to others. Overall, experiences emphasize dependable service, clear communication, and solid workmanship.

- Overall tone: Mixed but generally positive regarding workmanship and reliability, with a notable exception describing a poor customer service experience.

- Work performed: Reviews mention roofing, gutters, downspouts, siding, soffit & fascia, and even recessed lighting. Multiple customers describe high-quality results and attractive finishes; some note added features such as leaf guards and heavy-duty stand pipes, and one cites a lifetime transferable warranty.

- Quality and longevity: Several customers express satisfaction with long-term results (including neighbors’ work cited as still satisfactory after years). A few reviews highlight professional and knowledgeable crews.

- Crew and service experience: Crews described as courteous, professional, and skilled; Amish crews are specifically praised in one review. Showroom staff are commended for guidance on colors and materials.

- Communication and scheduling: Many reviews praise prompt responses and easy scheduling, with ongoing communication cited positively in several projects. However, at least one review notes inadequate communication or issues with scheduling, including a claim of lost wages due to rescheduling and an assertion of poor customer service from ownership.

- Cleanliness and process: A common practical point is thorough cleanup with no mess after work in several projects.

- Value and pricing: Some reviewers indicate the company is not the cheapest option but provides good value for quality work; one reviewer highlights a competitive bid along with a warranty.

- Issues raised: One review reports internal damage from a roof leak and ongoing concerns about addressing the underlying issue. Another notes dissatisfaction with the customer service experience and accountability when disputing scheduling.

The reviews pertain to American Window Industries (AWI) focusing on window and door replacements. Customers describe professional, knowledgeable staff, clear communication, thorough explanations, and punctual installation. Several reviews highlight competitive pricing and timely project completion, with reports of high-quality, energy-efficient windows (including triple-pane designs) and aesthetically pleasing results. Installations often involved multiple windows/doors, with cleanup completed to the customer’s satisfaction. No siding repair work or warranties are explicitly mentioned, and maintenance tips are not provided.

Overall, customer experiences with McClellands Contracting and Roofing are predominantly positive for siding, gutters, flashing, and roofing work. Reviewers frequently cite prompt estimates, on-time crews, careful workmanship, and updates during projects (including photos) that help keep customers informed. Many describe staff as professional, courteous, honest about capabilities, and willing to address related concerns beyond the requested work, sometimes performing small fixes at no charge and providing clear next-step guidance. Jobs noted range from storm-related siding fixes and gutter work to full roof replacements and ancillary projects like fascia, shutters, and vent work; several projects were completed quickly, some in a single day, with good cleanup and minimal disruption. A common pattern is strong recommendations and high satisfaction with quality and communication. However, there are a few outlier experiences with poor communication, billing confusion, or disputed timelines after signing a contract, suggesting potential customers should establish written timelines and confirm points of contact upfront.

point_of_interest, establishment

Customers report generally positive experiences with S&L for roofing, siding, gutters, decks, and painting, including storm-damage repairs. They describe prompt responsiveness, especially during emergencies, with on-site protection and repairs often achieved quickly (for example, roof protection within hours and complete storm-related work in about 2–3 days). The company is said to work with insurance providers smoothly and to document estimates effectively. Work quality is described as high, with thorough cleanup (including removal of nails and screws) and attention to protecting and restoring damaged areas. Pricing is viewed as fair and reasonable; several customers note they are not pushed to perform unnecessary additional work. The team is characterized as professional, reliable, and customer-focused, with good communication and follow-through. The business is frequently described as family-oriented and respectful, capable of handling multi-property projects, and many customers say they would consider using them again for future roofing, siding, gutters, or related needs.

Customer reviews consistently rate New Horizons Home Exteriors highly for siding and exterior renovations, with many projects including siding replacement or repair, windows, doors, gutters, and roofing. Reviewers cite accurate scheduling, on-time completion, clean work sites, professional crews, and clear communication. Pricing is described as competitive or reasonable, and the owner (Joe) and team are praised for reliability and customer-friendly service. A rare minor issue (a flashing pull-off after high winds) was resolved at no cost. Overall, customers report high quality workmanship and a willingness to hire again.

The reviews describe a roofing-focused contractor with generally professional crews, notable for timely on-site work and thorough cleanup. Several buyers report prompt estimates and good communication from project reps, while others note slow or problematic quote processes and occasional communication barriers. Pricing is often cited as competitive or good value. Warranties are not mentioned, and there is little discussion of siding materials, as the feedback centers on roofing projects (e.g., shingles) rather than siding repairs.

- Overall sentiment is predominantly positive: customers describe PJ Fitzpatrick as professional, thorough, and capable, with strong workmanship on siding and gutters and responsive on-site management.

- Typical projects include siding replacements and gutter work; several reviews note quick completion (commonly around four days) and attentive supervision, sometimes by a manager named James. Several customers appreciated clear communication and explanations, sometimes including photos.

- Strengths highlighted: high-quality installation, knowledgeable staff, and reliable problem-solving; many reviewers would recommend the company or reuse them for future work.

- Notable staff frequently mentioned include supervisors and technicians such as James, Christian, Daniel, Mike, Kyle, Josh, Allen, Darin, Dawn, Leanna, Cory, Alan, and Pete.

- Areas of concern: several reviews report inconsistent job-site cleanup (debris or screws left on site); a few reviews raise pricing concerns (service fees, discounts, perceived value) and trust issues related to pricing practices; one project involving a shower raised questions about blocking materials and whether pre-existing water damage would be addressed.

- In at least one instance, PJ Fitzpatrick could not take on a customer’s needs and provided a referral to another contractor.

- Overall takeaway for potential customers: the company is generally capable for siding and gutter projects with strong workmanship and customer communication, but buyers should confirm cleanup expectations, pricing disclosures, and scope of work before proceeding.

Reviews for the roofing, siding, and gutter contractor cover a mix of experiences. Positive notes highlight professional crews, responsive staff in some cases, thorough cleanup, and warranties backing the work. Negative feedback frequently cites slow or unresponsive communication, misinstalled components (notably gutters and vent work), unfinished or recurring issues, and disputes over warranty coverage and pricing. Some customers reported timely follow-up visits that resolved initial problems, while others experienced prolonged delays or lack of resolution. Warranties mentioned include manufacturer shingle warranties (often around 50 years) and labor warranties (typically about 10 years). Pricing feedback is mixed, with reports of fair quotes in some cases and concerns about value or additional charges in others. Maintenance-related mentions are limited but include gutter upkeep and ensuring proper venting during installation.

- Overall, reviews describe DeLuca Roofing/DeLuca Roofing, LLC as a consistently positive experience for roofing, gutters, fascia, soffit, gutter guards, and siding projects, with many customers returning for multiple jobs.

- Communication and estimating: Maryann is repeatedly highlighted for clear explanations, detailed estimates, scheduling coordination, and responsive updates. The process is described as non-pushy and informative.

- Speed and workmanship: Several projects are completed quickly—often in one day—without sacrificing quality. Crews are described as efficient, professional, and thorough, with careful attention to cleanup.

- Pricing and value: Customers report competitive pricing and sometimes the best bid among quotes, noting good value for the quality of work.

- Reliability and responsiveness: The company is praised for reliability, punctuality, and rapid response to urgent issues (e.g., loose fascia, leaks). They have a track record of following through on repairs and communicating clearly through contingencies.

- Staff and service: Bob (owner), Justin (foreman), and Maryann (office) are frequently commended for professionalism, courtesy, and customer care. Many reviews mention consistent, hands-on involvement by the leadership and crew.

- Scope of work and outcomes: Projects include new roofs, fascia, soffit, gutters, gutter guards, porch roofs, and siding. Customers note high-quality results, helpful guidance on color and materials, and durable outcomes.

- Aftercare and guarantees: Some reviewers report post-project follow-ups and no-charge repairs for issues arising after completion, contributing to trust and long-term satisfaction.

- Cleanliness and site management: Multiple references to clean job sites and minimal disruption.

- Recommendation and loyalty: The majority of reviews end in strong recommendations and willingness to hire again, with several customers stating they would not hesitate to contact the company for future needs.

- Overall, customers report strong communication and customer service, with a trustworthy, professional approach to roofing and siding work.
- Reviews highlight objective, thorough assessments of needed work, helping customers make informed decisions.
- Quoting is described as detailed and formal, with itemized components and explicit materials; responses to quotes are prompt (often delivered within hours).
- Scheduling is generally smooth, with office staff (including scheduling managers) coordinating dates and accommodating changes.
- On-site crews are described as punctual, efficient, and focused, with on-site supervision addressing questions and overseeing progress.
- Workmanship is framed as high quality, with attention to detail and careful cleanup, leaving little to no debris behind.
- Practical examples include gutter and downspout replacement as well as roof work; some reviews emphasize long warranties and durable installations.
- Repeated customers note improvements with each project and express willingness to recommend the company to others.

Overall, customers describe positive, professional experiences with this service. Key practical takeaways include:

- Staff consistently professional and courteous, with individuals such as Branden, Joe M., Jamal Hicks, Earl, Ryan, and Brandon noted for helpful demeanor and clear communication.
- Thorough assessments and explanations: several reviews highlight thorough inspections, walk-arounds, and explanations of what was being done; questions were answered and future repair options discussed.
- Prompt and timely service: multiple accounts of quick responses—arriving within a few hours—and swift repairs, including one instance of a fix completed in under an hour.
- Work quality and approach: customers emphasized honest, knowledgeable service, least invasive repair options when possible, and solid workmanship.
- Broad service scope: while labeled as a siding repair business, reviews reference plumbing-related repairs (garbage disposal, leaks) as part of the service experience, suggesting a broader home-repair capability.
- Repeat engagement: several reviewers said they would use the company again and would call on them for future needs, indicating customer satisfaction and reliability.
- Positive customer interactions: in at least one case, the technician entertained a child during the visit, highlighting a personable approach to service.

Customer experiences with Always Perfect Contracting are consistently positive and centered on punctual, professional service from initial estimate to project completion. Reviews highlight quick estimates and responsive communication, with the ability to fit small fixes (such as gutter repairs) into busy schedules and to address urgent needs promptly. Work examples include roof replacements (including slate and older homes), gutters and downspouts, siding, and chimney work, with some projects noting specific materials used (e.g., OBS underlayment and Owens Corning shingles) and careful attention to color coordination with brick and trim. Reported workmanship is described as thorough and detail-oriented, and crews are noted for being on time, respectful, and easy to contact for questions. Clean-up after completion is frequently mentioned as a plus. Several customers cite fair pricing and proactive measures to prevent leaks during interim periods or permit delays. The overall sentiment is that the team delivers high-quality results and is highly recommended to friends and family, with some customers returning for additional projects.

- Company and scope: DC Mullins Construction specializes in James Hardie fiber cement siding, often replacing older siding (including EIFS) and sometimes coordinating with stone, windows, and deck projects. They use scaffolding, reattach roof shingles after work, and typically complete cleanup and a punch-list review (caulking, downspouts, nails) at project end. Color consultations or mid-project color adjustments are mentioned.

- Quality and workmanship: Across many reviews, customers praise high-quality craftsmanship, clean and professional crews, attention to detail, and careful site protection. The team is frequently described as diligent, on time, and able to realize complex designs with good coordination with other trades. Several reviews note they stand by their work and address concerns after completion.

- Timeline and process: Projects are described as efficient (e.g., a full siding job completed in about 3 days in one account). However, there are mixed reports about scheduling and responsiveness to inquiries, with some customers experiencing slow or delayed estimates and one instance of a quote cancellation after prior bids. The owner’s responsiveness is noted in some cases after initial friction.

- Pricing and value: Several reviewers compare pricing favorably to competitors, with some saying they offer the best or better pricing for the siding and related work. A few accounts acknowledge that the value comes with higher service and quality, rather than being the absolute cheapest option.

- Customer service and communication: Experiences vary. Many customers report positive interactions with the owner and crew, including clear explanations, helpful design input, and transparent planning. Some reviewers recount negative experiences with the initial estimator’s tone or with outreach after not selecting them for a prior job. There are mentions of follow-up and re-engagement by the company after concerns were raised.

- Practical considerations for potential customers: Expect expertise with James Hardie installations and coordination with other trades; anticipate a thorough initial discussion on material choices (Hardie vs. vinyl) and potential color changes; plan for possible variations in scheduling and response times; be prepared to provide design preferences and to review punch lists and site cleanups before project close.

- Overall tone: Mixed to positive. Many customers report strong communication, thorough inspections, and high-quality workmanship, but a minority describe poor follow-up and disputed claims.

- What customers liked most:
- Prompt, clear communication and responsiveness (texting or calls returned quickly; updates throughout projects).
- Help with insurance coordination and claim management; drone inspections and detailed damage assessments frequently cited.
- Efficient workmanship, with several jobs completed in one day and professional crews.
- High-quality craftsmanship, thorough inspections during and after work, and good site cleanup.
- Positive interactions with specific staff (e.g., Ian, Shaina, Joe, Dustin, Anthony) and reliable project management.

- Practical outcomes reported:
- Roof replacements and repairs, hail-damage repairs, flashing, window trim, deck repainting, and drywall/painting in kitchens and baths.
- Some customers noted proactive roof/area assessments and transparent progress updates.
- In several cases, work was scheduled quickly and completed promptly with good debris cleanup.

- Concerns and negatives raised:
- Delays or lack of follow-up after inspections or estimates; some claims took months to resolve with insurance.
- Instances of being told they would hear back and then not receiving a response; customers feeling stood up or neglected.
- A few accusations of overcharging or scams by the company; reports of incorrect workmanship (e.g., flashing) and disputes requiring further action (including small claims court in at least one case).
- Some projects extended over longer periods or required multiple visits to address issues.

- Takeaway for potential customers:
- The company frequently delivers responsive communication, efficient service, and solid workmanship, especially when insurance coordination is involved. However, potential customers should verify references, obtain written estimates, set clear expectations for follow-up, and weigh mixed feedback regarding follow-through and cost concerns.

- Responsiveness and scheduling: Customers consistently noted quick starts, proactive communication, and willingness to accommodate scheduling changes (including short-notice rescheduling).

- Project process and transparency: John Choi frequently visited the site during and after installation, provided clear explanations of options, and shared per-sheet costs for items (with modeling software to preview siding choices). Projects were described as handled with regular updates and no hidden costs.

- workmanship and approach: The team was praised for being hardworking, thorough, and detail-oriented, with clean, daily site maintenance. They adapted to challenges and provided fair compromises when issues arose. Honest recommendations and a focus on meeting client goals were highlighted.

- Materials and scope: Jobs included removal of existing siding and installation of James Hardie fiber-cement plank and shake siding, along with repairs to sheathing and added insulation. One project noted they could work with types of modern siding outside their prior experience, and another example described replacing limited sections quickly and professionally.

- Outcomes and satisfaction: Clients reported a refreshed exterior appearance, high-quality results, and satisfaction with timelines. Several reviews indicated they would hire again or recommend the company to others, citing reliability, professionalism, and value.

- Notable details from specific projects: A lengthy project (October 2024) for a brick/frame home involved comprehensive scope definition, progress tracking via renderings, daily crew presence, and a completed, well-received result with positive comments on coordination, communication, and workmanship.

Customer experiences with this siding contractor were uniformly positive. Projects were completed on or ahead of schedule with pricing described as fair or on-point. Workmanship on siding installation and repairs was consistently high-quality, with attention to detail and some clients noting design recommendations that enhanced the final result. The team, especially Ben, was described as professional, courteous, responsive, and easy to work with, with strong communication throughout and thorough site cleanup. Several reviews highlighted practical problem-solving, including diagnosing and addressing leakage from prior installation (sometimes at no charge) and assisting with warranty claims and insurance coordination. After-storm responses were fast and efficient, with crews that coordinated well with insurers. Overall, customers would hire again and would readily recommend the company.

- Services provided include roof installation/replacement, shingle repairs, ridge vent work, vent pipe installation, gutters, chimney work, brick pointing, window sealing, and eave work. Several projects were completed on or within short timeframes, with some jobs finished in one day.

- Inspections and estimates often used, with drone-based inspections cited as a helpful, transparent feature for assessment and progress updates.

- Customer service and communication were frequently praised: courteous crews, timely updates, and efforts to coordinate with insurance companies. Some clients noted proactive owner involvement and post-work follow-up.

- Quality and outcomes were commonly described as high: attention to detail, workmanship meeting insurance estimates, thorough cleanup, and satisfaction with the final appearance.

- Pricing and value were described positively by many customers, with references to reasonable prices and good value for the work performed.

- Notable positive outcomes included easy insurance coordination, efficient project completion, and strong responsiveness from certain staff members (e.g., references to David G. and Clint).

- However, some negative experiences were reported: at least one instance of a roof replacement that leaked months after completion, with repeated no-shows and rescheduling, suggesting potential reliability concerns for certain jobs; another comment indicated small jobs may not be prioritized.

- Overall impression: a mix of strong positive experiences highlighting efficiency, drone-assisted inspections, clear communication, and quality work, alongside a minority of reports pointing to scheduling reliability issues. Potential customers may find the company responsive and detail-focused, but should consider project size and timeline expectations.