Top Siding Repair Services in Fort Wayne

- Services and scope: Replaced vinyl siding (about 4 squares) that were warped/falling off, plus fascia and soffit work on a tall peak; installed house wrap for waterproofing; added vented soffit and fascia wrap; updated window J-channel to divert water; detached and reattached gutter downspout and railing for access; also included gutters, some door installations, and a roof replacement in separate notes.

- Project execution and timeline: Work completed on time and exactly as quoted; the entire job often finished in about two days; crew cleaned up after finishing; some reviewers noted they worked through heat to complete the job.

- Materials and workmanship: New siding feels solid and non-movable to touch; house wrap improved waterproofing; window J-channel correctly installed to manage water flow; workmanship described as significantly better than prior installations; levels used to ensure straight, neat results.

- Staffing and communication: Positive mentions of specific team members—Austin (installer), Zach (point of contact), Fabian (helpful, explains options), Rich (patient and thorough), Eli (tireless and friendly, even mowed the yard); reviewers frequently highlighted good communication, responsiveness, and straightforward explanations of options.

- Customer experience and reliability: Customers reported professional, respectful service, with crews taking time to understand needs and handle unforeseen problems; photos of work provided to help visualize results.

- Pricing and value: Several comments noted affordable pricing and quotes that were lower than competitors (one quote cited as about half of others); multiple reviewers felt the value justified the cost and would recommend the company.

- Outcomes and recommendations: Strong overall satisfaction with appearance and function of siding, gutters, and other repairs; many reviewers would highly recommend Priority Exteriors to others; some testimonials referenced endorsements from unrelated professionals (e.g., cable technicians) as external validation.

- Responsiveness and assessments: Several customers described prompt on-site attention (including next-day visits for siding repairs and quick storm damage response with tarps). A few noted repairs were completed quickly and efficiently.

- Communication and sales approach: Many reviews highlight thorough communication, detailed explanations of conditions and options, and an absence of high-pressure sales tactics. Office staff and project leads (e.g., Chase, Leah, Greg, Sam, Aaron) were repeatedly cited as accessible and helpful.

- Project execution and supervision: Projects were reported to progress smoothly from inspection through completion, with on-site supervision and regular updates. Roofs were often completed in a single day, and gutters or siding work were coordinated with cleanup and final inspections.

- Quality and materials: Reviewers mentioned high-quality products and careful workmanship, along with meticulous site cleanup (magnet checks for nails, etc.). Several customers felt confident in recommending the company for future work.

- Siding-specific notes: Instances included a quick repair of siding that had slipped and an explanation of the condition of 30-year-old siding, with a future plan to replace it. One reviewer appreciated the detailed, at-home explanation of needs and options for siding.

- Customer outcomes and sentiment: Overall, customers expressed high satisfaction, willingness to hire again, and willingness to recommend the company to others.

- Community involvement: The company was noted for charitable activity, including a donation of a roof to Habitat for Humanity.

Faze Construction is frequently praised for roofing, siding, and gutter work delivered promptly and with thorough clean-up. Reviews describe on-time or rapid responses, quotes provided quickly, and projects often completed in one day or within hours. Customers report professional, courteous crews, good communication, and strong attention to detail, with the work including gutters, gutter guards, and siding in some cases. Pricing is generally described as competitive and fair, and there are warranties noted (including a 50-year roof warranty on seals). A noted exception is a complaint about unsafe driving by some company vehicles; overall customer service and workmanship are rated highly. No explicit maintenance tips are provided in the reviews.

Overall, customers report high satisfaction with Hoosier Windows & Siding for window and siding projects on homes and rental properties. They highlight professional, courteous crews, clean and efficient installations (examples include a large window replacement completed in about 2–3 hours and neat siding work that neighbors compliment), and an organized process from scheduling to follow-up. The company is described as non-pushy during measurements, responsive to issues with quick fixes (often next-day), and supportive of staff training within a family-owned environment. Neighbors frequently comment positively on the results, and customers commonly would recommend the company for windows, siding, gutters with guards, and doors. A few mentions note nails left around the property after work and a minor adjustment that was promptly addressed.

Customer experiences with Schmucker Quality Construction (siding and related work) are mixed. Several reviews describe ongoing communication and scheduling challenges, including deposits being cashed with long delays before any work, repeated follow-ups needed for inspections, and instances of unannounced visits. Some customers had to guide the company on permit processes or verify permit status themselves, indicating uncertainty about who handles city permits and inspections.

Work quality and adherence to code also vary. Reported issues include porch posts not properly anchored to concrete, a claimed lack of necessity for a moisture barrier under siding (which the customer disagreed with), and at least one instance of materials or parts arriving that did not match expectations. In other cases, projects were completed quickly or to satisfaction, such as roofing, gutters, shutters, and siding replacements, with praise for professionalism, workmanship, and cleanup. A number of reviews note that after initial problems the company acknowledged issues, took corrective action, and followed through to make things right, while others describe prolonged timelines and unfinished or rework-heavy experiences.

Timeline stability appears inconsistent. Some jobs were completed in a matter of hours or days, particularly roofing or small-scale updates, while larger siding/porch projects extended over several months with multiple visits and fixes.

Practical takeaways for potential customers:
- Clarify who handles permits and what inspections are required; obtain a written permit plan and point of contact.
- Set and document a detailed schedule with milestones; confirm responsiveness expectations.
- Obtain a clear scope of work, material specifications, and part numbers; verify sizes and styles before ordering.
- Insist on corrective processes if workmanship, safety, or code concerns arise; request a written plan for any required corrections.
- Check references for similar siding/porch projects to gauge consistency of outcomes.

Overall, experiences range from satisfactory, timely work to frustrating delays and workmanship concerns, underscoring the importance of clear communication, a defined scope, and explicit permit plans for future projects.

Customer feedback for TruChoice Roofing is largely positive and highlights professional service and workmanship across roofing, gutters, siding, and related work. Reviewers report punctual, well-coordinated crews, efficient execution, and thorough cleanup. Communication from initial inspection through installation is described as clear and responsive, with explanations of options and transparent quotes and little to no high-pressure sales. Projects frequently involve multiple trades (roofing, gutters, soffit, fascia, windows) and are completed promptly, sometimes in a single day, with attention to detail such as fascia repair during gutter work. Many customers note good value for the price relative to quality and are satisfied enough to recommend the company. When issues arise, customers say they are addressed quickly, with warranty follow-up as needed.

Customer feedback describes a siding repair business that also handles floor repair, gutter cleaning, and full remodeling projects. Reported practical advantages include pricing perceived as more affordable than larger brands, quick turnaround, and professional service. Reviewers consistently describe staff as honest, reliable, respectful, and expert in their work. Overall, customers express satisfaction and indicate they would recommend the company.

Customer reviews for Advanced Building Concepts, LLC primarily involve window and exterior door installations. Reported outcomes include high-quality workmanship, professional and courteous crews, thorough site cleanup, punctual arrivals, clear communication, and reasonable pricing. Projects cited include multiple window replacements and exterior French doors, with positive remarks on materials and craftsmanship and a general willingness to hire the company again.

Neutral overview of customer feedback on the siding projects handled by Home Pro. Reviews show a mix of positive interactions with sales staff and notable concerns about workmanship and project execution. Some customers praised responsive, knowledgeable reps (e.g., Mike Fox) and quick initial contact, while others cited color mismatches, missed tasks (vents, trim, caulking), communication gaps, use of subcontractors, and lengthy or incomplete project timelines. Several reviews describe aggressive sales pitches and unclear or high pricing relative to perceived value. Overall experiences vary from favorable quotes and prompt responses to significant dissatisfaction with results and reliability.

- Many customers report positive experiences with Graber Roofing & Gutters, describing the work as thorough, professional, and well-executed, with clean and organized job sites.
- Estimates and pricing are frequently described as fair and transparent, with detailed estimates and responsive scheduling; several reviewers note helpful and knowledgeable sales representatives.
- Work quality is consistently highlighted, including precise cuts and angles, efficient crews, timely completion, and thorough cleanup; projects include roof replacements, gutter installations, siding repairs, and skylights.
- Communication is commonly praised, with ongoing updates during projects and accessibility for questions; some customers received photos or documentation for insurance claims.
- The company is noted for handling various scopes, from small siding repairs to full roof replacements and ancillary tasks (e.g., removing an old antenna).
- Quality control and post-project follow-up are mentioned, including checks by a quality control person and responsiveness to any issues (e.g., promptly addressing a minor gap).
- A minority of reviews note issues such as cleanup lapses or lack of notification about crew arrival; nonetheless, many customers express willingness to recommend Graber Roofing & Gutters and to use them again.

Customer feedback for Landmark Roofing is broadly positive, highlighting high-quality workmanship, professional crews, and clean, organized job sites. The company is described as responsive and easy to work with, with frequent and clear communication from quotes through project completion, and timely follow-ups after delays.

Practical details for potential customers:
- Quality and scope: Strong performance across roofing, siding, gutters, and related work (including complex projects like a rooftop deck on a container home and emergency repairs after severe damage). Several references note top-notch workmanship and attractive results.
- Communication and project management: Prompt responses, regular updates, and good coordination from the project estimator to the crew. On-site oversight and daily presence were common, with customers appreciating the transparency and clarity.
- Scheduling and timeliness: Quick quotes and start-to-completion timelines in many cases (e.g., roof installed within a month after signing). Occasional scheduling snags were noted but resolved, and crews often followed up promptly to ensure completeness.
- Problem resolution: When issues arose (e.g., a misconnected bathroom vent, a missed foam layer), the company addressed them and completed fixes, sometimes with a fair settlement process.
- Pricing and value: Multiple quotes were obtained by customers, and Landmark’s pricing was described as competitive or the best value among options.
- Cleanup and site safety: Crews were reported to leave sites clean and free of debris; there was consistent attention to debris removal and nails.
- Insurance and claims support: The company was praised for helping with insurance claims and guiding customers through the process, notably in severe storm damage cases.
- Overall sentiment: Many customers would “highly recommend” Landmark Roofing for roofing, siding, and related needs, and describe the team as professional, trustworthy, and customer-focused.

Key Exteriors focuses on exterior remodeling including siding, roofing, gutters and windows. Reviews consistently describe honest, knowledgeable staff (notably Levi and Geoff) who provided clear options, thorough explanations and design guidance. Many customers report high-quality workmanship and fair pricing; some praise punctuality and professionalism while at least one review mentions delays or missed appointments. Warranties are not discussed in the reviews, and there is little explicit detail on materials, though several projects mention siding and dry-rot repairs. Overall, customers view the team as helpful and customer-service oriented with positive outcomes on installations and estimates.

- Overall impression: Professional, respectful, and well-organized teams with positive salesperson interactions. Several customers noted a low-pressure, informative sales process.

- Scheduling and communication: Some reports of a quiet period between contract signing and workday; a few mentions that communications could be improved or prices higher than expected.

- On-site performance: Crews arrived promptly or early, worked efficiently, and protected interior and exterior spaces. Workforces included two-person teams on windows and larger crews on multi-project jobs; strong emphasis on cleanup after completion.

- Project duration and outcomes: Windows installations often completed in 1–2 days; a roof replacement completed in about 6 hours. Some projects required a follow-up visit to address minor issues. Visible results included improved energy performance (reduced drafts) and aesthetically satisfactory installations (windows, doors, and roofs).

- Quality and guarantees: Work described as high quality with company guarantees and, in the case of roofing, a written transferable warranty (e.g., 50 years mentioned). Products and workmanship generally praised as durable and long-lasting.

- Professionalism and reliability: Installers and sales staff described as knowledgeable, punctual, and trustworthy; the company’s licensing, bonding, and insured status was affirmed in reviews.

- Price considerations: While most reviews were favorable, at least one noted price as a potential drawback relative to expectations. Some cited value given warranties and quality, while others highlighted cost as a caveat.

- Endorsements: Multiple customers indicated they would recommend Centurion Exteriors and would consider using them again for future projects.

Most customers describe ABC Seamless as professional and easy to work with, with crews arriving on time and completing work efficiently. Roofing is often finished in one day, with gutters installed the following day or within two days total, and crews are noted for working hard, staying on schedule, and keeping yards and planting beds clean. Many reviews highlight clear communication from Ben Beck (and Patrick in some cases), thorough project walkthroughs after each stage, prompt responses to questions, and honest, straightforward estimates. Customers frequently praise high-quality results on siding, soffit, fascia, gutters, and roofing, along with favorable pricing and good value. Overall sentiment is positive, with several customers saying they would hire again or recommend ABC Seamless to others.

A few concerns are noted by a minority of customers: a gutter subcontractor reportedly left nails in driveways and yards, one gutter project took about a week with limited updates, and there was an instance of a gutter screw causing a flat tire. Despite these issues, these reviews do not dominate the overall positive feedback and many customers still express high satisfaction.

- Overall tone: Mixed but largely positive regarding workmanship and service; a recurring caveat is the sales process and pricing.

- Positive practical details:
- Crews described as efficient, hardworking, and professional; quick project completion (examples include a roof finished in about 5 hours; some projects completed in 1–2 days).
- Thorough cleanup and accurate final presentation; crews addressed issues promptly (e.g., replacing damaged siding after a nail gun incident).
- Strong communication before and during installation, with updates from crew members (e.g., Devin) and post-install follow-up.
- High-quality outcomes praised (metal roofing, architectural details, gutters, soffit, fascia, and windows); several mentions of good looks and protective performance.
- Additional value offerings such as military discounts and veteran-owned status highlighted.
- Warranties mentioned (e.g., lifetime warranty on roofing) and customer appreciation for attention to detail and workmanship.

- Mixed/negative practical details:
- Sales process described as lengthy and aggressively price-focused by some customers; claims of instant quotes followed by pressure to sign a price drop, with perceptions of lack of price transparency.
- Advice to obtain multiple quotes due to wide price variations; some customers compared Allied Exteriors unfavorably on price versus other local bids.
- A few concerns about sales tactics, including a report of intrusive door-to-door behavior and a customer request to not be contacted again.
- One anecdote about confusion or inconsistency regarding metal supplier claims and in-house manufacturing.

- Bottom line for potential customers:
- If prioritizing quality installation, fast completion, clean worksite, and responsive communication, Allied Exteriors receives strong praise.
- If price sensitivity or a transparent, low-pressure pricing process is important, expect to compare multiple quotes and be prepared for a robust sales pitch.

Mullins & Son is described as a small, family-owned contractor focusing on siding (vinyl and aluminum), roofing, and related repairs, with occasional work on bathrooms or storm/water damage. Across reviews, customers generally report strong communication, on-time arrivals, professional conduct, and competitive pricing. Many accounts highlight prompt responses to storm or wind damage, the ability to complete large jobs quickly (sometimes in one day), high-quality workmanship, and thorough cleanup. Several customers would recommend them and note satisfaction with the final results and value.

However, there are notable exceptions. At least one reviewer described a disappointing inspection experience due to a missing ladder and no estimate, along with a return of what they perceived as unhelpful or unprofessional behavior from staff. Another review labeled a particular interaction as unprofessional and disrespectful. A few accounts mention inconveniences such as taking time off work for appointments or longer overall project timelines.

Overall, most customers report favorable outcomes and would hire again, especially for siding and roof work, but prospective customers should confirm ladder readiness and appointment expectations and be aware that experiences may vary by staff and project.

The reviews present a generally positive, yet mixed, picture of Honey Badger Home Improvement, with a focus on gutters, guards, windows, and occasional roofing work. Practical takeaways for potential customers include:

- Services offered: gutter replacement and repairs (including guards/protection), window replacement (including triple-pane options), and some roof work; occasional fascia repair.
- Timeliness and scheduling: quick quotes and prompt scheduling; some customers received next-day repairs or timely follow-up after issues.
- Work quality: most customers report attractive, durable results and professional installation; crews are described as efficient (e.g., window installs by a four-person crew in about 2.5–3 hours) and thorough.
- Communication: many reviews praise clear, friendly, no-pressure communication; some report receiving final photos of completed work; a few note miscommunications (e.g., window sill work) or a desire for more arrival notice.
- Cleanliness and site impact: several accounts mention good cleanup, though at least one instance notes dust and debris not cleaned up after window removal.
- Pricing and value: multiple reviews describe competitive or reasonable pricing and good value for the work performed.
- Follow-up and reliability: some customers experienced prompt follow-up or repairs (e.g., unclogging gutters the next day); others cite reliable maintenance and willingness to address issues.
- Consistency and caveats: while the majority are highly satisfied and would recommend, there are isolated notes about non-paintable caulk affecting paint projects and occasional gaps in cleanup or communication.
- Overall sentiment: most customers would hire again and express strong satisfaction; several emphasize attentive service, quality workmanship, and respectful treatment of property.

- Services performed: roofing-related work (roof replacement/tear-off, skylights) and related exterior tasks; at least one note mentions gutters and debris disposal.

- Timelines and scheduling: many jobs completed in one day; several customers were scheduled within about a week of requesting service; some crews worked 8–12+ hours in a single day.

- workmanship and outcomes: multiple testimonials describe high-quality work and thorough cleanup; roofs and decking repairs were completed as quoted, with some instances of minimal price increases despite extra work.

- pricing and quotes: quotes described as reasonable or good value; customers appreciated transparent explanations of options and felt the price was fair.

- customer service: Nick Johnson and the team are repeatedly praised for honesty, professionalism, patience, responsiveness, and clear communication; customers felt heard and not pressured.

- site conduct and care: references to careful handling of properties and pets (dogs) during service; cleanup left property in good condition; some customers provided before/after photos.

- likelihood to recommend or reuse: multiple customers would hire again or strongly recommend the company to others.

- overall sentiment: generally positive experiences with emphasis on prompt scheduling, solid workmanship, fair pricing, and courteous, transparent service.

The provided customer feedback for Big’s Roofing and Repair is mixed, with some clients reporting strong results on roofing projects and others describing ongoing problems with siding work and service afterward. Key patterns:

Siding workmanship and post-installation issues
- Several customers report siding problems within 1–2 years of installation, including loose siding, slipping corner trim, loose fascia, and missed sections (e.g., above windows).
- Some say fixes are quick but require repeated visits and persistent follow-up; multiple mentions of not receiving callbacks after leaving messages.
- Complaints include poor cuts, large gaps, nails or screws left in driveways and yards, and repairs that rely on nails through siding, which reviewers allege fail to resolve the underlying issues.
- A number of reviews note the work being contracted out to third-party crews, with additional concerns about the quality and accountability of those crews.
- There are references to a lack of written agreements or assurances regarding responsibility for damage or warranty coverage on the siding work.

Communication and accountability
- Frequent reports of poor communication, including delays, not following through on written requests, and inconsistent responses.
- Some reviewers describe rude or dismissive interactions with staff and a lack of follow-through after complaints or BBB filings.
- A few reviews indicate desire to resolve issues but feel management does not engage or take responsibility for contracted work.

Property damage and site management
- One reviewer reports landscaping damage caused by crews and refusal to assume responsibility, with nails/screws left around the property.
- Other accounts describe damage to flowers/flowerpots and messy job sites, with statements that staff did not care for surroundings.

Roofing experiences
- Several reviews praise roofing work as fast, professional, and well-coordinated with insurance, including:
- Efficient removal of damaged shingles and replacement of wood, followed by gutters and fascia installation.
- Positive impressions of owner James and his wife Angie, with claims of fair pricing and good explanations.
- Instances of prompt response and on-site visits, sometimes same-day service for urgent issues.
- A contrasting roofing note exists where a customer did not receive a timely estimate or follow-up from a different representative, highlighting inconsistent customer service.

Overall impressions and practical takeaways for potential customers
- Experiences vary widely by project type and individual crew. Roofing work is frequently described as professional, efficient, and well-coordinated, including insurance interactions.
- Siding projects, particularly when subcontracted, receive more critical feedback regarding workmanship, post-installation support, and communication.
- Potential customers should:
- Clarify who will perform the work (in-house vs. subcontracted crews) and obtain a detailed written scope of work and warranty terms.
- Request written commitments for post-installation support and a clear process for handling issues, with expected response times.
- Be prepared to verify and document any damage to landscaping or property and ensure accountability for repairs or reimbursements.
- Obtain multiple references and consider visiting current job sites if possible to assess workmanship and site management.
- Confirm a single point of contact for updates and follow-ups, and set expectations for communication cadence.

- Services provided include roofing, gutters, siding, drywall, and related repairs, with some projects addressing hail damage, insurance coordination, and interior water damage.
- Customers consistently report strong communication and responsiveness from Cole throughout the process, with quick turnarounds and clear updates.
- Work quality and professionalism are repeatedly noted: timely completion (often in one day for roofing), careful workmanship, and courteous, respectful crews; sites are left clean and orderly.
- Pricing and quotes are described as fair and competitive, with several customers noting better pricing than local chain competitors and transparency in payments and insurance matters.
- Practical outcomes highlighted: gutters functioning without leaks, roofs matched in appearance (e.g., metal roof with seamless look), and interior/exterior issues resolved with coordination of multiple trades.
- Project management and coordination are emphasized, including scheduling to meet tight deadlines (e.g., before events) and handling insurance communications, documentation, and third-party coordination.
- Overall sentiment: customers would hire again and would recommend 260 Roofing/Cole Campbell for their services.