Top Siding Repair Services in Nampa

Summary of customer experiences with Home Specialties, LLC (siding repair and related work):

- Overall: Experiences are mixed, with both highly positive and highly negative reports. Outcomes appear to depend on project scope and management.

- Positive experiences (practical details):
- Customers praised professionalism, politeness, and knowledge; some noted easy communication and helpful handling of insurance.
- Several projects were completed promptly or ahead of schedule, especially gutter replacement, roofing, and small-scale repairs.
- Some clients valued ongoing hands-on involvement by Steve and the ability to tailor options to their needs; pricing was described as reasonable.
- Several reviews recommended the company for future work and reported good results on specific tasks (gutters, painting, downspouts, custom work).

- Negative experiences (practical details):
- Major delays and extended timelines: one siding/garage project extended to 5+ months beyond an initial 8-week estimate, with remaining items on a punch list for months.
- Communication problems: stories of excuses, conflicting accounts, and delayed or vague dates; several clients felt follow-through and updates were lacking.
- Payment and subcontractor issues: reports of paying a substantial upfront amount, with disputes over paying subs directly; one case resulted in a chargeback and concerns about unaddressed deficiencies.
- Incomplete or subpar work: multiple accounts of unfinished tasks, “half the job” outcomes, or work that required additional self-directed effort; some clients felt overcharged or faced unapproved additional costs.
- Some multi-project engagements were described as unmanageable, leading to walk-away from completed and partially completed work.

- Services covered:
- Siding repair and replacement, gutters and downspouts, roof work, paint, and related exterior improvements; several reviews mention handling insurance and coordinating various aspects of home exterior upgrades.

- Practical guidance for potential customers:
- Seek a detailed written contract with concrete milestones, defined scope, and penalties for missed deadlines.
- Establish a clear payment schedule and clarify who pays subcontractors; obtain a documented plan to prevent direct sub payments.
- Require a formal punch list process with agreed completion criteria and a final inspection.
- Request references for siding repair projects of similar scope and confirm capacity to manage multiple tasks if needed.
- Insist on regular progress updates and on-site progress checks to avoid surprises.

- Overall takeaway:
- The company can deliver effective results on certain projects with strong communication and efficient management, but risks include significant delays, payment disputes, and incomplete work on more complex or multi-project engagements. Potential customers should insist on clear contracts, milestones, and oversight to mitigate these risks.

- Services: The business handles siding, roofing, window and sliding door replacement, fence work, gates, eaves, and related exterior repairs.

- Quality and workmanship: Across many reviews, crews are described as fast, professional, and detail-oriented. Projects are said to result in significant cosmetic and structural improvements (e.g., “looks like a new house,” “amazing job,” “great quality”). Inspectors and project managers are commended for thorough oversight and responsiveness.

- Scheduling and collaboration: Teams are praised for reasonable turnaround times (some jobs completed in a few days), flexibility in work hours (including short days to avoid disturbing a newborn), and willingness to come out promptly (even on weekends or in bad weather). Several customers note they received multiple options and recommendations.

- Customer service and communication: Clients frequently highlight clear communication, transparency, and assistance with insurance claims (coordinating with insurers, negotiating with adjusters). Staff such as Blake and Chris are repeatedly mentioned for courtesy and responsiveness.

- Pricing and value: Reports describe fair pricing and helpful negotiation, with some customers feeling they got good value and the most suitable options for their needs.

- Notable negative experiences: At least one review describes a wrong sliding door installed, damage to a fence and walkway lights, and rude behavior, leading to a negative impression and a lack of recommendation in that case.

- Overall sentiment: Many customers express strong satisfaction and would hire again or recommend the company; however, there are isolated reports of mishaps and poor conduct that potential customers may want to verify and address during estimates and contracts.

Summary of customer experiences:

- Services provided commonly include removing old vinyl siding and installing Hardie fiber cement siding on homes and outbuildings, with some projects also including exterior repaint and occasional trim work; in some cases, referrals were made for related work such as gutters.
- The teams typically involved Ed and project managers like Charley, with crew members such as Benny, Liam, Eric, and Nolan; painters like Ivan; and office staff such as Erin who handled scheduling and color selection.
- Work quality and process are described as professional and detail-focused, with crews arriving on time, maintaining clean sites, being courteous to neighbors, and completing tasks efficiently; several projects noted custom trim work around windows and doors and thorough daily cleanup.
- Bidding and pricing are generally viewed as fair and transparent; many comments mention accurate bids with no hidden costs, and some customers reported price matches with lower bids from others.
- Outcomes and long-term satisfaction are positive, with reports of improved curb appeal, stronger and more durable siding, and perceived benefits to exterior energy performance; post-installation issues were addressed promptly (including at least one free repair in a later service call).
- Overall sentiment is highly favorable, with multiple customers expressing willingness to hire Siding Pros of Idaho again and to recommend them for siding work.

Overall, the experiences describe a consistently positive impression of Silver Lining Roofing (and related siding/repair work), with emphasis on workmanship, professionalism, and reliability in multiple projects including roof repairs, full roof replacements, gutters, and fascia.

Key practical patterns for potential customers:
- Timeliness and responsiveness: rapid responses for inspections and quotes; many projects completed on schedule; one note of a minor scheduling delay that was resolved quickly.
- Communication and transparency: frequent updates during projects; clear explanations of recommended repairs; straightforward, fair pricing with no unnecessary upsells.
- Project management: often functioning as the general contractor, coordinating multiple contractors and trades; handling scheduling, coordination, and cleanup; providing documentation such as roof certifications.
- Quality and outcomes: described as high-quality workmanship; many clientele stated the finished roofs look good and appear durable; attention to detail and thorough cleanup.
- Pricing and value: several reviews highlighted affordability and fair pricing; mixed mentions of upfront quotes and no hidden charges.
- Customer service and staff: praised for professionalism and reliability; specific staff noted include Kyle (thorough inspections and reliable execution), Mandy and Lindsay (excellent communication and oversight), Jay (professional and communicative), and Johnny S. (production foreman) among others.
- Satisfaction and referrals: numerous customers stated they would highly recommend the company and consider it their go-to provider for clients’ roofing needs.

In sum, potential customers are likely to encounter prompt service, clear communication, coordinated project management, fair pricing, and solid workmanship with follow-up to ensure satisfaction.

- Scope of work: Siding replacement and repairs for single-family homes, condo complexes, and office buildings; some projects also included exterior painting and coordination with roofing work.
- Responsiveness and communication: Generally quick responses and personable staff; detailed explanations of processes; daily updates during installs; clear questions and answers; some scheduling delays when jobs were smaller or waiting for openings.
- Craftsmanship and results: Several cases of excellent attention to detail and substantial improvement (house looking brand new, office looks great); a few instances noted of wavy siding and at least one report of poorer craftsmanship on a partial re-siding job.
- Timeliness and sequencing: Crews on time for many projects; multi-week durations for larger jobs; some wait times due to job size or schedule; noisy work environment noted during some projects.
- Team and personnel: Repeated positive mentions of Kent, Cheri, Sam, Kenny, and Adam Rogers (noting help with insurance and cost coordination); staff described as knowledgeable, professional, and customer-focused.
- Insurance and pricing: Strong emphasis on working with insurance to maximize benefits and reduce costs; cost estimates generally honored; multiple accounts of securing favorable terms or savings.
- Customer outcomes and satisfaction: Broadly positive experiences, with many customers recommending the company to friends and family; instances of positive impacts on curb appeal and perceived home value; condo owners and office clients reported high satisfaction.
- Potential drawbacks or concerns: One customer reported ongoing issues with flashing after a roof replacement managed by a company contact, resulting in water intrusion concerns; a few notes about weather-related disruptions or post-install cleanup needs.

Feedback on Northwest Contracting Services LLC (Jay Adams) is mixed. Many customers report positive experiences, highlighting:
- prompt, clear communication and timely responses
- transparent breakdowns of cost and timeline
- professional, trustworthy leadership and a knowledgeable team
- high-quality remodeling and siding work, with projects completed on schedule
- good collaboration, with guidance that aligns with the client’s vision
- reliable, hardworking crews and strong customer service

However, there are notable negative accounts as well, describing:
- a long-running remodel that was abandoned after about nine months, leaving extensive unfinished work and a nonfunctional kitchen
- property damage during the project (yard disturbance, paint stains, trampled plants, discarded waste)
- organizational problems, no-shows, and concerns about overall reliability and quality
- allegations that some positive reviews may have been written by employees or family members
- at least one account noting the need to bring in another contractor to complete and rectify work

Geographically, several positive reviews reference projects in the Boise area. Potential customers should consider obtaining written scope and milestones, checking multiple references, and clearly outlining site protection and cleanup requirements, payment schedules, and remedies for delays when engaging this contractor.

Overall, the feedback is predominantly positive, with customers citing clear communication, professionalism, knowledgeable staff, and competitive pricing across roofing, siding, and window projects. Practical details highlighted by reviewers include:

- Staff and communication: Russell Evans repeatedly praised for excellent communication and knowledge; Cody Widmer described as professional, on time, and non-pressuring; James Tinsley presented windows clearly and effectively; Jeff Shelton noted for timely visits and practical guidance; other staff (Robert, Ian, Jim) were noted as friendly, helpful, and informative.

- Quotes and scope: Several customers appreciated quotes that matched the stated scope of work (e.g., Kegan’s quote as scoped to roof work only); owners were described as accommodating and willing to address concerns (Jeff King).

- Pricing and deals: Claims of competitive pricing and good value, with mentions of “the best price possible,” pricing that beat competitors (e.g., Windows prices versus Dabella), and “great deals” on siding or windows.

- Timeliness and process clarity: On-time arrivals and timely assessments; explanations of installation or repair processes provided in a way that customers could understand; low-pressure sales approached noted by multiple reviewers.

- Outcomes and satisfaction: Positive remarks about results, such as beautiful roofs and attractive siding or window updates; anticipation of favorable results after projects is common.

- Issues addressed: At least one reviewer specifically noted that concerns were candidly addressed to satisfaction by the owner; another reviewer suggested considering the company carefully after a long period (about three years), though details are sparse.

In summary, most customers would consider or recommend Three Brothers based on communication, professionalism, pricing, and satisfactory project outcomes, with a small minority offering cautionary or vague negative feedback.

- Overall sentiment across reviews is strongly positive, with multiple customers expressing high satisfaction and willingness to recommend Boise Siding.
- Estimates and quotes: respondents reported prompt responses, often with quotes prepared within 24 hours, and many noted competitive pricing compared with competitors.
- Scheduling and timelines: customers praised clear start/finish estimates, accurate timelines, and efficient scheduling; several projects were completed on or ahead of schedule, with some tasks finished in a single day.
- Work quality and scope: feedback covers a wide range of exterior work (siding repair/replacement, fascia, gutters, painting, and even broader projects like brick-to-stone transitions); repairs and installations were described as high quality with strong attention to detail.
- workmanship and site management: reviewers highlighted professional crews, on-time performance, thorough daily cleanups, and careful workmanship; projects were completed within budget and with good craftsmanship.
- communication and customer service: consistent praise for responsive communication from owners and crew leads (notably Scott, Jereme, Alexis, Claudia); updates and follow-ups after project completion were common.
- integrity and problem resolution: when issues arose (e.g., a paint mistake), they were acknowledged and corrected promptly, reinforcing trust in the company.
- notable caveats: at least one project did not proceed for a client who would consider Boise Siding for future needs, but the client would still hire them later; a brief reference to a challenging bidding/processing phase being handled well.
- overall outcomes: customers reported high satisfaction with the final appearance and durability of the work, with frequent positive remarks about the transformation and professional conduct of the team.

Mountain View Roofing receives predominantly positive feedback across roofing projects with a few mixed notes. Customers report:

- Services performed: full roof tear-offs and replacements, roof repairs, gutter and downspout installation, vent replacement, and matching paint; some reviews mention minor related work and rechecking past issues caused by previous contractors.
- Timeliness and efficiency: many jobs are described as fast and efficient, with crews arriving on time and completing work in a single day or within a few hours; some projects finished by late afternoon.
- Quality and results: reviewers frequently describe high-quality workmanship, attention to detail, and aesthetically pleasing results (e.g., color matching and finishing touches like vent work and satellite reconnection).
- Communication and professionalism: numerous accounts praise prompt responses, clear quotes, courteous staff, and good coordination with HOA approvals; several note that the foreman/owner is involved and professional. One review reports unresponsiveness after an initial inquiry.
- Cleanup and disruption: multiple mentions of thorough cleanup and leaving the property and yard in very good condition, with little to no debris afterward.
- Pricing and value: quotes are often described as fair or competitive, with some reviewers noting no upsell pressure and prices aligning with estimates.
- Trust and referrals: customers frequently recommend Mountain View Roofing to neighbors, family, and friends; several testimonials reference resolving issues from prior roofing work and delivering reliable, reputable service.

Overall, customers portray the company as responsive, skilled, and dependable, with strong emphasis on professional conduct, cleanups, and fair pricing, alongside a minority note of unreturned communications.

- Service scope and outcome: The experiences center on roof replacement (and gutter work) performed by Legacy Roofing LLC; results are consistently described as high quality with a strong cosmetic and functional outcome.

- Timelines and delivery: Reported timelines vary from about two weeks from quote to replacement to completion within a single day for some jobs. Several reviews note on-time arrival and efficient work, with full completion and cleanup by the end of the project.

- Pricing: Multiple customers describe Legacy Roofing as highly price-competitive, with quotes often described as the best among comparisons.

- Quality and appearance: Customers praise the finished roofs as looking great, with details such as a solid, flat installation and, in at least one case, a matching black gutter system.

- Cleanup and site cleanliness: A recurring theme is thorough cleanup, with mentions of no nails left behind and the work area kept clean throughout and after the job.

- Communication and customer service: General feedback is positive for responsiveness and professionalism; in one instance, the owner addressed initial communication issues personally and apologized, indicating a commitment to service quality.

- Professionalism and crew conduct: Reviewers describe crews as fast, efficient, honest, reliable, clean, friendly, and easy to work with, with praise for coordination and workmanship.

- Recommendations and likelihood to reuse: Many reviewers state they would strongly recommend Legacy Roofing to others or would hire them again for future needs.

- Notable positive endorsements: Some reviews include explicit 10/10 ratings across multiple dimensions (quality, value, professionalism, customer service, attention to detail) and high praise for the team by name.

- Services cited include fascia and soffit repair/replacement, siding repair, roof replacement, and gutter installation, with several customers noting attention to detail and quality workmanship.
- Customers report excellent results and visual improvements to their exteriors, with thorough cleanups after work.
- Scheduling and communication are consistently praised: quick estimates, prompt scheduling, crews arriving on time, and updates provided throughout the project.
- Pricing is described as fair and competitive, with several customers noting they could work within a budget or insurance claim parameters.
- The team is portrayed as friendly, reliable, not pushy, and professional, with some customers highlighting after-hours walkthroughs and thorough explanations.
- Many customers are repeat clients or would readily hire again, citing a locally owned, family-run business and strong customer service.
- Overall outcomes emphasize dependable service, responsive support, and high-quality results across roofing, siding, and gutter work.

Treasure Valley Exteriors (TVE) offers exterior remodeling services including windows, doors, roofing, siding, and painting, with a locally sourced emphasis and assistance with permits. Customer feedback is mixed but includes many positive experiences: sales staff such as Cherie and Anthony are frequently praised for knowledge and responsiveness; crews are often described as on time, professional, and capable; projects like window replacements and roof replacements are reported to finish within promised timelines with good quality results and thorough cleanup; several customers commend strong customer service and willingness to address issues.

However, there are notable negative experiences as well, particularly a 2024 project involving five exterior doors and three windows. Reported problems include doors installed crooked or oriented incorrectly, some frames and caulking causing cosmetic and weatherproofing issues, removal of trim pieces, some windows not functioning, and lengthy, repeated service visits to fix defects. Several reviews describe gaps in communication, missing or unclear warranty information, and disputes over pricing or billing. Some customers allege misleading advertising or practice concerns, and several notes highlight inconsistent oversight and unfinished or unsatisfactory post-installation work, even when costs were high.

Other reviews are strongly positive, praising fast response, professional installers, and high-quality outcomes for specific jobs (e.g., window replacements, sliding-to-French door installs, and roof replacements where permits and cleanup were handled well). Overall, potential customers should anticipate variable results and consider asking for detailed written scope and material specifications, confirmation of permit handling and inspections, a formal final walkthrough, comprehensive warranty documentation, and a single point of contact to manage communication and follow-up.