Top Siding Repair Services in Binghamton

A collection of reviews for Dave Wagner Roofing/Contracting, showing mostly positive feedback on roofing work with fast completion and clean sites. Customers frequently note prompt, professional crews, reasonable pricing, and thorough cleanup; several reviews recommend the company. There are some negative experiences citing a lack of responsiveness, not standing behind repairs when leaks occurred, and poor post-service communication.

Customer experiences with Edify, including Eugene, Jim, and their team, are consistently positive across residential, commercial, and institutional projects. In a residential roof replacement, one client noted removing multiple layers of shingles, replacing rotted wood, installing a new vent and flashing, and completing the job in one day with several crew members. Cleanup was thorough, and the team returned the following day to check for loose nails. Reviewers described the crew as professional, friendly, honest, and easy to work with, and they recommended Edify for roofs or repairs. Another client praised high-quality work. A church project was described as beautiful and thorough, with kindness and helpfulness throughout the process, and a strong recommendation. A major commercial project was completed at a good price with the job done right. Overall, experiences suggest quality workmanship, efficiency, fair pricing, and dependable service, suitable for residential, commercial, and institutional roofing needs.

Feedback on this siding repair business is mixed. One reviewer alleges the company does not follow through on contracts or promises and would not recommend using them. Another reviewer describes the experience as easy to do business with and says they are real professionals.

Customer experiences with Joe’s Home Improvement / Mr. Joe’s Home Improvement encompass roofing, siding-related work, and general home improvements. Most reviewers report professional conduct, reliable communication, and high-quality workmanship, with several noting quick completion times and thorough cleanups. Specific practical details from reviews include:

- Roofing and related work: new roof installations, porch roof repairs (completed in under a day), and on-roof tasks where the owner occasionally assists to ensure quality. Some reviewers mention additional on-site tasks such as adding a downspout on a dormer and installing gutter hangers.
- Renovations and extensions: a full 800-square-foot apartment gut renovation, including kitchen and bathroom remodels; installation of rails, aluminum balusters, and soffit work.
- Quality and reliability: reviewers frequently describe skilled, reliable crews, fair pricing, and no unexpected add-ons. The owner and staff are cited as responsive and trustworthy; work is often completed ahead of or on schedule.
- Cleanup and site management: many reviews note daily debris removal and overall cleanliness; some mention especially careful site maintenance.
- Customer service and responsiveness: several accounts highlight prompt scheduling (e.g., snow removal/ice dam work within five days of contact) and willingness to address issues or rectifications as needed.
- Negative experience: one tenant reported unprofessional behavior, including smoking inside the home and litter, and leaving the interior in disarray; this contrasts with the broader positive sentiment.
- Overall impression: the majority of reviews are positive, with praise for workmanship, professionalism, and value. A minority of experiences note cleanliness or behavior concerns.

For potential customers, practical considerations include confirming scope of work (roofing, siding, or interior renovations), expectations for cleanup, communication style and response times, whether subcontractors will be used, and any warranty or post-project follow-up commitments.

Customers describe JKS Roofing/JKS Home Improvements as delivering roofing, gutter, and siding work for Endwell Church of Christ (parsonage roof and church gutters) and for a private residence (preacher’s home). Projects were typically started and finished promptly and within projected budgets; notably, a roof replacement was completed in one day following a hail storm, and gutters were installed on a separate day with quick address of any adjustments. Clients praised workmanship, thorough cleanup, and the crews’ professionalism and courtesy. Several customers cited specific staff (Josh, Phil Sager) and said they would use JKS again and recommend them to others. One siding job was described as a “transformation” with a highly positive outcome. Overall, reviews highlight responsive communication, reasonable pricing, and high satisfaction with results.

roofing_contractor, point_of_interest, establishment

A mixed but generally positive set of reviews for a contractor handling siding repairs (often with roofing). Customers frequently note fast scheduling (often same-day or next-day), professional crews, and satisfactory to excellent workmanship on siding and roof projects, along with fair or competitive pricing and good communication. Occasional negatives include disputes over pricing, incomplete or delayed work, and some workmanship concerns on non-siding tasks. Warranties are not mentioned, and no maintenance tips are provided in the reviews.

Rost Construction LLC offers general contracting, renovation, and repair services including siding-related work. Reviews describe prompt communication, professional and reliable crews, and timely completion across projects such as bathrooms, flooring, doors, windows, porches, and siding repairs. They are noted for lead remediation work, site cleanliness, and responsiveness, with several customers citing quick estimates and scheduling. Customer service is consistently praised, and pricing is generally viewed as reasonable, though a few mentions suggest prices can be high for some clients. Warranties are not discussed in the reviews, and specific siding materials are not specified. The company appears capable of handling multi-project scopes for older homes and specialty needs, with repeat customers and referrals evident in the feedback.

Neutral summary: Reviews for Ace Handyman show strong satisfaction with workmanship and reliability. Customers describe meticulous, clean, and efficient service, with easy scheduling and good communication. The scope of work cited includes drywall repair, ceiling repair, window replacement, door locks, gutters, floor repairs, and general handyman tasks. Several reviewers note on-time arrivals and fast completion for certain small jobs. A notable negative mentioned is a pricing discrepancy where an initial estimate was far lower than the final cost. No warranties are discussed in the reviews.

Overall, feedback is positive across siding, remodeling, painting, and related services. Reported benefits include high-quality finishes, attention to detail, and durable results (for example, siding replaced a year ago remains in flawless condition). Customers noted timely, efficient work; courteous, neat crews; and no surprise charges, with some expressing satisfaction and willingness to hire again or recommend. Specific services cited: siding replacement with a flawless finish; kitchen updates that matched quoted price and timeline; and exterior painting covering soffits, siding, shutters, trim, and foundation. A single reviewer described poor follow-up in the estimate process for a two-car garage, noting delays in drafts/quotes and lack of updates after initial contact.

Overall, feedback on Laman Construction is mixed, with several customers reporting positive outcomes and others recounting significant problems.

Positive experiences and practical details
- Quick responsiveness and clear steps: multiple reviewers describe rapid initial contact, with estimates provided promptly after site visits (e.g., estimate visit arranged within days; quote emailed the next day).
- Competitive pricing and timely work: several customers note fair or below-expected pricing and fast project execution, including large roof jobs completed in a day or within a week.
- Skilled crews and thorough work: many accounts credit the crews as hardworking, professional, and capable, with clean, thorough site cleanup and even leaving the property in better condition than at the start.
- Strong communication with a named contact: some customers report reliable, responsive communication from specific staff (e.g., Kyle, Dustin, Sean).

Negative experiences and practical concerns
- Poor communication and reliability issues: at least a couple of reviews cite failing communication, unreturned requests, or a receptionist providing misleading information.
- Scheduling and quoting delays: one reviewer waited a month for a quote; another reported delays when the company claimed not to have time to provide estimates.
- Quality concerns and incidents: a few accounts describe problematic workmanship (e.g., tarp not secured leading to water intrusion) and unprofessional behavior.
- Mixed recommendations: some customers would hire again or would recommend the company, while others explicitly say not to use them.

Scope of work observed
- Projects mentioned include roof replacements, gutter work, soffit/fascia repairs, and chimney work; several reviews reference a combination of these services and positive outcomes when completed.

Reviews for Window World of Binghamton (Window World) focus on window and door installations rather than siding. The crew, including installers such as Casey Ward, Trevor, Brett, and Ridge, is repeatedly described as on time, professional, courteous, and skilled. Customers praise clear communication, thorough cleanup, and high satisfaction with product quality and pricing, noting that follow-up service is quick and frictionless. The experiences span multiple projects over several years, with emphasis on value, workmanship, and responsive support rather than any siding-specific repairs.

Customer experiences with BSR vary widely, from highly positive to strongly negative, with notable differences by project and crew.

Positive/strongly favorable notes:
- Gutters finished in one day; three-day roofing job kept clean and on schedule.
- Fast, friendly service from initial contact through project completion; easy to reach with questions.
- Knowledgeable about metal roofing options, ventilation, and warranty choices; estimator explained needs clearly; helpful with insurance claims; flexible payment options.
- Quick response to emergency roof leaks; storm damage repairs completed with apparent satisfaction.

Negative/concerned experiences:
- Communication described as spotty and unprofessional; some customers felt ignored or forgotten, with one instance of “ghosting.”
- Damages and improper work reported: lawn damage, incorrect roof material on part of the first level, flashing issues, and use of red screws on white trim.
- Extended delays and unresolved issues: over a month to fix specific problems; in one case, attempts to fix issues were not followed through and credit for damages was not issued.
- Issues with follow-through and payment pressure: some customers were asked to pay in full before all issues were resolved; one account led to the perception that their business wasn’t worth continuing.
- Specific negative interactions included a worker taking the customer’s ladder and not rectifying the situation promptly; some customers could not recall details or provide a clear assessment of workmanship due to poor follow-up.

Mixed/unclear notes:
- Some customers reported none of the above issues, praising overall quality or the effectiveness of the repairs, particularly regarding leaks and storm-related damage.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Clarify project scope, materials, and timeline in writing; confirm warranty details and what is covered.
- Establish a single point of contact and a clear communication plan; request regular updates.
- Discuss site protection, cleanup expectations, and what happens if damages occur during work.
- Ask about the payment schedule and whether any credits or adjustments are available for post-install issues.
- If insurance claims are involved, document the process and expected support.

- Overall sentiment: Predominantly positive experiences with high-quality workmanship, fair pricing, and professional service across roofing, gutters, slate repair, and related exterior work. A few reviews note responsiveness or warranty follow-up concerns.

- Work quality and scope: Clients report capable handling of challenging tasks (e.g., slate roofs, unique repairs) and complex restorations. Projects include roof tear-offs and replacements, gutter work, water intrusion repairs, and even deck construction.

- Efficiency and finish: Many projects completed quickly (some in a single day) with thorough site protection and cleanup. Crews are described as careful to protect adjacent landscaping and properties; one project involved an 8-person crew finishing 27 squares in about 11 hours.

- Estimating and value: Reviewers highlight fair or reasonable pricing and detailed, trustworthy recommendations and options. Some note payment terms, such as no payment until final approval for specific work.

- Project leadership and reliability: Several testimonials mention on-site oversight by owners or lead personnel and a willingness to propose practical solutions. Long-term use and referrals are cited, including church work and ongoing home restoration.

- Warranty and follow-up: One customer reports slow warranty follow-up and difficulty securing a timely return call, though another update indicates later contact and attempts to address concerns. This suggests mixed experiences with warranty responsiveness.

Neutral summary of customer experiences with 607 Home Improvement:

- Service scope and outcomes: Reviews describe a wide range of projects, from kitchen and bathroom remodels to siding, roofing, basements, and even near‑total house renovations. Several customers report high‑quality finishes, professional crews, and transformation of their homes, with some projects completed quickly and with noticeable attention to detail.

- Timelines: Reported timeframes vary widely. Some projects were completed very quickly (e.g., kitchens finished in about two weeks to a month, or a kitchen remodel in 12 days), while others reference extended timelines or faster completion than insurers expected. A few customers experienced delays or mismatches between promised and actual schedules.

- Pricing and quotes: Experiences with pricing range from competitive to perceived high. Some customers encountered quotes they considered excessive or not aligned with other estimates, and a few instances involved discounts or pressure related to reviews. One account describes a notably high bid for multi‑layer roofing compared with other contractors.

- Insurance coordination: Several reviews note involvement with insurance claims—some praise support coordinating claims and handling paperwork, while others imply frustration with the process or expectations around insurance outcomes.

- Communication and reliability: Opinions are mixed on communication. Some customers highlight responsiveness, accessibility, and helpful design support (including in‑store selections and computer renderings). Others report missed appointments, unreturned messages, slow follow‑ups, or being told they did not service their area after traveling to the job.

- Work quality and safety: Many accounts commend the quality of work, professionalism, and outcomes (described as stunning or “brand new” results). A smaller number allege damage occurred during work, unsatisfactory results, or unresolved issues.

- Practical cautions for potential customers: Given the range of experiences, potential customers should obtain a detailed written scope of work and timeline, request multiple formal estimates, verify whether insurance coordination is included, review prior project references with similar scope, and confirm communication expectations and point‑of‑contact throughout the project.